Book a demo

Geopolymer Mix Design & Precursors Patent Landscape

Geopolymer Mix Design & Precursors Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Geopolymer Mix Design & Precursors Patent Landscape in 2026

The geopolymer mix design and precursors field is in an active growth phase, with 3,004 patent families on record and a 55% increase in the most recent window — activity is still rising, with the most recent months understated by publication lag. The field is moderately concentrated: Schlumberger Technology BV leads by family count, but oilfield-services and construction-chemistry players coexist with a broad Chinese academic cohort, signalling that no single actor controls the technology.

3,004
Patent families in scope
18%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+55%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Schlumberger leads a fragmented top tier alongside US Gypsum and ENTECH

United States Gypsum Co (72) and ENTECH Corp (64). The top five filers — Schlumberger Technology BV, United States Gypsum Co, ENTECH Corp, Catholic University of America, and Synthos SA — together account for 18% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating a moderately fragmented competitive structure.

The gap between the first-ranked filer (94 families) and the twentieth-ranked filer (Schlumberger Canada Ltd, 27 families) is meaningful but not insurmountable, and a dense cluster of Chinese universities occupies ranks six through twenty, showing that academic institutions are significant patent generators in this space.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Schlumberger Technology BV94
2United States Gypsum Co72
3ENTECH Corp64
4Catholic University of America62
5Synthos SA61
6Wuhan University of Technology48
7Southeast University48
8Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA47
9Wuhan University38
10Sika Technology AG34
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH34
12Heungkuk Industrial Co Ltd34
13Zhejiang University33
14Schlumberger Tech Corp32
15Tongji University31
16Shenzhen University30
17Zhengzhou University28
18Dow Global Technologies LLC28
19Hebei University of Technology27
20Schlumberger Canada Ltd27
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Schlumberger’s multi-entity presence (Schlumberger Technology BV, Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA, Schlumberger Tech Corp, Schlumberger Canada Ltd) suggests a coordinated oilfield-cementing IP strategy, while. United States Gypsum Co and ENTECH Corp represent construction-material incumbents. Chinese universities collectively represent a pipeline of publicly accessible IP that could constrain freedom-to-operate for commercial entrants.

Filings from 2025 onward are understated due to standard patent publication lag of 18–24 months; the apparent softening in the most recent data should not be read as a genuine slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sustained filing growth with ceramics and cement chemistry dominating the technology mix

Annual filing volume has grown substantially over the review period, and the technology distribution is heavily anchored in ceramics, cement, and refractories (C04B), with a long tail of adjacent application classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 191 families in 2017 to a visible high in 2023 and 2025, consistent with a growth-stage field. The 2026 data point (71 families) reflects only partial-year publication and should not be read as a decline. The 55% growth in the recent window confirms the underlying upward trajectory.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 480 in 2025.191201718920182492019238202032720213552022469202343520244802025712026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement & refractories) dominates the IPC distribution by a wide margin, reflecting the core binder-chemistry focus of geopolymer research. The next-largest branches — C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications), B28B (shaping clay and cement products), E21B (earth drilling/wells), and E01C (roads and pavements) — each represent a small share, pointing to diversifying end-use applications in oilfield, infrastructure, and shaping processes.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 3,971; C09K · Materials for misc. applications 210.C04B · Ceramics, cement …3,971C09K · Materials for mis…210B28B · Shaping clay & ce…135E21B · Earth & rock dril…114E01C · Roads & pavements95B28C · Mortar & concrete…83C08J · Polymer processin…75E02D · Foundations & ear…54↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20210188707A1Published 2021-06-24

Copper slag-fly ash geopolymer, a preparation meth…

North Minzu University

The present invention discloses a copper slag-fly ash geopolymer, a preparation method thereof, and use thereof, belongs to the technical field of geopolymer. The preparation method of copper-fly ash geopolymer provided by the application comprises the steps of: mixing the copper slag, fly ash and alkali activator solution, obtaining a slurry; proceeding… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Copper slag-fly ash geopolymer, a preparation meth… — patent drawingCopper slag-fly ash geopolymer, a preparation meth… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1High-strength geopolymer composite cellular concrete183
2Geopolymer composition and application in oilfield…150
3Geopolymer composition and its production method145
4Geopolymer composite for ultra high performance co…122
5Geopolymers and methods for their production107
6憎水改性碱激发无机聚合物涂覆修复材料100
7Dimensionally stable geopolymer compositions and m…89
8Tailored geopolymer composite binders for cement a…87

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The field’s growth stage, moderate concentration, and strong Chinese academic presence each carry distinct implications for where an R&D team or corporate acquirer should focus attention.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, with annual filings still rising and recent-period data understated by publication lag. A 55% increase in the recent window confirms that the technology is well past early experimentation but has not yet entered the slowdown characteristic of mature fields. Teams entering now can still establish meaningful IP positions before saturation.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate fragmentation with a dual-sector top tier

The top five filers hold 18% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output — moderate concentration that leaves substantial room for new entrants. The top tier splits cleanly between oilfield services (Schlumberger entities) and construction chemistry (US Gypsum, ENTECH, Synthos), meaning that each sector sub-space has a different incumbent landscape. Chinese universities in the mid-tier generate published prior art that shapes freedom-to-operate across both sectors.

Fragmented top tier
Collaboration

Collaboration is concentrated within the Schlumberger group and one construction-chemistry pair

The most active co-filing relationships are internal to the Schlumberger corporate family: Schlumberger Technology BV co-files most heavily with Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA (47 shared families), Schlumberger Canada Ltd (22), and Schlumberger Tech Corp (19). Outside that group, Construction Research & Technology GmbH and Sika Technology AG share 2 co-filed families, the only notable cross-company collaboration on record. Meaningful open-innovation partnerships between academia and industry are not yet evident in the co-filing data.

Intra-group dominant
Geography

China is the primary filing jurisdiction by a large margin

China is the lead filing jurisdiction, followed by India, the United States, Europe (EPO), and WIPO (PCT). Australia, South Korea, and Japan also show meaningful activity. The concentration of filings in China and India reflects both strong domestic research programs and the relevance of geopolymer technology to large infrastructure markets. North American and European filers relying primarily on PCT or EPO routes may face freedom-to-operate exposure in Asian markets.

China-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Schlumberger Technology BVServices Petroliers Schlumberger SA47
Schlumberger Technology BVSchlumberger Canada Ltd22
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Canada Ltd22
Schlumberger Technology BVSchlumberger Tech Corp19
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Tech Corp19
Schlumberger Technology BVPrad Research & Development Ltd8
Schlumberger Technology BVSchlumberger Holdings Ltd8
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SAPrad Research & Development Ltd8
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Holdings Ltd8
Construction Research & Technology GmbHSika Technology AG2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, jurisdiction distribution, lifecycle, and co-filing data.Explore insights →
Leaders

Schlumberger’s oilfield focus contrasts with construction-chemistry incumbents

The two leading applicants occupy distinct technology sub-spaces: Schlumberger Technology BV targets well-cementing and oilfield fluid applications, while. United States Gypsum Co focuses on cementitious binder chemistry for construction.

Leader · Schlumberger Technology BV

Schlumberger Technology BV

Schlumberger Technology BV leads with 94 patent families, concentrated in C09K 8 (materials for oilfield applications), C04B 28 (hydraulic binders), and C04B 22 (cement chemistry). Its recent-period momentum is classified as a new entrant surge (56 families in the recent window), indicating a major ramp-up in geopolymer-specific IP. When the broader Schlumberger corporate family is aggregated, the group’s position is substantially larger, suggesting a systematic effort to protect geopolymer cementing formulations for well construction.

families: 94
Challenger · United States Gypsum Co

United States Gypsum Co

United States Gypsum Co holds 72 patent families, all concentrated in C04B 28 (hydraulic binders), C04B 12 (non-Portland cements), and C04B 111 (special-purpose cement properties). Its technology emphasis on construction-grade binder formulations positions it squarely in the building-products market rather than oilfield applications. Momentum data for US Gypsum is not separately listed in the recent-trend evidence, so trajectory is evidence pending.

families: 72
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their technology emphasis, and filing momentum across the full geopolymer precursor landscape.
Synthos SAWuhan University of Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Schlumberger Technology BV56▲ new entrant
Synthos SA6▲ new entrant
ENTECH Corp2▼ -87%
Wuhan University of Technology22▲ +120%
Southeast University24▲ new entrant
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA32▲ new entrant
Construction Research & Technology GmbH1▲ new entrant
Wuhan University18▲ +13%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles draw on applicant ranking, technology focus (IPC), and recent-period momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served routes in roads, drilling, and shaping applications

Several IPC classes adjacent to the dominant C04B core show relatively low patent-record counts, suggesting that certain end-use application domains remain less fully covered and may offer room for differentiated IP development.

E21B · Earth drilling & well construction

E21B (earth and rock drilling) carries 114 patent records — small relative to the C04B core — despite geopolymer cement being technically relevant to well-plug, abandonment, and cementing operations in high-temperature and corrosive downhole environments. Schlumberger entities are the primary filers here, meaning the sub-space is not unoccupied, but the breadth of coverage is narrow. An entrant with novel precursor formulations for high-pH or high-temperature stability could find differentiated filing space, particularly given the regulatory push toward well integrity in decommissioning.

Search this in Eureka →

E01C · Roads, pavements & surface layers

E01C (roads and pavements) shows 95 patent records, modest given the large potential demand for low-carbon geopolymer paving binders as a Portland-cement substitute in infrastructure projects. Current coverage is sparse, and the intersection with industrial by-product precursors (fly ash, slag) — which are already covered under C04B — suggests that formulation-to-pavement-performance linkages are underexplored in patent literature. Teams working on alkali-activated binder systems for road-base stabilisation or geopolymer asphalt modifiers may find meaningful white space here.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete adjacent-branch analysis across all IPC classes with filing-density and entry-path scoring.
B28B · Shaping clay & cement productsB28C · Mortar & concrete mixing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent-branch observations are based on relative patent-record counts across IPC classes; sparse count alone does not confirm a commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route and application domain

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 12 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 111 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 18 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 7 · Ceramics, cement & refractories
United States Gypsum CoStrong · 69Strong · 40Moderate · 34AbsentModerate · 14
ENTECH CorpStrong · 60AbsentModerate · 16Strong · 48Moderate · 18
Schlumberger Technology BVStrong · 88Moderate · 18Moderate · 33AbsentAbsent
Catholic University of AmericaStrong · 47Strong · 24AbsentStrong · 38Absent
Synthos SAStrong · 68AbsentModerate · 22AbsentAbsent
Southeast UniversityStrong · 47AbsentModerate · 16Moderate · 11Moderate · 12
Wuhan University of TechnologyStrong · 38Moderate · 12AbsentModerate · 12Moderate · 15
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own geopolymer patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.