Book a demo

Geopolymer Mix & Structure Optimization Patent Snapshot

Geopolymer Mix & Structure Optimization Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Geopolymer Mix / Structure Optimization Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus on geopolymer mix and structure optimization is nascent, with 8 patent families in scope concentrated almost entirely in India and Malaysia. Activity accelerated sharply in 2025, and the field is dominated by academic institutions and individual inventors rather than industrial incumbents.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Academic filers lead a highly concentrated, early-stage corpus

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia and individual inventor Singh Ran Bir share the top rank with 2 patent records each, together accounting for the largest block of activity in a very small field.

The top five filers collectively hold 54% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating high concentration within a corpus that is still largely the domain of universities and independent researchers rather than established cement or materials corporations.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Universiti Teknologi Malaysia2
2Singh Ran Bir2
3Graphic Era Deemed to be University1
4Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University1
5Kumaraguru College of Technology1
6Mr. Mayankeshwar Singh1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Mr. Abhishek Tiwari1
8Dr. Mukesh Ruhela1
9Vellore Institute of Technology1
10Ms. Ritu Sharma1
11Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that no industrial player has yet staked a strong IP claim in this specific optimization sub-domain, leaving the visible assignee structure open to entry by companies with manufacturing scale or formulation expertise.

The most recent filings — particularly the surge recorded in 2025 and the single 2026 record — should be treated as preliminary given normal patent publication lag; the true volume for those years is likely higher than what is currently visible.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A late-breaking surge and a ceramics-dominant technology mix

Two charts together tell the field’s story: filing activity was essentially zero from 2017 through 2022, then jumped in 2023–2025, while the technology classification is anchored in ceramics and cement chemistry with a handful of adjacent digital branches.

Annual filing trend

Zero filings were recorded from 2017 through 2022; a single record appeared in each of 2023 and 2024 before a cluster of five records in 2025 and one in 2026. The 2025–2026 figures are subject to publication lag and will likely grow on recount.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2025.02017020180201902020020210202212023120245202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) is visible in with 10 patent records, reflecting core geopolymer binder chemistry. Secondary branches — G16H healthcare informatics, C22B metal extraction, G06N AI models, G06Q business data processing, and H03K pulse techniques — each carry only 1–2 records, suggesting experimental or incidental overlap rather than deliberate cross-domain strategy.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 10; G16H · Healthcare informatics 2.C04B · Ceramics, cement …10G16H · Healthcare inform…2C22B · Metal extraction …1G06N · Computing based o…1G06Q · Business, commerc…1H03K · Pulse technique &…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
IN202311044924APublished 2023-07-28

Development of zero carbon emission geopolymer con…

MR. Abhishek Tiwari

The present invention relates to produce and develop of Sustainable Environment by using carbonless materials. Material selection is to identify suitable industrial by-products or waste materials that can be used as raw materials for geopolymer concrete. Mix design optimization for the mixture proportions and the chemical composition of geopolymer concrete… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia holds 2 patent records, both classified under C04B 28 (ceramics, cement and refractories), indicating a focused binder-chemistry approach. As an academic institution it files in Malaysia; no industrial licensing activity is indicated by the evidence. Its position as the only non-Indian filer gives it modest geographic differentiation.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Singh Ran Bir

Singh Ran Bir

Singh Ran Bir (listed separately as an individual inventor alongside the co-filing group of Dr. Arshdeep Singh, Dr. Kanish Kapoor, Dr. Ran Bir Singh, and Ms. Divya Sharma) holds 2 patent records with a broad C04B focus spanning sub-classes C04B 12, C04B 18, and C04B 28 — covering binder types, supplementary materials, and hydraulic cements. Three associated individuals (Ms. Ritu Sharma, Mr. Mayankeshwar Singh, Mr. Abhishek Tiwari) are flagged as new entrants, each filing 1 record.

patent records: 2
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Graphic Era Deemed to be UniversityVellore Institute of Technology+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.