Book a demo

Geopolymer Precast Standardization Patent Snapshot 2026

Geopolymer Precast Standardization Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Geopolymer Precast Standardization Patent Snapshot in 2026

Patent activity in geopolymer precast standardization is highly nascent, concentrated entirely within India and dominated by individual inventors and academic institutions. Meaningful filing volume only emerged from 2023 onward, signaling that the field remains in an early, exploratory stage with substantial room for first-mover positioning.

8
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

India-only activity, led by individual inventors and universities

The corpus is concentrated around a small set of Indian applicants. PRUSTY SATYA RANJAN leads with 2 patent records, while all other ranked filers hold 1 record each — indicating no visible institutional force has yet staked a commanding position.

The top five filers account for 50% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, a moderate-to-high concentration figure for such a small corpus. The absence of large industrial incumbents leaves the ranking populated almost entirely by academic institutes and individual researchers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Prusty Satya Ranjan2
2J B INST OF ENG & TECH1
3J. D. Chaitanya Kumar1
4Pololy Pradeep Kumar1
5M. Reddy Manju Bhargav1
6Dr. C. Sashidhar1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7B. Rajini1
8KL University1
9Vallurupalli Nageswara Rao Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and Technology1
10National Institute of Technology Rourkela1
11VEL TECH RANGARAJAN DR SAGUNTHALA R&D INST OF SCI …1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

This structure suggests the technology is still being defined at the research level rather than developed for commercial deployment. Entry by an industrial player with manufacturing and standards expertise would represent a significant shift in the assignee snapshot.

The most recent 18 to 24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the 2025 and 2026 figures should be treated as partial. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity emerged only in 2023; ceramics chemistry dominates the technology mix

Two charts together reveal a field that is both temporally young and technically narrow, with essentially all activity clustering in a single IPC class and a sharp uplift in filings confined to the last three years.

Annual filing trend

Zero filings were recorded in each year from 2017 through 2022. Activity began in 2023 with 2 records, dipped to 1 in 2024, then rose to 4 in 2025 and 1 in 2026 to date. Given publication lag, the 2025 and 2026 counts are almost certainly incomplete and should not be read as a plateau.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2025.02017020180201902020020210202222023120244202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement and refractories) accounts for all 8 patent records, confirming that current work is firmly anchored in geopolymer binder and mix-design chemistry. G06N (AI-based computing) appears in 2 records, reflecting early-stage efforts to apply machine-learning models to mix optimization. B09B (solid waste disposal) and G16H (healthcare informatics) each appear in 1 record, representing sparse and likely tangential coverage.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 8; G06N · Computing based on AI models 2.C04B · Ceramics, cement …8G06N · Computing based o…2B09B · Solid waste dispo…1G16H · Healthcare inform…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
IN202641017300APublished 2026-02-27

Strength and durability studies on geopolymer and …

B Rajini

The increasing environmental impact associated with the production of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) has driven significant research toward the development of sustainable alternative construction materials. Geopolymer concrete (GPC), synthesized through the alkali activation of alumino-silicate rich industrial byproducts, offers a promising low-carbon… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · PRUSTY SATYA RANJAN

PRUSTY SATYA RANJAN

The leading applicant with 2 patent records — the only filer to hold more than 1 — and is associated with SANGHAMITRA JENA, who is flagged as a new entrant with 2 recent records focused entirely on C04B ceramics and cement chemistry (C04B 111, C04B 12, and C04B 28). This pairing represents the most active cluster in the corpus and signals a research program oriented toward binder formulation and mix proportioning.

Patent records: 2
Challenger · K L UNIV

KL University (K L Univ)

KL University holds 1 patent record and is flagged as a new entrant in the momentum data, with its recent filing covering both C04B (ceramics and cement) and B09B (solid waste disposal) — the only applicant to bridge geopolymer chemistry and waste valorization in a single filing. This dual focus on mix design and industrial by-product integration distinguishes it from purely chemistry-oriented peers.

Patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
J B Institute of Engineering and TechnologyNational Institute of Technology Rourkela+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.