Book a demo

Geopolymer Precursor Supply & Substitution Patent Landscape

Geopolymer Precursor Supply & Substitution Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Geopolymer Precursor Supply & Substitution Patent Landscape in 2026

The geopolymer precursor supply and substitution space is growing on a multi-year basis, with recent-window filings up 53% over the prior period, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. Schlumberger entities dominate the corpus, holding the top positions in a highly concentrated field oriented toward oil-well cementing applications.

111
Patent families in scope
58%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+53%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Schlumberger controls the field; a small tier of challengers follows at a distance

The top-ranked applicant, Schlumberger Technology BV, leads the hundred largest filers with 33 patent records, trailed by CEMALT LLC at 18 and Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA at 17. Together the top five filers account for 58% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, signaling strong concentration.

The tier gap is sharp: the Schlumberger family entities collectively account for the first, third, fourth, and eighth positions, meaning no single non-Schlumberger challenger approaches their aggregate footprint. CEMALT LLC at rank two is the most credible independent challenger, followed by Lubrizol Advanced Materials at rank five with 11 patent records.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Schlumberger Technology BV33
2CEMALT LLC18
3Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA17
4Schlumberger Tech Corp14
5Lubrizol Advanced Materials Inc11
6Sika Tech AG7
7Vicat7
8Schlumberger Canada Ltd7
9The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona7
10Dow Global Technologies LLC6
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Meadows WR Inc2
12Halliburton Energy Services Inc2
13Verdment Brazil Ltda2
14Cui Jessica H2
15Zhejiang University2
16Arizona Board of Regents2
17KALASALINGAM ACADEMY OF RES & EDUCATION2
18Chang’an University1
19PSG INST OF TECH & APPLIED RES1
20Chowdary Komarina Dileep1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Schlumberger’s dominance is rooted in oilfield cementing chemistry, a niche where geopolymer precursor substitution offers direct commercial value for well integrity and lower-carbon well construction. Challengers such as CEMALT and Sika Tech AG are approaching from construction chemistry, suggesting divergent application paths within the same precursor-substitution theme.

The most recent 18–24 months of the filing record are subject to publication lag and will be augmented as applications become public; the true recent activity level is therefore higher than raw counts suggest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 peak in annual filings, with ceramics and cement chemistry dominating the technology mix

Annual filing volume and the IPC class breakdown together reveal both the pace of field expansion and the technology routes being protected. The trend chart and the composition chart should be read together to understand where investment is concentrated.

Annual filing trend

Filings were absent through 2018, surged to 21 in 2019, dipped and recovered through 2022, then peaked at 27 in 2023. The 2024 and 2025 figures appear lower but are partially understated by publication lag and should not be read as a sustained decline. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with the recent three-year window running 53% above the prior three-year window.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 27 in 2023.02017020182120197202010202115202227202316202412202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) is the dominant IPC class by a wide margin, reflecting geopolymer binder chemistry as the core technical focus. C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications) and E21B (earth and rock drilling) rank second and third, confirming the oilfield well-cementing application cluster. Smaller branches — B33Y (additive manufacturing), E04B (building structures), F16L (pipes) and C09D (coatings) — each carry fewer than eight patent records, marking them as adjacent and under-served relative to the core.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 128; C09K · Materials for misc. applications 43.C04B · Ceramics, cement …128C09K · Materials for mis…43E21B · Earth & rock dril…34B33Y · Additive manufact…7E04B · Building structur…6E05G · Safes & strong-ro…6F16L · Pipes & pipe fitt…6C09D · Coatings, paints …5↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20230090940A1Published 2023-03-23

Heat and fire resistant geopolymer materials

CUI, Jessica H.

A light weight geopolymer concrete, having a specific gravity less than 2.0, more typically between 1 and 1.3, is provided that has compressive strength comparable to or greater than ordinary Portland concrete. The light weight geopolymer concrete has low shrinkage, expansion, and cracking, and substantially no loss of compressive strength when exposed to… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Heat and fire resistant geopolymer materials — patent drawingHeat and fire resistant geopolymer materials — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Geopolymer resin materials, geopolymer materials, …55
2Geopolymer resin materials, geopolymer materials, …35
3Heat and fire resistant geopolymer materials9
4Geopolymer resin materials, geopolymer materials, …8
5Geopolymer resin materials, geopolymer materials, …8
6Geopolymer compositions and methods7
7一种地聚物核壳结构轻骨料及其制备方法5
8Geopolymer precursor-aerogel compositions5

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape the risk and opportunity profile for an entrant or incumbent assessing where to commit resources.

Growth

Growth stage, with annual volume easing from a 2023 peak

The field carries a Growth lifecycle designation: the recent three-year filing window is 53% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. However, annual volume peaked in 2023 at 27 filings and has eased since then. An R&D team entering now faces an established but not yet crowded prior-art base, and can still define differentiated positions before the field matures further.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Top five filers hold 58% of the hundred largest filers’ output

Concentration is high: the top five filers account for 58% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, and three of those five are Schlumberger entities. The second tier — CEMALT LLC, Lubrizol Advanced Materials, Sika Tech AG, and Vicat — each hold single-digit to low-teen patent records. For a new entrant, the safest positioning lies in application niches (additive manufacturing, coatings, building structures) where the dominant player has minimal coverage.

High concentration
Collaboration

Co-filing is almost entirely intra-Schlumberger

The most active co-filing pairs are Schlumberger Technology BV with Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA (17 joint records), and Schlumberger Technology BV with both Schlumberger Canada Ltd and Schlumberger Tech Corp (7 joint records each). No cross-organizational collaboration pairs appear in the evidence. This suggests that the dominant player is coordinating IP internally across jurisdictions rather than partnering externally, leaving an opening for ecosystem-building collaboration with universities or specialty chemical firms.

Intra-firm collaboration
Geography

Europe (EPO) and the US lead; India and Australia are notable secondary markets

Europe (EPO) and the United States are tied as the leading jurisdictions at 26 patent records each, followed by WIPO PCT at 19. India ranks fourth at 14, reflecting both local industrial demand and active academic filing, while Australia at 10 likely tracks oilfield application interest. China holds only 3 patent records, which is notably low for an advanced-materials field of this scale and may represent a filing gap or a strategic choice by the dominant players.

EPO/US lead
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Schlumberger Technology BVServices Petroliers Schlumberger SA17
Schlumberger Technology BVSchlumberger Canada Ltd7
Schlumberger Technology BVSchlumberger Tech Corp7
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Canada Ltd7
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SASchlumberger Tech Corp7
Schlumberger Tech CorpSchlumberger Canada Ltd7

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a family can be filed in multiple jurisdictions.Explore insights →
Leaders

Schlumberger Technology BV leads; CEMALT LLC is the strongest independent challenger

The two cards below cover the top-ranked applicant and the leading non-Schlumberger challenger. All named applicants in this field entered the corpus as new entrants in the recent measurement window, reflecting the field’s relatively recent origin.

Leader · Schlumberger Technology BV

Schlumberger Technology BV

Schlumberger Technology BV holds 33 patent records and is classified as a new entrant in the recent filing window, consistent with the field’s emergence from 2019 onward. Its technology focus spans C04B 28 (cement binder chemistry), C09K 8 (oilfield materials), and E21B 33 (well sealing and cementing), confirming that its geopolymer precursor work is anchored in well-integrity applications. The Schlumberger group coordinates filings across four related entities, amplifying total group coverage well beyond any single challenger.

patent records: 33
Challenger · CEMALT LLC

CEMALT LLC

CEMALT LLC holds 18 patent records and is also classified as a new entrant in the recent window. Unlike Schlumberger, its IPC focus is concentrated entirely within C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) — specifically C04B 22 and C04B 24 at 16 records each and C04B 28 at 10 — indicating a construction-chemistry rather than oilfield orientation. This positions CEMALT as the primary independent challenger for precursor-substitution IP in the construction and infrastructure segment.

patent records: 18
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings for all applicants in the hundred largest filers, including momentum and technology emphasis.
Lubrizol Advanced Materials IncSika Tech AG+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Schlumberger Technology BV28▲ new entrant
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA16▲ new entrant
Schlumberger Tech Corp12▲ new entrant
Lubrizol Advanced Materials Inc6▲ new entrant
Schlumberger Canada Ltd6▲ new entrant
Sika Tech AG6▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Patent record counts reflect each applicant’s individual filings within the ranked corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches worth monitoring: additive manufacturing and protective coatings

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant C04B core carry very low patent record counts relative to the corpus size. Two stand out as having both technical plausibility and a realistic entry path for a new applicant.

B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing)

With only 7 patent records and a 3% share of the corpus, the additive-manufacturing branch is sparse despite growing industrial interest in 3D-printed geopolymer structural components. Sika Tech AG is the only top-tier filer with notable B33Y coverage (6 records), meaning the competitive space is largely unoccupied. An entrant with expertise in geopolymer rheology and printability could establish a differentiated IP position in this branch with relatively limited prior-art resistance.

Search this in Eureka →

C09D · Coatings, paints & inks

The coatings branch holds only 5 patent records at a 2% share. Lubrizol Advanced Materials is the only ranked applicant with C09D coverage, suggesting that geopolymer-based protective or decorative coating formulations remain largely uncharted. Given that precursor substitution in coatings aligns with low-carbon and fire-resistance performance claims — both commercially active areas — this branch presents an observation of relative sparsity with plausible technical value for specialty coatings developers.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access all five under-served branches with applicant gap analysis and entry-path assessment.
E04B · Building structures & elementsF16L · Pipes & pipe fittings+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; shares are relative to the full IPC-tagged corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 111 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC09K 8 · Materials for misc. applicationsC04B 24 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 22 · Ceramics, cement & refractories
Schlumberger Technology BVStrong · 33Moderate · 14Strong · 33Moderate · 12Moderate · 16
Services Petroliers Schlumberger SAStrong · 17Moderate · 7Strong · 17Moderate · 6Moderate · 7
Schlumberger Tech CorpStrong · 14Strong · 9Strong · 13Moderate · 6Moderate · 7
CEMALT LLCStrong · 10AbsentEmerging · 2Strong · 16Strong · 16
Schlumberger Canada LtdStrong · 7Moderate · 3Strong · 7AbsentModerate · 3
Sika Tech AGStrong · 7Strong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
Lubrizol Advanced Materials IncStrong · 10AbsentAbsentEmerging · 2Absent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.