Book a demo

Geopolymer Recycled Aggregate & Byproduct Patent Landscape

Geopolymer Recycled Aggregate & Byproduct Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
Geopolymer Recycled Aggregate & Byproduct Patent Landscape in 2026

The geopolymer recycled aggregate and byproduct field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, with a 182% increase in the recent three-year window versus the prior three-year window, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. The competitive structure is fragmented, with no single dominant player holding more than a single-digit share of the corpus, and activity is concentrated in India and China across a ceramics-and-cement-dominated technology base.

111
Patent families in scope
20%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+182%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Fragmented field with a modest leader and a large academic cohort

LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC leads the applicant ranking with 9 patent records, followed by HEUNGKUK IND CO LTD and GREENCRAFT LLC at 6 patent records each. The top five filers collectively account for 20% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, signaling a broadly distributed competitive landscape with no entrenched dominant position.

The top-tier gap between LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC and the second tier is modest — a difference of only 3 patent records — which means challenger positions are contestable. A substantial share of the applicant list comprises academic and research institutes, particularly from India, indicating that the knowledge base is still being established rather than consolidated.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC9
2HEUNGKUK IND CO LTD6
3GREENCRAFT LLC6
4PSG INST OF TECH & APPLIED RES4
5VEL TECH RANGARAJAN DR SAGUNTHALA R&D INST OF SCI …4
6Nutech Ventures Ltd.3
7Sika Technology AG3
8Wuhan University of Technology3
9Zhenjiang Jinshengyuan Information Technology Co., Ltd.3
10Hanyang University Industry-University Cooperation Foundation2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation2
12Zha Xiaoxiong2
13FUJIAN AGRI & FORESTRY UNIV2
14National Institute of Technology Calicut2
15Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics2
16HANA K CO LTD2
17Lee Ju-young2
18JOSEPH ANETTA ANNU2
19MEESARAGANDA LAKSHMI VARA PRASAD2
20BEIJING UNIV OF CIVIL ENG & ARCHITECTURE2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

LATICRETE’s lead is rooted in C04B ceramics, cement, and refractories, the field’s dominant IPC class, suggesting that incumbent advantage tracks closely with formulation expertise rather than any proprietary process route that would require heavy capital to replicate.

Filing counts for the most recent 18–24 months are understated due to publication lag; apparent activity in 20242026 should be interpreted as a floor, not a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Strong multi-year growth, C04B dominance, and scattered adjacent branches

Two structural features define this field: a sharp multi-year acceleration in filing activity and an overwhelming concentration of technical claims within a single IPC domain, with a long tail of adjacent branches at very low counts.

Annual filing trend

Filings were minimal from 2017 to 2019, then accelerated through 2020–2023, reaching a peak of 22 patent records in 2023. Counts for 2024–2026 should be read as understated due to publication lag; the underlying pace of activity is likely higher than the recorded figures suggest.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 27 in 2025.32017220181201962020102021132022222023132024272025142026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C04B (Ceramics, cement & refractories) accounts for 127 patent records and overwhelmingly dominates the technology mix. All other branches — including B28B (Shaping clay & cement products), E01C (Roads & pavements), B28C (Mortar & concrete mixing), and B09B (Solid waste disposal) — carry five or fewer records each, confirming that geopolymer binder chemistry is the primary innovation focus while downstream applications remain sparsely covered.

Technology compositionC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories leads with 127; B28B · Shaping clay & cement products 5.C04B · Ceramics, cement …127B28B · Shaping clay & ce…5E01C · Roads & pavements5B28C · Mortar & concrete…4B09B · Solid waste dispo…3C08L · Polymer compositi…3E04C · Structural buildi…3B02C · Crushing, grindin…2↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
AU2021103680A4Published 2021-08-19

A composition of environmental friendly self-compa…

Lakshmi Vara PRASAD,MEESARAGANDA

A COMPOSITION OF SELF-COMPACTING GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE AND METHOD OF PREPARATION THEREOF The present invention relates to a composition of self-compacting geopolymer concrete and method of preparation thereof. The propose invention produces environmental friendly concrete by utilizing industrial wastes as ingredients to get the self-compacting durable… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1一种基于再生骨料地质聚合物混凝土及其制备方法63
2Eco-friendly geopolymer mortar compound for restor…27
3Geopolymeric concrete and manufacturing method for…25
4Manufacture method of inorganic foam using geopoly…24
5Early strength geopolymer binder material and meth…20
6全废弃物制备的地聚合物基人工备防石及其制备方法16
7Lightweight geopolymer using fly ash highly contai…16
8Method for production of high strength concrete us…16

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The field’s fragmented applicant base and nascent commercial consolidation create both risk and opportunity for new entrants. The following cards read the key structural signals an R&D strategist should weigh.

Growth

Growth stage, easing from 2023 peak

The field is in a Growth lifecycle stage: the recent three-year filing window sits 182% above the prior three-year window on a multi-year basis, confirming sustained expansion. Annual volume peaked in 2023 at 22 patent records and has since eased, though publication lag means post-2023 counts are understated. The window for staking foundational positions ahead of consolidation remains open but is narrowing.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Fragmented: top five hold only 20% of the leading-filer pool

The top five filers account for 20% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, an unusually low concentration for a maturing field. The leader, LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC, holds only 9 patent records. This fragmentation reduces freedom-to-operate risk but also signals that no player has yet established a blocking position, making portfolio-building via targeted prosecution a viable strategy.

Low concentration
Collaboration

Sparse co-filing; Wuhan University of Technology most active

Three co-applicant pairs are recorded. Wuhan University of Technology has filed jointly with both Hubei Sanxin Gold Copper Co., Ltd. and Guangdong Changda Road Maintenance Co., Ltd., reflecting a university-industry model common in Chinese applied research. Sika Technology AG and Kobe Steel Ltd. have one joint filing, indicating early cross-sector interest from specialty chemicals and steel. The overall collaboration network is thin, suggesting ecosystem formation is at an early stage.

Early ecosystem
Geography

India leads filings; China and US follow

India accounts for 48 patent records — the leading jurisdiction — driven largely by academic and technical institute applicants. China follows with 32 records, the United States with 17, and South Korea with 14. Europe (EPO) has 8 records and WIPO (PCT) has 4, indicating limited international prosecution activity. R&D teams seeking broad protection should prioritize filing strategies that extend beyond domestic-only India and China filings.

India-led geography
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Wuhan University of TechnologyHubei Sanxin Gold Copper Co., Ltd.1
Wuhan University of TechnologyGuangdong Changda Road Maintenance Co., Ltd.1
Sika Technology AGKobe Steel, Ltd.1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level and reflect filing office, not applicant nationality.Explore insights →
Leaders

LATICRETE leads on formulation; challengers are differentiated by route

The Technology emphasis across leaders remains anchored in C04B ceramics and cement sub-classes.

Leader · LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC

LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC

LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC holds 9 patent records, the highest count in the corpus. Its portfolio is concentrated in C04B 28 (hydraulic cements and geopolymer binders), C04B 7 (Portland and blended cements), and C04B 14 (inorganic aggregate and filler compositions). Momentum data classifies LATICRETE as a new entrant in the recent filing window, indicating that its leadership position has been built rapidly rather than through long-term accumulation.

9 patent records
Challenger · HEUNGKUK IND CO LTD

HEUNGKUK IND CO LTD

HEUNGKUK IND CO LTD holds 6 patent records and focuses on C04B 28 (geopolymer binders), C04B 38 (porous or cellular ceramics), and C04B 12 (non-Portland hydraulic cements), indicating a distinct emphasis on lightweight and foam-structure geopolymer products that complements rather than directly overlaps LATICRETE’s formulation-led approach. GREENCRAFT LLC also holds 6 patent records and represents a third competitive force at the same tier.

6 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings, momentum trends, and technology-route profiles for all top filers in this space.
GREENCRAFT LLCPSG INST OF TECH & APPLIED RES+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INC8▲ new entrant
VEL TECH RANGARAJAN DR SAGUNTHALA R&D INST OF SCI …2▲ new entrant
PSG INST OF TECH & APPLIED RES2▲ new entrant
Nutech Ventures Ltd.2▲ new entrant
Wuhan University of Technology1▲ new entrant
Sika Technology AG2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Patent record counts reflect each applicant’s entries in the ranked applicant list.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served routes adjacent to the core ceramics domain

Outside the dominant C04B class, several IPC branches carry very low patent-record counts relative to the field’s overall activity. These represent under-served adjacent areas that may have technical relevance to geopolymer recycled aggregate applications but have attracted limited dedicated prosecution to date.

E01C · Roads & pavements

With only 5 patent records, road and pavement applications of geopolymer binders incorporating recycled aggregate are sparsely covered despite the material’s established performance credentials as a low-carbon binder for infrastructure. The combination of alkali-activated fly ash or slag with crushed concrete aggregate for sub-base or surface layers has documented technical precedent in academic literature, and India’s and China’s large infrastructure pipelines represent a plausible entry context. An applicant able to link geopolymer mix design to pavement performance specifications could find relatively clear prosecution space here.

Search this in Eureka →

B09B · Solid waste disposal

B09B (Solid waste disposal) carries only 3 patent records, making it one of the sparsest branches despite the field’s foundational premise of diverting industrial byproducts — fly ash, slag, recycled concrete fines — from landfill. Waste-encapsulation and immobilization applications of geopolymers (e.g., heavy-metal stabilization in demolition waste) could justify dedicated filings under this class. The sparse count suggests most applicants are claiming the product and not the disposal-system context, leaving the system-level framing open.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level analysis, including share data and co-occurrence mapping across all IPC classes in scope.
B28C · Mortar & concrete mixingC08L · Polymer compositions+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; low counts indicate sparse dedicated prosecution, not absence of technical activity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology sub-class emphasis

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC04B 28 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 18 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 111 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 12 · Ceramics, cement & refractoriesC04B 14 · Ceramics, cement & refractories
LATICRETE INTERNATIONAL INCStrong · 9AbsentModerate · 2AbsentModerate · 4
PSG Institute of Technology and Applied ResearchStrong · 4AbsentStrong · 3Strong · 3Moderate · 2
HEUNGKUK IND CO LTDStrong · 6AbsentAbsentStrong · 4Absent
Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and TechnologyStrong · 4AbsentModerate · 2Moderate · 2Absent
Sika Technology AGStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsent
GREENCRAFT LLCAbsentStrong · 2AbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.