Book a demo

Geothermal Energy Patent Landscape 2026

Geothermal Energy Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Geothermal Energy Patent Landscape in 2026

Halliburton Energy Services dominates a highly concentrated field, holding a commanding lead over the next tier of filers across 8,749 patent families globally. The field reached its peak in 2022 and has since plateaued, though multi-year growth of 24% confirms continued strategic relevance.

8,749
Patent families in scope
37%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+24%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Halliburton leads a concentrated field with a wide gap to challengers

Halliburton Energy Services holds the top position by a substantial margin, followed by Baker Hughes, Eavor Technologies, and Schlumberger Technology Corp, all of which are clustered significantly below the leader in the applicant ranking.

The top five filers account for 37% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, reflecting a moderately concentrated competitive structure where a handful of oilfield-services and energy firms set the pace.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Halliburton Energy Services Inc1,660
2Baker Hughes Company543
3Eavor Technologies Inc314
4Schlumberger Technology Corp314
5Weatherford Technology Holdings LLC306
6Shell Oil Company262
7Nippon Steel Corporation210
8VALLOUREC MANNESMANN OIL & GAS FRANCE201
9Chevron USA Inc201
10Schlumberger Technology BV177
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Schlumberger Canada Ltd154
12Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA148
13Foro Energy Inc121
14Toshiba Corporation120
15EnhancedGEO Holdings LLC115
16Enventure Global Technology LLC107
17JAPAN METALS & CHEM CO LTD99
18Fuji Electric Co Ltd91
19ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company86
20Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV85
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect deep investment in downhole drilling and well-completion technology — a legacy from the oil and gas sector now being redirected toward geothermal applications — creating high barriers for new entrants lacking comparable subsurface engineering portfolios.

Filings from 2024 onward are subject to publication lag and likely undercount actual activity; the apparent dip in 2025–2026 data should not be read as a real-world decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2022 and has plateaued; drilling dominates the technology mix

Two charts together show where the field stands in its lifecycle and how technology investment is distributed across IPC branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed steadily from 2017 through a 2022 peak of 1,322, then eased to 1,167 in 2023 and 1,112 in 2024. The sharp drop in 2025–2026 reflects publication lag rather than a genuine decline; treat those years as provisional.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,322 in 2022.6722017900201892320191,000202097220211,32220221,16720231,11220246342025472026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

E21B (earth and rock drilling for wells) is the dominant branch by a large margin, consistent with oilfield-services firms leading the corpus. F24T (geothermal systems) and F03G (miscellaneous motors) form the next tier, while branches covering heat exchange, power generation, and geophysical surveying represent smaller but potentially strategic concentrations.

Technology compositionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells) leads with 10,797; F24T · Geothermal systems 4,396.E21B · Earth & rock dril…10,797F24T · Geothermal systems4,396F03G · Spring/weight & m…2,826C09K · Materials for mis…1,279F01K · Steam & thermal p…977F24J710G01V · Geophysics & grav…703F28D · Heat-exchange app…601↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Foundational and most-cited patents

The most-cited families that anchor this space. Hover a row and click to open it in Eureka.

Featured patent
WO2020152485A1Published 2020-07-30

Geothermal well, method of establishing thereof an…

Geomax Project KFT.

The object of the invention is a geothermal well, which comprises in a wellbore formed in the Earth’s crust: a fist tube (1) comprising at least one opening in a first depth and having a first inner diameter, a first outer diameter, and a side wall which is thermally insulated at least in a portion thereof; a second tube (2) having a closed bottom in a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Geothermal well, method of establishing thereof an… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Most-cited patents
#PatentCitations
1Downhole data transmission system549
2Proppant for well fractures and method of making s…393
3In situ recovery from a kerogen and liquid hydroca…381
4Sealing system for a well bore in which a hot flui…374
5In situ thermal processing of a relatively imperme…364
6Method for dumping and disposing of carbon dioxide…360
7In situ thermal processing of an oil reservoir for…356
8In situ thermal processing of an oil shale formati…348

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts accrue over time, so this list favours older, broadly-cited patents and may include general-purpose work beyond the specific topic; treat it as foundational context rather than a current-activity ranking.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural readings — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — point to a field where the incumbent advantage is strong but collaboration patterns and geographic gaps offer entry angles.

Maturity

Field is mature, not declining

Annual filings plateaued near their 2022 peak rather than continuing to climb, placing the field in a maturity stage. Multi-year growth of 24% confirms the corpus is still expanding on a longer horizon. New entrants face a crowded core but can find less-contested ground in adjacent branches.

Lifecycle: Mature
Concentration

Oilfield-services firms dominate; one player towers above the rest

Halliburton’s patent-family count is more than three times that of second-ranked Baker Hughes, creating a steep tier gap. The top five filers collectively represent 37% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. This concentration means licensing negotiations, standard-setting, and technology partnerships will almost certainly pass through a small set of incumbents.

High concentration
Collaboration

Cross-company co-filing is active among a specific cluster of pairs

The most active co-filing relationship is between Nippon Steel Corporation and Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France, with 168 jointly filed patent families — reflecting their shared focus on tubular goods and pipe fittings for downhole use. Halliburton and Chevron USA are the second most active pair at 143 families, followed by multiple Schlumberger-entity internal and inter-entity collaborations. These clusters signal where technology-sharing agreements are already well-established.

Collaborative clusters
Geography

US and China dominate; Europe and PCT paths are secondary

The United States leads all jurisdictions, followed by China and then WIPO PCT and European EPO filings. Canada, Japan, and Australia form a secondary tier. Markets such as Indonesia, the Philippines, and Latin America — geothermal resource-rich regions — show comparatively thin patent coverage, which may reflect both lower enforcement incentives and early-stage commercial development in those countries.

US & China-led
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Nippon Steel CorporationVallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France168
Halliburton Energy Services IncChevron USA Inc143
Schlumberger Technology BVServices Petroliers Schlumberger SA115
Schlumberger Technology CorpServices Petroliers Schlumberger SA90
Schlumberger Technology CorpSchlumberger Canada Ltd88
Schlumberger Technology BVSchlumberger Canada Ltd81
Schlumberger Technology CorpSchlumberger Technology BV79
Halliburton Energy Services IncSDG LLC49
Chevron USA IncSDG LLC49
Chevron USA IncSensing Dynamics Inc18

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family filing across multiple offices is counted once per jurisdiction.Explore insights →
Leaders

Halliburton and Eavor Tech represent contrasting models: incumbent scale vs. purpose-built geothermal

The ranking separates legacy oilfield-services conglomerates from newer geothermal-native companies. Understanding their technology emphasis explains where the competitive frontier is moving.

Leader · Halliburton Energy Services

Halliburton Energy Services

With 1,660 patent families, Halliburton’s position is built on depth in well completion, production engineering (E21B43), wellbore sealing (E21B33), and downhole fluids and materials (C09K8). Its momentum is positive at +30% in recent filings, reinforcing an active, not coasting, strategy. The breadth of its portfolio makes it the de facto standard-setter in subsurface geothermal engineering.

families: 1,660
Challenger · Eavor Technologies

Eavor Technologies

Eavor Technologies, with 314 patent families, is the highest-ranked geothermal-native company in the corpus and concentrates almost entirely on geothermal systems (F24T10, F24T50) with supporting drilling coverage (E21B43). Its recent filing momentum shows a –62% decline from the prior three-year window, suggesting it has completed an initial portfolio-building phase rather than retreating from the field. As a pure-play closed-loop geothermal developer, it occupies a distinct and less-crowded segment from the oilfield-services leaders.

families: 314
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings and technology profiles for all top 100 filers in the geothermal energy corpus.
Schlumberger Technology CorpWeatherford Technology Holdings+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Halliburton Energy Services Inc291▲ +30%
Baker Hughes Company2▼ -93%
Eavor Technologies Inc78▼ -62%
Schlumberger Technology Corp106▲ +194%
Nippon Steel Corporation42▼ -57%
Vallourec Mannesmann Oil & Gas France54▼ -33%
Chevron USA Inc8▼ -60%
Schlumberger Technology BV68▲ 4.3× vs prior 3-yr
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player rankings are based on patent family counts within the geothermal energy corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the geothermal core

Several IPC branches sit within the geothermal energy corpus at relatively low shares, indicating areas where the existing base of activity is thin relative to their technical relevance to geothermal systems.

G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying

Geophysical surveying methods are central to site characterization for enhanced geothermal systems and closed-loop projects, yet G01V accounts for only a 2% share of branch records in this corpus. The technical case for deeper investment is clear — better subsurface mapping directly reduces exploration risk. An entrant with seismic or gravity-survey IP could position as an essential data-layer provider to the dominant drilling-focused players.

Search this in Eureka →

F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus

Heat exchangers are a critical component in every geothermal power cycle and district heating system, yet F28D holds only a 2% share within this corpus. Given that thermal efficiency at the surface is a key economic lever — particularly for low-enthalpy resources — this branch represents an under-served interface between geothermal resource extraction and energy conversion. Entry paths include surface-plant optimization, compact exchanger designs for remote deployments, and corrosion-resistant materials suited to brine-rich geothermal fluids.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all identified adjacent branches with sparse coverage and their technical entry paths.
C09K · Materials for misc. applicationsF01K · Steam & thermal power plants+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are based on patent-record counts within the geothermal energy corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerE21B 43 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)F24T 10 · Geothermal systemsF03G 4 · Spring/weight & misc. motorsE21B 47 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)E21B 33 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)
Halliburton Energy Services IncStrong · 586AbsentAbsentStrong · 387Strong · 459
Eavor Technologies IncStrong · 109Strong · 203Moderate · 64AbsentModerate · 88
Baker Hughes CompanyModerate · 78AbsentAbsentStrong · 236Absent
Shell Oil CompanyStrong · 223AbsentAbsentModerate · 57Absent
Schlumberger Technology CorpStrong · 62Moderate · 34AbsentStrong · 86Moderate · 42
Schlumberger Technology BVStrong · 51AbsentAbsentStrong · 79Moderate · 32
ICE Thermal Harvesting LLCAbsentAbsentStrong · 70Strong · 55Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own geothermal energy landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.