GFRP Laminate Design Optimization Patent Snapshot
The patent corpus for GFRP laminate design optimization is extremely small, with only 4 patent families in scope, filed almost entirely in India and concentrated among individual academic inventors. Activity is nascent, with all recorded filings appearing in 2024–2025, and no established corporate leaders have yet staked out dominant positions.
A nascent, India-dominated field with no entrenched corporate incumbents
The evidence snapshot is defined by a very small number of individual inventors rather than corporate entities. Dr. Rittin Abraham Kurien and G. Ashwin Prabhu each hold 2 patent records, placing them at the top of the ranking; all other ranked applicants hold 1 record each.
The top five filers account for 21% of the combined total of the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating a highly fragmented structure with no single visible bloc. The absence of large corporate assignees leaves the field structurally open.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dr. Rittin Abraham Kurien | 2 | |
| 2 | G. Ashwin Prabhu | 2 | |
| 3 | Dr. Dipak Shriramji Bajaj | 1 | |
| 4 | Dr. Banakara Nagaraj | 1 | |
| 5 | Mr. G. M. Pradeep | 1 | |
| 6 | V. Ravi Raj | 1 | |
| 7 | Dr. P. Saravana Kumar | 1 | |
| 8 | Dr. I. Ameeth Basha | 1 | |
| 9 | Mr. S. Karuppaswamy | 1 | |
| 10 | Mr. S. Sathishkumar | 1 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Dr. Sekar K. | 1 | |
| 12 | Dr. Vishnu S. Aher | 1 | |
| 13 | Dr. Veerabathini Manohar | 1 | |
| 14 | Johnson Matthew E. | 1 | |
| 15 | Mr. Kiran C. H. | 1 | |
| 16 | Dr. D. Srinivasan | 1 | |
| 17 | Dr. Thummala Venkatamuni | 1 | |
| 18 | Mr. Kurmana Premakumar | 1 | |
| 19 | M. Rajesh | 1 | |
| 20 | Dr. S. Vijayan | 1 |
The leading positions held by individual inventors — rather than industrial firms or major research institutions — suggest that the technology is at an exploratory academic stage, and that any corporate entrant would encounter minimal incumbent resistance.
The most recent filings (2024–2025) may be under-represented due to standard patent publication lag; the current corpus size should be treated as a lower bound for actual recent activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Filing activity emerged only in 2024; technology spans fabrication, characterization, and simulation
The annual filing trend and the technology class breakdown together reveal both when and how inventors have approached GFRP laminate design optimization.
Annual filing trend
No filings appear from 2017 through 2023; 3 records were filed in 2024 and 1 in 2025. Given that the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag, the 2025 figure should be read as a minimum, not a plateau. The effective start of the field in this corpus is 2024.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
The technology mix is spread across four equally weighted leading classes — shaping of plastics (B29C), layered products and laminates (B32B), material analysis and testing (G01N), and electric digital data processing (G06F) — each with 2 records. This split reflects two distinct approaches: physical fabrication and laminate construction on one side, and computational simulation and optimization on the other. Five additional classes each carry a single record, pointing to early-stage application diversification into wind turbines, roofing, and glass compositions.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Advanced composite roofing shingle
An advanced, lightweight composite roofing shingle specifically designed to prevent hail damage and high wind uplift. The inventive laminate includes a conventional random fiberglass mat (20) used for shingle stability, sandwiched by an upper ply of Kevlar fabric (28) selected for high impact resistance, and a bottom ply of E-glass fabric (24) or similar… (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Advanced composite roofing shingle | 194 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set
The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.
Dr. Rittin Abraham Kurien
Holds 2 patent records with a trajectory described as a new entrant. Technology focus spans shaping of plastics (B29C 70), specific plastic articles (B29D 99), and layered products and laminates (B32B 27), indicating an emphasis on physical fabrication and laminate construction methods.
patent records: 2G. Ashwin Prabhu
Also holds 2 patent records with a new entrant trajectory. The technology focus mirrors Dr. Kurien’s across B29C 70, B29D 99, and B32B 27, suggesting that these two inventors may share overlapping research scope within the same fabrication-oriented cluster.
patent records: 2Frequently asked questions
The corpus in scope contains 4 patent families. This is a very small body of work, consistent with an embryonic field where formal patent activity only began appearing in 2024.
India is the visible jurisdiction, accounting for all 4 filings. One record also appears under the United States. No filings are recorded in Europe, China, Japan, or other major industrial markets, leaving substantial geographic white space.
Dr. Rittin Abraham Kurien and G. Ashwin Prabhu lead with 2 patent records each. All ranked applicants are individual inventors or academics; no corporate entities appear in the ranking.
The filings split roughly between physical fabrication and laminate construction (classes B29C, B32B, B29D) and computational simulation and optimization (classes G06F, G06T). Additional records address material testing (G01N), wind turbines (F03D), roofing (E04D), and glass compositions (C03C).
No co-applicant relationships are recorded in the available evidence. All filings appear to have been made by individual inventors acting independently, with no consortium or joint-filing activity identified.
Zero filings appear from 2017 through 2023; 3 records were filed in 2024 and 1 in 2025. The 2025 figure is likely under-counted due to publication lag. The pattern is consistent with an embryonic or pre-growth stage where the formal patent landscape has yet to develop meaningful density.
Built on Patsnap Open Platform
This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.