Glass Tempering Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing peaked in 2022 at 12 families and has not been matched since — the technology base looks settled rather than still expanding.
- China leads filing by receiving office with 15 records, ahead of the United States at 9 and South Korea at 5, showing where examiners and prior art concentrate.
- Only two co-assignee pairs appear in the whole set meaning most work here is filed solo rather than through joint ventures or research partnerships.
What this landscape covers
Glass tempering and strengthening covers the processes that put a glass sheet under surface compression — thermal quenching, chemical ion-exchange, and the furnace and cooling-air control systems that make either process repeatable at thin gauges. The 47 patent families in this set span core furnace and cooling hardware under C03B, glass composition work under C03C, and a smaller but persistent thread of control-systems and machine-vision filings — G05B, G06N, G06T, G06V — aimed at monitoring fragmentation pattern and anisotropy in-line rather than only in a lab.
Filing is concentrated on the equipment side: adjusting cooling zones, roller conveyance through the furnace, and ion-exchange chemistry for thin substrates, rather than on end-product claims. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend understates actual filing activity.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 47 families: when they were filed, and which IPC subclasses they touch.
A flat-to-declining curve after a 2022 peak
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2022, then eased off. With the midpoint year matching the peak, this reads as a technology base that has been substantially claimed rather than one still accelerating — later applicants are more likely to be filing around existing art than opening new ground.
Core glass-forming claims dominate, control systems a distant second
Every record touches C03B, the core glass manufacture and shaping subclass. The next-largest group, G05B control and regulating systems at 10, points to a secondary but real cluster of claims on furnace and cooling automation rather than on glass chemistry itself; G01N, G06N, G06T and G06V together suggest a smaller but active push toward sensor- and vision-based process monitoring.
Shares are the percentage of the 47 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Glass Tempering and Strengthening Processes with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about glass tempering and strengthening processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe prior art doing the most work
US6279350B1 — Adjusting cooling air in glass tempering machine
A method and equipment for adjusting the cooling air of a glass tempering machine, using fans directed at a tempering area that can be reduced by a closing device to raise pressure enough to temper thin glass evenly, without a separate tempering zone.Filed by Uniglass Engineering Oy; granted 2001-08-28.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN1843988A | 一种薄玻璃物理钢化的生产工艺 | 25 |
| 2 | US3694182A | Glass tempering die construction | 23 |
| 3 | CN103864283A | 一种薄玻璃化学钢化的离子交换工艺及熔盐 | 21 |
| 4 | US6279350B1 | Adjusting cooling air in glass tempering machine | 15 |
| 5 | US3775087A | Apparatus for conveying and heat treating hot glass with a roller conveyor | 12 |
| 6 | US20150284283A1 | Method for glass tempering using microwave radiation | 10 |
| 7 | GB801532A | Improvements in glass tempering apparatus | 7 |
| 8 | CN116514379A | 自动排除故障片的超薄玻璃钢化炉 | 3 |
| 9 | US20230212055A1 | Self-correcting vertical flatness in a glass tempering system | 3 |
| 10 | WO1997044285A1 | Adjusting cooling air in glass tempering machine | 3 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this as a signal of influence on later work, not of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the field
Three patterns stand out once filing counts, geography and citation data are put side by side.
A single peak, not a ramp
Filing climbed from zero in 2017 to 12 in 2022 and has since flattened. That shape is more consistent with a technology that reached a stable claim set than one still being actively opened up — new entrants are filing into a space others have already mapped.
Filing follows manufacturing capacity
China's lead in receiving-office counts tracks its position in flat and architectural glass manufacturing; the US and South Korea trail as secondary filing markets, with WIPO PCT filings (5) indicating some applicants are still hedging jurisdiction rather than committing early.
Old thin-glass chemistry still anchors the field
The most-cited record in the set addresses physical tempering of thin glass, and the third most-cited addresses chemical ion-exchange tempering of thin glass — both well over a decade old. Later filers are still building on, or designing around, that early thin-glass work.
Solo filing is the norm
Only two co-assignee pairs appear across the full set, both single-instance. Compared with fields built on joint ventures, this suggests IP here is held and defended individually rather than pooled — a relevant fact for anyone scouting for licensing partners.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to glass tempering and strengthening processes, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the field is open
Assignee activity is thin and dispersed — recent-year momentum shows single-digit filings even for the most active names, and most listed assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year.
Cardinal IG is the only assignee still filing
Of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum, only Cardinal IG shows a filing in the latest year; every other listed name — including Nippon Sheet Glass-affiliated and Chinese glass processors — shows zero in that same window, consistent with the overall flat-to-declining trend.
No single assignee dominates the count
With 47 families spread across a long list of Chinese, Korean and Western assignees and only two co-assignee pairs, ownership is fragmented rather than concentrated at the top — a contrast with fields where two or three players hold the bulk of the art.
Chinese processors dominate volume, not citations
China leads on receiving-office count but the most-cited records in the set are older US and Chinese thin-glass filings, not recent high-volume filers — volume and influence are not tracking the same names.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Cardinal IG Company | 1 | — |
| Uniglass Engineering Oy | 0 | — |
| NP Holdings Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Gyroscope Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Vidal Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Zhejiang Sperling Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Shandong Longkou Aoyu Home Furnishing Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Libbey-Owens-Ford Company | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature core process with a thinner, more active edge in monitoring and control.
Check the control-systems cluster before filing
G05B, G06N, G06T and G06V filings are a fraction of the C03B total but are the part of this landscape still showing new activity — a narrower search there is likely to surface less-crowded claim space.
Explore adjacent IPC classesMap the thin-glass ion-exchange lineage
Two of the five most-cited records in this set concern thin-glass tempering specifically, one chemical and one physical. Tracing citations forward from both shows which recent filings are actually building on that base.
Trace citation lineageWatch the single active filer
With only one assignee showing filings in the latest tracked year, monitoring that applicant's future publications is a low-cost way to catch the next real movement in this space early.
Set up assignee monitoringCommon questions on glass tempering patents
Filing peaked at 12 families in 2022 and has flattened since, based on 47 tracked families from 2015 onward. That pattern suggests the core thermal and chemical tempering processes are largely claimed, though a smaller cluster of control-systems and machine-vision filings around cooling automation and defect detection is still showing activity. Anyone assessing freedom to operate should focus due diligence on that newer control layer rather than the core furnace and ion-exchange chemistry, which is older and more heavily cited.
Physical (thermal) tempering uses rapid air cooling to set surface compression, and chemical tempering uses ion exchange in a molten salt bath, typically for thinner substrates. Both appear among the most-cited records in this dataset, with one top-cited filing covering thin-glass physical tempering and another covering the ion-exchange process and molten-salt chemistry for thin-glass chemical tempering. The persistence of citations to both routes indicates neither has displaced the other; the choice tends to depend on glass thickness and end application rather than one process being clearly superior.
Ownership in this dataset is fragmented: 47 families are spread across a long list of assignees rather than concentrated in two or three dominant players, and only two co-assignee pairs appear across the whole set. In the most recent tracked year, only one assignee shows any filing activity, with the rest — including several Chinese glass processors and a Korean holding company — showing none. That combination points to a field where IP is held individually and defended piecemeal rather than pooled through joint filing.
The under-claimed areas sit outside the core C03B glass-forming claims, in the smaller IPC clusters: in-line fragmentation-pattern imaging, anisotropy detection via machine vision, AI-assisted cooling-zone control, and heat-soak defect prediction. These subclasses (G05B, G06N, G06T, G06V, G01N) appear in single digits against 47 core filings, meaning the process chemistry is crowded but the monitoring and control layer around it is not. A first claim there would likely combine a sensing step — imaging or spectral — with a closed-loop adjustment to furnace or cooling parameters, rather than claiming the glass process itself.
US6279350B1, assigned to Uniglass Engineering Oy and granted in 2001, claims a method and equipment for adjusting cooling air in a glass tempering machine, using fans and a closing device to raise pressure in a reduced tempering zone so that thin glass tempers evenly without a separate zone. It is one of the more heavily cited records in this dataset. Its age means the core claim is likely to have run its full patent term in most jurisdictions, but its citation weight signals that later cooling-zone and pressure-control filings should be checked against its specific claim language before assuming clear space.
Research Glass Tempering and Strengthening Processes in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole glass tempering and strengthening processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.