https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/global-shutter-pixel-architectures-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Image Sensors
Global Shutter Pixel Architecture Patents: Where Claim Space Is Open in 2026
  • 46.1% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees hold 259 of the 562 records in scope, leaving a long tail of smaller filers below them.
  • Filings down 21% from 2021 to 2024. Annual filings fell from 19 to 15 over that span — the most recent period publication lag allows to be read as complete — after peaking at 67 in 2018.
  • H10F and G01S remain thin. Photovoltaic-adjacent and positioning-adjacent storage-node claims sit under 4% and 6.5% of records respectively, far below the 58–69% carried by the two core subclasses.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
562
Published Records
46%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (19 records) with 2024 (15) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 562 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What global shutter pixel patents actually claim

Global shutter pixel architectures solve a specific problem: capturing an entire image sensor array at one instant instead of scanning it row by row, which removes the motion artifacts that rolling shutter designs introduce on fast-moving subjects. The patent activity in this space concentrates on the on-pixel storage node — the structure that holds captured charge or voltage between exposure and readout — and on shielding it from stray light so that parasitic light sensitivity does not corrupt the stored signal before it is read out.

This dataset covers 562 published records from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn from filings that combine storage-node or charge-domain shutter language with terms describing shutter efficiency, motion artifact suppression, or noise contribution. The mix skews heavily toward semiconductor device claims and pictorial-communication claims, with smaller pockets touching positioning and photovoltaic-adjacent structures.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1BRILLNICS JAPAN71
  2. 2LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORP60
  3. 3SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC57
  4. 4APPLE INC41
  5. 5MAGIC LEAP INC30
  6. 6AMS SENSORS BELGIUM BVBA26
  7. 7TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD23
  8. 8CMOSIS18
  9. 9OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES INC16
  10. 10Brillnics Singapore Pte. Ltd.16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The 562 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with publication lag meaning the most recent two years understate actual filing activity.

Filings rose to a 2018 peak, then eased back

Annual filings peaked at 67 in 2018. From 2021 (19) to 2024 (the most recent complete year, 15), filings fell 21% — a real pullback in a maturing claim space, not a data artefact, since 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under the usual 18-month publication lag.

Filings rose to a 2018 peak, then eased back020406080242017672018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Two subclasses carry most of the claim weight

H04N (pictorial communication) and H01L (semiconductor devices) appear in 69.4% and 58.2% of the 562 records respectively — the two subclasses most global-shutter pixel filings have to clear. Smaller subclasses such as G01S (6.4%) and H10F (3.6%) show far less density, which is where claim space is comparatively open.

Two subclasses carry most of the claim weightH04N · Pictorial communication (video…39069.4%H01L · Semiconductor devices32758.2%H10B · Memory device manufacture6211.0%H10P5710.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)437.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing427.5%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning366.4%H10F · Photovoltaic & light-sensitive…203.6%Other14525.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 562 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about global shutter pixel architectures and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Notable Filing

A representative claim in this space

Representative Filing
US20120273854A12012-11-01

Global shutter pixel with improved efficiency (US20120273854A1)

APTINA IMAGING CORPORATION

A global shutter pixel cell includes a serially connected anti-blooming, storage-gate and transfer transistor chain coupled between a voltage supply and a floating diffusion region, with a photodiode terminal between the anti-blooming and storage-gate transistors and a storage-node diode terminal between the storage-gate and transfer transistors. Part of the photodiode region extends beneath the storage-node region so the photodiode shields the storage node from stray photons, with a metallic layer above extending the shielding further.Filed by Aptina Imaging Corporation, published 2012-11-01.

US20120273854A1 — patent drawing 1US20120273854A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8695880B2Imaging devices and methods for inhibiting or removing captured aiming pattern841
2US8773562B1Vertically stacked image sensor355
3US20120001615A1Array column integrator217
4US5900623AActive pixel sensor using CMOS technology with reverse biased photodiodes212
5US20120001056A1CCD-based multi-transistor active pixel sensor array197
6US20190056498A1Gated imaging apparatus, system and method175
7US8217433B1One-transistor pixel array173
8US20120001236A1One-transistor pixel array with cascoded column circuit167
9US20120001237A1Two-transistor pixel array167
10US20120056248A1One-transistor pixel array164

Citation counts favour older filings within this searched corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on later filings rather than current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Read

What the filing pattern says about this field

Concentration at the top, a post-2018 pullback, and uneven density across IPC subclasses together describe a field where the foundational shielding architecture is settled and the remaining activity is in narrower variants.

Concentration
46.1%
of 562 records held by top 5

A small group holds the core claims

The leading assignee alone accounts for 71 records, and the top five combined reach 46.1% of the full 562-record set. That level of concentration means the foundational storage-node shielding geometry is already staked out by a handful of filers.

Top 10 reach 63.7% of all records
Trajectory
-21%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing activity has eased since the 2018 peak

Annual filings peaked at 67 in 2018 and the most recent complete window shows a 21% decline, from 19 filings in 2021 to 15 in 2024. Later years in the trend are understated by the roughly 18-month gap between filing and publication.

Peak year: 2018 at 67 filings
Technology mix
58.2%
of records under H01L

Two subclasses carry most of the claim density

H04N and H01L together anchor the field, appearing in 69.4% and 58.2% of the 562 records respectively. Smaller subclasses like H10B (11.0%) and G01S (6.4%) show meaningfully less density, marking where claim space is comparatively open.

Eight IPC subclasses tracked across the dataset
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to global shutter pixel architectures, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who holds the core claims, and where the field is open

The 76-company ranking shows real concentration at the top alongside a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, with recent-year momentum data suggesting even the largest historical filers have slowed their latest recorded output.

Leader position
71
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer sets the baseline for the core architecture

The leading assignee's 71 records place it well ahead of the fifth-ranked company at 30, meaning the foundational shielded storage-node claims are concentrated rather than distributed evenly across the field.

Ranking covers 76 companies total
Top-10 concentration
63.7%
of 562 records held by top 10

Two-thirds of the field sits with ten companies

With the top five at 46.1% and the top ten at 63.7% of all 562 records, most of the remaining 66 ranked companies hold comparatively small filing counts, forming a long tail below the concentrated core.

Fifth place: 30 records; tenth place: 16 records
Recent momentum
0
filings in the latest tracked year for several top filers

Latest-year counts understate real activity

Several of the largest historical assignees show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, including a recorded -100% year-on-year change for one major filer. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reflects incomplete data more than an actual halt in R&D.

Read alongside the 2021-to-2024 -21% filing trend, not in isolation
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches with real record counts but low concentration at the top of the assignee ranking — the practical definition of open claim space in this field.
Storage-node shielding for time-of-flight pixelsNon-photodiode storage-node shielding structuresVoltage-domain storage for reduced parasitic light sensitivityPhotovoltaic-adjacent light-sensitive storage structuresAlternative transistor-sequencing around floating diffusion
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum by assignee, latest tracked year
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Life Technologies Corporation0—
Brillnics Japan Inc.0—
Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC0—
Apple Inc.0-100%
BRILLNICS INC(GB)0—
Magic Leap, Inc.0—
CMOSIS0—
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The patterns above point to specific next questions for R&D and IP teams working in this space.

Check freedom to operate against the concentrated core

With 63.7% of the 562 records held by ten assignees, any new storage-node shielding design should be checked against those specific families before development goes further.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Scope a filing in the thinner subclasses

H10F and G01S show low record density and low assignee concentration, making them worth a closer look for a differentiated first filing rather than a crowded design-around.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Frequently Asked

Questions practitioners ask about this space

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Global Shutter Pixel Architectures covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Global Shutter Pixel Architectures in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole global shutter pixel architectures corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.