Book a demo

Gold Leaching and Adsorption Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Gold Leaching and Adsorption Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Gold Leaching and Adsorption Patents: Who Files, Where the Gaps Sit

Filing peaked in 2021 at 32 records, then fell 88% to 4 by 2024 before the most recent years, still incomplete due to publication lag, are excluded from that read. Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 32 in 2021, then fell to 4 by 2024 — an 88% drop over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years should not be read as a continued decline yet.

Filing activity peaked in 2021, then cooled
Complete Incomplete
Filing activity peaked in 2021, then cooled01020304032017201820192020322021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
284
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-88%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Top filers · published records
  1. 1BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION45
  2. 2MAELGWYN MINERAL SERVICES AFRICA28
  3. 3COREM20
  4. 4SINGH ASHOK ADRIAN20
  5. 5SHERRITT INC12
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full gold leaching and adsorption analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Who holds the most patents in gold leaching and adsorption?+

The ranking covers 82 companies and research institutes across the 284 records in scope, with the leading assignee holding 45 records. The top 5 assignees together account for 44.0% of all 284 records, and the top 10 account for 62.3%, so while filing is concentrated at the top there is still a long tail of entities with only one or two filings. This mix of a strong leader and a wide tail is typical of a field where core process claims are held by a few large mining and metallurgy specialists while smaller equipment and engineering firms file narrower circuit variants.

What is carbon-in-leach and why does it dominate the patent record?+

Carbon-in-leach (CIL) and carbon-in-pulp (CIP) are process routes where activated carbon is added directly to the cyanide leach slurry to adsorb dissolved gold, avoiding a separate leaching-then-adsorption step. It dominates because it is the commercial default for most modern gold plants, and the patent data reflects this: 94.4% of the 284 records in scope carry a C22B metal-extraction classification tied to leaching and recovery processes. Most recent innovation documented in this dataset refines this established route — oxygen addition, residence time control, cyanide consumption reduction — rather than replacing it outright.

What is preg-robbing and how much patent activity addresses it?+

Preg-robbing occurs when carbonaceous material naturally present in the ore adsorbs dissolved gold before it can reach the intended carbon or resin adsorbent, effectively stealing recovered value. It is one of the search terms defining this dataset’s scope, and the most-cited records in the set — including US6482373B1 and its EPO counterpart EP0508542A2 — specifically address treating ore with recoverable metal values including arsenic-containing components, a common cause of refractory, preg-robbing behaviour. This makes pre-treatment of refractory ore one of the most heavily anchored claim areas in the field.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.