https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/gold-leaching-and-adsorption-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Precious Metal Metallurgy
Gold Leaching and Adsorption Patents: Who Files, Where the Gaps Sit
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 32 records, then fell 88% to 4 by 2024 before the most recent years, still incomplete due to publication lag, are excluded from that read.
  • 94.4% of all 284 records sit in core C22B extraction claims while electrolytic recovery, water treatment and soil reclamation each sit under 4%, marking the thin adjacent branches.
  • The top 10 of 82 ranked assignees hold 62.3% of all records leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants across the rest of the field.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
284
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-88%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (32 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 284 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 284 published patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine core gold cyanidation and carbon-in-leach or carbon-in-pulp process claims with a specific operating problem: cyanide consumption, preg-robbing, elution circuit design, carbon regeneration, oxygen addition, or leach residence time. It is a process-metallurgy field rather than a materials field — the claims are about how a plant runs, not what a novel reagent is made of.

Records are drawn from receiving offices spanning the major gold-mining jurisdictions, with the United States, Australia and Canada leading. Because <em>patent families</em> neutralise repeat filings of the same invention across jurisdictions, the family-based assignee ranking is the fairer read of who is actually active, rather than raw document counts.

Records by filing year, 2015–2026
  1. 1BARRICK GOLD CORPORATION45
  2. 2MAELGWYN MINERAL SERVICES AFRICA28
  3. 3COREM20
  4. 4SINGH ASHOK ADRIAN20
  5. 5SHERRITT INC12
  6. 6RIO TINTO TECH DEV11
  7. 7DUBLIN INST OF TECH11
  8. 8MINMET11
  9. 9SEABRIDGE GOLD INC10
  10. 10LINFOX TECH9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The dataset covers 284 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, giving a view of how gold leaching and adsorption claims have shifted since carbon-in-leach and resin-based circuits moved from pilot to commercial scale.

Filing activity peaked in 2021, then cooled

Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 32 in 2021, then fell to 4 by 2024 — an 88% drop over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years should not be read as a continued decline yet.

Filing activity peaked in 2021, then cooled01020304032017201820192020322021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

C22B extraction dominates; supporting classes are thin

94.4% of the 284 records carry a C22B metal-extraction classification, with separation (B01D), catalysis/chemical processing (B01J) and flotation (B03D) each present in roughly 9-11% of records as supporting claims rather than standalone routes. Electrolytic recovery, water treatment and soil reclamation each sit under 4%, marking the thinnest-claimed adjacent branches.

C22B extraction dominates; supporting classes are thinC22B · Metal extraction & refining26894.4%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…3110.9%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …3110.9%B03D · Flotation269.2%B01F · Mixing & stirring196.7%C25C · Electrolytic metal production113.9%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment103.5%B09C · Soil & contaminated land recla…93.2%Other3010.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 284 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Gold Leaching and Adsorption with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gold leaching and adsorption and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited and representative filings

Representative Filing
WO2023283700A12023-01-19

WO2023283700A1 — Improved gold-copper recovery circuit and method

GREENGOLD ENGINEERING PTY LTD

A gold-copper recovery circuit comprises an adsorption circuit and an elution circuit. The adsorption circuit receives a slurry containing gold and copper in a cyanide solution together with a resin adsorbent for adsorbing gold, copper and free cyanide, and includes a resin offtake that separates loaded resin into a first and a second portion. The elution circuit comprises a copper elution column, which receives the first portion of loaded resin and a copper eluant, followed by a gold elution column configured to receive the copper-eluted resin.Filed by Greengold Engineering Pty Ltd, published 2023-01-19.

WO2023283700A1 — patent drawing 1WO2023283700A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing in Eureka
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6482373B1Process for treating ore having recoverable metal values including arsenic containing components65
2US5961833AMethod for separating and isolating gold from copper in a gold processing system59
3US5599515AMethod of removing mercury from solution44
4EP0508542A2Process for treating ore having recoverable metal values including arsenic containing components37
5US4610724ARecovery of gold from refractory auriferous iron-containing sulphidic material35
6US20090071295A1Method to improve recovery of gold from double refractory gold ores32
7US20090019970A1Process for recovery of metal values from materials containing arsenic and/or antimony32
8WO2005100243A1A process for the removal of thiocyanate from effluent27
9US6248301B1Process for treating ore having recoverable metal values including arsenic containing components26
10GB2349876ARecovering noble metals from ores using thiourea22

Citation counts favour older records in a searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later filings, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing data signals

Read together, the concentration, trend and classification figures point to a field where core extraction chemistry is heavily claimed and adjacent processing steps are not.

Concentration
44.0%
of 284 records held by top 5

Filing is led but not locked up

The leading assignee holds 45 records on its own, and the top 5 combined hold 44.0% of all 284 records in scope. That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail of 77 further ranked entities, many with only one or two records.

Top 5 of 82 ranked assignees
Momentum
-88%
filings 2021 → 2024

Activity has cooled from its 2021 peak

Filings rose to a peak of 32 in 2021 and fell to 4 by 2024. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as confirming a continued decline.

Peak year: 2021 at 32 records
Technology mix
94.4%
of records classified C22B

Core extraction claims dominate the classification mix

Metal extraction and refining (C22B) appears in 94.4% of the 284 records, far ahead of separation processes and flotation, each near 10%. Electrolytic recovery, water treatment and soil reclamation each sit under 4%, the thinnest-claimed branches in the set.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes
Geography
56
records at the US receiving office

Filing offices track major mining jurisdictions

The United States leads receiving offices with 56 records, followed by Australia (47), Canada (37), WIPO/PCT (35), the EPO (31) and South Africa (15) — a spread that mirrors where large-scale gold mining and processing operations are concentrated.

Receiving office counts, not family counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gold leaching and adsorption, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranked assignee list spans 82 companies and institutes across the 284 records in scope. Filing is led by a small group of mining and metallurgical-technology specialists, but the majority of entities in the ranking hold only one or two records each.

Leader
45
records

A single assignee leads the ranked field

The top-ranked assignee holds 45 of the 284 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 12 and tenth place at 9. That gap suggests a sustained, deliberate filing programme rather than opportunistic single filings.

Leader vs. 5th place: 45 vs. 12
Mid-field
62.3%
held by top 10 of 82

Concentration flattens quickly after the leader

After the leading assignee, filing counts drop off fast — fifth place holds 12 records and tenth place holds 9. The top 10 together hold 62.3% of all 284 records, leaving the remaining 72 ranked entities to split the rest.

Top 10 of 82 ranked assignees
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs

Joint filing is rare and clustered

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole dataset, and the strongest pairs cluster around a small group of research-institute and mining-technology partners. Most assignees, including several of the largest, file independently.

Strongest pairs recur at 12 shared records
Recent activity
1
latest-year record, top assignee

Recent-year momentum has thinned across leaders

Among the most active historical filers, only one shows any record in the latest year captured, and it is a single filing. This is consistent with the broader post-2021 cooldown rather than any one leader stepping back specifically.

Latest-year filings, leading assignees
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches sit well below the 94.4% claim density in core C22B extraction, based on IPC composition across the 284 records in scope.
Electrolytic recovery from barren eluateCyanide-bearing wastewater treatmentTailings and contaminated-land reclamationResin dual-column copper-gold elution sequencingOxygen-addition control in leach residence time
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SEABRIDGE GOLD INC1
Barrick Gold Corporation0
MAELGWYN MINERAL SERVICES AFRICA0
SINGH ASHOK ADRIAN0
COREM0
Sherritt Inc0
Dublin Institute of Technology0
RIO TINTO TECH DEV0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this next

The figures above describe the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going record by record.

Check freedom-to-operate against the anchor patents

The most-cited records in this set, including US6482373B1 and EP0508542A2, anchor refractory-ore pre-treatment claims that later filings build on. Any new circuit design touching arsenic-bearing or refractory ore treatment should be checked against these directly.

Run a claim chart in Eureka

Track the resin-elution niche as it develops

WO2023283700A1 and similar recent filings suggest resin-in-pulp elution sequencing is where active claiming continues even as overall filing volume has cooled since 2021.

Monitor this niche in Eureka

Scope a filing in the thin adjacent branches

Electrolytic recovery, wastewater treatment and soil reclamation each sit under 4% of the 284 records in scope, well below core extraction claims, making them the more open ground for a first-mover filing.

Draft a claim scaffold in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Gold Leaching and Adsorption covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Gold Leaching and Adsorption in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole gold leaching and adsorption corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.