GPU Architecture Thermal Management Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- 178 patent families tracked, with filings peaking at 26 in 2024 before tapering — the 2025-2026 dip reflects publication lag, not a slowdown in R&D.
- China outfiles the US 71 to 63 at the receiving-office level, but no single assignee shows sustained year-over-year growth into the latest tracked year.
- Cooling claims cluster in G06F and H05K, while lighting (F21V), imaging (G06T) and alarm/signalling (G08B) subclasses carry real volume but far less crowding.
What this landscape covers
GPU architecture thermal management sits at the intersection of chip packaging, printed-circuit design and system-level heat dissipation. This landscape draws on 178 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine GPU or GPGPU architecture terms with thermal-management language — hotspot cooling, package cooling, heat dissipation — restricted to the IPC classes that cover digital data processing housings, semiconductor packaging and electronic equipment cooling structures.
The filing curve rose from 10 records in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2024, with the midpoint year of 2022 sitting at 11 — a pattern that reads as flat-to-declining growth through the middle of the window before the 2023-2024 surge. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the low counts shown for 2025 and 2026 understate actual filing activity in those years rather than signalling a real drop-off.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 178-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that define the thermal-management claim space.
A late-window surge, not a steady climb
Filings held near 10-11 per year through the early part of the window before climbing to a 2024 peak of 26. That shape — flat middle, late peak, then an apparent tail-off that is mostly a publication-lag artefact — suggests the technology area drew a fresh wave of filing interest around 2023-2024 rather than growing continuously since 2017.
Cooling claims concentrate in two subclasses
G06F (electric digital data processing) covers 165 of the 178 records and H05K (printed circuits and assemblies) covers 68, confirming that most claims are written as digital-device or PCB-level cooling structures rather than as semiconductor-packaging claims — H01L accounts for only 20 records despite being one of the search's core IPC targets. F21V, G08B and G06T each carry secondary volume, pointing to cooling claims that piggyback on lighting, alarm-signalling and image-processing applications.
Shares are the percentage of the 178 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on GPU Architecture Thermal Management with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about gpu architecture thermal management and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA representative filing and the most-cited prior art
US7952880B2 — Graphics card and heat dissipation method thereof
A graphics card includes a graphics processing unit (GPU), a heat dissipation fin, an electric cooling module and a thermoelectric generator. The electric cooling module has a cold side and a hot side. The cold side contacts the GPU, and the hot side contacts the heat dissipation fin. The thermoelectric generator contacts the heat dissipation fin and is electrically connected to the electric cooling module. Furthermore, a method for dissipating the heat of the graphics card is also disclosed herein.Filed by ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., granted 2011 — predates most of the corpus and defines a hybrid active-cooling-plus-thermoelectric-recovery architecture still cited against later filings.
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US10327713B2 | Modular multi-parameter patient monitoring device | 513 |
| 2 | US20180242924A1 | Modular multi-parameter patient monitoring device | 225 |
| 3 | US20200000415A1 | Modular multi-parameter patient monitoring device | 61 |
| 4 | US9665134B2 | Computer internal architecture | 29 |
| 5 | US20140362576A1 | Computer architecture | 26 |
| 6 | WO2014197726A1 | Computer internal architecture | 26 |
| 7 | US9395772B2 | Computer internal architecture | 25 |
| 8 | US20170300095A1 | Computer internal architecture | 23 |
| 9 | US20180246547A1 | Desktop electronic device | 22 |
| 10 | US9207728B2 | Computer input/output interface | 22 |
Citation counts reward older, earlier-filed documents simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations — read this table as a signal of influence on later filings, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three read-throughs from the trend, geography and citation data — useful for deciding where a new filing is likely to face dense prior art versus open claim space.
The surge is recent and narrow
Filings stayed near 10-11 per year through 2017-2022 before nearly doubling by 2024. A single peak year this late in the window means the claim space around current architectures is still being staked out, not settled.
China leads at the receiving-office level
China accounts for 71 filings against 63 for the United States, with Europe, Australia, WIPO and India trailing well behind. A filing strategy built only around US and EPO coverage will miss most of the recent activity in this space.
Digital-device framing dominates over packaging framing
Nearly every record touches G06F, while only 20 touch H01L semiconductor packaging. Claims describing cooling as a device-level architecture feature are far more common than claims anchored purely in package or die-level heat transfer.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to gpu architecture thermal management, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where the gaps sit
The 178 families are held across a mix of consumer electronics majors, component makers and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, with no assignee showing renewed filing momentum into the latest tracked year.
A long tail beneath a handful of repeat filers
The ranking is dominated by a small number of established hardware and component companies, with the majority of assignees appearing only once or twice — typical of a claim space still being explored rather than consolidated.
No assignee is currently accelerating
Every assignee flagged in the recent-momentum data shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, and several show a full year-over-year drop to zero. This is consistent with the broader publication-lag pattern rather than a genuine pullback by any one filer.
Chinese entities file locally in volume
A large share of the long tail consists of China-based component and materials firms filing through the Chinese receiving office, alongside global names filing more selectively across US, EPO and PCT routes.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. | 0 | — |
| Suzhou Yuannao Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Masimo Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| NVIDIA Corporation | 0 | — |
| Shanghai Institute of Technology | 0 | -100% |
| 酷码科技股份有限公司 | 0 | — |
| 超威半导体公司 | 0 | — |
| 戴尔产品有限公司 | 0 | — |
Where to take this landscape
The dataset points to open sub-areas and a filing curve still in motion; the next step is testing a specific claim direction against the full family set.
Stress-test a filing direction
Run a candidate claim — for example, a package-level die-to-heatsink interface — against the full 178-family set to see how much prior art actually reads on it before drafting.
Explore this in EurekaTrack the 2024 surge as it matures
Watch whether the 2024 peak was a one-year spike tied to a specific architecture generation or the start of a sustained filing wave, once 2025-2026 data fully publishes.
Set up monitoring in EurekaMap the China filing wave by sub-area
Break the 71 China-origin filings down by IPC sub-branch to see whether they concentrate in the same G06F/H05K core or are opening genuinely new claim territory.
Run this analysis in EurekaCommon questions on GPU thermal management patents
This landscape tracks 178 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine GPU or GPGPU architecture terms with thermal-management claims, restricted to IPC classes covering digital-device housings, semiconductor packaging and electronic cooling structures. That figure understates true filing volume for 2025-2026 because publication typically lags filing by about eighteen months. It also reflects a specific search string, so adjacent cooling patents that do not name GPU architecture explicitly are excluded.
The ranking is led by a small group of established consumer-electronics and component companies, with a long tail of assignees holding only one or two families each. None of the assignees tracked for recent-year momentum show growth into the latest tracked year — all sit at zero filings in that year, which is more consistent with publication lag than an actual pullback. Readers should treat any single-year leadership claim cautiously given how thin recent-year data currently is.
China leads at the receiving-office level with 71 filings against 63 for the United States, out of 178 total families. Europe, Australia, WIPO and India each account for meaningfully smaller shares. A defensive or freedom-to-operate search limited to US and European filings alone would miss the majority of recent Chinese-origin activity in this space.
US7952880B2, assigned to ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., claims a graphics card architecture combining a GPU, a heat dissipation fin, an electric cooling module with distinct cold and hot sides, and a thermoelectric generator that recovers heat from the fin and feeds it back to the cooling module. It is a hybrid active-cooling design rather than a passive heatsink, and its 2011 grant date means it predates most of the corpus and is cited as prior art against later hybrid-cooling filings. Anyone designing a thermoelectric-assisted GPU cooling module should review its claim scope before finalising an architecture.
IPC volume is heavily concentrated in G06F and H05K, while H01L semiconductor-packaging claims account for only 20 of 178 records despite packaging being a core target of the search — suggesting die-to-heatsink interface claims are comparatively under-filed relative to device-level cooling claims. Secondary subclasses like F21V, G08B and G06T carry real volume but sit outside the main G06F/H05K crowding, pointing to dual-function cooling-plus-lighting or cooling-plus-signalling architectures as less contested ground. Any white-space read should be confirmed against a fresh claim-by-claim search before drafting, since IPC volume is a proxy for crowding, not a guarantee of it.
Research GPU Architecture Thermal Management in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole gpu architecture thermal management corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.