Book a demo

Graphene Oxide Patents: Filing Trends & Top Assignees 2026

Graphene Oxide Patents: Filing Trends & Top Assignees 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/graphene-oxide-and-functionalization-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Carbon Materials
Graphene Oxide and Functionalization Patents: Where Filings Are Concentrated and Where They Have Stalled
  • Filing has declined since 2019. Filings peaked at 74 in 2019 and have fallen since; 2022's midpoint of 44 confirms the trend is flat-to-declining, not a data artefact.
  • China dominates the filing venue. 346 of 653 records were filed in China, more than the next four offices (US, EPO, India, WIPO) combined.
  • Polymer-integration IPC classes outweigh pure nanotech. C08K and C08L (polymer additives and compositions) together carry more records than B82Y (nanotechnology), showing the field is claimed mainly as a materials-integration problem.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
653
Published Records
15%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-4%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (50 records) with 2024 (48) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 653 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A materials-integration field, not a standalone nanotech niche

Graphene oxide and functionalized graphene patents span oxidation degree control, reduction methods, dispersion in polymer and composite matrices, and the barrier and conductivity properties that result. The IPC composition shows C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) as the largest single class at 402 records, but the combined weight of C08K, C08L and C08J — additives, compositions and processing of polymers — signals that most filings exist to put graphene oxide into something else: a coating, a composite, a film.

Filing activity rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2019 at 74 records, and has trended down since, with the 2022 midpoint at 44 confirming a genuine slowdown rather than a reporting gap. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in the trend will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, but the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak predates that lag effect.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
  1. 1ARCELORMITTAL SA40
  2. 2SEMICON ENERGY LAB CO LTD19
  3. 3TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE SA16
  4. 4SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO11
  5. 5HANGZHOU GAOXI TECH CO LTD10
  6. 6KING ABDULLAH UNIV OF SCI & TECH10
  7. 7SHENZHEN CANTONNET ENERGY SERVICES CO LTD9
  8. 8THE SIXTH ELEMENT CHANGZHOU MATERIALS TECH9
  9. 9ROYAL MELBOURNE INST OF TECH8
  10. 10安徽省阜阳市国泰彩印包装有限公司7
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

653 patent families across a decade of filing, broken down by year and by IPC subclass, show where claim density sits and where it has thinned out.

A decade past its filing peak

From 67 filings in 2017 to a peak of 74 in 2019, the trend has since declined toward 8 in the most recent partial year. Read the final one or two years as undercounted due to publication lag, not as a cliff.

A decade past its filing peak020406080672017201874201920202021202220232024202582026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Polymer integration outweighs pure nanotechnology claims

C01B leads at 402 records, with C08K (223) and C08L (197) close behind. B82Y, the dedicated nanotechnology class, trails at 64 — evidence that most applicants are claiming graphene oxide as a functional additive rather than as a nanomaterial in its own right.

Polymer integration outweighs pure nanotechnology claimsC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…40261.6%C08K · Use of additives in polymers22334.2%C08L · Polymer compositions19730.2%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions11317.3%C09D · Coatings, paints & inks7211.0%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications649.8%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells467.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates385.8%Other50076.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 653 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about graphene oxide and functionalization and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records anchor the reduction and barrier-property claims

Representative filing
US9318231B22016-04-19

US9318231B2 — Method of preparing reduced graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide-polymer composites

KOREA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Methods of preparing reduced graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide-polymer composites. The methods include covalently binding a halogen-substituted aromatic compound to a graphene oxide and heat treating the graphene oxide with the halogen-substituted aromatic compound covalently bound thereto at a low temperature, for example 450 degrees Celsius or less. Using these methods, reduced graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide-polymer composites with high electrical conductivities (30,000 S/m or more) may be obtained.Filed by Korea Institute of Science and Technology, granted 2016-04-19.

US9318231B2 — patent drawing 1US9318231B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited patent families in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN102674315A一种石墨烯-碳纳米管复合全碳超轻弹性气凝胶及其制备方法104
2CN102115566A高阻隔性氧化石墨烯和聚合物纳米复合膜的制备方法69
3CN104030275A一种还原氧化石墨烯导热薄膜的制备方法53
4US20160064726A1Storage battery electrode, manufacturing method thereof, storage battery, electronic device, and graphene50
5US20110114897A1Functionalized graphene sheets having high carbon to oxygen ratios47
6CN105820519APET基石墨烯复合材料、其制备方法及浮空器46
7CN103508447A石墨烯的制备方法44
8US20160349905A1Film formation method and element42
9WO2019070514A1Methods and apparatus for the production of graphite oxide and reduced graphene oxide41
10US20170106342A1Reduced Graphene Oxide Barrier Materials39

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within this searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field's vocabulary, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision

Three patterns in the dataset matter more than any single ranking: where the volume sits, where it is heading, and where the citation weight has landed.

Filing venue
346 of 653
records filed in China

China is the primary filing venue by a wide margin

China's 346 records outnumber the US (130), EPO (63), India (32), WIPO (28) and Australia (11) combined. A freedom-to-operate search that skips Chinese-language prior art in this field is searching well under half the corpus.

Receiving office data, 653 records
Trend direction
74 → 8
peak (2019) to latest partial year

The field has cooled since its 2019 peak

Filing volume has declined from a 2019 peak of 74 through a 2022 midpoint of 44 toward single digits in the most recent partial year. Some of that recent drop is publication lag, but the multi-year direction predates it.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology mix
402 vs 64
C01B records vs B82Y records

Claims cluster on materials chemistry, not nanotech classification

C01B (inorganic compounds) carries more than six times the record count of B82Y (nanotechnology applications), reinforcing that most applicants frame graphene oxide work as a chemistry and materials-integration problem rather than a nanomaterials-specific one.

IPC composition, 653 records
Citation concentration
104 citations
top-cited record

Aerogel and barrier-film claims carry the heaviest citation weight

The most-cited record concerns a graphene-carbon nanotube aerogel; the next two most-cited concern high-barrier composite films and thermally conductive reduced graphene oxide films. Older filings on these three sub-areas set much of the field's citation baseline.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to graphene oxide and functionalization, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

A fragmented field with almost no collaborative filing

With only two identified co-assignee pairs across 653 families, this is a field of independent filers rather than joint ventures or research consortia. Recent-year momentum is thin across the board, consistent with the broader post-2019 slowdown.

Collaboration
2 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is nearly absent

The strongest co-assignee link pairs a Chinese materials company with a university research institute; a second pair links a national oil company with its US affiliate. Neither reflects a broader pattern of joint filing in the space.

Co-assignee pairs, 653 records
Momentum
0-1 filings
latest-year activity across tracked assignees

Recent-year filing has gone quiet even among named assignees

Every tracked assignee shows zero or one filing in the latest year, including entities that filed steadily in earlier years. This mirrors the corpus-wide decline rather than signalling any single company's exit.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Geography
5 of 6 offices
receiving offices below China's volume

Filing strategy is regionally concentrated

Beyond China's lead, the US, EPO, India, WIPO and Australia each carry a fraction of the volume, suggesting most assignees are prioritising a single home jurisdiction rather than building broad multi-region families.

Receiving offices, 653 records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show comparatively thin representation relative to the core oxidation and reduction claims.
Conductivity recovery after reductionBarrier property tuning by oxidation degreeDispersion stability in thermoset matricesBattery-electrode graphene composites (H01M overlap)Laminate barrier films (B32B overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Hangzhou Gaoxi Technology Co., Ltd.1
ArcelorMittal0
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.0-100%
Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance S.A. (Switzerland)0
Shenzhen Yuewang Energy Saving Technology Service Co., Ltd.0
Saudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)0
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)0
Fuzhou University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field past its filing peak but still active in specific niches. These are reasonable next steps for a team deciding where to file or license.

Run a China-language prior art search before filing

With 346 of 653 records filed in China, an FTO search limited to English-language databases misses more than half the relevant prior art in this field.

Search Chinese filings in Eureka

Model the reduction-method and barrier-property claim clusters

The most-cited records concentrate on aerogels, barrier films and thermally conductive films; mapping claim scope in these three areas clarifies what is already occupied.

Map claim clusters in Eureka

Watch battery-electrode overlap for new entrants

H01M (batteries) accounts for 46 records within this corpus, a smaller but distinct overlap worth monitoring as electrode applications for graphene oxide develop separately from coatings and composites.

Track H01M overlap in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about graphene oxide patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Graphene Oxide and Functionalization covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Graphene Oxide and Functionalization in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole graphene oxide and functionalization corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.