Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (99 records) with 2024 (125) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 910 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks 910 patent families filed against green hydrogen production systems where the claims touch electrolyzer integration, levelized cost, intermittent operation, purification or compression — the operational problems that separate a lab electrolyzer from a plant that runs on variable renewable power. The search restricts to IPC classes covering electrolytic production (C25B) and non-metallic inorganic compounds (C01B), so this is a production and purification view rather than a fuel-cell or end-use view.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend line will look thinner than actual filing activity — read the most recent year as a floor, not a ceiling.
Two views of the same 910 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses are absorbing the claim volume.
Filings ran from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 165 in 2023. The midpoint year, 2022, already sat at 139 — close to peak — meaning most of the growth happened early and the curve has since flattened rather than continued climbing toward 2026.
C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) and C25B (electrolytic production) together dwarf the other six subclasses tracked. Separation (B01D) and catalysis (B01J) form a second tier tied to purification and compression claims, while gasification (C10J) and hydrocarbon refining (C10G) sit at the back — routes that overlap this space but are not where filers are concentrating.
Shares are the percentage of the 910 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about green hydrogen production systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing couples a water-splitting unit with a photon-plasma decomposition step that regenerates the hydrogen-production catalyst, feeding both the resulting hydrogen and oxygen into a co-located power generation unit. The design integrates catalyst reduction and power generation into a single closed loop rather than treating electrolysis and power output as separate systems.Filed 2025-03-06 — illustrates how recent applicants are still combining core electrolysis chemistry with novel catalyst-regeneration and power-integration steps.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6497856B1 | System for hydrogen generation through steam reforming of hydrocarbons and integrated chemical reactor for hy… | 192 |
| 2 | US6623719B2 | System for hydrogen generation through steam reforming of hydrocarbons and integrated chemical reactor for hy… | 88 |
| 3 | CN105084311A | 一种零碳排放的甲醇水重整制氢系统及其应用和制氢方法 | 74 |
| 4 | US20020146359A1 | System for hydrogen generation through steam reforming of hydrocarbons and integrated chemical reactor for hy… | 67 |
| 5 | US20190135626A1 | Systems and methods for production and separation of hydrogen and carbon dioxide | 63 |
| 6 | US4936869A | Liquid hydrogen polygeneration system and process | 55 |
| 7 | US8658026B2 | Method for producing fuel with renewable content having reduced lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions | 52 |
| 8 | US20060207178A1 | Renewable energy operated hydrogen reforming system | 52 |
| 9 | US20220162077A1 | Biomass pyrolysis integrated with bio-reduction of metal ores, hydrogen production, and/or activated-carbon p… | 49 |
| 10 | US20050097819A1 | System for hydrogen generation through steam reforming of hydrocarbons and intergrated chemical reactor for h… | 49 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings — treat them as a map of foundational prior art, not a ranking of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on: where the claim space is dense, where it is thin, and where the two most-cited patent families actually sit.
Filings rose from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 165 in 2023, but the 2022 midpoint of 139 shows most of that climb happened before 2023. A flat or declining line into 2026 suggests the core electrolysis and inorganic-chemistry claims are becoming saturated rather than newly contested.
China accounts for 500 of the 910 tracked records, more than four times the US figure of 118 and well ahead of EPO, PCT, Australian and Canadian filings combined. A freedom-to-operate check that skips Chinese filings will miss the majority of the relevant art.
The most-cited records in this corpus describe steam reforming of hydrocarbons, not electrolysis — a reminder that citation counts favour older, foundational filings over the newer green-hydrogen-specific claims this search is built to surface.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest links are between a parent and its own energy-systems subsidiary rather than cross-company joint filings — collaborative IP strategy is not yet a dominant pattern here.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to green hydrogen production systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee list is long-tailed rather than led by one dominant filer, and the momentum data shows several previously active names dropping to zero in the latest tracked year.
IOGEN CORPORATION, Sunshine Hydrogen Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and Carbon Technology Holdings, LLC each show a -100% year-on-year change, dropping from prior activity to none in the latest tracked year. Given the ~18-month publication lag, some of this may reflect filings still working through the pipeline rather than a genuine stop.
The strongest co-assignee pairing, Toshiba Corporation with its own Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corporation subsidiary, points to internal corporate-group filing structure rather than external partnership as the main driver of joint applications in this space.
The receiving-office split shows China carrying more than half the tracked filings, while the most-cited prior art in the corpus is predominantly US-originated steam-reforming work — volume and influence are currently concentrated in different places.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| IOGEN CORPORATION | 0 | -100% |
| Sunshine Hydrogen Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Carbon Technology Holdings, LLC | 0 | -100% |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| Hpu Energy Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ZEG Power AS | 0 | — |
| KOLOMA INC | 0 | -100% |
| Eight Rivers Capital, LLC | 0 | — |
The landscape points to three follow-up questions worth running before committing a filing or freedom-to-operate budget.
With 500 of 910 families filed in China, a freedom-to-operate review limited to US and EPO records will miss most of the documented art. Cross-check any planned claim against the Chinese filing set specifically.
Run a China-focused search in EurekaThe highest-cited records describe steam reforming, not electrolysis-based green hydrogen. Build a citation view that filters to post-2015 electrolytic filings before drawing conclusions about influential current art.
Filter citations by IPC in EurekaSeveral named filers show -100% year-on-year activity. Given publication lag, confirm whether this reflects a real pullback or filings still in the pipeline before treating them as inactive.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaThis dataset tracks 910 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine green hydrogen production language with claims touching electrolyzer integration, levelized cost, intermittent operation, purification or compression. That is a bounded search scope, not a count of every hydrogen-related patent — broader searches without the IPC and claim-language restrictions would return a larger number. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true count for 2025 and 2026 filings is understated in any snapshot taken now.
The assignee base is long-tailed rather than dominated by a single filer, with named organisations including Toshiba Corporation (Toshiba) and its energy-systems subsidiary showing among the more active filers and collaborators. Several assignees that were active in prior years show zero filings in the latest tracked year, which may reflect a real slowdown or simply filings still working through the publication pipeline. China accounts for the largest share of receiving-office activity at 500 of 910 records, so filer analysis that ignores Chinese assignees will miss a large part of the picture.
Electrolytic production (IPC class C25B) and non-metallic inorganic compound processing (C01B) together account for over a thousand of the classification hits across the corpus, far ahead of separation, catalysis, water treatment, fuel cells, hydrocarbon refining or gasification. This indicates that core electrolysis chemistry and the associated inorganic-compound handling are the most densely claimed areas, meaning new filings there face denser prior art than filings in adjacent branches like compression or intermittent-load control.
Not clearly. Filings rose from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 165 in 2023, but the 2022 midpoint already sat at 139, close to the eventual peak, and activity has been flat or declining since. Readers should treat the most recent one to two years with caution because of publication lag, but the overall shape of the curve — steep early growth followed by a plateau — is a real signal, not an artifact of missing recent data alone.
Relative to the dense electrolysis and inorganic-chemistry claim clusters, sub-areas such as intermittent-load electrolyzer stack control, integrated compression trains, catalyst regeneration loops and hybrid gasification-electrolysis routes carry noticeably fewer filings. That does not mean these areas are unpatented, but the filing density is thinner, which is generally where a well-drafted first claim has more room to stand without colliding with a large body of prior art.
Go past this page: query the whole green hydrogen production systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.