Book a demo

Greenhouse Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Greenhouse Automation Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/greenhouse-automation-controlled-environment-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Agriculture Technology · Patent Landscape
Greenhouse Automation Patents: Mapping Controlled-Environment Filings
  • Filing is accelerating sharply, not steadily. the midpoint year 2022 shows zero filings against a peak of 12 in the most recent year, so nearly all activity in this dataset is recent.
  • India dominates the filing base. 20 of 28 published records route through the Indian patent office, far ahead of China, EPO and South Korea combined.
  • Horticulture claims dominate, but AI is entering fast. A01G appears in 23 of 28 records while G06N (AI models) already appears in 8, signalling a shift toward algorithmic control claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
28
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
IN
Leading Jurisdiction
54
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families at the intersection of greenhouse climate control, CO2 enrichment, supplemental lighting and environmental control systems, filtered to A01G9/24, A01G7/045 and G05D classifications. It captures 28 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, spanning horticulture-specific hardware claims through to software and AI-driven control logic layered on top of it.

Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year in any trend line understates real filing activity. Treat the latest data point as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1GROWPONICS GREENHOUSE TECH3
  2. 2GALGOTIAS UNIVERSITY2
  3. 3MS ANGITHA K A1
  4. 4Guo Limin1
  5. 5DR PUNGAVI R1
  6. 6MANIPAL UNIVERSITY JAIPUR1
  7. 7FATIMA FIRDOUS NIKHAT1
  8. 8VANIDHASRI R1
  9. 9LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY1
  10. 10DR ADITYA NARAYAN CHAUBEY1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 28-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

From near-zero to double digits in under a decade

Filings moved from 2 in 2017 to 0 at the 2022 midpoint, then to 12 in the most recent year. That non-linear path suggests a recent triggering event — likely falling sensor and compute costs plus AI-control tooling maturing — rather than steady organic growth.

From near-zero to double digits in under a decade0369122201720182019202020212022202320242025122026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Horticulture hardware still anchors the field

A01G (horticulture and forestry) appears in 23 of 28 records, confirming that most filings are still anchored to physical greenhouse structures and environmental hardware. G06Q (business/commerce data processing), G05D and G06N each appear in a meaningful minority, pointing to a growing software and analytics layer riding on top of the hardware base.

Horticulture hardware still anchors the fieldA01G · Horticulture & forestry2382.1%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…1139.3%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…932.1%G06N · Computing based on AI models828.6%G05B · Control & regulating systems725.0%H04W · Wireless communication networks310.7%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery27.1%G06F · Electric digital data processi…27.1%Other517.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 28 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about greenhouse automation controlled environment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative filing
WO2019202495A12019-10-24

WO2019202495A1 — Greenhouse control system

GROWPONICS GREENHOUSE TECHNOLOGY LTD.

The present invention is directed to computerized agricultural systems and methods for controlling and managing plant development, from seeding through harvest, in greenhouses and other agricultural production facilities.Filed by Growponics Greenhouse Technology Ltd., published 2019-10-24, this PCT filing frames greenhouse control as a full lifecycle management system rather than a single-variable controller — a broader claim posture than most of the corpus.

WO2019202495A1 — patent drawing 1WO2019202495A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN205596721U一种基于物联网的智能化多功能庭院温室系统13
2KR1020120072552ASystem and method for controlling a green house11
3KR1020180126277AEnvironment Control Apparatus, Method, and System for Multi-Cover Green House4
4IN202541077870ASystem and method for predicting growth and yield of ficus plants using machine learning2
5WO2019202495A1Greenhouse control system1

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once family counts, filing years and IPC codes are lined up against each other.

Filing velocity
0 → 12
2022 midpoint to peak year

Growth is compressed into the last few years

A flat or empty midpoint followed by a sharp run-up to 12 filings in the most recent year means almost the entire filing history in this space has accumulated recently. Competitive positioning here is still being decided, not settled.

Based on year-by-year filing counts, 2017-2026
Jurisdictional concentration
20 of 28
records filed via India

India is the centre of gravity for this filing set

China, the EPO, South Korea and the WIPO PCT route account for the remainder. A filing strategy built only around China or Europe would miss the majority of the activity captured here.

Based on receiving-office counts across 28 records
Technology layering
8 of 28
records touch G06N (AI models)

AI-based control logic is a distinct, growing claim layer

Nearly a third of records now touch machine-learning classifications alongside traditional G05D/G05B control claims, suggesting predictive and adaptive control logic is becoming a separate front for new filings rather than an incremental feature.

Based on IPC subclass counts across the dataset
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to greenhouse automation controlled environment, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what they are filing on

The assignee base is fragmented rather than concentrated: recent-year momentum is spread across university-affiliated filers rather than a single dominant commercial player.

Recent momentum
2 in latest year
Galgotias University

Academic filers lead current-year activity

Galgotias University shows the strongest recent-year filing count in this dataset, ahead of other university-affiliated applicants such as Lovely Professional University and Vellore Institute of Technology Chennai, both filing in the latest year.

Based on recent-year momentum counts by assignee
Legacy citation base
13 citations
highest-cited record in corpus

Early Chinese and Korean filings still anchor citation counts

The most-cited records in this corpus were filed years before the current filing surge, and their high citation counts reflect time in the corpus more than ongoing commercial relevance today.

Based on citation counts across the 28-record corpus
Collaboration pattern
1 pair
strongest co-assignee link

Co-filing is rare in this dataset

Only one co-assignee pairing recurs, linking two affiliated Xi'an-based entities. Most records in this corpus are filed by a single assignee, with little evidence yet of joint-venture or cross-licensing filing patterns.

Based on co-assignee pair frequency
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches where filing density is still low relative to the core climate-control claim space.
ML-based yield prediction modelsmulti-cover greenhouse environment controlCO2 enrichment dosing algorithmswireless sensor mesh integrationplant-diagnostic imaging tie-ins
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
GALGOTIAS UNIVERSITY2
Lovely Professional University1
VELLORE INST OF TECH CHENNAI1
Growponics Greenhouse Technology Ltd.0
Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)0
Guo Limin0
Xi'an Mingshi Electromechanical Development Co., Ltd.0
Xi'an Mingshi CNC Machine Tool Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The filing surge captured here is recent and still forming. Two follow-on questions matter most for anyone deciding where to file or partner.

Track the AI-control claim layer separately

G06N appears alongside traditional control classifications in a growing share of records. Watch whether these become independent claim sets or stay bundled with hardware claims.

Explore AI-control filings in Eureka →

Watch India's filing base for commercial conversion

The bulk of records here are Indian-filed and skew academic. Whether these convert into PCT or commercial filings over the next 18 months will signal whether this is a research wave or a market entry.

Monitor filing conversion in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Greenhouse Automation Controlled Environment in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole greenhouse automation controlled environment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.