Book a demo

Grid-Forming Inverter for EV Charging Patent Landscape

Grid-Forming Inverter for EV Charging Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Grid-Forming Inverter for EV Charging Patent Landscape in 2026

Grid-forming inverter IP for EV charging is a nascent, highly concentrated field anchored in the United States, with Ford Global Technologies leading a small set of corporate and start-up filers. Filing activity has accelerated sharply from 2023 onward, signaling early-stage commercialization pressure rather than a mature, crowded space.

18
Patent families in scope
75%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Ford leads a tight cluster of nine filers in an early-stage field

Ford Global Technologies holds the top position with 4 patent families, followed by PXISE Energy Solutions with 3 and Innovation Asset Collective and Robert Bosch each with 2. The remaining filers each hold a single family, confirming a sharply tiered competitive structure.

The top five filers account for 75% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers — an exceptionally high concentration ratio that reflects the field’s immaturity and the absence of broad-based industrial participation.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Ford Global Technologies LLC4
2PXISE Energy Solutions LLC3
3Innovation Asset Collective2
4Robert Bosch Corp2
5Indian Institute of Technology1
6Dhahagani K1
7Muthukumaran M1
8Adaptr Inc1
9Muthukumar R1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Ford’s lead, combined with PXISE’s grid-management focus, suggests that both OEM-side and independent power-systems perspectives are already staking claims, leaving limited room at the top but substantial open territory for differentiated technical approaches.

Filings from 2024 onward are subject to standard patent-publication lag and are under-counted; the apparent modest 2024 figure and the 2026 count should be read as partial, not as signals of declining interest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity surged from 2023 while H02J dominates the technology mix

The filing trend and IPC composition together reveal a field that emerged from near-zero activity before 2023 and is overwhelmingly anchored in grid-systems power supply, with secondary branches in EV propulsion and AC/DC conversion.

Annual filing trend

Zero filings were recorded from 2017 through 2022; 4 families appeared in 2023, followed by a spike to 10 in 2025. The 2024 and 2026 figures are partial due to publication lag and should not be read as troughs or declines — the underlying trajectory from 2023 onward is one of rapid emergence.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2025.020170201802019020200202102022420231202410202532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (Power supply and grid systems) spans the entire corpus, establishing it as the defining IPC branch. B60L (Electric vehicle propulsion) and H02M (Power conversion) each appear at a secondary level, reflecting the dual grid-interface and vehicle-systems character of the technology. H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) and G06F (Digital data processing) are sparse, flagging adjacent territory covered in the white-space section.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 18; B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion 7.H02J · Power supply & gr…18B60L · Electric vehicle …7H02M · Power conversion …7H01M · Batteries, cells …2G06F · Electric digital …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260189053A1Published 2026-07-02

Grid-forming equipment for home backup energy mana…

Ford Global TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

An energy management apparatus and method are disclosed for maintaining power delivery during grid outages. The system includes a grid-forming inverter electrically connected to a grid and an inverter via a distribution line. A controller activates the grid-forming inverter upon detecting a loss of grid power, prompting it to generate a grid-forming signal… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Grid-forming equipment for home backup energy mana… — patent drawingGrid-forming equipment for home backup energy mana… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Emergency Load Management Using A DC Microgrid Dur…42
2Emergency load management using a DC microgrid dur…13
3Grid adapter systems and methods8
4Resilient on-site microgrid system5
5Resilient on-site microgrid system1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the IP structure means for R&D investment decisions

The field’s concentration, nascent filing history, and narrow jurisdictional spread each have distinct implications for teams evaluating where to build, buy, or license grid-forming inverter capability for EV charging.

Maturity

Nascent field with no lifecycle stage confirmed yet

Filing activity was effectively zero before 2023, and the lifecycle stage cannot yet be formally classified from the available evidence. The burst of activity from 2023 onward is consistent with early technical standardization and pilot deployments, but the patent base is too small and too recent to confirm a growth or maturity label. Teams entering now would be doing so ahead of broad-based competition.

Early-stage
Concentration

Top five filers hold 75% of the leading-100 filers’ output

With only nine identified filers and the top five accounting for 75% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, the competitive field is narrow. Ford, PXISE, Innovation Asset Collective, and Robert Bosch constitute the core tier. This concentration means that a new entrant with a differentiated technical angle — particularly outside the H02J core — could establish a meaningful position without displacing incumbents directly.

High concentration
Collaboration

Robert Bosch entities show the only co-filing relationship on record

The sole co-applicant relationship identified in the evidence links Robert Bosch Corp and its German parent entity, with 2 co-filed patent families. This is an internal corporate coordination pattern rather than a cross-industry alliance. No university–industry or OEM–supplier co-filing structures have been confirmed, leaving the ecosystem relatively atomized at this stage.

Limited co-filing
Geography

United States dominates; India and Australia hold minor positions

The United States accounts for 16 of the recorded patent filings, making it the overwhelmingly dominant jurisdiction. India holds 2 filings, Australia 1, and a single WIPO (PCT) application has been recorded. The near-absence of European, Chinese, or Japanese filings is notable given those regions’ EV infrastructure ambitions and suggests either a strategic gap or an early-stage US-first filing posture by current applicants.

US-centric
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Robert Bosch GmbHRobert Bosch Corp2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; the collaboration record reflects co-applicant relationships in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Ford anchors the OEM tier; PXISE leads the independent power-systems entrants

The top two filers approach grid-forming inverter technology from different angles — Ford from the vehicle and vehicle-to-grid integration side, PXISE from grid management and communications infrastructure — creating two distinct but overlapping strategic positions.

Leader · Ford Global Technologies

Ford Global Technologies

Ford leads with 4 patent families concentrated across H02J 3 (grid power systems), B60L 55 (EV propulsion and charging), and H02J 9 (emergency and backup power supply). This spread confirms a vehicle-to-grid integration strategy that spans both the inverter hardware and the grid-support use cases such as emergency load management. Momentum data does not flag Ford as a new entrant, indicating an established filing baseline.

4 patent families
Challenger · PXISE Energy Solutions

PXISE Energy Solutions

PXISE holds 3 patent families and is flagged as a new entrant in the momentum data, meaning all 3 families were filed in the most recent tracked period with no prior-period baseline. Its technology emphasis sits entirely within H02J — specifically H02J 13 (remote grid monitoring and control) and H02J 3 (AC power systems) — positioning it as a grid-side control and management specialist rather than a vehicle-systems player.

3 patent families
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked filers, their IPC subclass profiles, and filing momentum in the full PatSnap Eureka dataset.
Innovation Asset CollectiveRobert Bosch Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
PXISE Energy Solutions LLC3▲ new entrant
Adaptr Inc1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards draw on patent family counts from the applicant ranking and technology focus from IPC subclass analysis.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Battery integration and digital control are under-served adjacent branches

Two IPC branches sit at the sparse periphery of the current corpus. Both have plausible technical relevance to grid-forming inverter systems for EV charging, and the low filing counts suggest they have not yet been systematically addressed by current filers.

H01M · Batteries, cells and fuel cells

Only 2 patent records touch H01M against 18 families in scope, representing 6% of the IPC branch distribution. Battery-state-aware grid-forming control — where the inverter’s synthetic inertia and voltage-support parameters are co-optimized with battery state-of-charge and degradation models — is a technically plausible extension that no current filer appears to have claimed in depth. Adaptr Inc’s single H01M 8 filing (fuel cells) is the only signal of activity in this direction, suggesting early entry remains possible.

Search this in Eureka →

G06F · Electric digital data processing

A single patent record touches G06F, representing 3% of the branch distribution. Digital-twin modeling, real-time optimization algorithms, and AI-based grid-forming reference-signal generation all fall within this space. Given the growing role of software-defined power electronics and the absence of substantive G06F filings among current applicants, this branch is the most accessible adjacent area for a software or controls-oriented entrant.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all IPC branches, filing density, and applicant coverage gaps across the complete grid-forming inverter for EV charging corpus.
H02M advanced modulation for grid-forming controlB60L vehicle-to-grid reactive power support+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is observed from IPC distribution within the 18-family corpus; low count alone does not confirm commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by IPC subclass emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 9 · Power supply & grid systemsH02M 1 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)B60L 53 · Electric vehicle propulsionB60L 55 · Electric vehicle propulsion
Ford Global Technologies LLCStrong · 4Strong · 3AbsentAbsentStrong · 3
Robert Bosch CorpStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Robert Bosch GmbHStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
PXISE Energy Solutions LLCStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Dhahagani KStrong · 1AbsentStrong · 1AbsentAbsent
Muthukumar RStrong · 1AbsentStrong · 1AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own grid-forming inverter landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.