Book a demo

Grid-Forming Inverter for Mining Operations Patent Landscape

Grid-Forming Inverter for Mining Operations Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

Grid-Forming Inverter for Mining Operations Patent Landscape in 2026

The grid-forming inverter for mining operations patent space is small but accelerating, with 29 patent families on record and a 63% recent-window growth rate — driven by a burst of activity centred on 2024. Siemens AG holds a commanding first-mover lead, while power-conversion and grid-systems classes dominate the technology mix, leaving control, software, and energy-storage branches notably under-served.

29
Patent families in scope
100%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+63%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Siemens AG leads a highly concentrated, still-nascent field

With only 29 patent families in scope, grid-forming inverters for mining operations remain an early-stage niche. Siemens AG sits at the top of

The top five filers account for 100% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating extreme concentration. ABB (Schweiz) AG and Adaptr Inc each hold 1 patent family, creating a wide tier gap between Siemens and all challengers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Siemens AG8
2ABB (Schweiz) AG1
3Adaptr Inc1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Siemens AG’s position implies both a defensive moat and a signal of early commercialisation intent in mine-site power systems. The thin challenger base means that a focused filing programme from any industrial-automation or microgrid specialist could rapidly alter the competitive balance.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the true volume for 20242026 is probably higher than current records show. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2024 filing spike atop an H02J/H02M core, with sparse adjacent branches

Two charts together reveal the timing and technological shape of the field: an irregular but rising annual volume and a technology mix concentrated in grid and power-conversion classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019, spiked briefly that year, then lay dormant until surging to 12 families in 2024 — the field’s single largest year. The 2025 and 2026 figures are understated by publication lag and should be read as lower bounds rather than real-activity measures. The lifecycle evidence confirms the field remains in growth phase with annual volume still rising on a multi-year basis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 12 in 2024.020170201882019020200202102022120231220247202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and H02M (power conversion) together account for the bulk of IPC-branch coverage, reflecting the core inverter and microgrid control problem. B60L (electric vehicle propulsion) appears, likely tied to mine-haul electrification overlap. G05B (control and regulating systems), G06Q (business and administrative data processing), G06F (digital data processing), and H01M (batteries and fuel cells) each carry very few records, flagging them as structurally under-developed relative to the dominant classes.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 17; H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.) 15.H02J · Power supply & gr…17H02M · Power conversion …15B60L · Electric vehicle …4G05B · Control & regulat…2G06Q · Business, commerc…2G06F · Electric digital …1H01M · Batteries, cells …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2025261587A1Published 2025-12-26

Power supply system and method for operating a pow…

Abb Schweiz AG

A power supply system for providing, powered by an external power source, a load power to one or more loads is provided. The power supply system includes a power supply bus connectable to the external power source, a first electric component, a first feed forward data link, and a first synchronous condenser configured to output reactive power to the power… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Power supply system and method for operating a pow… — patent drawingPower supply system and method for operating a pow… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Distributed energy resource management system36
2Grid adapter systems and methods8
3Resilient on-site microgrid system5
4Multiport transformer enabled modular multiport po…4
5Distributed energy resource management system4
6Distributed energy resource management system2
7Resilient on-site microgrid system1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of early lifecycle stage, extreme applicant concentration, and sparse adjacent branches creates both risk (dependence on a single leader’s trajectory) and opportunity (open white space in high-value adjacent areas).

Growth

Growth phase: annual filings still rising

The field is classified as Growth, with a 63% recent-window increase and the lifecycle evidence confirming that annual filings are still rising rather than easing from a peak. A 2024 spike to 12 families in a single year is consistent with a nascent technology crossing from research into engineering application. Early movers filing now can still establish foundational positions before the field becomes crowded.

Growth stage
Concentration

Single-leader dominance with negligible challenger depth

Siemens AG holds 8 of the 29 in-scope patent families; the top five filers collectively represent 100% of the top-100 filers’ combined total. This level of concentration in such a small corpus means the competitive dynamics are defined by one incumbent rather than a multi-player race. Any new entrant filing even a handful of families in under-covered branches could become a visible challenger within two to three years.

Highly concentrated
Collaboration

No co-filing activity detected

Evidence pending: the collaboration dataset shows no co-applicant relationships within the current corpus. The absence of joint filings may reflect the field’s early stage, where individual firms are still building proprietary positions before forming alliances. R&D teams should monitor whether Siemens AG or new entrants begin forming consortium or joint-development agreements as the field matures.

No co-filers detected
Geography

US-anchored filing, limited global coverage

The United States leads all jurisdictions with 11 patent records, followed by WIPO PCT filings (4), Australia (3), and Europe via EPO (3). Australia’s presence is notable given its significance as a major mining jurisdiction. Israel, the UAE, Austria, Canada, Germany, India, and Singapore each carry one record, suggesting that most applicants have not yet pursued broad international protection — leaving many mining-active jurisdictions without coverage.

US + AU leading
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family can be counted in multiple jurisdictions.Explore insights →
Leaders

Siemens AG dominates; new entrants DG Matrix and Adaptr emerging on power-conversion and niche routes

The leader board is short but structurally clear: Siemens AG holds the dominant position by family count, while DG Matrix and Adaptr Inc represent the most active new entrants by recent filing momentum.

Leader · Siemens AG

Siemens AG

Siemens AG leads with 8 patent families, focused on H02J 3 (grid-connected power supply systems), H02J 13 (remote control of network systems), and G05B 19 (control and regulating systems). This combination reflects a systemic approach to mine-site grid control rather than inverter hardware alone. Siemens’ trajectory predates 2024, giving it the deepest portfolio foundation in the field.

families: 8
Challenger · DG Matrix

DG Matrix

DG Matrix enters as a new entrant with 11 recent patent families — a notably high volume for a new entrant in a 29-family corpus — concentrated on H02M 1 and H02M 7 (power conversion, AC/DC electronics) and H02J 3 (grid systems). Its technology emphasis on power-conversion hardware distinguishes it from Siemens’ control-layer focus. Its momentum (flagged as a new entrant with 11 recent families) makes it the most active challenger by filing pace.

families: 11 (recent)
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum scores for all applicants in the corpus.
ABB (Schweiz) AGAdaptr Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Adaptr Inc1▲ new entrant
ABB (Schweiz) AG1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts are drawn from the applicant ranking; recent-entrant momentum reflects the most recent filing window.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Control systems, storage integration, and data processing branches remain under-served

Several IPC branches appear at the margin of current activity, representing areas where the core inverter technology intersects with higher-level systems engineering but where few patent families have been filed to date.

G05B · Control & Regulating Systems

Only 2 patent records sit in G05B, representing 5% of IPC-branch coverage. Grid-forming inverters for mining require sophisticated autonomous control logic — frequency and voltage regulation without a utility grid reference — yet this branch is structurally thin. A team with expertise in real-time embedded control or adaptive droop strategies could file foundational claims in an area where neither Siemens nor any challenger has established density. The realistic entry path is via control-algorithm patents that reference the H02J and H02M hardware already in the corpus.

Search this in Eureka →

H01M · Batteries, Cells & Fuel Cells

H01M holds only 1 patent record, a 2% share, despite energy storage being operationally inseparable from grid-forming operation in islanded mine-site microgrids. The sparse coverage likely reflects applicants filing storage claims in separate portfolios rather than integrating them with inverter filings. There is a plausible technical case for hybrid inverter-storage co-optimisation patents that span H02J, H02M, and H01M simultaneously — an approach that Adaptr Inc’s technology profile (which touches B60L 53 and H01M 8) hints at but has not yet developed at scale.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served IPC branches ranked by filing gap and technical adjacency to your core R&D.
G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processingG06F · Electric digital data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. White-space branches are identified by low patent-record count relative to dominant IPC classes in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02M 1 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02M 7 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02M 5 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02J 13 · Power supply & grid systems
Siemens AGStrong · 8AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 5
ABB (Schweiz) AGStrong · 1AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Adaptr IncStrong · 1AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own grid-forming inverter landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.