Book a demo

Grid-Forming Inverter Patent Landscape 2026

Grid-Forming Inverter Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Grid-Forming Inverter Patent Landscape in 2026

Grid-forming inverter IP is in active growth, with filings rising sharply since 2019 and the United States leading as the top filing jurisdiction. General Electric Renovables España leads a moderately concentrated field, though the top five filers account for under a quarter of the leading hundred applicants’ combined output, leaving meaningful room for challengers.

700
Patent families in scope
24%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+169%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

GE Renovables leads a moderately open competitive field

General Electric Renovables España holds the top position with 60 patent families, a clear margin ahead of the second-ranked TMEIC Corp at 26 families. The ranking reveals a tiered structure in which a handful of industrial players and wind-energy specialists dominate, while a diverse tail of utilities, research institutes, and start-ups occupy the lower ranks.

The top five filers — General Electric Renovables España, TMEIC Corp, ABB (Schweiz), Vestas Wind Systems, and Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy — together account for 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output. That share indicates moderate concentration: the leader holds a genuine advantage, but no single player has locked up the space.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1General Electric Renovables España SL60
2TMEIC Corp26
3ABB (Schweiz) AG23
4Vestas Wind Systems A/S21
5Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S20
6GE Infrastructure Technology LLC19
7Vestesen Hybrid Energy ApS17
8Toshiba Mitsubishi-Electric Industrial Systems Corporation16
9Korea Institute of Energy Research16
10Bloom Energy Corporation16
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11GE Vernova Infrastructure Technology LLC14
12Toshiba Corporation12
13Battelle Memorial Institute11
14Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission PLC10
15North China Electric Power University10
16General Electric Company9
17Zhejiang University9
18Elexsys IP Pty Ltd9
19Siemens AG8
20Tianjin University8
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect deep industrial experience in grid-connected power electronics and wind-energy integration, suggesting that meaningful competitive entry requires either differentiated control-algorithm IP or a partnership with grid operators — consistent with the co-filing pattern observed in the collaboration data.

Filings from 2025 and 2026 are understated due to typical patent-publication lag of 12–18 months; counts for those years will rise materially as applications publish. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume has surged since 2019 and the technology core is power-supply grid systems

Two charts frame the competitive dynamics: the annual trend shows when commercial urgency accelerated, and the IPC composition reveals which engineering sub-fields attract the most claims and which remain sparse.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings were minimal through 2018 then accelerated sharply from 2019 onward, reaching a recorded peak of 165 families in 2024. The apparent drop in 2025 and the low 2026 figure reflect publication lag, not a real slowdown — these years will backfill as applications are published. The multi-year window shows a 169% growth rate, firmly placing the field in its growth phase.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 165 in 2024.7201782018372019392020672021952022125202316520241252025322026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (Power supply and grid systems) dominates with 631 records, confirming grid-interface and stability control as the core engineering challenge. H02M (Power conversion) is the second-largest branch with 236 records, reflecting the inverter hardware layer. Downstream application classes — F03D (wind turbines), H02H (protective circuits), G05B (control systems), H02P (motor/generator control), and G06F (digital data processing) — each carry fewer than 45 records, signaling adjacent but comparatively under-served sub-fields.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 631; H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.) 236.H02J · Power supply & gr…631H02M · Power conversion …236F03D · Wind motors (wind…43H02H · Protective circui…38G05B · Control & regulat…27H02P · Control of motors…27G06F · Electric digital …26G01R · Electric & magnet…24↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260100586A1Published 2026-04-09

System and method for protecting grid-forming inve…

Ge Infrastructure Technology LLC

A method for protecting a grid-forming inverter-based resource connected to a power grid from power deviations. The method includes receiving a first feedback signal for a first parameter. The first parameter being one of a power of the grid-forming inverter-based resource or an electrical frequency of the power grid. The method also includes determining a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

System and method for protecting grid-forming inve… — patent drawingSystem and method for protecting grid-forming inve… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1System for handling short circuits on an electrica…43
2Emergency Load Management Using A DC Microgrid Dur…42
3Distributed energy resource management system36
4Design, deployment, and operation of modular micro…31
5Method of starting a wind park29
6Method of starting a wind park28
7具有动态限流功能的构网型逆变器控制方法24
8Using distributed power electronics-based devices …21

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the IP structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of rapid growth, moderate concentration, sparse adjacent branches, and a tightly coupled main technology class creates both competitive risks and exploitable gaps for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Active growth phase — annual filings still rising

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, with a 169% increase over the recent multi-year window and annual filings still rising as of the 2024 recorded peak. Publication lag means 2025–2026 figures will increase further. Entrants who establish foundational claims now can still shape the IP landscape before consolidation begins.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a visible tier gap

The top five filers hold 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined families, and the leader’s 60-family position is more than double the second-ranked player’s 26. Below the top two, the gap narrows — ABB at 23, Vestas at 21, and Siemens Gamesa at 20 form a tight mid-tier. This structure means the leader has a defensible but not impenetrable advantage, and the mid-tier remains genuinely competitive.

Concentration: Moderate
Collaboration

Limited co-filing observed; TMEIC entities the most active co-filers

The only co-filing relationship identified in the evidence is between TMEIC Corp and the related entity TMEIC (the Japanese parent), which share 3 jointly filed patent families. This suggests that collaborative patenting across independent organizations is rare in this space so far, and that most IP is being developed and filed unilaterally. Broader consortium-level co-development agreements may exist outside the patent record.

Collaboration: Early-stage
Geography

US and China lead filings; PCT and EPO routes signal global intent

The United States is the top filing jurisdiction with 172 records, followed closely by China with 152. WIPO (PCT) filings at 92 and the European Patent Office at 86 indicate that leading applicants are pursuing broad international protection rather than limiting themselves to single markets. India at 49 and South Korea at 31 round out the top five, reflecting the global scale-up of grid-modernization programs.

Geography: Global
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
TMEIC CorpTMEIC Corporation (Japan)3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a family can appear in multiple jurisdictions.Explore insights →
Leaders

General Electric Renovables España leads; TMEIC and DG Matrix are accelerating challengers

The leader position is held by an industrial wind-energy specialist with a core focus on grid-interface control, while the challenger tier includes a Japanese power-electronics incumbent and a new-entrant start-up with a hardware-centric approach.

Leader · General Electric Renovables España

General Electric Renovables España

Ranked first with 60 patent families, General Electric Renovables España concentrates its portfolio in H02J 3 (grid power supply systems, 50 families), with secondary positions in H02P 9 (generator control) and F03D 7 (wind turbine control). Filing momentum is strong at 3.5× versus the prior three-year period, indicating continued aggressive portfolio expansion rather than a maintenance posture.

families: 60
Challenger · TMEIC Corp

TMEIC Corp

TMEIC Corp enters the evidence as a new entrant in the recent window with 12 recent families and a trend classified as new entrant, holding 26 total patent families overall. Its technology emphasis sits squarely in H02M 7 (power conversion hardware, 17 families) and H02J 3 (grid systems, 9 families), complemented by DG Matrix — also a new entrant with 11 recent families — whose focus on H02M 1 and H02M 7 hardware suggests a converging hardware-layer competition below the grid-interface software tier.

families: 26
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology-route heatmaps for all 100 tracked applicants.
ABB (Schweiz) AGVestas Wind Systems+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
General Electric Renovables España SL35▲ 3.5× vs prior 3-yr
General Electric Company25▲ +150%
ABB (Schweiz) AG7▼ -50%
Toshiba Mitsubishi-Electric Industrial Systems Corporation5▼ -71%
Vestas Wind Systems A/S14▲ new entrant
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy A/S9▼ -10%
TMEIC Corp12▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant rankings are based on patent family counts within the 700-family corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Protective circuits and control systems are under-served relative to the grid-interface core

Several IPC branches appear in the corpus at low share relative to the dominant H02J class. These represent areas where the current patent footprint is sparse; technical plausibility and entry paths vary by branch.

H02H · Protective circuit arrangements

With 38 records and a 3% share among the hundred largest filers’ output, fault-ride-through and overcurrent-protection circuitry specific to grid-forming operation is notably sparse. Grid-forming inverters must handle fault conditions differently from conventional grid-following designs — particularly for short-circuit current limitation — yet this sub-field has attracted limited dedicated IP. A targeted filing program combining inverter control algorithms with hardware protection topologies could establish a defensible position before larger players move in.

Search this in Eureka →

G05B · Control and regulating systems

At 27 records and a 2% share, advanced control-system architectures for grid-forming inverters — including model-predictive control, adaptive droop, and real-time regulation — remain under-represented. Given the increasing interest in AI-assisted grid management (G06N appears with only 6 records), combining classical control-system patents (G05B) with machine-learning-based adaptive schemes represents a plausible entry path for software-heavy or research-oriented applicants, with realistic technology readiness given existing academic work from institutions such as North China Electric Power University and Zhejiang University already active in the corpus.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level gap analysis across all 41 IPC classes observed in the grid-forming inverter corpus.
H02P · Control of motors and generatorsG06F · Electric digital data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are computed across the hundred largest filers’ combined patent-record counts.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across grid, conversion, and wind sub-classes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02M 7 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02M 1 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02J 13 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systems
General Electric Renovables España SLStrong · 50AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
General Electric CompanyStrong · 34Emerging · 6AbsentAbsentAbsent
Korea Institute of Energy ResearchStrong · 16Strong · 14Strong · 9AbsentAbsent
ABB (Schweiz) AGStrong · 21Moderate · 5Moderate · 8AbsentAbsent
Toshiba Mitsubishi-Electric Industrial Systems CorporationAbsentStrong · 22Moderate · 6AbsentAbsent
Bloom Energy CorporationStrong · 13AbsentModerate · 4Moderate · 5Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own grid-forming inverter landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.