Ground Anchor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing peaked in 2021 at 29 records then fell to 1 by 2024, a -97% drop over that three-year span — the sharpest contraction of any window in the dataset.
- The top 5 assignees hold 40.9% of all 149 records but none of the leading names show any activity in the latest year, so the concentration is historical, not current.
- E02D foundation claims cover 80.5% of records while corrosion-protection and load-monitoring adjacencies like G01L force measurement sit at just 4.7%, leaving room to file narrower, better-supported claims there.
Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 149 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape covers 149 published patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine ground anchor or retaining wall support systems with a technical control point: prestress loss, grout body bond, corrosion protection, proof load testing, anchor spacing, or excavation deformation. The scope is deliberately narrow — it is not every foundation patent, but the subset where anchor performance and its verification are claimed together.
The dataset spans foundation engineering (E02D), tunnel and mine support (E21D), structural components (E04C), and cable/rope hardware (D07B), reflecting how ground anchor claims routinely cross from civil structure into materials and instrumentation.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 149 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
A sharp rise and fall around 2021
Filing rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2021, then contracted to 1 by 2024 — a -97% move over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing, the 2025-2026 tail should not be read as continued decline; it is incomplete data, not a trend line.
Foundation claims dominate; instrumentation is thin
E02D (foundations & earth drilling) appears in 80.5% of the 149 records, far ahead of E21D shaft/tunnel support at 23.5% and E04C structural components at 13.4%. Force and pressure measurement (G01L), the class most tied to proof-load verification, appears in only 4.7% of records — a small footprint for a control point the search terms treat as central.
Shares are the percentage of the 149 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ground anchors and retaining support and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited records
US5423635A — Anchoring element
Filed via PCT and granted in 1995 to Paul Keller Ingenieurbuero AG, this record claims an anchoring element that lets an operator check the intactness of the protective tube enclosing a ground anchor's strands — even after the anchor head has been grouted — by applying a voltage between the strands and earth and measuring the resulting current.The claim ties corrosion-protection verification directly to the anchoring hardware, rather than treating it as a separate test procedure.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5697191A | Manufactured home stabilizing foundation system | 57 |
| 2 | US7416367B2 | Lateral force resistance device | 53 |
| 3 | EP0059070A1 | Steel corrosion protected members | 46 |
| 4 | US4678375A | Covering or liner system and method for constructing the same | 45 |
| 5 | US20070000187A1 | Lateral force resistance device | 39 |
| 6 | US4449855A | Anchor head for a corrosion-protected injected anchor | 38 |
| 7 | US5368414A | Method and system for rehabilitating a bulkhead | 31 |
| 8 | US5444949A | Collapsible ground piercing wheel anchor for motor vehicle | 30 |
| 9 | US3754757A | Tightwire sports equipment | 30 |
| 10 | US4302131A | Anchor elements | 29 |
Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial weight.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for filing decisions
Three patterns stand out once raw counts are put in context.
Leadership is historical, not active
The top 5 assignees combined account for 40.9% of all 149 records, and the top 10 for 54.4%. But recent-year momentum data shows the leading names — including Geo Tech (Pty) Ltd, Dywidag-Systems International, and BBR VT International — at zero filings in the latest tracked year.
A sharp contraction after a single peak year
Filing climbed steadily to a peak of 29 records in 2021, then dropped to 1 by 2024. That magnitude of swing in a niche geotechnical category usually points to a wave of continuation or divisional filings around a core technology rather than a steady market expansion.
Verification hardware is thinly claimed
E02D foundation claims cover 80.5% of the 149 records, but G01L force-and-pressure measurement — the class most relevant to proof load testing — covers only 4.7%. Corrosion protection and grout-bond verification methods sit similarly light relative to the core anchor hardware claims around them.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ground anchors and retaining support, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and what they are not covering
The ranking covers 78 companies across the 149 records in scope — the full set the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
A single leader well ahead of fifth place
The leading assignee holds 16 records against 8 at fifth place and 3 at tenth — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-long-tail field rather than an evenly distributed one.
Filing is spread across US, Europe and Japan
The United States leads with 32 filings, followed closely by the EPO and Japan at 19 each, then the UK at 18. No single office dominates, suggesting anchor and retaining-support technology is being protected as a multi-jurisdiction portfolio rather than concentrated in one home market.
Co-filing is rare and clustered
Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest repeated pairings involve the same small set of individual inventors filing together three times. Joint filing is not a common strategy in this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| GEO TECH (PTY) LTD | 0 | — |
| Dywidag-Systems International GmbH | 0 | — |
| BBR VT INTERNATIONAL LTD | 0 | — |
| Georgia Tech Research Corporation | 0 | — |
| Dyckerhoff & Widmann AG | 0 | — |
| Fosroc International Ltd | 0 | — |
| RAYCHEM LTD | 0 | — |
| USA INTPROP HLDG INC | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The dataset points to a field with historical concentration but thin recent activity in verification-adjacent claims.
Map the verification white space in detail
G01L force-and-pressure measurement sits at just 4.7% of records against an 80.5% base of foundation hardware claims. A focused search on proof-load and grout-bond verification methods would clarify whether this is genuinely open or simply under-indexed by the search terms used here.
Explore white space in EurekaCheck freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records
The most-cited records in this corpus, including corrosion-protection and lateral-force-resistance patents, carry citation counts well above the rest of the set. Any new filing on anchor corrosion protection or lateral load hardware should be checked against these specifically.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaCommon questions about ground anchor patents
The leading assignee in this dataset holds 16 of the 149 records in scope, with a steep drop to 8 records at fifth place and 3 at tenth. That pattern — one clear leader followed by a long tail of smaller filers — means no single company controls the field outright, and the top holders show no filings in the most recent tracked year, so current leadership is more open than historical counts suggest. Anyone assessing freedom to operate should still check the leader's portfolio directly rather than assuming it is inactive.
Filings peaked at 29 records in 2021 and fell to 1 by 2024, a -97% change over that span. This kind of spike-then-drop pattern in a narrow geotechnical category often reflects a cluster of related filings — continuations, divisionals, or a coordinated portfolio build — around a specific technology window rather than a broad market pulling back. Note that publication lags filing by about 18 months, so 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete and should not be read as continued decline.
Force and pressure measurement (G01L), which covers proof-load testing instrumentation, appears in only 4.7% of the 149 records despite the search scope explicitly including proof load testing as a control point. Corrosion protection verification and grout body bond monitoring show similarly thin coverage relative to the 80.5% of records claiming core E02D foundation hardware. These gaps suggest verification and monitoring methods are claimed as afterthoughts within broader anchor patents rather than protected on their own terms.
E02D, foundations and earth drilling, is the dominant class, appearing in 80.5% of the 149 records in scope. E21D, shaft and tunnel support, follows at 23.5%, and E04C structural building components at 13.4%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures do not sum to 100% and should be read as independent shares of the same 149-record base, not as parts of a whole.
US5423635A, granted to Paul Keller Ingenieurbuero AG, claims an anchoring element that allows corrosion-protection integrity checks on a ground anchor's protective tube by applying voltage across the strands and measuring current, even after grouting is complete. It is a specific verification method tied to particular hardware, not a broad claim over ground anchors generally. New filings that use different verification mechanisms, such as fibre-optic or acoustic monitoring instead of electrical continuity testing, would likely sit outside its claim scope, though a formal freedom-to-operate review is the only reliable way to confirm that.
Research Ground Anchors and Retaining Support in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole ground anchors and retaining support corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.