Book a demo

Ground Anchor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Ground Anchor Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ground-anchors-and-retaining-support-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Geotechnical & Foundations
Ground anchor and retaining support patents: who is filing, and where the claim space is still open
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 29 records then fell to 1 by 2024, a -97% drop over that three-year span — the sharpest contraction of any window in the dataset.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 40.9% of all 149 records but none of the leading names show any activity in the latest year, so the concentration is historical, not current.
  • E02D foundation claims cover 80.5% of records while corrosion-protection and load-monitoring adjacencies like G01L force measurement sit at just 4.7%, leaving room to file narrower, better-supported claims there.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
149
Published Records
41%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-97%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 149 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers 149 published patent records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine ground anchor or retaining wall support systems with a technical control point: prestress loss, grout body bond, corrosion protection, proof load testing, anchor spacing, or excavation deformation. The scope is deliberately narrow — it is not every foundation patent, but the subset where anchor performance and its verification are claimed together.Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understate real filing activity; treat 2024 as the last complete year and read 2025-2026 as still filling in.

The dataset spans foundation engineering (E02D), tunnel and mine support (E21D), structural components (E04C), and cable/rope hardware (D07B), reflecting how ground anchor claims routinely cross from civil structure into materials and instrumentation.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1GEO TECH (PTY) LTD16
  2. 2DYWIDAG-SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL GMBH14
  3. 3BBR VT INTERNATIONAL LTD14
  4. 4GEORGIA TECH RES CORP9
  5. 5DYCKERHOFF & WIDMANN AG8
  6. 6FOSROC INT LTD5
  7. 7RAYCHEM LTD5
  8. 8USA INTPROP HLDG INC4
  9. 9EMMA LOUISE HOOD3
  10. 10BABCOCK JOHN W3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 149 records: how filing activity moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A sharp rise and fall around 2021

Filing rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2021, then contracted to 1 by 2024 — a -97% move over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing, the 2025-2026 tail should not be read as continued decline; it is incomplete data, not a trend line.

A sharp rise and fall around 20210815233012017201820192020292021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Foundation claims dominate; instrumentation is thin

E02D (foundations & earth drilling) appears in 80.5% of the 149 records, far ahead of E21D shaft/tunnel support at 23.5% and E04C structural components at 13.4%. Force and pressure measurement (G01L), the class most tied to proof-load verification, appears in only 4.7% of records — a small footprint for a control point the search terms treat as central.

Foundation claims dominate; instrumentation is thinE02D · Foundations & earth drilling12080.5%E21D · Shafts, tunnels & mine support3523.5%E04C · Structural building components2013.4%D07B · Ropes & cables128.1%E01D · Bridges128.1%E04B · Building structures & elements96.0%E04H · Specialised buildings & struct…85.4%G01L · Force & pressure measurement74.7%Other5939.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 149 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ground anchors and retaining support and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative and most-cited records

Representative filing
US5423635A1995-06-13

US5423635A — Anchoring element

PAUL KELLER INGENIEURBUERO AG

Filed via PCT and granted in 1995 to Paul Keller Ingenieurbuero AG, this record claims an anchoring element that lets an operator check the intactness of the protective tube enclosing a ground anchor's strands — even after the anchor head has been grouted — by applying a voltage between the strands and earth and measuring the resulting current.The claim ties corrosion-protection verification directly to the anchoring hardware, rather than treating it as a separate test procedure.

US5423635A — patent drawing 1US5423635A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5697191AManufactured home stabilizing foundation system57
2US7416367B2Lateral force resistance device53
3EP0059070A1Steel corrosion protected members46
4US4678375ACovering or liner system and method for constructing the same45
5US20070000187A1Lateral force resistance device39
6US4449855AAnchor head for a corrosion-protected injected anchor38
7US5368414AMethod and system for rehabilitating a bulkhead31
8US5444949ACollapsible ground piercing wheel anchor for motor vehicle30
9US3754757ATightwire sports equipment30
10US4302131AAnchor elements29

Citation counts favour older records simply by virtue of being searchable longer; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing decisions

Three patterns stand out once raw counts are put in context.

Concentration
40.9% of 149 records
held by top 5 assignees

Leadership is historical, not active

The top 5 assignees combined account for 40.9% of all 149 records, and the top 10 for 54.4%. But recent-year momentum data shows the leading names — including Geo Tech (Pty) Ltd, Dywidag-Systems International, and BBR VT International — at zero filings in the latest tracked year.

Concentration reflects an earlier filing wave, not present-day control of the space.
Filing trajectory
29 → 1 records, 2021-2024
-97% over three years

A sharp contraction after a single peak year

Filing climbed steadily to a peak of 29 records in 2021, then dropped to 1 by 2024. That magnitude of swing in a niche geotechnical category usually points to a wave of continuation or divisional filings around a core technology rather than a steady market expansion.

2025-2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as confirming further decline.
Class coverage
80.5% vs 4.7%
E02D vs G01L record share

Verification hardware is thinly claimed

E02D foundation claims cover 80.5% of the 149 records, but G01L force-and-pressure measurement — the class most relevant to proof load testing — covers only 4.7%. Corrosion protection and grout-bond verification methods sit similarly light relative to the core anchor hardware claims around them.

A record can carry several IPC classes, so these shares are independent, not additive.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ground anchors and retaining support, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and what they are not covering

The ranking covers 78 companies across the 149 records in scope — the full set the data endpoint returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.

Leader
16 records
leading assignee

A single leader well ahead of fifth place

The leading assignee holds 16 records against 8 at fifth place and 3 at tenth — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-plus-long-tail field rather than an evenly distributed one.

None of the top assignees show filings in the latest tracked year.
Receiving offices
US 32 · EPO 19 · Japan 19
top filing jurisdictions

Filing is spread across US, Europe and Japan

The United States leads with 32 filings, followed closely by the EPO and Japan at 19 each, then the UK at 18. No single office dominates, suggesting anchor and retaining-support technology is being protected as a multi-jurisdiction portfolio rather than concentrated in one home market.

Australia and Canada each carry 10 filings, rounding out a genuinely international spread.
Collaboration
8 co-assignee pairs
joint-filing relationships

Co-filing is rare and clustered

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest repeated pairings involve the same small set of individual inventors filing together three times. Joint filing is not a common strategy in this field.

Most records in scope carry a single assignee.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches where record counts are thin relative to the core anchor hardware claims.
proof load test instrumentationgrout body bond monitoringcorrosion protection verification methodsanchor spacing optimisation for excavation deformation controlforce and pressure sensing at anchor head
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
GEO TECH (PTY) LTD0
Dywidag-Systems International GmbH0
BBR VT INTERNATIONAL LTD0
Georgia Tech Research Corporation0
Dyckerhoff & Widmann AG0
Fosroc International Ltd0
RAYCHEM LTD0
USA INTPROP HLDG INC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a field with historical concentration but thin recent activity in verification-adjacent claims.

Map the verification white space in detail

G01L force-and-pressure measurement sits at just 4.7% of records against an 80.5% base of foundation hardware claims. A focused search on proof-load and grout-bond verification methods would clarify whether this is genuinely open or simply under-indexed by the search terms used here.

Explore white space in Eureka

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records

The most-cited records in this corpus, including corrosion-protection and lateral-force-resistance patents, carry citation counts well above the rest of the set. Any new filing on anchor corrosion protection or lateral load hardware should be checked against these specifically.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about ground anchor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Anchors and Retaining Support covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ground Anchors and Retaining Support in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ground anchors and retaining support corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.