Book a demo

Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ground-stations-and-mission-operations-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Space & Satellite Systems · Patent Landscape
Ground stations and mission operations patents: who is filing, and where the claim space is still open
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 175 records, then fell 54% to 80 by 2024 — the most recent complete year on record, since publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
  • The leader holds 104 records, but the ranked leaders' top 5 combined take only 16.9% of all 1,925 records in scope, and the top 10 combined take 25.5% — concentration at the very top, then a long tail.
  • H04B transmission claims sit in 53.9% of records , while control-of-non-electric-variables (G05D) and traffic control (G08G) each sit under 8% — a much thinner claim layer around autonomy and coordination logic.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,925
Published Records
17%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-54%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (175 records) with 2024 (80) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,925 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape covers patent families indexed under ground stations paired with mission-facing functions: remote sensing payload handling, image acquisition, ground antenna design, telemetry control, orbital operation and satellite payload management. The search combines ground segment terms with payload and operations terms, so the corpus sits at the intersection of the physical ground infrastructure and the software and control logic that runs a mission through it. Ground station here spans commercial satcom gateways, remote-sensing downlink sites and government or defence telemetry facilities alike.

The 1,925 records in scope span filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, giving a decade-long view of how claim activity has shifted between the ground hardware side (antennas, RF transmission) and the operations side (orbital control, traffic management, image handling) as satellite constellations have grown denser and more commercial.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1ICEYE OY104
  2. 2THE BOEING CO84
  3. 3THE DIRECTV GRP INC53
  4. 4AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE LTD45
  5. 5VIASAT INC40
  6. 6HUGHES NETWORK SYST38
  7. 7NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP34
  8. 8AEROVIRONMENT INC33
  9. 9SKYSTREAM LLC31
  10. 10PLANET LABS PBC28
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,925 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, the composition shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 125 in 2017 to a peak of 175 in 2021, then declined to 80 by 2024 — a 54% fall over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the true recent-year picture is understated in any raw count.

Filing trend, 2017–2026050100150200125201720182019202017520212022202320242025212026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H04B (transmission, general) appears in 53.9% of all records, far ahead of G01S positioning and radar work (18.2%) and H04W wireless networks (15.2%). Spacecraft-specific claims under B64G sit at 12.6%, while control logic (G05D) and traffic coordination (G08G) each remain under 8% of the corpus — the thinnest layers relative to how central autonomous coordination is becoming to mission operations.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH04B · Transmission (general)1,03753.9%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning35018.2%H04W · Wireless communication networks29215.2%B64G · Cosmonautics & spacecraft24212.6%H04L · Digital information transmissi…23112.0%H01Q · Antennas1527.9%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…1377.1%G08G · Traffic control systems1065.5%Other1,29267.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,925 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ground stations & mission operations patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative record

Representative Patent
US11876597B22024-01-16

Enhanced LDACS system combined with cellular telephone ground stations and associated methods (US11876597B2)

SKYSTREAM LLC

An enhanced L-band Digital Aeronautical Communications System (LDACS) may include cellular telephone ground stations and LDACS ground stations, together with a plurality of LDACS airborne stations, each configured to selectively communicate with either a corresponding LDACS ground station or a corresponding cellular telephone ground station based upon the altitude of the airborne station.Filed by Skystream LLC, published 2024-01-16 — illustrates how ground-station claims are increasingly framed around altitude-conditional switching between aeronautical and cellular links rather than pure RF hardware.

US11876597B2 — patent drawing 1US11876597B2 — patent drawing 2
View full patent record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6405132B1Accident avoidance system1,259
2US7202776B2Method and system for detecting objects external to a vehicle778
3US7085637B2Method and system for controlling a vehicle764
4US6526352B1Method and arrangement for mapping a road701
5US20020198632A1Method and arrangement for communicating between vehicles657
6US20050134440A1Method and system for detecting objects external to a vehicle601
7US20050060069A1Method and system for controlling a vehicle586
8US6163296ACalibration and integrated beam control/conditioning system for phased-array antennas564
9US20030191568A1Method and system for controlling a vehicle536
10US20190154439A1A Method and Apparatus for Cooperative Usage of Multiple Distance Meters524

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this corpus — read them as a signal of historical influence on the field, not of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the filing trend, the technology mix and the assignee concentration are read together.

Filing Momentum
175 → 80
peak (2021) to 2024

The 2021 peak has receded, not vanished

175 records in 2021 fell to 80 by 2024, a 54% decline over three years. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in the raw trend are still filling in and should not be read as a continued fall — the honest read is a cooled-off peak, not a dying field.

Treat 2024 as the last complete comparison year.
Concentration
16.9% / 25.5%
top 5 / top 10 share of 1,925 records

One clear leader, then a long tail

The leading assignee holds 104 records on its own, well ahead of fifth place at 40. Yet the top 5 combined take only 16.9% of all 1,925 records in scope, and the top 10 combined take 25.5% — meaning three-quarters of the corpus sits outside the ranked leaders' top 10, spread across the other 90+ ranked companies and unranked filers.

No single assignee controls the field.
Claim Density
53.9% H04B
share of 1,925 records

Transmission claims dominate; control logic is thin

H04B (general transmission) sits in over half of all records, and G01S positioning work in nearly a fifth. G05D control-of-non-electric-variables and G08G traffic-control classes each sit under 8% of the corpus — a much smaller claim footprint given how much mission-operations language now centres on autonomous coordination between ground and orbit.

Autonomy-adjacent claims remain comparatively open.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ground stations & mission operations patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the openings sit

The ranking covers 100 companies returned by the data endpoint — not a curated top-50 or top-100 list, but the full set the search returns, counted by patent family.

Leader
104 records
leading assignee

A commercial remote-sensing filer sets the pace

The single largest filer holds 104 records, more than double the fifth-place holder's 40. That gap suggests a company building a defensive filing programme around its own constellation and downlink architecture rather than one participant among several comparable filers.

Watch for continuation filings around its core downlink claims.
Momentum
-67% YoY
leader's latest-year change

Recent-year activity has cooled across the named leaders

Several of the most active historical assignees show zero filings in the latest year, and the top-ranked filer's own latest-year count is down 67% year over year. Read this alongside the 18-month publication lag: some of this is real slowdown, some is simply filings not yet published.

Re-check momentum once 2025-26 data fully lands.
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Collaboration is limited and mostly intra-corporate

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pairing links a parent company with its own national subsidiary rather than two independent firms. Cross-company joint filing is not a major feature of this landscape yet.

Joint-venture filings remain rare relative to the total.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense H04B and G01S clusters but carry comparatively few claims in this corpus.
altitude-conditional link switchingautonomous ground-to-orbit traffic coordinationmulti-constellation antenna handoff logictelemetry-driven payload schedulingnon-electric orbital control variables
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ICEYE Oy1-67%
The Boeing Company0
The DIRECTV Group, Inc.0
Airbus Defence and Space Ltd0
HUGHES NETWORK SYST0-100%
ViaSat, Inc.0
AeroVironment, Inc.0
Globalstar, L.P.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific questions worth running down before committing a filing strategy.

Map the white space claim by claim

The gate chips above name sub-areas with thin coverage relative to the H04B and G01S clusters. Running a claims-level search inside those specific branches, rather than the broad ground-station search string, will show whether the gap is real or just under-indexed.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the leader's continuation activity

A 104-record leader with a recent-year drop is either winding down or waiting on publication lag. Monitoring its filing family for new continuations over the next few quarters will settle which.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Re-run the trend once 2025-26 fully publishes

Any conclusion about the field slowing is provisional while the two most recent years are still filling in. Revisit the filing trend after the 18-month publication window closes.

Track filing trends in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ground Stations & Mission Operations Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ground stations & mission operations patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.