Book a demo

GTF FADEC Control Patent Snapshot 2026

GTF FADEC Control Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
GTF FADEC Control Patent Snapshot in 2026

The GTF FADEC Control patent space is highly concentrated, with RTX Corp and its predecessor United Technologies Corporation accounting for all ranked activity. The field peaked in 2021 and annual volume has since eased, placing it in a post-peak lifecycle stage with Europe (EPO) as the primary filing jurisdiction.

7
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

RTX Corp and United Technologies dominate a tightly held niche

RTX Corp leads all ranked applicants by patent records, followed closely by United Technologies Corporation (the corporate predecessor entity). These two organisations together account for the entirety of the top-ranked filers in this space.

The top five filers collectively hold 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, confirming extreme concentration with no meaningful third-party presence in the rankings.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1RTX Corp10
2United Technologies Corporation8
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

This degree of consolidation — effectively a single corporate lineage following the RTX/United Technologies merger — signals that independent challengers have not established a visible patent footprint in this narrowly defined control technology, leaving the field as a proprietary enclave.

Patent publication typically lags filing by 18–24 months; activity in 20242026 should be treated as under-counted pending further publications. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A brief 2020–2021 filing burst followed by a return to dormancy

The annual filing trend and technology composition together reveal a narrow, episodic innovation pattern concentrated in gas-turbine plant control, with virtually all activity attributable to a single corporate family.

Annual filing trend

Filings were absent through 2019, surged to a peak in 2021, then returned to zero in subsequent years. Given the standard 18–24-month publication lag, figures from 2024 onward remain under-counted and should not be read as a confirmed trend. The peak year of 2021 marks the high-water mark for this topic.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2021.02017020180201922020520210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

The IPC branch mix is dominated by F02C (Gas-turbine plants), with secondary presence in F01D (Turbines and non-positive displacement engines) and F02K (Jet and reaction propulsion). This distribution reflects the systems-level nature of FADEC integration in geared turbofan architectures, where engine control touches combustion management, turbine mechanics, and propulsion performance simultaneously.

Technology compositionF02C · Gas-turbine plants leads with 18; F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines 8.F02C · Gas-turbine plants18F01D · Turbines & non-po…8F02K · Jet & reaction pr…8↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US7849668B2Published 2010-12-14

Rotor brake and windmilling lubrication system for…

Rtx Corporation

A journal bearing provides lubrication to planetary gears during windmilling operation of a fan section. A primary oil pump provides oil from an oil supply during driven operation of the fan and a secondary oil pump driven by a generator provides oil during windmilling operation of the fan. The generator acts as a dynamic brake when the aircraft is grounded… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Rotor brake and windmilling lubrication system for… — patent drawingRotor brake and windmilling lubrication system for… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Rotor brake and windmilling lubrication system for…69
2Rotor brake and windmilling lubrication system for…44
3Geared turbofan gas turbine engine with reliabilit…29
4Geared turbofan gas turbine engine with reliabilit…6
5Rotor brake and windmilling lubrication system for…2
6Geared turbofan with over-speed protection1
7Geared turbofan with over-speed protection1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · RTX Corp

RTX Corp

RTX Corp holds the leading position with 10 patent records in this topic. Its technology emphasis spans F02C 7 (Gas-turbine plant accessories and control), F02C 3 (Gas-turbine plants proper), and F02K 3 (Jet and reaction propulsion). No momentum data is available for the recent period, consistent with the post-peak filing pattern observed from 2022 onward.

10 patent records
Challenger · United Technologies Corporation

United Technologies Corporation

United Technologies Corporation is the predecessor entity to RTX Corp, holding 8 patent records. Its IPC emphasis aligns closely with RTX Corp — F02C 7 at the core, with additional coverage in F01D 21 and F01D 25 (turbine fault detection and mechanical structures). The filing activity attributed to this entity predates the corporate consolidation and should be read as part of the same continuous R&D programme.

8 patent records
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
RTX CorpUnited Technologies Corporation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.