Book a demo

GTF Superalloy / CMC / Gear Materials Patent Snapshot

GTF Superalloy / CMC / Gear Materials Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
GTF Superalloy / CMC / Gear Materials Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for GTF superalloy, CMC, and gear materials is highly concentrated, with Rolls-Royce entities holding all identified filings and activity peaking in 2020. Annual volume has since eased, signalling a post-peak phase in which the competitive window remains narrow and technology coverage is concentrated in turbine and gas-turbine plant classifications.

3
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Rolls-Royce holds all ranked positions in a highly concentrated field

Two Rolls-Royce entities — Rolls-Royce Corporation and Rolls-Royce PLC — together occupy both positions in the applicant ranking, making this one of the most concentrated patent spaces observable in advanced propulsion materials.

The top five filers account for 100% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating no meaningful competitive tier gap exists — there is effectively a single-bloc leader with no challenger group in evidence.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Rolls-Royce Corporation3
2Rolls-Royce PLC3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

This level of concentration implies that any new entrant or adjacent player seeking to compete in GTF superalloy, CMC, or gear material patenting would face a field where all prior art anchors to one corporate family, making freedom-to-operate analysis essential before committing R&D resources.

Activity in the most recent 18–24 months is subject to normal publication lag and likely under-represents true filing levels; the apparent zero-activity period from 2022 onward should not be read as confirmed cessation. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2020 and has eased; turbine classifications dominate the technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a brief, concentrated burst of activity centered on 2019–2020, with the technology mix anchored overwhelmingly in turbine and gas-turbine plant classifications and only marginal representation in gearing.

Annual filing trend

A single filing appeared in 2019, followed by the peak of two records in 2020, with no recorded activity before or after. The most recent years are subject to publication lag, so the post-2020 zero counts should be treated as provisional rather than confirmed.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2020.02017020181201922020020210202202023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

F01D (Turbines and non-positive engines) and F02C (Gas-turbine plants) each account for three patent records, establishing them as co-visible branches. F16H (Gearing and transmissions) contributes one record, confirming that gear-material aspects are a peripheral rather than primary focus of this corpus.

Technology compositionF01D · Turbines & non-positive engines leads with 3; F02C · Gas-turbine plants 3.F01D · Turbines & non-po…3F02C · Gas-turbine plants3F16H · Gearing & transmi…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US11408345B2Published 2022-08-09

Oil tank for geared turbofan engine

ROLLS-ROYCE PLC

An oil delivery system is provided that includes a tank for a gas turbine engine, where the tank is positioned radially outward from a compressor section, a combustor section, and/or a turbine section of the gas turbine engine. The tank is configured to store oil for the gas turbine engine. The oil delivery system further includes a primary lubrication… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Oil tank for geared turbofan engine — patent drawingOil tank for geared turbofan engine — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Oil tank for geared turbofan engine2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Rolls-Royce Corporation

Rolls-Royce Corporation

Rolls-Royce Corporation holds 3 patent records and shares co-authorship with Rolls-Royce PLC on all of them. Its technology focus is concentrated in F01D 25 (Turbines and non-positive engines) and F02C 7 (Gas-turbine plants), with one record extending into F16H 57 (Gearing and transmissions). No momentum data is available from the evidence, consistent with the post-peak filing pattern observed from 2020 onward.

patent records: 3
Challenger · Rolls-Royce PLC

Rolls-Royce PLC

Rolls-Royce PLC holds 3 patent records with an identical technology distribution to Rolls-Royce Corporation — F01D 25, F02C 7, and F16H 57 — reflecting coordinated intra-group IP filing rather than an independent challenger strategy. The two entities function as complementary holders within the same corporate family rather than competing filers. No external challengers are present in the evidence.

patent records: 3
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Rolls-Royce CorporationRolls-Royce PLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.