Hardware Security Module Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
Hardware Security Module Patents: Filing Trends and Who Leads
22.9% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees account for 2,214 of 9,680 records in scope, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them. Annual filings rose from 719 in 2017 to a peak of 808 in 2020, then declined; the 730-to-507 drop from 2021 to 2024 (-31%) is the most recent span that can be read as a complete trend, since 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under the usual publication lag.
- 1VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION5.4%
- 2MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC5.0%
- 3CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC4.8%
- 4INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION3.9%
- 5AMAZON TECH INC3.8%
See the full hardware security modules analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about Hardware Security Module patents
Who holds the most Hardware Security Module patents?
The leading assignee in this dataset holds 527 of the 9,680 records in scope, with the field dropping off steeply after that – fifth place holds 365 and tenth place holds 113. The top five combined account for 22.9% of all records and the top ten for 31.4%, which means even the largest holders control a modest slice of a field with a long tail of smaller filers. The mix of leaders spans payment networks, cloud platforms and financial institutions rather than a single dominant chip vendor.
Is Hardware Security Module patent filing growing or slowing?
Filings rose from 719 in 2017 to a peak of 808 in 2020, then declined to 507 by 2024, a 31% drop from 2021’s 730 – the last span that can be read as a complete trend. Filings in 2025 and 2026 will understate real activity because publication typically lags actual filing by about 18 months, so this should not yet be read as a confirmed long-term decline. A clearer read will emerge once another full year or two of publications lands.
What technology areas do Hardware Security Module patents actually cover?
The large majority of records, 69.6%, carry an H04L classification for digital information transmission, and 45.1% carry G06F for general digital data processing. Business and commerce processing (G06Q) and wireless networks (H04W) trail at 16.1% and 11.1%, and the dedicated cipher-and-secret-communication class G09C covers only 2.1% of records. This tells a practitioner that most HSM-relevant claim language is embedded inside transmission or processing systems rather than filed as standalone cryptographic-hardware art, so a narrow search limited to G09C will miss most of the field.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hardware Security Modules covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.