https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/head-up-display-windshields-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Automotive Glazing
Head-Up Display Windshield Patents: Who Holds the Wedge Interlayer Claims
  • One firm anchors the field. the leading assignee holds 18 records against a fifth-place count of 7 and a tenth-place count of 3 — a steep drop-off rather than an even spread across the 18 ranked companies.
  • Filing activity has round-tripped. activity peaked at 22 records in 2021 and the 2021→2024 span (the last complete filing year) shows a -100% swing to 0, though publication lag means 2025-2026 counts are still filling in.
  • Claim density sits in the interlayer, not the display. B32B (layered products) covers 80.2% of the 91 records and G02B (optics) 60.4%, while B60K (vehicle propulsion, likely AR/HUD integration) sits at 22.0% — the electronics side is comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
91
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
18
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (22 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

Head-up display (HUD) windshields solve an optical problem inside a mechanical one: a windshield is a wedge-shaped laminate, and that wedge must hold a precise, tightly-controlled angle across the HUD viewing region or the driver sees a doubled, ghost image. The 91 records in scope span the interlayer chemistry that sets the wedge profile, the glass lamination that carries it, and the optical testing methods used to verify uniformity and eyebox size in production.

Filing here is dominated by glass and interlayer suppliers rather than display or electronics makers, which shows up directly in the technology composition: laminate and optics classes dominate, while vehicle-propulsion-adjacent classes linked to AR-HUD integration are a smaller slice of the same record set.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1SOLUTIA INC18
  2. 2AGP AMERICA18
  3. 3AGC GLASS EUROPE SA17
  4. 4PILKINGTON GRP LTD11
  5. 5PILKINGTON AUTOMOTIVE DEUT GMBH7
  6. 6AGG GLASS EUROPE6
  7. 7CENT GLASS CO LTD5
  8. 8KURARAY EURO GMBH5
  9. 9SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO LTD5
  10. 10AGP WORLDWIDE OPERATIONS GMBH3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 91 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from 10 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2021, then fell to 0 by 2024 — a -100% swing over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 are shown but not yet comparable: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent years understate true activity.

Filing trend, 2017-202606131925102017201820192020222021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B32B (layered products & laminates) appears in 80.2% of the 91 records and G02B (optical elements & systems) in 60.4%, confirming that most claims are written around the interlayer/laminate structure and its optical behaviour rather than the display hardware. B60K (vehicle propulsion & drive), at 22.0%, is the closest proxy for AR-HUD integration claims and is the smallest of the major classes — a gap worth watching. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.

IPC subclass compositionB32B · Layered products & laminates7380.2%G02B · Optical elements & systems5560.4%B60J · Windows, doors & vehicle fitti…3033.0%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions2527.5%B60K · Vehicle propulsion & drive2022.0%B29C · Shaping of plastics66.6%G01N · Material analysis & testing55.5%E06B · Doors, windows & shutters33.3%Other33.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 91 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Head-Up Display Windshields with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about head-up display windshields and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in the field

Representative filing
US20230288699A12023-09-14

Interlayers having enhanced optical performance (US20230288699A1)

SOLUTIA INC.

A wedge-shaped interlayer having reduced dynamic ghosting is provided, wherein the interlayer comprises at least one polymer layer comprising a poly(vinyl acetal) resin and at least one plasticizer, wherein said wedge-shaped interlayer defines a head-up display (HUD) region having a target vertical wedge angle, an actual vertical wedge angle and an absolute wedge angle rate of change, wherein the absolute wedge angle rate of change is less than 3.0 prad/mm throughout the entire HUD region.Filed by Solutia Inc., published 2023-09-14. The claim ties allowable wedge-angle deviation to a numeric rate-of-change ceiling across the entire HUD region, rather than at a single test point — a tighter and more defensible way to claim ghost-image suppression than earlier single-angle specifications.

US20230288699A1 — patent drawing 1US20230288699A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka →
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170232713A1Obscuration having superior strength and optical quality for an automotive laminate90
2US20110189426A1Laminated glazing51
3US20180117883A1Wedge-shaped multilayer interlayer and glass laminate41
4WO2021122848A1Head up display system29
5WO2018122770A1Obscuration having superior strength and optical quality for an automotive laminate26
6US20200333593A1Head-up display with improved Anti-reflection functional coating on windshield25
7US20200290318A1Glass laminate with printed obscuration having superior strength and optical quality22
8US20170297310A1Obscuration having superior strength and optical quality for an automotive laminate21
9US20200290319A1Glass laminate with thin insert obscuration having superior strength and optical quality18
10WO2018081570A1Wedge-shaped multilayer interlayer and glass laminate18

Citation counts are pulled from within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, class mix and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
18 vs 7 vs 3
leader / 5th place / 10th place, by records

One supplier, then a long tail

The leading assignee's 18 records sit well above the fifth-place count of 7 and the tenth-place count of 3. That gap suggests one supplier has built a broad claim position around wedge-interlayer optics, while the rest of the 18 ranked companies hold narrower, more specific filings.

Ranking covers 18 companies, counted in records.
Momentum
22 → 0
peak 2021 vs 2024, filings

A sharp round-trip, not a slow fade

Filing volume peaked at 22 in 2021 and the 2021-2024 span shows a full -100% swing. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 near-zero counts are not yet reliable evidence of a real slowdown — treat 2024 as the last usable data point.

Growth figure taken directly from the dataset's 2021-2024 span.
Claim geography
80.2% vs 22.0%
B32B laminate share vs B60K propulsion-adjacent share, of 91 records

Optical laminate claims crowd the field; integration claims don't

B32B and G02B together dominate the class mix, meaning the wedge-profile interlayer and its optical behaviour are the most heavily claimed territory. B60K, the class closest to vehicle-integration and AR-HUD electronics, covers a much smaller share of the same 91 records — new entrants are more likely to find room there than in interlayer chemistry.

Shares sum to more than 100% because records can carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to head-up display windshields, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where they cluster

The ranked leaders are almost entirely glass and interlayer suppliers, with lamination know-how as the common thread rather than display electronics.

Scale leader
18 records
top of an 18-company ranking

Broadest position in the ranking

The leading assignee's 18 records give it the widest coverage in this field, consistent with a strategy of claiming multiple points along the wedge-interlayer optical-performance curve rather than a single formulation.

Recent-year filings from this assignee show 0 in the latest tracked year, consistent with the field-wide slowdown before the publication-lag window closes.
Co-filing cluster
7 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair, of 8 pairs total

Glass-maker and its regional subsidiary file jointly

The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links a glass group to its own regional automotive subsidiary across 7 shared filings — a sign of centralised IP strategy executed through a local filing entity rather than independent joint development.

8 co-assignee pairs identified across the full record set.
Mid-tier tail
3 records
tenth-place assignee, by records

A wide band of narrower filers

Below the top few names, filers hold single-digit record counts, typically 3 or fewer — consistent with defensive or point-solution filings around specific interlayer formulations or test methods rather than platform-level claims.

Ranking is the full 18-company list returned by the data endpoint, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit adjacent to the dense laminate and optics classes but carry comparatively few records in this set.
AR-HUD vehicle integration claimsdynamic eyebox-size controlcoating-interference correction methodsproduction-tolerance test protocolssensor-fused wedge-angle calibration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Solutia Inc.0
AGP America0
AGC Glass Europe SA0
Pilkington Group Limited0
Pilkington Automotive Deutschland GmbH0
AGC Glass Europe0
Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd.0-100%
Central Glass Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to a field with a dominant interlayer position and a comparatively open integration layer. Two directions follow from that.

Map the wedge-angle claim boundaries precisely

Before filing near ghost-image suppression, chart exactly how the leading assignee's numeric wedge-angle-rate claims are bounded, and where a different measurement basis (e.g. spatial frequency, region size) sits outside them.

Explore claims in Eureka →

Test the AR-HUD integration gap

B60K's comparatively low share of the 91 records suggests vehicle-integration and sensor-fusion claims around HUD windshields are less crowded than the interlayer itself — worth a freedom-to-operate check before committing R&D there.

Run a white-space search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about HUD windshield patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Head-Up Display Windshields covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Head-Up Display Windshields in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole head-up display windshields corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.