Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (22 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
Head-up display (HUD) windshields solve an optical problem inside a mechanical one: a windshield is a wedge-shaped laminate, and that wedge must hold a precise, tightly-controlled angle across the HUD viewing region or the driver sees a doubled, ghost image. The 91 records in scope span the interlayer chemistry that sets the wedge profile, the glass lamination that carries it, and the optical testing methods used to verify uniformity and eyebox size in production.
Filing here is dominated by glass and interlayer suppliers rather than display or electronics makers, which shows up directly in the technology composition: laminate and optics classes dominate, while vehicle-propulsion-adjacent classes linked to AR-HUD integration are a smaller slice of the same record set.
Two views of the same 91 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings ran from 10 in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2021, then fell to 0 by 2024 — a -100% swing over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 are shown but not yet comparable: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent years understate true activity.
B32B (layered products & laminates) appears in 80.2% of the 91 records and G02B (optical elements & systems) in 60.4%, confirming that most claims are written around the interlayer/laminate structure and its optical behaviour rather than the display hardware. B60K (vehicle propulsion & drive), at 22.0%, is the closest proxy for AR-HUD integration claims and is the smallest of the major classes — a gap worth watching. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 91 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about head-up display windshields and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA wedge-shaped interlayer having reduced dynamic ghosting is provided, wherein the interlayer comprises at least one polymer layer comprising a poly(vinyl acetal) resin and at least one plasticizer, wherein said wedge-shaped interlayer defines a head-up display (HUD) region having a target vertical wedge angle, an actual vertical wedge angle and an absolute wedge angle rate of change, wherein the absolute wedge angle rate of change is less than 3.0 prad/mm throughout the entire HUD region.Filed by Solutia Inc., published 2023-09-14. The claim ties allowable wedge-angle deviation to a numeric rate-of-change ceiling across the entire HUD region, rather than at a single test point — a tighter and more defensible way to claim ghost-image suppression than earlier single-angle specifications.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170232713A1 | Obscuration having superior strength and optical quality for an automotive laminate | 90 |
| 2 | US20110189426A1 | Laminated glazing | 51 |
| 3 | US20180117883A1 | Wedge-shaped multilayer interlayer and glass laminate | 41 |
| 4 | WO2021122848A1 | Head up display system | 29 |
| 5 | WO2018122770A1 | Obscuration having superior strength and optical quality for an automotive laminate | 26 |
| 6 | US20200333593A1 | Head-up display with improved Anti-reflection functional coating on windshield | 25 |
| 7 | US20200290318A1 | Glass laminate with printed obscuration having superior strength and optical quality | 22 |
| 8 | US20170297310A1 | Obscuration having superior strength and optical quality for an automotive laminate | 21 |
| 9 | US20200290319A1 | Glass laminate with thin insert obscuration having superior strength and optical quality | 18 |
| 10 | WO2018081570A1 | Wedge-shaped multilayer interlayer and glass laminate | 18 |
Citation counts are pulled from within this searched corpus and favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the trend, class mix and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.
The leading assignee's 18 records sit well above the fifth-place count of 7 and the tenth-place count of 3. That gap suggests one supplier has built a broad claim position around wedge-interlayer optics, while the rest of the 18 ranked companies hold narrower, more specific filings.
Filing volume peaked at 22 in 2021 and the 2021-2024 span shows a full -100% swing. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 near-zero counts are not yet reliable evidence of a real slowdown — treat 2024 as the last usable data point.
B32B and G02B together dominate the class mix, meaning the wedge-profile interlayer and its optical behaviour are the most heavily claimed territory. B60K, the class closest to vehicle-integration and AR-HUD electronics, covers a much smaller share of the same 91 records — new entrants are more likely to find room there than in interlayer chemistry.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to head-up display windshields, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders are almost entirely glass and interlayer suppliers, with lamination know-how as the common thread rather than display electronics.
The leading assignee's 18 records give it the widest coverage in this field, consistent with a strategy of claiming multiple points along the wedge-interlayer optical-performance curve rather than a single formulation.
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links a glass group to its own regional automotive subsidiary across 7 shared filings — a sign of centralised IP strategy executed through a local filing entity rather than independent joint development.
Below the top few names, filers hold single-digit record counts, typically 3 or fewer — consistent with defensive or point-solution filings around specific interlayer formulations or test methods rather than platform-level claims.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Solutia Inc. | 0 | — |
| AGP America | 0 | — |
| AGC Glass Europe SA | 0 | — |
| Pilkington Group Limited | 0 | — |
| Pilkington Automotive Deutschland GmbH | 0 | — |
| AGC Glass Europe | 0 | — |
| Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Central Glass Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a field with a dominant interlayer position and a comparatively open integration layer. Two directions follow from that.
Before filing near ghost-image suppression, chart exactly how the leading assignee's numeric wedge-angle-rate claims are bounded, and where a different measurement basis (e.g. spatial frequency, region size) sits outside them.
Explore claims in Eureka →B60K's comparatively low share of the 91 records suggests vehicle-integration and sensor-fusion claims around HUD windshields are less crowded than the interlayer itself — worth a freedom-to-operate check before committing R&D there.
Run a white-space search in Eureka →Within this 91-record dataset, one supplier leads an 18-company ranking with 18 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 7 and the tenth-place holder at 3. That leader and the other ranked assignees are predominantly glass and interlayer manufacturers rather than automakers or display electronics firms, which reflects where the underlying optical problem — controlling a wedge-shaped laminate's angle precisely enough to avoid ghost images — actually gets solved. The steep drop from first to fifth place suggests a concentrated core with a long tail of narrower filers below it.
A wedge interlayer is the plastic layer laminated between the two glass panes of a windshield, shaped so its thickness varies slightly across the HUD viewing region. That controlled wedge angle prevents the reflected HUD image from doubling into a 'ghost' image caused by reflections off both glass surfaces. Because the tolerance for the wedge angle is extremely tight and directly determines image quality, suppliers file dense claims around the exact angle profiles, rate-of-change limits and manufacturing tolerances — B32B, the layered-products class, covers 80.2% of the 91 records in this dataset for that reason.
Filing activity peaked at 22 records in 2021 and had fallen to 0 by 2024, a -100% swing over that span, which is the last three-year period this dataset can treat as complete. Counts for 2025 and 2026 appear low but should not be read as a real decline yet, because publication typically lags actual filing by roughly 18 months and those years are still filling in. The honest read is that the field ran hot through 2021 and cooled sharply afterward, but a firmer verdict on 2025-2026 needs another year or two of data.
The class composition points to it directly: B32B (laminates) and G02B (optics) together dominate the 91 records, while B60K, the class closest to vehicle and AR-HUD integration, covers only 22.0% of the same set. That gap suggests claims tying wedge-interlayer optics to sensor-fused calibration, dynamic eyebox control, or coating-interference correction are comparatively under-claimed relative to the interlayer chemistry itself. Anyone filing new claims in this field is more likely to find open ground on the integration and testing side than in the core laminate formulation.
US20230288699A1, assigned to Solutia Inc. and published 2023-09-14, claims a wedge-shaped interlayer with a poly(vinyl acetal) resin and plasticizer where the HUD region's wedge angle has an absolute rate-of-change below 3.0 prad/mm across the entire region, not just at a single point. That numeric, region-wide limit is a fairly specific and defensible claim scope — it does not block every wedge-interlayer approach, but it does narrow the room for competitors using the same resin chemistry and a similar rate-of-change basis. Alternatives using different measurement bases (e.g. spatial-frequency uniformity) or different polymer chemistries sit outside its literal scope, though a full freedom-to-operate check would need to confirm that against the full claim set.
Go past this page: query the whole head-up display windshields corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.