Book a demo

Health Privacy & Security Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Health Privacy & Security Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/health-privacy-and-security-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Digital Health & Health Informatics
Health privacy and security patents: where claim density sits and who holds it
  • Filings peaked in 2021 at 16 records and fell to 4 by 2024, a 75% drop over that three-year span — the sharpest contraction in the dataset.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 37.2% of all 86 records while the top 10 hold 64.0%, so concentration builds fast past the fifth-ranked filer.
  • Healthcare informatics (G16H) touches 41.9% of records far ahead of business-process and transmission classes, marking where claim space is most crowded.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
86
Published Records
37%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-75%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (16 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 86 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks 86 published records matched against health privacy and security terms — authentication tokens, encryption keys, security events, protected data, patient records and clinical decision support — layered onto healthcare-specific language. It captures where patient-data protection mechanics intersect with clinical workflow, rather than generic enterprise security filings that never reference health data or clinical decisions.

The scope spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with United States filings dominating the receiving-office mix and PCT applications forming the largest non-national channel. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in any trend understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1PRINCETON BIOCHEMICALS INC9
  2. 2423 ENTERPRISES LLC6
  3. 3GAL EHRLICH6
  4. 4MAIER FENSTER6
  5. 5EHRLICH GAL5
  6. 6FENSTER MAIER5
  7. 7ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION5
  8. 8TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE THE5
  9. 9RPX CORP4
  10. 10THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 86-record set: activity over time, and where those records sit across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than 100% of records.

Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then contracted

Annual filings climbed from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 16 in 2021, then fell to 4 by 2024 — a 75% decline over that three-year window. Years after 2024 are still filling in as publications catch up to filing dates, so the apparent tail-off should not be read as the field slowing.

Filings rose to a 2021 peak, then contracted0510152032017201820192020162021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Healthcare informatics carries the largest share

G16H (healthcare informatics) appears in 41.9% of the 86 records, well ahead of G06Q (business/admin data processing) and H04L (digital transmission), each at 25.6%. Wireless networking (H04W, 18.6%) and AI-based computing (G06N, 10.5%) show meaningful but secondary presence, pointing to where infrastructure and clinical logic claims overlap.

Healthcare informatics carries the largest shareG16H · Healthcare informatics3641.9%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…2225.6%H04L · Digital information transmissi…2225.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1719.8%H04W · Wireless communication networks1618.6%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery1315.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing910.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models910.5%Other5361.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 86 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about health privacy & security patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited and representative filings

Representative Filing
US9419951B12016-08-16

US9419951B1 — System and method for secure three-party communications

RPX CORPORATION

A system and method for communicating information between a first party and a second party, comprising the steps of receiving, by an intermediary, an identifier of desired information and accounting information for a transaction involving the information from the first party, transmitting an identifier of the first party to the second party, and negotiating, by the intermediary, a comprehension function for obscuring at least a portion of the information communicated between the first party and the second party. The data transmission may be made secure with respect to the intermediary by providing an asymmetric key or direct key exchange for encryption of the communication.Filed by RPX Corporation, published 2016-08-16 — part of a family that also includes the two highest-cited records in this set.

US9419951B1 — patent drawing 1US9419951B1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US8316237B1System and method for secure three-party communications1,622
2US20060154642A1Medication & health, environmental, and security monitoring, alert, intervention, information and network sys…1,517
3US7181017B1System and method for secure three-party communications1,316
4US9419951B1System and method for secure three-party communications209
5US8904181B1System and method for secure three-party communications189
6US20140300490A1Wearable computing device for secure control of physiological sensors and medical devices, with secure storag…173
7WO2007027660A2Medication & health environmental, and security monitoring, alert, intervention, information and network syst…131
8US20190282324A1Augmented Reality Device for Providing Feedback to an Acute Care Provider129
9US20130145420A1Secure authentication using mobile device85
10WO2013096954A1Wearable computing device for secure control of physiological sensors and medical devices, with secure storag…67

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three signals stand out once the ranking, trend and IPC composition are read together: where claim density already exists, where activity has cooled, and where the technology composition points to unclaimed combinations.

Concentration
64.0% top-10 share
of 86 records

Ownership concentrates fast after the leader

The single leading assignee holds 9 records, but by the tenth-ranked filer the cumulative share reaches 64.0% of all 86 records in scope. That leaves a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants below rank ten, typical of a field still being staked out rather than dominated by one player.

47 assignees ranked in total
Momentum
16 → 4 records
2021 to 2024

Activity cooled sharply after 2021

Filings fell from a peak of 16 in 2021 to 4 in 2024, a 75% contraction over three years. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, 2025-2026 figures are not yet reliable evidence of a continued decline, but the 2021-2024 drop itself is measured on complete years.

Peak year: 2021
Composition
41.9% G16H
of 86 records

Healthcare informatics anchors the field

G16H appears in 41.9% of records, well ahead of the transmission and business-process classes that each sit at 25.6%. AI-based computing (G06N) and material analysis (G01N) each cover only 10.5% of records, suggesting clinical-decision security paired with modern ML pipelines is comparatively lightly claimed.

8 IPC subclasses tracked
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to health privacy & security patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranked leaders sit alongside a long tail of smaller filers, several of them holding only one or two records. Co-assignment activity is limited, with just 7 recorded pairs in the entire dataset.

Leader
9 records
top-ranked assignee

A single leader, no runaway dominance

The top-ranked assignee holds 9 of the 86 records in scope, with the fifth-ranked filer at 5 and the tenth at 4. That gradient — steep at the top, flattening quickly — means no single entity controls the field outright.

Fifth place: 5 records
Co-filing
7 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Collaboration is rare in this set

Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across all 86 records, and the strongest recurring pairing links the same small cluster of related entities. Most filings in this landscape are single-assignee efforts rather than joint ventures.

Strongest pair: 6 shared records
Channels
55 US filings
of 86 records

US-centric filing with a PCT bridge

United States filings account for 55 of the 86 records, with WIPO (PCT) applications the largest non-national channel at 14. Filing volume through India, Israel, Europe and Australia is comparatively thin, suggesting international protection is still being built out.

PCT filings: 14
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Combinations that appear thin relative to the core informatics and transmission classes
AI-assisted clinical decision authenticationWireless sensor patient-record encryptionCross-device security-event correlation for clinical alertsMaterial-analysis data protection at point of care
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
PRINCETON BIOCHEMICALS INC0
Maier Fenster0
Gal Ehrlich0
MAIER FENSTER0
GAL EHRLICH0
423 ENTERPRISES LLC0
Trustees of Dartmouth College0
Zoll Medical Corporation0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with a settled core and a thinning edge. The next step is deciding whether to file into the crowded informatics claims or target the adjacent combinations that remain lightly covered.

Map claim overlap before drafting

Before drafting new claims in healthcare informatics or transmission security, check the most-cited filings in this set for overlapping mechanics — several trace back to the same underlying family.

Explore the citation network in Eureka

Track the post-2024 filing gap

The 2021-2024 drop is real, but 2025-2026 data is still incomplete. Revisit filing counts once publication catches up before drawing conclusions about the field's current direction.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed combinations

AI-assisted clinical decision authentication and wireless sensor record encryption both sit below the density of the core classes, and may offer cleaner freedom-to-operate.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Health Privacy & Security Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole health privacy & security patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.