Book a demo

Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/heat-pump-clothes-dryer-cycle-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Home Appliances
Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design Patents
  • Five filers hold 63.3% of the field. 76 of 120 records in scope sit with the top five assignees, leaving a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants competing for the remainder.
  • Cycle-transient and frosting claims trail drying-time claims by a wide margin. D06F drying/laundering classifications cover 86.7% of records while F25B refrigeration-cycle classifications cover only 8.3%, pointing to where cycle-level claim space is thinner.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2017 peak of six records a year. The three-year span from 2021 to 2024 shows a 67% drop, though 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete because publication lags filing by about 18 months.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
120
Published Records
63%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 120 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Heat pump clothes dryer cycle design sits at the intersection of laundry appliance engineering and small-scale refrigeration control: compressor sizing, evaporator frosting management, refrigerant charge, and the transient behaviour of the cycle as a load dries. This landscape draws on 120 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that reference heat pump clothes dryers or dryer refrigeration cycles alongside at least one of compressor sizing, evaporator frosting, drying time, energy label performance, refrigerant charge, or cycle transients. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for judging how crowded any one sub-area actually is.

Filing activity is concentrated among appliance manufacturers with existing heat pump dryer product lines, and the record set spans receiving offices in the United States, China, Europe, India, Japan and Germany. The technology composition below shows most records classified under laundering and drying rather than refrigeration itself, which is a useful signal for where claim space is thin.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1QINGDAO HAIER WASHING MASCH CO LTD18
  2. 2QINGDAO HAIER DRUM WASHING MACHINE CO LTD17
  3. 3HAIER GROUP CORP15
  4. 4HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC13
  5. 5SELF PROPELLED RES & DEV SPECIALISTS13
  6. 6LG ELECTRONICS INC13
  7. 7HAIER SMART HOME CO LTD9
  8. 8WHIRLPOOL CORP6
  9. 9QINGDAO JIAONAN HAIER WASHING MACHINE CO LTD5
  10. 10GOLDBERG MICHAEL4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 120 records from different angles: one tracks filing activity over time, the other shows how records are classified across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings peaked at 6 records in 2017 and have declined since; the 2021-to-2024 span shows a 67% drop (3 to 1 records). The most recent one to two years are understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 should not be read as a continued decline yet.

Filing trend, 2017-2026023566201720182019202020216202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

D06F (laundering, drying and ironing) covers 86.7% of the 120 records in scope and F26B (drying) covers 40.8%, confirming this is primarily an appliance-and-drying-process field. F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps) appears in only 8.3% of records, with F25D, F04C, A47L, F24F and F24H each under 3%. Because records can carry multiple classes, these shares add up to more than 100% and should be read against the 120-record total, not against each other.

Technology composition by IPC subclassD06F · Laundering, drying & ironing10486.7%F26B · Drying4940.8%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps108.3%A47L · Cleaning & washing appliances32.5%F04C · Rotary-piston pumps32.5%F25D · Refrigerators & cooling21.7%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation10.8%F24H · Fluid heaters & water heaters10.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 120 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about heat pump clothes dryer cycle design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US8528227B22013-09-10

Apparatus and method for refrigerant cycle capacity acceleration (US8528227B2)

HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC.

The patent describes partitioning available energy in a heat pump clothes dryer into a portion that maintains standard performance and a second portion used to energise an auxiliary heater during the start transient phase, accelerating the dry cycle beyond what the base refrigeration cycle alone would deliver.Filed by Haier US Appliance Solutions; granted 2013-09-10.

US8528227B2 — patent drawing 1US8528227B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20050066538A1Heat pump clothes dryer282
2US7055262B2Heat pump clothes dryer207
3US20060179676A1Heat pump clothes dryer148
4US7665225B2Heat pump clothes dryer91
5US7020985B2Multiple outlet air path for a clothes dryer79
6US20140366397A1Clothes dryer55
7US20120102779A1Apparatus and method for refrigeration cycle elevation by modification of cycle start condition44
8WO2005032322A2Heat pump clothes dryer41
9US8572865B2Apparatus and method for using a hybrid dryer tub for airflow improvement35
10US8601717B2Apparatus and method for refrigeration cycle capacity enhancement30

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited within this searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on later work, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once concentration, classification and citation data are read together.

Concentration
63.3%
of 120 records held by top 5 assignees

The field has a narrow leading group and a long tail

Five assignees hold 76 of the 120 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 94.2%. That leaves very little filing activity outside a small set of established appliance manufacturers, so a new entrant is filing directly against incumbents rather than into open ground.

Based on the full 34-company assignee ranking.
Claim density
86.7% vs 8.3%
D06F share vs F25B share of 120 records

Drying-process claims dominate over refrigeration-cycle claims

D06F laundering and drying classifications appear in 86.7% of records while F25B refrigeration and heat pump classifications appear in only 8.3%. Claim writers have concentrated on drying process and control, leaving the refrigeration-cycle mechanics of the same appliance comparatively open.

Shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes.
Momentum
-67%
change 2021 to 2024 (3 to 1 records)

Recorded filing has slowed, but the most recent years are incomplete

The three-year span from 2021 to 2024 that can be treated as complete shows a drop from 3 to 1 records. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 counts will keep rising as more filings publish, so this should be read as the last confirmed trend point rather than the current state.

Peak year recorded so far is 2017 at 6 records.
Geography
30 / 25 / 20
US / China / EPO receiving-office counts

Filing is spread across three major offices rather than one

The United States (30), China (25) and the European Patent Office (20) each carry a meaningful share of records, with India, Japan and Germany each in single digits. Any freedom-to-operate check needs to clear all three major offices rather than treating one as dominant.

Receiving-office counts, not family counts.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to heat pump clothes dryer cycle design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranking below covers the 34 companies the data endpoint returns for this search, ordered by record count. It is not a top-50 or top-100 list — it is the whole ranked field.

Leader
18
records held by the top-ranked assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the rest of the ranking

The leading assignee holds 18 records, roughly 40% more than the record count at fifth place. That gap suggests a company with a sustained, multi-generation product programme rather than a single filing burst.

Fifth place holds 13 records; tenth place holds 4.
Co-filing
10
strongest co-assignee pairing count

Co-assignee pairs cluster around a small number of inventor teams

The strongest co-assignee pairings recur at a count of 10, which points to stable internal engineering teams or parent-subsidiary filing arrangements rather than one-off joint ventures.

10 co-assignee pairs identified across the dataset.
Tail
94.2%
of 120 records held by the top 10 assignees

Almost nothing is filed outside the top ten assignees

With 113 of 120 records held by ten companies, an entrant outside that group is filing into a field where nearly every prior record already belongs to an established player. Differentiation has to come from a specific technical angle, not from volume.

Remaining 24 assignees in the ranking hold single-digit counts each.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit at the low-density end of the IPC composition and away from the most-cited prior art clusters.
Evaporator frost-sensing control loopsRefrigerant charge optimisation for compact circuitsStart-transient compressor ramp strategiesCycle-level energy-label compliance logicAuxiliary-heater hybrid cycle acceleration
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qingdao Haier Washing Machine Co., Ltd.0
SELF PROPELLED RES & DEV SPECIALISTS0
Qingdao Haier Drum Washing Machine Co., Ltd.0
Haier Group Corporation0
LG Electronics Inc.0
OKRUCH JR NICHOLAS0
BEERS DAVID G0
Haier Smart Home Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this from here

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or competitor tracking.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leading five assignees

With 63.3% of records held by five companies, any new cycle-design filing should be checked against that group's claim scope first, particularly around drying-time and energy-label control logic where D06F density is highest.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Draft claims into the refrigeration-cycle gap

F25B classifications cover only 8.3% of records, well below the drying-process share. Evaporator frosting control and refrigerant charge optimisation are candidate areas for a first claim with less dense prior art to design around.

Explore whitespace claims in Eureka

Track the leading assignee's continuation filings

The top-ranked assignee's 18-record position and the recurring co-assignee pairings suggest an active internal filing programme worth monitoring for continuations that could narrow the refrigeration-cycle gap over time.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Heat Pump Clothes Dryer Cycle Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole heat pump clothes dryer cycle design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.