Book a demo

Heat Pumps Patents: Top Companies, Trends & White Space 2026

Heat Pumps Patents: Top Companies, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/heat-pumps-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Thermal Systems, HVAC & Refrigeration
Heat Pumps Patents: Who Leads and Where the Claim Space Is Still Open
  • 10.7% of all 54,638 records sit with the five leading assignees — concentration exists but a long tail of single- and low-count filers still accounts for the vast majority of the field.
  • Filing volume held roughly flat, -5% from 996 records in 2021 to 944 in 2024, the most recent year that can be treated as complete under an 18-month publication lag.
  • F25B carries 10.0% of records far ahead of the next subclass, showing that core refrigeration-cycle claims are the densest single layer in the landscape, not ancillary control or materials claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
54.6K
Published Records
11%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-5%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (996 records) with 2024 (944) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 54,638 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What the heat pump patent record actually covers

The search set spans 54,638 published records filed against heat pump cycles, working-fluid control and adjacent thermal-management claims between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. It is a broad technical bucket by design: refrigerant circuits, air-conditioning control, domestic water heating and even body-fluid thermal devices all cite the same core mechanical vocabulary — evaporator, condenser, working fluid, temperature sensor — so the corpus mixes appliance-level heat pump cycles with medical and industrial thermal-cycle claims that use the same language.

That breadth matters for anyone using this as a freedom-to-operate signal. A record carrying an F25B refrigeration classification is not necessarily a residential heat pump; it may be an industrial refrigerant circuit, a medical thermal-control device, or a power-plant working-fluid claim. The IPC composition below should be read as where claim density sits across the whole bucket, not as a breakdown of consumer heat pump products alone.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP1,442
  2. 2THE CHEMOURS CO FC LLC1,389
  3. 3DEKA PRODUCTS LP1,346
  4. 4CARRIER CORP838
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC827
  6. 6DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD718
  7. 7BAXTER INT INC600
  8. 8BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA567
  9. 9DENSO CORP541
  10. 10PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORP446
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 54,638-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that carry the underlying technical claims.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Published records rose from 847 in 2017 to a peak of 1,139 in 2022, then eased to 944 by 2024 — a -5% move from the 2021 level of 996. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the roughly 18-month publication lag and should not be read as a decline.

Filing trend, 2017–202603006009001,200847201720182019202020211,1392022202320242025622026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

F25B (refrigeration & heat pumps) leads at 10.0% of the 54,638 records in scope, roughly three times the share of F24F (air conditioning & ventilation) at 3.3%. F01K, F24D, C09K, A61M, F28D and F24H each sit between 2% and 3%, indicating claim activity spread thinly across steam/thermal power, domestic heating, working-fluid materials, medical fluid devices and heat-exchange hardware rather than concentrated in a second dominant class.

Technology composition by IPC subclassF25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps5,46710.0%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation1,7833.3%F01K · Steam & thermal power plants1,6323.0%F24D · Domestic heating systems1,4042.6%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…1,3242.4%A61M · Devices for body fluids1,2892.4%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus1,2762.3%F24H · Fluid heaters & water heaters1,0962.0%Other21,33839.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 54,638 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about heat pumps patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

A representative claim: heat pump cycle inside a clothes-treating appliance

Representative Record
US10240276B22019-03-26

US10240276B2 — Clothes treating apparatus with heat pump cycle and method for controlling the same

LG ELECTRONICS INC.

A clothes treating apparatus that includes a heat pump cycle and a dehumidifying device is provided herein. The clothes treating apparatus may include a case and a drum installed within the case and configured to accommodate an item for drying. A circulation duct may be provided to form an air circulation flow channel that allows air to circulate through the drum. The heat pump cycle may include an evaporator and a condenser disposed to be spaced apart from one another within the circulation duct, the heat pump cycle being configured to absorb heat of air released from the drum through the evaporator and transmit the absorbed heat to air introduced to the drum through the condenser, by using…Abstract truncated as published; filed by LG Electronics, granted 2019-03-26.

US10240276B2 — patent drawing 1US10240276B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the heat pump corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20130201316A1System and method for server based control1,727
2US5359993AApparatus for counting the number of times a medical instrument has been used1,435
3US9044261B2Temperature controlled ultrasonic surgical instruments1,410
4US20060264831A1Portable therapy delivery device with fluid delivery1,177
5US6409722B1Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …1,103
6US6506189B1Cool-tip electrode thermosurgery system1,096
7US6537272B2Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …1,026
8US6176323B1Drilling systems with sensors for determining properties of drilling fluid downhole861
9US7169144B2Apparatus and method for creating, maintaining, and controlling a virtual electrode used for the ablation of …763
10US20150224845A1Active vehicle suspension system700

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat this table as a signal of historical influence, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Read

What the filing pattern tells a decision-maker

Three readings of the same dataset, each pointed at a different question a filing or freedom-to-operate team actually needs answered.

Concentration
10.7% / 15.9%
share of 54,638 records held by top 5 / top 10 assignees

Leadership is real but thin

The five leading assignees together account for 10.7% of all records, and the top ten only reach 15.9%. That is enough to show a durable set of active filers, but it leaves the large majority of the corpus to entities outside the ranked leaders — this is not a field with a dominant gatekeeper.

Read as: no single blocking assignee, but a persistent group worth monitoring.
Filing momentum
-5% (2021→2024)
change in records, 2021 to 2024

Volume has plateaued, not collapsed

Records peaked at 1,139 in 2022 and settled at 944 by 2024, a modest -5% move from the 2021 level. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, 2025–2026 numbers are still incomplete and should not be read as a further drop.

Read as: a mature but still active filing base, not a shrinking one.
Technology spread
10.0% F25B
share of 54,638 records classed under refrigeration & heat pumps

One subclass carries the core claims

F25B holds roughly three times the share of the next-largest subclass, F24F. The remaining subclasses — steam/thermal power, domestic heating, working-fluid materials, medical fluid devices, heat exchangers, water heaters — each sit in the 2-3% band, meaning the field's technical weight sits in the refrigeration cycle itself rather than in any single downstream application.

Read as: cycle-level claims are the densest single layer; application-specific claims are dispersed.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to heat pumps patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who Is Filing

Assignee landscape: a ranked field, not a duopoly

The ranking covers 100 companies across the full record set. The leader holds 1,442 records, fifth place 827, and tenth place 446 — a steady taper rather than a cliff, consistent with the top-10 share of 15.9% of all 54,638 records.

Leader
1,442 records
leading assignee, full ranking

A clear but not dominant leader

The top-ranked assignee holds 1,442 records against a field of 54,638 — a meaningful lead over rank five (827) and rank ten (446), but nowhere near a majority share of the corpus.

Watch for continuation filings around core refrigerant-circuit claims.
Mid-field taper
827 → 446
records, rank 5 to rank 10

Gradual drop-off through the ranked leaders

The gap between fifth and tenth place is a steady taper rather than a sharp cliff, suggesting a genuine competitive set of active filers below the leader rather than a single runner-up.

Useful for identifying secondary licensing or blocking risk beyond the top name.
Co-assignee structure
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings identified

Corporate family filings, not joint ventures

The strongest co-assignee pairs reflect parent-subsidiary filing structures (medical device and regional entities filing jointly) rather than cross-company collaboration, so they should be read as corporate structure signals, not partnership activity.

Relevant when tracing ownership across group entities during diligence.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core refrigeration-cycle claims.
Variable-speed compressor control logicLow-GWP refrigerant blends for retrofit systemsWaste-heat recovery integration with domestic water heatersMulti-zone airflow balancing sensorsHybrid electric-thermal working fluid circuits
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Chemours Company FC, LLC2-93%
DEKA Products Limited Partnership2-33%
Baxter International Inc.1-88%
Baxter Healthcare SA1-88%
Carrier Corporation1-91%
General Electric Company1-80%
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0
Daikin Industries, Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or R&D scoping.

Check claim scope against the representative filing

Any new heat pump cycle design involving a dehumidifying drum path or evaporator-condenser spacing within a circulation duct should be checked against the representative record and its family before committing to a design.

Explore full claim scope in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches before filing

The gate chips above point to sub-areas with comparatively thin filing density; a fuller design-around or whitespace check should confirm this before scoping new claims.

Run a whitespace search in Eureka

Track the ranked leaders' recent momentum

Several leading assignees show sharp year-on-year drops in the latest partial year; given the publication lag, this is more likely reporting delay than a real pullback and is worth re-checking in six months.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the heat pump patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heat Pumps Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Heat Pumps Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole heat pumps patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.