Book a demo

Hemodialysis Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Hemodialysis Machine Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hemodialysis-machines-and-dialyzers-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Medical Equipment
Hemodialysis Machine and Dialyzer Patents: Concentration at the Top, a Flat Filing Curve
  • 51.3% of the field sits with five companies. 470 of 916 records in scope belong to the top five assignees — this is a market with an entrenched core, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 48 and has not recovered. The 2022 midpoint of 36 sits below peak, and momentum data show several leading assignees at zero filings in the latest year.
  • A61M dominates classification at 96.1% of records. B01D separation processes appear in 41.4% of records, but informatics-adjacent classes like G16H and G06F sit at just 3.1% each — a narrow slice of an otherwise crowded field.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
916
Published Records
51%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+94%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the dialysis patent record actually shows

Hemodialysis machines and dialyzers form a mature device category where core mechanical and fluid-handling claims were staked out decades ago, and the current filing record reflects incremental defense of that ground more than a wave of new entrants. The search scope covers 916 records published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to claims touching ultrafiltration control, dialysate preparation, biocompatibility, home hemodialysis and middle-molecule clearance. Filing activity peaked in 2020 at 48 records and has trended flat to down since, with the most recent year understated because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months.

Classification data point to a field still anchored in body-fluid device claims (A61M, 96.1% of records) and separation membrane and filtration claims (B01D, 41.4%), with smaller but persistent activity in sterilization, water treatment, valves, pumps and digital health informatics. The receiving-office spread — led by the United States, Europe and Canada, with meaningful volume in Japan, WIPO and China — indicates the leading assignees are filing for global coverage rather than concentrating in a single jurisdiction.

Filing trend and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1BAXTER INT INC138
  2. 2BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA120
  3. 3DIALITY INC83
  4. 4FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS INC67
  5. 5VANTIVE HEALTH GMBH62
  6. 6VANTIVE US HEALTHCARE LLC60
  7. 7DEKA PRODUCTS LP54
  8. 8FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH52
  9. 9EASYDIAL INC41
  10. 10GAMBRO LUNDIA AB28
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 916-record dataset: activity over time, and where claims cluster across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 20 in 2017 to a peak of 48 in 2020, then eased to 36 at the 2022 midpoint and continued declining toward the present. The final year is partial and undercounts true filing activity because of publication lag.

Filing trend, 2017–2026013253850202017201820194820202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

A61M and B01D together account for the great majority of claim activity; because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares are read against the full 916-record base rather than against each other.

Technology composition by IPC subclassA61M · Devices for body fluids88096.1%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…37941.4%A61L · Sterilising & disinfecting636.9%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment626.8%F16K · Valves & taps394.3%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps283.1%G06F · Electric digital data processi…283.1%G16H · Healthcare informatics283.1%Other17118.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 916 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hemodialysis machines and dialyzers and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

The most-cited prior art in this dataset

Representative Record
US5591344A1997-01-07

US5591344A — Hot water disinfection of dialysis machines, including the extracorporeal circuit thereof

HHD LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

A dialysis machine incorporates a water treatment module, a dialysate preparation module and an extracorporeal circuit including a dialyzer and blood lines connecting to the patient. The machine performs on-line disinfection of all fluid circuits — water treatment, dialysate preparation, blood lines and dialyzer — by circulating water heated to a high disinfection temperature (around 80°C) through the fluid passages for a sufficient time to achieve high-level disinfection.Cited 687 times within this dataset — the single highest citation count in scope.

US5591344A — patent drawing 1US5591344A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5591344AHot water disinfection of dialysis machines, including the extracorporeal circuit thereof687
2US20050131332A1High convection home hemodialysis/hemofiltration and sorbent system617
3US4661246ADialysis instrument with dialysate side pump for moving body fluids522
4US5863421AHemodialysis machine with automatic priming by induced pressure pulses426
5WO1996025214A1Modular home dialysis system366
6US4618343AApparatus for peritoneal dialysis344
7US8029454B2High convection home hemodialysis/hemofiltration and sorbent system334
8US5580460AProcess for determining the operability of the structural components in the dialysis section of a dialyzer of…324
9US5100554AMethod for the in-vivo determination of hemodialysis parameters324
10US5326476AMethod and apparatus for kidney dialysis using machine with programmable memory313

Citation counts inside this searched corpus favour older filings and should be read as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, trend and classification data are read together.

Concentration
51.3% of 916 records
held by top 5 assignees

The core is locked up, not fragmented

Five companies hold 470 of the 916 records in scope, and the top ten combined reach 705 records, or 77.0% of the field. New entrants are filing into a space where a small group already controls the majority of granted and pending claims around core machine and dialyzer architecture.

Concentration figures, assignee ranking
Momentum
Peak 2020, 48 filings
no recovery since

Filing activity has cooled since 2020

The 2022 midpoint of 36 filings sits below the 2020 peak, and recent-year momentum data show several of the largest assignees recording zero filings in the latest year, with year-over-year declines of -75% to -100% among tracked leaders. This reads as consolidation and defensive maintenance rather than an active filing race.

Filing trend, momentum by assignee
Classification
3.1% G16H, G06F
of 916 records each

Digital and informatics claims are thin

Core fluid-handling and separation claims (A61M, B01D) dominate the classification profile, while healthcare informatics and digital data processing classes each cover only 28 records, 3.1% of the field. That is a narrow footprint relative to the machine-hardware claim density surrounding it.

IPC composition table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hemodialysis machines and dialyzers, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it thins out

The ranked leaders account for a large share of filings, but the concentration is steep rather than even — a handful of names sit well ahead of a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

Leader
138 records
top-ranked assignee

A clear leader ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee holds 138 records against a fifth-place figure of 62 and a tenth-place figure of 28 — the drop-off from first to fifth place is steep, and the drop from fifth to tenth is comparatively gentle, pointing to one dominant filer and a cluster of mid-sized competitors behind it.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Co-filing
165 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Corporate structure shows up in the data

The strongest co-assignee pairing in this dataset links two entities within the same corporate family at 165 shared records, consistent with group restructuring or joint IP holding rather than an external collaboration. Only ten co-assignee pairs appear at all, so most filing in this field is done by a single assignee of record.

Co-assignee pairs
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several leading assignees

Even the leaders have slowed

Recent-year momentum figures show multiple top-ranked assignees, including the overall leader by co-filing volume, recording zero filings in the most recent tracked year, with declines as steep as -100% year-over-year for some. This is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a leader pulling away.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Classification shares point to where claim density is thin relative to the core machine and membrane art.
dialysate flow informaticshome hemodialysis automationmiddle-molecule clearance sensingsorbent-based water reclamationvalve-integrated priming controldigital ultrafiltration feedback
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum among the leading assignees
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
DEKA Products LP1-75%
Baxter International Inc.0
Baxter Healthcare SA0
DIALITY INC0-100%
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings Inc.0-100%
Easydial Inc.0
Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH0-100%
Axis International Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking, or scouting under-claimed ground.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited prior art

Before drafting claims around dialysate circuit disinfection or extracorporeal priming, review the highest-citation records in this dataset, several of which have been cited hundreds of times by later filers in the same space.

Explore the prior art table

Track the leaders whose filing has gone to zero

Several top-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Confirm whether that reflects a genuine pullback or a publication-lag artefact before assuming the ground is open.

Review assignee momentum

Scope claims in the thinner informatics classes

G16H and G06F each cover only 3.1% of records despite dialysis machines increasingly carrying embedded software and connectivity. That gap is worth a closer technical read before assuming it is crowded.

See the IPC breakdown
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about hemodialysis machine and dialyzer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hemodialysis Machines and Dialyzers in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hemodialysis machines and dialyzers corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.