Book a demo

Heterogeneous Catalyst Design Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Heterogeneous Catalyst Design Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/heterogeneous-catalyst-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Catalysis & Process Chemistry
Heterogeneous Catalyst Design Patents: Who Still Files, and Where the Claim Space Opens Up
  • Filing has declined since the 2018 peak of 92 records. By 2026 (partial year) filings sit at 11, down from a high of 92 in 2018 — a technology whose patent activity is cooling even as the underlying chemistry stays in production.
  • Every tracked leading assignee shows 0 filings in the latest year. Dow Global Technologies, BASF, Rohm and Haas, DICP, ExxonMobil and Polimeri Europa all report zero filings in the most recent year, several with -100% YoY — a sign the field's incumbents have shifted R&D spend elsewhere or are simply between filing cycles.
  • C07C carbocyclic/acyclic compound claims dominate the IPC overlap. 1,003 of 1,562 records also carry a C07C classification, meaning most catalyst-design claims are anchored to specific downstream chemistries rather than filed as standalone catalyst composition claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,562
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+13%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (69 records) with 2024 (78) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,562 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent families filed against heterogeneous catalyst, supported metal catalyst and catalyst design language, restricted to claims touching active site dispersion, deactivation, regeneration, selectivity or support interaction, and classified under B01J23, B01J35 or B01J37. That scoping keeps the corpus to catalyst-structure and catalyst-performance claims rather than every patent that merely mentions a catalyst in passing.

Coverage runs from 2017 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years of the trend will always look thinner than actual filing activity turns out to be once those applications publish.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC111
  2. 2BASF SE100
  3. 3ROHM & HAAS CO83
  4. 4DALIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES55
  5. 5EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO43
  6. 6COUNCIL OF SCI & IND RES32
  7. 7POLIMERI EUROPA SPA31
  8. 8THE DOW CHEM CO30
  9. 9NESTE OYJ26
  10. 10SHELL INTERNATIONALE RESEARCH MAATSCHAPPIJ BV24
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The trend line and the IPC breakdown together show a field that peaked in 2018 and has been on a declining trajectory since, with claim activity concentrated in a handful of adjacent chemical classes rather than spread evenly across catalysis.

A 2018 peak followed by a multi-year decline

Filings rose to 58 in 2017 and peaked at 92 in 2018. The 2022 midpoint of 69 sat below that peak, and the count has continued down toward 11 by 2026 (partial year) — consistent with a maturing claim space where the foundational composition-of-matter and process claims have already been staked out.

A 2018 peak followed by a multi-year decline02550751005820179220182019202020212022202320242025112026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Catalysis claims travel with downstream chemistry

B01J covers nearly the whole corpus (1,557 of 1,562), which is expected given the search scope. What stands out is the secondary classification: C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) appears in 1,003 records, C07B in 291, and C07D (heterocyclics) in 223 — meaning most heterogeneous catalyst claims are filed in the context of a specific reaction chemistry (hydrogenation, oxidation, cyclization) rather than as a catalyst structure claimed in isolation. C10G (hydrocarbon refining) and C01B (inorganic compounds) each add 126 records, marking refining and inorganic synthesis as smaller but persistent application niches.

Catalysis claims travel with downstream chemistryB01J · Chemical/physical processes & …1,55799.7%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds1,00364.2%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…29118.6%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds22314.3%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…1268.1%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining1268.1%C08F · Addition polymers (vinyl etc.)442.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…412.6%Other32821.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,562 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about heterogeneous catalyst design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited grants and a representative recent filing

Representative filing
US10143997B22018-12-04

US10143997B2 — Stabilized rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst and use thereof

SCG CHEMICALS CO., LTD.

The present invention relates to a stabilized rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst, obtainable by a process comprising contacting a rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst with a stabilizing agent at a temperature in a range from 0-100°C, the stabilizing agent comprising an aliphatic hydrocarbon compound and use thereof.Filed by SCG Chemicals Co., Ltd., granted 2018-12-04 — illustrates how stabilization-agent claims layer on top of an existing catalyst composition rather than replacing it.

US10143997B2 — patent drawing 1US10143997B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4777303AAlcohols production by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids351
2US4804791AAlcohols production by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids333
3US6692717B1Catalytic growth of single-wall carbon nanotubes from metal particles252
4US5061671ACatalyst for the production of alcohols by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids and process for the preparation …244
5US4990655AAlcohols production by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids224
6US3923843AEpoxidation process with improved heterogeneous catalyst199
7US4826795ACatalyst for the production of an alcohol and/or a carboxylic acid ester by hydrogenation of a carboxylic acid185
8WO2000017102A1Catalytic growth of single-wall carbon nanotubes from metal particles169
9US5455352APreparation of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine128
10US5928499AHydroconversion process employing catalyst with specified pore size distribution, median pore diameter by sur…104

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside a searched corpus; read them as a signal of historical influence, not current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns matter more than the raw counts: the citation leaders are decades-old alcohol-hydrogenation patents, the leading assignees have gone quiet in the latest year, and secondary IPC classes point to where catalyst claims actually get used.

Citation concentration
351 citations
top-cited record

Alcohol hydrogenation catalysts anchor the prior art

The five most-cited records in this corpus are all carboxylic-acid-to-alcohol hydrogenation catalysts dating back decades. Any new filing touching hydrogenation catalyst composition or preparation sits downstream of dense, long-settled prior art.

Old grants, still the reference point for examiners.
Filing momentum
0 filings, latest year
across six leading assignees

Incumbents have paused, not exited

Dow Global Technologies, BASF, Rohm and Haas, DICP, ExxonMobil and Polimeri Europa each show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this reads as a filing gap still working through the pipeline rather than a confirmed retreat.

Watch the next two publication cycles before reading this as exit.
Co-filing structure
10 co-assignee pairs
identified

Joint filings are rare and asymmetric

Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset. The Dow Global Technologies / Rohm and Haas pair accounts for 75 co-filed families — far ahead of the next pairing at 17 — suggesting most catalyst-design IP is filed solo rather than through joint ventures.

One dominant pairing, a thin tail behind it.
Downstream anchoring
1,003 records
also classed C07C

Claims are chemistry-specific, not platform-wide

Nearly two-thirds of the corpus carries a C07C classification alongside the catalysis class, meaning most filings claim a catalyst for a named reaction or compound family rather than a general-purpose catalyst architecture.

Reaction-specific claims outnumber platform claims.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to heterogeneous catalyst design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has stopped

The assignee set is led by large industrial chemical companies with decades of hydrogenation and refining catalyst portfolios, several of which show no filings in the latest tracked year. The gap between historical leaders and current momentum is the most useful signal here for a competitive-intelligence read.

Historical leader
75 co-filed families
with Rohm and Haas

Dow Global Technologies

The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset by a wide margin, reflecting a long-running joint filing relationship with Rohm and Haas on catalyst composition and process claims. Zero filings in the latest year, -100% YoY.

Deep joint-filing history, currently quiet.
Historical leader
0 filings, latest year
-100% YoY

BASF

One of the corpus's established filers on supported-metal catalyst claims, now showing no activity in the most recent tracked year. Given publication lag, this may understate filings still moving through the pipeline.

Paused, not confirmed exited.
Research institute
0 filings, latest year
reported

Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP)

A leading Chinese research institute in the assignee set, historically active in catalyst preparation and regeneration claims. Its zero-filing latest year sits alongside the same pattern seen across the corporate leaders.

Institute-side activity has also cooled.
Joint-venture filer
17 co-filed families
with Eni

Polimeri Europa

The second-strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset, filed jointly with Eni. Zero filings in the latest tracked year matches the broader pattern of incumbent quiet.

Second-largest joint-filing relationship in the corpus.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches adjacent to the core corpus that carry comparatively few dedicated filings
catalyst regeneration cycle claimssupport-metal interfacial bonding chemistrydeactivation-resistant dispersion structuresinorganic (C01B) supported catalyst synthesisrefining-grade (C10G) catalyst stabilization
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum by assignee, latest year
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Dow Global Technologies0-100%
BASF SE0-100%
Rohm and Haas Company0
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences0
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company0
Polimeri Europa S.p.A.0
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)0
The Dow Chemical Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing decline and the zero-momentum readings across leading assignees both deserve a closer look before drawing conclusions about the field's direction.

Check publication lag before calling a retreat

Zero filings in the latest year across six leading assignees could reflect the 18-month publication lag rather than an actual pullback. Re-run the assignee momentum view once the next one to two publication cycles land.

Explore assignee trends in Eureka →

Map claim language in the under-claimed branches

Regeneration cycles, support-metal interfacial chemistry and inorganic-supported synthesis show comparatively thin dedicated filing. A claim-language search in these branches can surface freedom-to-operate before a competitor files there.

Run a white-space search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about heterogeneous catalyst design patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Heterogeneous Catalyst Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole heterogeneous catalyst design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.