Heterogeneous Catalyst Design Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has declined since the 2018 peak of 92 records. By 2026 (partial year) filings sit at 11, down from a high of 92 in 2018 — a technology whose patent activity is cooling even as the underlying chemistry stays in production.
- Every tracked leading assignee shows 0 filings in the latest year. Dow Global Technologies, BASF, Rohm and Haas, DICP, ExxonMobil and Polimeri Europa all report zero filings in the most recent year, several with -100% YoY — a sign the field's incumbents have shifted R&D spend elsewhere or are simply between filing cycles.
- C07C carbocyclic/acyclic compound claims dominate the IPC overlap. 1,003 of 1,562 records also carry a C07C classification, meaning most catalyst-design claims are anchored to specific downstream chemistries rather than filed as standalone catalyst composition claims.
Filing growth compares 2021 (69 records) with 2024 (78) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,562 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families filed against heterogeneous catalyst, supported metal catalyst and catalyst design language, restricted to claims touching active site dispersion, deactivation, regeneration, selectivity or support interaction, and classified under B01J23, B01J35 or B01J37. That scoping keeps the corpus to catalyst-structure and catalyst-performance claims rather than every patent that merely mentions a catalyst in passing.
Coverage runs from 2017 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years of the trend will always look thinner than actual filing activity turns out to be once those applications publish.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
The trend line and the IPC breakdown together show a field that peaked in 2018 and has been on a declining trajectory since, with claim activity concentrated in a handful of adjacent chemical classes rather than spread evenly across catalysis.
A 2018 peak followed by a multi-year decline
Filings rose to 58 in 2017 and peaked at 92 in 2018. The 2022 midpoint of 69 sat below that peak, and the count has continued down toward 11 by 2026 (partial year) — consistent with a maturing claim space where the foundational composition-of-matter and process claims have already been staked out.
Catalysis claims travel with downstream chemistry
B01J covers nearly the whole corpus (1,557 of 1,562), which is expected given the search scope. What stands out is the secondary classification: C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) appears in 1,003 records, C07B in 291, and C07D (heterocyclics) in 223 — meaning most heterogeneous catalyst claims are filed in the context of a specific reaction chemistry (hydrogenation, oxidation, cyclization) rather than as a catalyst structure claimed in isolation. C10G (hydrocarbon refining) and C01B (inorganic compounds) each add 126 records, marking refining and inorganic synthesis as smaller but persistent application niches.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,562 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Heterogeneous Catalyst Design with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about heterogeneous catalyst design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited grants and a representative recent filing
US10143997B2 — Stabilized rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst and use thereof
The present invention relates to a stabilized rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst, obtainable by a process comprising contacting a rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst with a stabilizing agent at a temperature in a range from 0-100°C, the stabilizing agent comprising an aliphatic hydrocarbon compound and use thereof.Filed by SCG Chemicals Co., Ltd., granted 2018-12-04 — illustrates how stabilization-agent claims layer on top of an existing catalyst composition rather than replacing it.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4777303A | Alcohols production by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids | 351 |
| 2 | US4804791A | Alcohols production by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids | 333 |
| 3 | US6692717B1 | Catalytic growth of single-wall carbon nanotubes from metal particles | 252 |
| 4 | US5061671A | Catalyst for the production of alcohols by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids and process for the preparation … | 244 |
| 5 | US4990655A | Alcohols production by hydrogenation of carboxylic acids | 224 |
| 6 | US3923843A | Epoxidation process with improved heterogeneous catalyst | 199 |
| 7 | US4826795A | Catalyst for the production of an alcohol and/or a carboxylic acid ester by hydrogenation of a carboxylic acid | 185 |
| 8 | WO2000017102A1 | Catalytic growth of single-wall carbon nanotubes from metal particles | 169 |
| 9 | US5455352A | Preparation of N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine | 128 |
| 10 | US5928499A | Hydroconversion process employing catalyst with specified pore size distribution, median pore diameter by sur… | 104 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside a searched corpus; read them as a signal of historical influence, not current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing strategy
Three patterns matter more than the raw counts: the citation leaders are decades-old alcohol-hydrogenation patents, the leading assignees have gone quiet in the latest year, and secondary IPC classes point to where catalyst claims actually get used.
Alcohol hydrogenation catalysts anchor the prior art
The five most-cited records in this corpus are all carboxylic-acid-to-alcohol hydrogenation catalysts dating back decades. Any new filing touching hydrogenation catalyst composition or preparation sits downstream of dense, long-settled prior art.
Incumbents have paused, not exited
Dow Global Technologies, BASF, Rohm and Haas, DICP, ExxonMobil and Polimeri Europa each show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this reads as a filing gap still working through the pipeline rather than a confirmed retreat.
Joint filings are rare and asymmetric
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset. The Dow Global Technologies / Rohm and Haas pair accounts for 75 co-filed families — far ahead of the next pairing at 17 — suggesting most catalyst-design IP is filed solo rather than through joint ventures.
Claims are chemistry-specific, not platform-wide
Nearly two-thirds of the corpus carries a C07C classification alongside the catalysis class, meaning most filings claim a catalyst for a named reaction or compound family rather than a general-purpose catalyst architecture.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to heterogeneous catalyst design, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and who has stopped
The assignee set is led by large industrial chemical companies with decades of hydrogenation and refining catalyst portfolios, several of which show no filings in the latest tracked year. The gap between historical leaders and current momentum is the most useful signal here for a competitive-intelligence read.
Dow Global Technologies
The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset by a wide margin, reflecting a long-running joint filing relationship with Rohm and Haas on catalyst composition and process claims. Zero filings in the latest year, -100% YoY.
BASF
One of the corpus's established filers on supported-metal catalyst claims, now showing no activity in the most recent tracked year. Given publication lag, this may understate filings still moving through the pipeline.
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP)
A leading Chinese research institute in the assignee set, historically active in catalyst preparation and regeneration claims. Its zero-filing latest year sits alongside the same pattern seen across the corporate leaders.
Polimeri Europa
The second-strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset, filed jointly with Eni. Zero filings in the latest tracked year matches the broader pattern of incumbent quiet.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Dow Global Technologies | 0 | -100% |
| BASF SE | 0 | -100% |
| Rohm and Haas Company | 0 | — |
| Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 0 | — |
| ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | 0 | — |
| Polimeri Europa S.p.A. | 0 | — |
| Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) | 0 | — |
| The Dow Chemical Company | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing decline and the zero-momentum readings across leading assignees both deserve a closer look before drawing conclusions about the field's direction.
Check publication lag before calling a retreat
Zero filings in the latest year across six leading assignees could reflect the 18-month publication lag rather than an actual pullback. Re-run the assignee momentum view once the next one to two publication cycles land.
Explore assignee trends in Eureka →Map claim language in the under-claimed branches
Regeneration cycles, support-metal interfacial chemistry and inorganic-supported synthesis show comparatively thin dedicated filing. A claim-language search in these branches can surface freedom-to-operate before a competitor files there.
Run a white-space search in Eureka →Common questions about heterogeneous catalyst design patents
The dataset shows a peak of 92 filings in 2018 followed by a steady decline toward 11 by 2026, with the 2022 midpoint at 69 already below the peak. This pattern is typical of a claim space where the foundational composition-of-matter and preparation-method patents were filed early, leaving later entrants to compete for narrower improvement claims. It does not mean the underlying chemistry has stopped being used commercially — production and licensing activity can continue for years after patent filing slows. Readers should also account for the roughly 18-month publication lag, which understates the true filing count in the most recent one to two years.
The assignee ranking in this dataset is led by established industrial chemical companies including Dow Global Technologies, BASF, Rohm and Haas, and research institutes such as the Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, alongside refiners like ExxonMobil. Several of these show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which is worth checking against publication lag before assuming a competitive shift. The strongest joint-filing relationship in the corpus is between Dow Global Technologies and Rohm and Haas, with 75 co-filed families — far ahead of the next pairing.
1,003 of the 1,562 records in this corpus also carry a C07C classification, covering acyclic and carbocyclic organic compounds. That overlap means most heterogeneous catalyst claims are filed in the context of a specific reaction — commonly hydrogenation or related organic transformations — rather than as a standalone catalyst architecture claim. For a company evaluating freedom to operate, this means catalyst novelty often has to be assessed jointly with the target reaction chemistry, not in isolation.
US10143997B2, assigned to SCG Chemicals and granted in December 2018, claims a rhenium-based heterogeneous catalyst stabilized by contacting it with a stabilizing agent — an aliphatic hydrocarbon compound — at a temperature between 0 and 100 degrees Celsius. It is a process-and-composition claim over the stabilization step, not over rhenium catalysts generally. Work using rhenium catalysts with a different stabilization chemistry, temperature range, or no stabilization step at all would not fall inside this claim as described in the abstract.
The comparatively thinner IPC classes in this corpus point to the open branches: C01B (inorganic compounds and non-metallic elements) and C10G (hydrocarbon refining) each carry only 126 records against the corpus's 1,562 total, versus over 1,000 for C07C. Regeneration-cycle claims and support-metal interfacial bonding chemistry also appear underrepresented relative to composition and preparation claims. A first claim in these areas would likely target a specific regeneration protocol or interfacial structure tied to a named support material, rather than a broad catalyst composition claim, since the broad composition space is already dense with prior art.
Research Heterogeneous Catalyst Design in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole heterogeneous catalyst design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.