Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
This dataset tracks patent families combining high-barrier film claim language with recyclable, mono-material, bio-based or compostable barrier constructions, filtered to layered-product, container and polymer-processing IPC classes. It captures the shift from conventional multi-material barrier laminates — hard to recycle because they mix incompatible polymers — toward structures engineered to hit oxygen and moisture barrier targets from a single recyclable resin family or a compostable substrate.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line are undercounts of actual filing activity, not a sign that activity has stopped.
Two views of the same 83-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2023, with 2022 sitting at 18 — a plateau rather than continued growth, before the expected 2025-2026 publication-lag dip.
B32B (layered products) and B65D (containers) dominate at 70 and 59 records respectively, confirming this is primarily a structural-laminate field; C08J polymer processing (15) and the smaller coatings, adhesives and food-contact classes trail well behind.
Shares are the percentage of the 83 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about high-barrier film sustainable packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaDisclosed herein is a recyclable barrier film comprising a first layer comprising high density polyethylene; and a barrier layer comprising a polymer other than polyethylene; where the polymer is operative to reduce the oxygen transmission rate through the barrier film relative to the oxygen transmission rate through the first layer; where the barrier layer is present in the barrier film in an amount of less than 5 weight percent, based on the total weight of the barrier film. Disclosed herein too is a method of manufacturing the disclosed barrier film.Granted to Rohm and Haas Company, 2019-11-05. Its parent application, WO2015175871A1, is the single most-cited record in this dataset at 23 citations.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2015175871A1 | Barrier film, methods of manufacture thereof and articles comprising the same | 23 |
| 2 | WO2018203184A1 | A compostable multilayer membrane and cartridge using said membrane | 15 |
| 3 | US20200087056A1 | Compostable multilayer membranes and cartridges using such membranes | 15 |
| 4 | EP4019246A1 | Multilayer polymer barrier film for food packaging | 12 |
| 5 | US10465053B2 | Barrier film, methods of manufacture thereof and articles comprising the same | 8 |
| 6 | EP4424510A1 | Barrier film, laminate, and packaging bag | 5 |
| 7 | US20240149572A1 | Gas barrier film, laminate, and packaging material | 3 |
| 8 | EP4520526A1 | Gas barrier film, packaging film, and packaging bag | 2 |
| 9 | US20230053232A1 | Gas barrier film | 2 |
| 10 | EP4144522A1 | Gas barrier film | 2 |
Citation counts reward older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited — read this as a map of influence on the field to date, not a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four read-throughs from the trend, IPC split and citation data — useful for deciding where a new filing has room to stand.
The climb from 0 filings in 2017 to a peak of 20 in 2023, with 2022 already at 18, points to a field that filled in quickly and then plateaued rather than one still accelerating. New entrants are filing into an already-occupied structural-claim space.
B32B layered-product claims appear in 70 of 83 families and B65D container claims in 59 — the two overlap heavily. Compositional classes like C08L polymer compositions (5) and A23L food applications (1) are comparatively empty.
WO2015175871A1 and its US continuation US10465053B2 sit at the top of the citation table, with the compostable-membrane pair WO2018203184A1 / US20200087056A1 close behind. New filings in recyclable HDPE-based barrier structures will almost certainly be examined against this pair.
Only two co-assignee pairs exist in the entire dataset, and both connect the same corporate family. Joint development deals are not showing up in the patent record — most assignees are filing solo.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to high-barrier film sustainable packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum is essentially flat across the tracked assignees, which lowers the bar for a well-drafted new entrant rather than raising it.
Every major assignee in the momentum table shows zero or flat filings in the latest tracked year, including the two entities behind the strongest co-assignee link. That flatness is partly a publication-lag artefact, but it also means no single filer is visibly consolidating the space right now.
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset — 8 shared filings between two related Dow/Rohm and Haas entities — is also nearly the only collaborative signal present. A second, much smaller pair (2 filings) sits inside the same corporate family.
Europe (28) and the United States (15) take the top two spots, but India's 13 filings ahead of Australia, Canada and China signals that recyclable and compostable barrier claims are being pursued as a regional priority beyond the usual US/EU axis.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| McCormick (UK) Limited | 1 | 0% |
| TOPPAN INC | 0 | — |
| Toppan Holdings Inc. | 0 | — |
| Gualapack S.p.A. | 0 | — |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| Rohm and Haas Company | 0 | — |
| OERLEMANS PACKAGING BV | 0 | — |
| Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is filing, freedom-to-operate, or monitoring.
Coatings (C09D), adhesives (C09J) and food-contact chemistry (A23L) carry a fraction of the records that layered-structure claims (B32B) do. A structural claim filed today competes with 70 prior families; a coatings-chemistry claim competes with far fewer.
Explore white space in EurekaWO2015175871A1 / US10465053B2 and the compostable-membrane pair WO2018203184A1 / US20200087056A1 sit at the centre of this field's prior art. Any new recyclable or compostable barrier filing should be checked against both before drafting claims.
Run a citation map in EurekaZero YoY growth across the tracked assignees, combined with the 2023 peak, suggests the field is between waves rather than in decline. Publication lag means 2025-2026 filings are still arriving.
Track assignee activity in EurekaIn this dataset, a high-barrier film is a laminate or coated structure engineered to slow oxygen and moisture transmission to a target rate, while also meeting a recyclability, mono-material, bio-based or compostable requirement. That combination is what separates this landscape from ordinary multi-material barrier laminates, which achieve barrier performance but are not designed to be recycled or composted afterward. The claims in this dataset overwhelmingly sit in layered-product (B32B) and container (B65D) IPC classes, meaning the inventive step is usually in film structure rather than in a new barrier chemical itself.
Filing activity rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 20 families in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint already at 18 — a plateau rather than a continued climb. The apparent drop in 2025 and 2026 is expected and does not necessarily mean filing has slowed, because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months. Read the trend as flat-to-mature rather than declining, and expect the most recent one to two years to revise upward as more applications publish.
The dataset shows a small set of assignees with the strongest filing and citation activity, headlined by the Dow/Rohm and Haas corporate family, which also holds the strongest co-assignee link in the whole dataset at eight shared filings. Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is flat, with most showing zero year-over-year growth in the latest period. That flatness suggests no single filer is currently pulling decisively ahead, which matters if you are assessing freedom to operate rather than just watching a leaderboard.
US10465053B2, assigned to Rohm and Haas Company, claims a recyclable barrier film built from a high-density-polyethylene first layer plus a distinct barrier layer made of a different polymer, with that barrier layer capped at under 5 weight percent of the total film. It is a continuation of WO2015175871A1, the single most-cited record in this dataset at 23 citations, so any new filing touching HDPE-based recyclable barrier structures with a minority-weight barrier layer should be checked against both. It does not, however, cover barrier structures built on other base resins, compostable substrates, or coating-based rather than co-extruded barrier layers — those routes sit outside its specific claim language.
The clearest gaps sit in classes adjacent to the dominant B32B/B65D structural claims: bio-based barrier coatings for food contact (A23L has just 1 record), compostable adhesive tie-layers (C09J, 6 records), and barrier-relevant surface deposition techniques (C23C, 3 records). These branches use the same underlying barrier-film concept but have drawn far fewer filings than laminate-structure claims, which suggests real room for a well-drafted composition or process claim rather than a structural one. A freedom-to-operate search focused on these specific IPC pockets, rather than the crowded B32B core, is the more efficient starting point.
Go past this page: query the whole high-barrier film sustainable packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.