Book a demo

High-Entropy Alloys Patent Landscape 2026

High-Entropy Alloys Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

High-Entropy Alloys Patent Landscape in 2026

The high-entropy alloys patent field is in sustained growth, with Chinese academic institutions dominating the top ranks and China accounting for the overwhelming majority of filing activity. The competitive structure is moderately concentrated, with the top five filers holding a meaningful but not insurmountable share among the largest filers, leaving room for challengers across alloy composition, additive manufacturing, and surface engineering routes.

3,921
Patent families in scope
18%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+80%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Chinese universities lead a growing but moderately concentrated field

University of Science & Technology Beijing holds the top position with 114 patent families, ahead of Proterial Ltd (94 patent families) — the only major non-academic, non-Chinese entrant in the top tier — and Harbin Institute of Technology (91 patent families). The top twenty applicants are almost entirely Chinese universities and state research institutes, reflecting a field driven by publicly funded research.

The top five filers account for 18% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate rather than extreme concentration. A cluster of institutions — Beijing Institute of Technology, Kunming University of Science & Technology, and Central South University — trails the leader by fewer than 40 patent families, suggesting the top-tier gap can be closed with sustained investment.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING114
2Proterial Ltd94
3Harbin Institute of Technology91
4Beijing Institute of Technology89
5KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH76
6Central South University72
7Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences68
8Dalian University of Technology65
9Northwestern Polytechnical University64
10Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences64
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Xiangtan University56
12South China University of Technology44
13NANJING UNIV OF SCI & TECH44
14Northeastern University (China)42
15Xi’an Jiaotong University42
16POSTECH Academy-Industry Foundation (Pohang University of Science and Technology)41
17Xi’an Technological University40
18Shanghai University38
19Yanshan University35
20AVIC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials35
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of academic filers implies that commercialization pathways — scale-up, process transfer, and application-specific engineering — remain relatively open to industrial players willing to build on a large and accessible prior-art base.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; apparent softening in 20252026 should not be read as a real slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Sustained volume growth with alloy composition at the core and additive manufacturing rising fast

Annual filing volume and technology branch composition together reveal a field that has grown strongly on a multi-year basis while diversifying from pure alloy design into processing and functional applications.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from 178 families in 2017 to a recorded peak of 680 in 2024, representing 80% growth over the recent window. The 2025 and 2026 figures are materially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a decline; the lifecycle assessment confirms the field remains in the Growth stage.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 680 in 2024.178201725420182642019322202042520215522022592202368020245962025582026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C22C (Alloys) is the dominant branch by a wide margin, reflecting that compositional invention — new element combinations and phase design — remains the primary focus. B22F (Powder metallurgy) and C23C (Coating & surface deposition) are the next largest branches, signaling strong interest in near-net-shape fabrication and functional coatings. B33Y (Additive manufacturing / 3D printing) is notable as a fast-growing adjacent area, while branches such as H01M (Batteries & fuel cells), G21C (Nuclear reactors), and H01F (Magnets) illustrate the breadth of end-use ambitions.

Technology compositionC22C · Alloys leads with 3,847; B22F · Powder metallurgy 1,758.C22C · Alloys3,847B22F · Powder metallurgy1,758C23C · Coating & surface…938C22F · Non-ferrous metal…766B33Y · Additive manufact…537B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…180B22D · Metal casting178C22B · Metal extraction …173↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20200316718A1Published 2020-10-08

Fabrication of high-entropy alloy wire and multi-p…

Elmet TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

In various embodiments, metallic wires are fabricated by combining one or more powders of substantially spherical metal particles with one or more powders of non-spherical particles within one or more optional metallic tubes. The metal elements within the powders (and the one or more tubes, if present) collectively define a high entropy alloy of five or… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Fabrication of high-entropy alloy wire and multi-p… — patent drawingFabrication of high-entropy alloy wire and multi-p… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1High-entropy multielement alloys233
2High-temperature resistant alloy with low contents…170
3激光熔覆用高熵合金粉末和高熵合金涂层的制备方法132
4Precipitation Hardening High Entropy Alloy and Met…128
5具有弥散纳米析出相强化效应的高熵合金及其制备方法121
6AlCoCrFeNiTix高熵合金材料及其制备方法107
7Entropy-controlled BCC alloy having strong resista…98
8一种生物医用TiZrNbTa系高熵合金及其制备方法87

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural factors — maturity stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread — shape where new entrants and incumbents should place their bets.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising

The lifecycle assessment places high-entropy alloys firmly in the Growth stage, with annual filings rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. The 80% growth recorded over the recent multi-year window confirms this is not a maturing field. Early movers in emerging sub-routes such as additive manufacturing and energy applications retain a meaningful window to establish strong positions before the field consolidates.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a large academic base

The top five filers hold 18% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers — moderate concentration that leaves significant competitive space. The leading positions are held by universities rather than industrial firms, which means the IP landscape is built largely on academic disclosures. Industrial players face a dense but navigable prior-art environment, particularly in alloy composition, with more open space in processing and application-specific branches.

Moderate HHI
Collaboration

Co-filing concentrated within institutional networks

The most active co-filing pair is Beijing Institute of Technology with its Tangshan Research Institute, with 11 joint filings, followed by Harbin Institute of Technology with its Chongqing Research Institute (7 joint filings) and Northwestern Polytechnical University with its Shenzhen Research Institute (5 joint filings). Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics (Chinese Academy of Sciences) is the most networked node, appearing in three separate collaboration pairs. Collaboration is primarily intra-institutional — main campuses filing with affiliated research branches — rather than cross-sector, suggesting limited industry–academia co-development at scale.

Intra-institutional
Geography

China-centric filing with limited international protection

China accounts for the dominant share of patent records, with the United States the next largest jurisdiction, followed by Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT). South Korea and India are present but at materially lower volumes. Japan, despite Proterial Ltd’s strong ranking, shows relatively few records, suggesting selective rather than broad jurisdictional coverage. Innovators targeting non-Chinese markets face a less crowded filing environment in the US, Europe, and PCT pathways.

China-dominant
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Beijing Institute of TechnologyBeijing Institute of Technology Tangshan Research Institute11
Harbin Institute of TechnologyHarbin Institute of Technology Chongqing Research Institute7
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityNorthwestern Polytechnical University Shenzhen Research Institute5
Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesYantai Advanced Materials and Green Manufacturing Shandong Provincial Laboratory5
Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesYANTAI ZHONGKE RES INST OF ADVANCED MATERIALS & GR…5
University of Science & Technology BeijingXiangtan University4
Central South UniversitySuzhou Laboratory4
Northwestern Polytechnical UniversityNorthwestern Polytechnical University Taicang Yangtze River Delta Research Institute3
Dalian University of TechnologyNortheastern University (China)3
Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of SciencesQingdao Research Center for Resource Chemistry and New Materials3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration pairs are drawn from co-applicant data; geography counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

University of Science & Technology Beijing leads; Proterial Ltd is the sole industrial top-tier player

The top two filers represent structurally different strategic positions: a Chinese research university with accelerating volume and an industrial materials company with deep powder-metallurgy capability but declining recent output.

Leader · University of Science & Technology Beijing

University of Science & Technology Beijing

The leading filer with 114 patent families, USTB’s technology emphasis concentrates on alloy composition (C22C 30 and C22C 1) with a secondary presence in non-ferrous metal treatment (C22F 1). Recent momentum is strong: filings in the most recent period ran at 3.2× the prior three-year rate, confirming an accelerating rather than plateauing trajectory. This positions USTB as the benchmark to track in core alloy design.

families: 114
Challenger · Proterial Ltd

Proterial Ltd

With 94 patent families, Proterial Ltd is the highest-ranked non-academic filer and the only major industrial player in the top tier. Its technology profile is distinctively process-oriented, with powder metallurgy (B22F 1 and B22F 3) as a strong secondary focus alongside alloy composition — reflecting a commercial interest in manufacturable, near-net-shape HEA products. However, recent momentum has declined sharply (−61% versus the prior period), suggesting a strategic repositioning or consolidation phase rather than continued expansion.

families: 94
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, technology profiles, and momentum data for all top-100 filers in high-entropy alloys.
Harbin Institute of TechnologyCentral South University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
University of Science & Technology Beijing55▲ 3.2× vs prior 3-yr
Beijing Institute of Technology33▲ +38%
Harbin Institute of Technology45▲ 4.5× vs prior 3-yr
Proterial Ltd12▼ -61%
Central South University37▲ +76%
Kunming University of Science & Technology31▲ +48%
Northwestern Polytechnical University31▲ +29%
Dalian University of Technology37▲ +76%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent family counts are drawn from the applicant ranking; momentum figures compare recent versus prior filing periods.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC branches sit at notably lower filing density relative to the dominant alloy-composition core, representing areas where the prior-art environment is less crowded and where HEA properties offer plausible technical value.

B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D printing)

With 537 patent records, additive manufacturing represents approximately 5% of the branch mix — large enough to confirm real activity, but sparse relative to the 3,847-record alloy-composition core. HEAs present specific challenges for AM (solidification cracking, elemental segregation, oxidation) that are not fully addressed by adapting conventional alloy AM parameters. Researchers and equipment makers with HEA-specific powder design or process control know-how have a realistic entry path before this branch densifies.

Search this in Eureka →

B82Y · Nanotechnology applications

At 180 patent records and roughly 2% of the branch mix, nanotechnology applications of HEAs — including nanostructured coatings, nano-precipitate-strengthened alloys, and HEA nanoparticle catalysts — remain lightly covered. The intersection with catalysis (B01J, 54 records) and electrolytic production (C25B, 111 records) suggests functional nano-HEA materials for energy conversion and storage are an adjacent technical space with low prior-art density and growing scientific interest.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See filing density, trend direction, and key filers across all adjacent IPC branches in high-entropy alloys.
C22B · Metal extraction & refiningH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; share figures are relative to the top-branch record count.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading institutions differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerC22C 30 · AlloysC22C 1 · AlloysB22F 9 · Powder metallurgyB22F 1 · Powder metallurgyC22F 1 · Non-ferrous metal treatment
University of Science & Technology BeijingStrong · 105Strong · 86AbsentAbsentModerate · 23
Harbin Institute of TechnologyStrong · 86Strong · 60Moderate · 19Emerging · 17Emerging · 16
Beijing Institute of TechnologyStrong · 91Strong · 70AbsentAbsentModerate · 35
Proterial LtdStrong · 77AbsentModerate · 30Strong · 53Moderate · 31
Central South UniversityStrong · 73Strong · 52Moderate · 28Moderate · 22Moderate · 16
Kunming University of Science & TechnologyStrong · 72Strong · 39Moderate · 23Moderate · 18Absent
Dalian University of TechnologyStrong · 67Strong · 60AbsentAbsentModerate · 22
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own high-entropy alloys landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.