High-Salinity Membrane Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- One assignee dominates. A single filer holds 56 of the 80 families in scope, with the rest split thinly across ten other entities — a structure closer to a single occupied core than a competitive field.
- Filing is climbing again after a lull. Activity peaked at 7 filings in 2017, cooled, then grew from 1 filing in 2021 to 3 in 2024 — a 200% rise over that span, even as the most recent years remain undercounted due to publication lag.
- Separation and water treatment classes dominate the claim space. B01D (separation processes) touches 87.5% of the 80 records and C02F (water treatment) 56.3%, leaving smaller classes like C01D, C25B and B01F comparatively open.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
What this landscape covers
High-salinity membrane processes cover the methods used to recover clean water and value from streams too concentrated for conventional reverse osmosis — forward osmosis with engineered draw solutions, membrane distillation, and the scaling-inhibitor chemistry that keeps concentrate lines from fouling. The 80 patent families in this dataset span filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search anchored on osmotic pressure, draw solution, membrane distillation, wetting resistance, recovery ratio and scaling inhibitor terms alongside high-salinity and forward-osmosis-brine language.
The record set is small enough that a single assignee's filing decisions move the whole trend line, and citation activity concentrates on a handful of foundational osmotic-separation filings from the mid-2010s. That combination — a dominant filer plus early, heavily-cited core patents — is the first thing to understand before reading the rest of the page.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 80-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims sit in.
Filing trend
Filings peaked at 7 in 2017, then dropped before recovering — 1 filing in 2021 rising to 3 in 2024, a 200% increase across that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in given typical publication lag, so treat the most recent bars as a floor, not a ceiling.
IPC composition
B01D (separation processes) appears in 87.5% of the 80 records and C02F (water and wastewater treatment) in 56.3%, confirming this is fundamentally a filtration-and-treatment corpus. C01D, C25B and B01F each sit at 5.0% or under, marking them as thin rather than empty.
Shares are the percentage of the 80 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on High-Salinity Membrane Processes with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about high-salinity membrane processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filings that anchor this field
US20230234869A1 — Production of potable water using chemically forced precipitation
The disclosure provides two integrated methods for the production of potable water from seawater or other brackish waters using chemical forced precipitation. The process is closed loop, recycling process reactants to produce potable water and commercially valuable salts. A computer software method of process variable control maintains the chemical forced precipitation process salt, solvent and water concentrations to optimise water production, and the process is designed to require less energy than alternative water production routes, drawing on solar or waste heat where available.Filed by Richardson, Robert George — 2023-07-27.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20120267307A1 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 91 |
| 2 | US20120267306A1 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 70 |
| 3 | WO2011053794A2 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 37 |
| 4 | US20160002073A1 | Renewable desalination of brines | 29 |
| 5 | US20140224716A1 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 28 |
| 6 | US20140224718A1 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 19 |
| 7 | US9039899B2 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 15 |
| 8 | WO2014126925A1 | Renewable desalination of brines | 11 |
| 9 | CN104591456A | 一种高盐氨氮废水的处理方法 | 11 |
| 10 | US20180155218A1 | Osmotic separation systems and methods | 9 |
Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus — read this table as a map of technical influence to date, not current commercial weight.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs of the dataset that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
One filer set the technical agenda
With 56 of the 80 families in scope, the leading assignee's early osmotic-separation filings are also the most-cited records in the set. New entrants are effectively filing around an incumbent claim base rather than into open territory.
Activity is rebuilding from a low base
The three-year rise from 1 filing in 2021 to 3 in 2024 is a real recovery in absolute terms, but the base is small enough that a couple of filings from any one entrant would shift the curve again.
Separation claims are the crowded lane
B01D separation-process claims touch the large majority of records, and C02F water-treatment claims cover more than half. Anyone filing a pure membrane or filtration claim is filing into the densest part of the map.
The core patents predate the recent activity
The five most-cited records are early-2010s osmotic-separation filings from the dominant assignee. Recent filers are building adjacent to, not on top of, that citation core — a sign the foundational claims are settled rather than contested.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to high-salinity membrane processes, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and who has gone quiet
The assignee ranking covers 11 companies and individual inventors — the entire ranking the dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. Recent-year activity across the named assignees reads flat, which is consistent with a corpus this size and with the publication lag on 2025-2026 records.
The dominant filer holds the foundational claims
The leading assignee's share of the ranked set includes the most-cited osmotic-separation filings, giving it effective control of the core forward-osmosis draw-solution claim territory that the rest of the field cites into.
Everyone else is filing in small numbers
Fifth place and tenth place both sit at 2 families, meaning most of the remaining ten entities have filed only once or twice. This is a field with one occupied core and a scattering of single-filing entrants around it.
Collaboration is limited and inventor-linked
The strongest co-assignee pairs connect the leading corporate filer to named individual inventors rather than to other companies, suggesting the collaborative structure here is closer to inventor-founder arrangements than cross-company joint development.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Oasys Water Inc | 0 | — |
| Fluid Technology Solutions (FTS) Inc | 0 | -100% |
| MCGINNIS ROBERT L | 0 | — |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Industry, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation | 0 | — |
| China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) | 0 | — |
| ZUBACK JOSEPH E | 0 | — |
| RICHARDSON ROBERT GEORGE | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or a fresh filing.
Check freedom-to-operate against the citation core
Before filing a forward-osmosis or draw-solution claim, run the most-cited early filings from the dominant assignee against your specific claim language — that citation cluster is where overlap risk concentrates.
Explore citation mapping in EurekaTest the under-claimed classes for a narrower filing
C01D, C25B and B01F carry far fewer records than B01D or C02F. A claim built around salt recovery chemistry or draw-solution regeneration mixing has more room to establish novelty.
Run a white-space search in EurekaTrack the 2024 rebound as more data lands
With 2025 and 2026 filings still incomplete due to publication lag, revisit the trend once those years settle to see if the 2021-2024 growth continues or was a one-off.
Set up filing alerts in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
One assignee holds 56 of the 80 patent families in this dataset, making it by far the largest filer in the field. That same assignee's early filings are also the most-cited records in the set, which means its claim position covers both volume and technical influence. The remaining ten ranked entities each hold far smaller counts, with fifth and tenth place both at 2 families, so the field outside the leader is a long tail rather than a second tier of comparable competitors.
Filing peaked at 7 records in 2017, then fell before recovering to a smaller but real rise from 1 filing in 2021 to 3 in 2024, a 200% increase over that span. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look low but publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so those years are not yet complete and should not be read as a slowdown. The honest read is a small field rebuilding from a low base, not a maturing or declining one.
The large majority of records, 87.5% of the 80 in scope, carry a B01D separation-process classification, and 56.3% also carry a C02F water-and-wastewater-treatment classification, since many filings claim both together. Smaller classes — C01D alkali-metal compounds, C25B electrolytic production and B01F mixing — each appear in 5% or fewer records, marking them as thinly claimed rather than absent. That split shows the field is anchored in filtration and treatment engineering, with salt-recovery and electrochemical valorisation still emerging.
The clearest openings sit in the classes with low record counts relative to the core: C01D alkali-metal salt recovery, C25B electrolytic brine valorisation, and B01F mixing methods tied to draw-solution regeneration each cover 5% or less of the 80 records. These branches sit adjacent to the dense B01D and C02F core rather than outside the field entirely, so a claim there still needs to be drafted carefully around the dominant assignee's existing osmotic-separation filings. A first claim in these areas would likely centre on the chemistry or process control step rather than the membrane or draw-solution architecture itself, which is already heavily claimed.
US20230234869A1 claims a closed-loop chemically-forced precipitation process for producing potable water and salts from seawater or brackish water, including a software-based process control method for managing salt, solvent and water concentrations. It sits outside the dominant assignee's forward-osmosis and draw-solution claim territory, so it does not block membrane-based approaches directly, but anyone using chemical precipitation with computer-controlled concentration management for brine treatment should review its claim scope closely. Because it is a relatively recent filing (2023), its practical blocking effect will depend on how the granted claims are eventually construed.
Research High-Salinity Membrane Processes in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole high-salinity membrane processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.