Book a demo

High-Salinity Membrane Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

High-Salinity Membrane Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/high-salinity-membrane-processes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Water Infrastructure
High-Salinity Membrane Process Patents: Who Holds the Ground and Where It's Still Open
  • One assignee dominates. A single filer holds 56 of the 80 families in scope, with the rest split thinly across ten other entities — a structure closer to a single occupied core than a competitive field.
  • Filing is climbing again after a lull. Activity peaked at 7 filings in 2017, cooled, then grew from 1 filing in 2021 to 3 in 2024 — a 200% rise over that span, even as the most recent years remain undercounted due to publication lag.
  • Separation and water treatment classes dominate the claim space. B01D (separation processes) touches 87.5% of the 80 records and C02F (water treatment) 56.3%, leaving smaller classes like C01D, C25B and B01F comparatively open.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
80
Published Records
+200%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
11
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

High-salinity membrane processes cover the methods used to recover clean water and value from streams too concentrated for conventional reverse osmosis — forward osmosis with engineered draw solutions, membrane distillation, and the scaling-inhibitor chemistry that keeps concentrate lines from fouling. The 80 patent families in this dataset span filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search anchored on osmotic pressure, draw solution, membrane distillation, wetting resistance, recovery ratio and scaling inhibitor terms alongside high-salinity and forward-osmosis-brine language.

The record set is small enough that a single assignee's filing decisions move the whole trend line, and citation activity concentrates on a handful of foundational osmotic-separation filings from the mid-2010s. That combination — a dominant filer plus early, heavily-cited core patents — is the first thing to understand before reading the rest of the page.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1OASYS WATER INC56
  2. 2CHINA CAMC ENG HONGKONG CO LTD12
  3. 3FLUID TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS FTS INC4
  4. 4MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH3
  5. 5RICHARDSON ROBERT GEORGE2
  6. 6ZUBACK JOSEPH E2
  7. 7BEIJING RES INST OF CHEM IND CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEM CORP2
  8. 8MCGINNIS ROBERT L2
  9. 9CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP2
  10. 10MCGINNIS ROBERT2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 80-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims sit in.

Filing trend

Filings peaked at 7 in 2017, then dropped before recovering — 1 filing in 2021 rising to 3 in 2024, a 200% increase across that three-year window. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in given typical publication lag, so treat the most recent bars as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing trend02468720172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC composition

B01D (separation processes) appears in 87.5% of the 80 records and C02F (water and wastewater treatment) in 56.3%, confirming this is fundamentally a filtration-and-treatment corpus. C01D, C25B and B01F each sit at 5.0% or under, marking them as thin rather than empty.

IPC compositionB01D · Separation processes (filtrati…7087.5%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment4556.3%C01D · Alkali-metal compounds45.0%C25B · Electrolytic production of com…45.0%B01F · Mixing & stirring22.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 80 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on High-Salinity Membrane Processes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about high-salinity membrane processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The filings that anchor this field

Representative Filing
US20230234869A12023-07-27

US20230234869A1 — Production of potable water using chemically forced precipitation

RICHARDSON, ROBERT GEORGE

The disclosure provides two integrated methods for the production of potable water from seawater or other brackish waters using chemical forced precipitation. The process is closed loop, recycling process reactants to produce potable water and commercially valuable salts. A computer software method of process variable control maintains the chemical forced precipitation process salt, solvent and water concentrations to optimise water production, and the process is designed to require less energy than alternative water production routes, drawing on solar or waste heat where available.Filed by Richardson, Robert George — 2023-07-27.

US20230234869A1 — patent drawing 1US20230234869A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120267307A1Osmotic separation systems and methods91
2US20120267306A1Osmotic separation systems and methods70
3WO2011053794A2Osmotic separation systems and methods37
4US20160002073A1Renewable desalination of brines29
5US20140224716A1Osmotic separation systems and methods28
6US20140224718A1Osmotic separation systems and methods19
7US9039899B2Osmotic separation systems and methods15
8WO2014126925A1Renewable desalination of brines11
9CN104591456A一种高盐氨氮废水的处理方法11
10US20180155218A1Osmotic separation systems and methods9

Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus — read this table as a map of technical influence to date, not current commercial weight.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs of the dataset that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
56 of 80 families
held by the leading assignee

One filer set the technical agenda

With 56 of the 80 families in scope, the leading assignee's early osmotic-separation filings are also the most-cited records in the set. New entrants are effectively filing around an incumbent claim base rather than into open territory.

Assignee ranking, 80-family set
Momentum
+200% (2021→2024)
filings, 1 to 3

Activity is rebuilding from a low base

The three-year rise from 1 filing in 2021 to 3 in 2024 is a real recovery in absolute terms, but the base is small enough that a couple of filings from any one entrant would shift the curve again.

Filing trend, 2021–2024
Claim density
87.5% B01D
of 80 records

Separation claims are the crowded lane

B01D separation-process claims touch the large majority of records, and C02F water-treatment claims cover more than half. Anyone filing a pure membrane or filtration claim is filing into the densest part of the map.

IPC composition, 80 records
Citation pattern
91 citations
top-cited record

The core patents predate the recent activity

The five most-cited records are early-2010s osmotic-separation filings from the dominant assignee. Recent filers are building adjacent to, not on top of, that citation core — a sign the foundational claims are settled rather than contested.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to high-salinity membrane processes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

The assignee ranking covers 11 companies and individual inventors — the entire ranking the dataset returns, not a top-50 or top-100 cut. Recent-year activity across the named assignees reads flat, which is consistent with a corpus this size and with the publication lag on 2025-2026 records.

Leader
56 families
of 80 in scope

The dominant filer holds the foundational claims

The leading assignee's share of the ranked set includes the most-cited osmotic-separation filings, giving it effective control of the core forward-osmosis draw-solution claim territory that the rest of the field cites into.

Assignee ranking
Long tail
2 families
fifth and tenth place

Everyone else is filing in small numbers

Fifth place and tenth place both sit at 2 families, meaning most of the remaining ten entities have filed only once or twice. This is a field with one occupied core and a scattering of single-filing entrants around it.

Assignee ranking
Co-filing
5 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Collaboration is limited and inventor-linked

The strongest co-assignee pairs connect the leading corporate filer to named individual inventors rather than to other companies, suggesting the collaborative structure here is closer to inventor-founder arrangements than cross-company joint development.

Co-assignee pairs, 5 total
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a fresh look
Branches where filing density is thin relative to the core separation and treatment classes.
Salt-selective precipitation chemistryElectrolytic brine valorisation (C25B)Alkali-metal salt recovery (C01D)Draw-solution regeneration mixing methodsWaste-heat-driven concentrate management
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Oasys Water Inc0
Fluid Technology Solutions (FTS) Inc0-100%
MCGINNIS ROBERT L0
Massachusetts Institute of Technology0
Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Industry, China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation0
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)0
ZUBACK JOSEPH E0
RICHARDSON ROBERT GEORGE0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or a fresh filing.

Check freedom-to-operate against the citation core

Before filing a forward-osmosis or draw-solution claim, run the most-cited early filings from the dominant assignee against your specific claim language — that citation cluster is where overlap risk concentrates.

Explore citation mapping in Eureka

Test the under-claimed classes for a narrower filing

C01D, C25B and B01F carry far fewer records than B01D or C02F. A claim built around salt recovery chemistry or draw-solution regeneration mixing has more room to establish novelty.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the 2024 rebound as more data lands

With 2025 and 2026 filings still incomplete due to publication lag, revisit the trend once those years settle to see if the 2021-2024 growth continues or was a one-off.

Set up filing alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Salinity Membrane Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research High-Salinity Membrane Processes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole high-salinity membrane processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.