Book a demo

High-Speed Rail Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

High-Speed Rail Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/high-speed-rail-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Rail & Transit Systems
High-speed rail patents: who leads and where filing activity is heading
  • Concentrated but not locked up. The top 5 assignees hold 26.7% of all 901 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 37.8% — leaving most of the field outside the leading group.
  • Filing has cooled sharply from its peak. Activity peaked at 67 records in 2017 and fell from 24 in 2021 to 6 in 2024, a -75% move over that span, though 2025-26 figures are still filling in.
  • Track and running gear outweigh signalling in raw claim volume. E01B (railway track) and B61F (running gear/bogies) each rival B61L (traffic control) for share of the 901 records, showing infrastructure claims are as dense as control-system ones.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
901
Published Records
27%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-75%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (24 records) with 2024 (6) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 901 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the high-speed rail patent record actually covers

High-speed rail patenting spans far more than train control: the dataset behind this page covers 901 published records filed between 2015 and 2026 that combine high-speed rail or high-speed train terminology with specific technical subsystems — train position, wheel contact, traction supply, track condition, rail vehicle design and track systems. That breadth means a single search string pulls in signalling engineers, bogie and running-gear specialists, wireless-communications teams and civil-infrastructure filers into one comparable set.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be. The patterns below are read against that lag, not against the raw tail of the chart.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION GMBH88
  2. 2BEIJING DIDI INFINITY TECH & DEV CO LTD51
  3. 3GREENRAIL37
  4. 4CRRC QINGDAO SIFANG CO LTD35
  5. 5RAPISCAN SYST INC (US)30
  6. 6NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED26
  7. 7RAIL VISION LTD24
  8. 8SIEMENS AG17
  9. 9TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC17
  10. 10SIG SCHWEIZERISCHE INDUSTRIE-GESELLSCHAFT16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 901-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim volume.

Filing trend: a sharp pull-back from the 2017 peak

Filings peaked at 67 records in 2017. From a more recent baseline, filings fell from 24 in 2021 to 6 in 2024 — a -75% move over three years. Treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in rather than as evidence of a continued decline.

Filing trend: a sharp pull-back from the 2017 peak0204060806720172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: infrastructure and running gear rival signalling

B61L (railway traffic control) leads at 13.8% of the 901 records, but E01B (railway track & permanent way) at 13.3% and B61F (running gear & bogies) at 12.8% sit close behind. Wireless and digital-transmission classes (H04W, H04L) each clear 7-8%, showing communications claims are now a standing part of the field rather than a niche overlay. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the 901-record total.

Technology composition: infrastructure and running gear rival signallingB61L · Railway traffic control12413.8%E01B · Railway track & permanent way12013.3%B61F · Railway running gear & bogies11512.8%B61D · Railway vehicle bodies10211.3%H04W · Wireless communication networks768.4%B61B · Railway systems & cableways758.3%H04L · Digital information transmissi…697.7%B61C · Locomotives & railcars657.2%Other87897.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 901 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about high-speed rail patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited records

Representative filing
US20250024304A12025-01-16

US20250024304A1 — High speed rail cellular network service

T-MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC

Methods and systems for providing mobile broadband services to high speed rail are provided. The method begins with determining that a user equipment (UE) is moving at a speed between a first threshold and a second threshold between a first location and a second location. The first and second thresholds may be selected to encompass typical speed ranges of high speed rail operation. The method continues with identifying a set of access points between the first location and the second location, then predicting an access point from that set at which to transmit data — because high-speed rail runs on a fixed track, the prediction can rely on the vehicle's known route.Filed by T-Mobile Innovations LLC, published 2025-01-16.

US20250024304A1 — patent drawing 1US20250024304A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5332180ATraffic control system utilizing on-board vehicle information measurement apparatus196
2US8948690B2Doppler-nulling traveling-wave antenna relays for high-speed vehicular communications173
3US20180237039A1Locomotive control system159
4US20080195257A1Guidance and Security System for Complex Transport Systems144
5US10220881B2Cellular structures with fourteen-cornered cells128
6US10429006B2Cellular structures with twelve-cornered cells121
7US20150217790A1Data communication system and method112
8US20160359741A1Data communication system and method105
9US20130069834A1Doppler-nulling traveling-wave antenna relays for high-speed vehicular communications87
10US4864306ARailway anticollision apparatus and method78

Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus; read them as a signal of influence within this set, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the assignee, trend and technology data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
26.7% / 37.8%
top 5 / top 10 share of 901 records

Leadership is real but not exclusive

The top 5 assignees combine for 26.7% of all 901 records and the top 10 for 37.8%. That leaves well over 60% of filings spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, so a newcomer is not automatically boxed out of the field — the open ground is in the tail, not at the front.

Based on the 100-company assignee ranking returned for this dataset.
Momentum
-75%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Activity has pulled back from its 2017 peak

Filings peaked at 67 in 2017 and fell from 24 in 2021 to 6 in 2024. Several of the most active historical filers show zero filings in the latest year tracked. Given the ~18-month publication lag, the 2025-26 figures should not yet be read as confirmation the field has gone quiet.

Peak year 2017 at 67 records; 2021-2024 span used for the growth figure.
Technology mix
13.8% / 13.3%
B61L vs E01B share of 901 records

Infrastructure claims match signalling claims

B61L (traffic control) leads the IPC mix at 13.8% of records, but E01B (track & permanent way) at 13.3% and B61F (running gear & bogies) at 12.8% are close behind. A filing strategy built only around signalling and control software is missing roughly a third of the claim space sitting in physical track and running-gear subsystems.

Shares are of the 901-record total; a record can carry more than one class.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to high-speed rail patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders account for a minority of total volume, and recent-year activity has gone quiet even among historically active filers — both point to an open field rather than a settled one.

Leader
88 records
leading assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the pack

The leading assignee holds 88 records, well clear of fifth place at 30 and tenth place at 16. That gap suggests a genuine first-mover position in this search scope rather than a marginal lead.

Counted in the 100-company assignee ranking.
Mid-tier
30 / 16
records at 5th / 10th place

A fast drop-off after the leader

Volume drops steeply from the leader to fifth place (30 records) and again to tenth place (16), showing a small group of established filers rather than a broad plateau of equally active competitors.

Fifth and tenth place counts from the assignee ranking.
Recent activity
0 in latest year
several historically active filers

Even established filers have gone quiet recently

Multiple assignees with substantial historical filing counts show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, including one with a -100% year-on-year move. Read this alongside the publication lag rather than as a definitive stop in activity.

Recent-year momentum figures from the assignee-level dataset.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where the IPC and citation data show thinner claim density relative to the core signalling and running-gear classes.
wheel-rail contact condition sensingtraction power supply fault detectioncellular handover prediction on fixed routestrack geometry monitoring integrationon-board vehicle information fusion
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Bombardier Transportation0
Beijing Didi Infinity Technology and Development Co., Ltd.0
Greenrail0
CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co., Ltd.0-100%
Rapiscan Systems, Inc.0
Network Rail Infrastructure Limited0
Rail Vision Ltd.0
Siemens AG0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited records

The most-cited records in this set, including the on-board vehicle information measurement and locomotive control filings, anchor prior art that later filings had to design around. Any new filing touching train control or on-board measurement should be checked against these first.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map the under-claimed sub-areas before drafting claims

Wheel-rail contact sensing, traction fault detection and fixed-route cellular handover show thinner density than core signalling and running-gear classes. That gap is where a first claim has the most room to stand.

Run a white space search in Eureka

Track the leading assignee's recent activity

The leading assignee's filing pace has slowed in the most recent tracked year alongside several other historically active filers. Watching whether that continues past the current publication lag will clarify whether the field is consolidating or genuinely cooling.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the high-speed rail patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research High-Speed Rail Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole high-speed rail patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.