Hop Products & Dry Hopping Patents: Leader & Long Tail 2026
- One assignee holds 37 of 101 records in scope while the top 5 combined account for 84.2% of all 101 records — this is a field with a dominant filer, not a fragmented one.
- Filing activity has already peaked and cooled once the peak year so far is 2019 at 22 records, and the 2021→2024 span still shows +14% growth even as 2025 onward remains understated by publication lag.
- The most-cited records all trace to one enzymatic process family WO2020069100A1, US20210010038A1, WO2020069139A2 and US10961550B2 share the same 'enzymatic process for production of modified hop products' lineage, showing where prior art is thickest.
Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 101 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent filings at the intersection of hop product processing and dry hopping technique — spanning hop oil extraction, biotransformation of hop compounds by yeast or enzymes, hop creep (the residual fermentation activity that dry-hopped beer can exhibit), aroma retention during processing, dosing timing in the brewing cycle, and beer loss mitigation associated with hop solids. It is a narrow, technically defined slice of brewing patent activity rather than a broad hops-industry search.
The 101 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, concentrated overwhelmingly in beer brewing classifications with meaningful overlap into fermentation science, wine and fermented beverages, microbiology, and food formulation. That overlap pattern — one brewing-specific class carrying the bulk of records, several adjacent classes carrying a third or less — is itself informative: it shows dry hopping and hop product innovation is still filed primarily as a brewing-process problem, not yet routinely reframed as a fermentation-biology or food-science one.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 101 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the technical weight of the field.
Filing activity peaked in 2019, then resumed modest growth
Annual filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2019. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a further +14% increase, but every year from 2025 onward is still filling in under the roughly 18-month publication lag, so the apparent tail-off at the end of the chart should not be read as the field slowing down.
Brewing of beer dominates; fermentation science is the largest adjacent class
C12C (Brewing of beer) appears in 80.2% of the 101 records, far ahead of C12P (Fermentation & enzymatic synthesis) at 31.7% and C12G (Wine & fermented beverages) at 17.8%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100%; the pattern to read is which classes ride alongside C12C, not a share of a fixed pie. C07K (Peptides & proteins) and A61K (Medicinal preparations) sit at the thin end, at 5.9% and 3.0% respectively — each a small but real signal of hop-derived compounds being claimed outside beverage use.
Shares are the percentage of the 101 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Hop Products and Dry Hopping with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hop products and dry hopping and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents anchoring this landscape
Method for producing a hop extract emulsion, hop extract emulsion produced herewith, food and corresponding uses
A process for preparing a hop extract emulsion, at least comprising the steps of: providing a hop extract, mixing the hop extract with water in a mass ratio of 40:60 to 95:5 (water:hop extract), and homogenizing the resulting mixture using ultrasound to produce the hop extract emulsion; together with beverages and foodstuffs prepared using the emulsion and corresponding uses.Filed by SIMON H. STEINER, HOPFEN, GMBH, published 2026-02-26 — one of the most recent records in scope.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2020069100A1 | Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products | 8 |
| 2 | GB1576729A | Method of making an iso-acid preparation from hops | 8 |
| 3 | US20210010038A1 | Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products | 5 |
| 4 | WO2020069139A2 | New enzymatic process for production of modified hop products | 5 |
| 5 | US10961550B2 | Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products | 5 |
| 6 | US20200095619A1 | New enzymatic process for production of modified hop products | 5 |
| 7 | US11591625B2 | Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products | 4 |
| 8 | US20240254417A1 | Fermentation monitoring system and method | 2 |
| 9 | WO2021076917A1 | Genetically engineered yeast cells and methods of use thereof | 2 |
| 10 | US20190359918A1 | Natural bittering compounds from hops | 2 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influence on later filers, not a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for R&D and IP strategy
Three read-outs from the filing pattern that matter more than the raw counts.
The field has a clear leader, not a crowded field
A single assignee holds 37 of the 101 records in scope, and the top 5 combined reach 84.2% of all records. That leaves little room for a new entrant to build a broad position through volume filing; differentiation has to come from a narrower, unclaimed technical angle rather than a wider one.
Claim space in core brewing process is occupied
Eight in ten records touch C12C, the beer-brewing classification, meaning any new dry hopping or hop product claim drafted around the brewing step itself is likely to sit close to existing filings. The thinner classes — C07K peptides at 5.9% and A61K medicinal preparations at 3.0% — mark where hop-derived chemistry has been claimed outside the beverage context.
The most-cited records share one enzymatic lineage
WO2020069100A1 and GB1576729A each carry 8 citations, and three further records in the top-cited set are variants of the same 'enzymatic process for production of modified hop products' family. Anyone drafting around enzymatic hop modification is drafting around this cluster specifically, not the field in general.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hop products and dry hopping, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the activity has gone quiet
The ranking is short and top-heavy: 13 companies account for the entire assignee ranking, with the top 10 combined reaching 97.0% of all 101 records in scope.
One assignee anchors the field
The leading assignee's 37 records set the scale for everyone else in the ranking; fifth place holds 7 and tenth place holds just 2, a steep drop-off typical of a field defined early by one filer's enzymatic-process programme.
Recent-year activity has gone quiet for multiple filers
Several ranked assignees, including two with a recorded -100% year-on-year change, show zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true current activity rather than confirming a slowdown, but it does mean the visible pipeline from these filers has thinned.
Co-filing is rare in this field
The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset appears on just 2 shared records, between a brewing-patents entity and an affiliated research foundation. Outside that pair, the ranking is dominated by single-assignee filings rather than joint programmes.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Kalamazoo Holdings, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Berkeley Brewing Science, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| PHANTASM LTD | 0 | — |
| Anheuser-Busch InBev SA | 0 | — |
| JOHN I HAAS | 0 | — |
| CROSBY HOP FARM LLC | 0 | -100% |
| WAIMEA WEST LAND HLDG LTD | 0 | — |
| BREWING PATENTS | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The landscape points to two practical next steps: checking a specific claim idea against the enzymatic-modification cluster, and watching whether the leader's filing pace resumes once 2025–2026 data fills in.
Stress-test a claim against the cited cluster
Before drafting around enzymatic hop modification, check any candidate claim against the WO2020069100A1 / GB1576729A / US10961550B2 lineage specifically, since these carry the field's highest citation counts.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaTrack the leader's next filing wave
With the leading assignee holding over a third of all records and 2025 onward still understated by publication lag, monitoring its next disclosures will show whether the field's concentration is deepening or opening up.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaCommon questions about hop product and dry hopping patents
One assignee leads the ranked field with 37 of the 101 records in scope, well ahead of fifth place at 7 records. The top 5 assignees combined account for 84.2% of all 101 records, and the top 10 reach 97.0%, so filing activity in this niche is concentrated among a small group rather than spread across many small filers. The 13-company ranking returned for this dataset is the complete list the data endpoint provides, not a top-50 or top-100 cut.
The core technical areas are hop oil extraction, enzymatic biotransformation of hop compounds, hop creep management, aroma retention during processing, dosing timing in the brew cycle, and beer loss reduction tied to hop solids. Classification data shows 80.2% of the 101 records carry a C12C brewing-of-beer classification, with fermentation science (C12P, 31.7%) and wine/fermented beverages (C12G, 17.8%) as the largest adjacent areas. Smaller but distinct clusters touch peptide chemistry and medicinal preparations, showing hop-derived compounds are occasionally claimed outside the beverage context entirely.
Filing peaked so far in 2019 at 22 records, and the 2021-to-2024 span — the last window that can be treated as complete — shows a further +14% increase. Years from 2025 onward appear lower in the raw trend, but publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so those years are still filling in rather than showing an actual decline. Read the trend through 2024 as the reliable signal.
The two most-cited records, WO2020069100A1 and GB1576729A, each carry 8 citations, with three further records — US20210010038A1, WO2020069139A2 and US10961550B2 — all citing back to the same enzymatic-process family for modified hop products. This concentration means the most influential prior art in the field is not spread evenly; it sits on one specific enzymatic-modification lineage. Citation counts inside any searched corpus tend to favour older filings, so treat this as a map of influence rather than a ranking of current commercial value.
The thinnest classified areas — C07K peptides and proteins at 5.9% of records and A61K medicinal preparations at 3.0% — mark where hop-derived chemistry has barely been claimed outside conventional beverage use. Sub-areas such as ultrasound-assisted extract emulsification, in-line dosing-timing sensors, and hop creep enzyme deactivation methods also carry comparatively few records relative to the dense C12C brewing-process core. These branches sit adjacent to, rather than inside, the heavily filed enzymatic-modification cluster, which is where a narrower first claim is more likely to clear prior art.
Research Hop Products and Dry Hopping in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole hop products and dry hopping corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.