Book a demo

Hop Products & Dry Hopping Patents: Leader & Long Tail 2026

Hop Products & Dry Hopping Patents: Leader & Long Tail 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hop-products-and-dry-hopping-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Brewing & Beverages
Hop Products and Dry Hopping Patents: mapping the enzymatic-modification core and the long tail around it
  • One assignee holds 37 of 101 records in scope while the top 5 combined account for 84.2% of all 101 records — this is a field with a dominant filer, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing activity has already peaked and cooled once the peak year so far is 2019 at 22 records, and the 2021→2024 span still shows +14% growth even as 2025 onward remains understated by publication lag.
  • The most-cited records all trace to one enzymatic process family WO2020069100A1, US20210010038A1, WO2020069139A2 and US10961550B2 share the same 'enzymatic process for production of modified hop products' lineage, showing where prior art is thickest.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
101
Published Records
84%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+14%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (7 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 101 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent filings at the intersection of hop product processing and dry hopping technique — spanning hop oil extraction, biotransformation of hop compounds by yeast or enzymes, hop creep (the residual fermentation activity that dry-hopped beer can exhibit), aroma retention during processing, dosing timing in the brewing cycle, and beer loss mitigation associated with hop solids. It is a narrow, technically defined slice of brewing patent activity rather than a broad hops-industry search.

The 101 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off, concentrated overwhelmingly in beer brewing classifications with meaningful overlap into fermentation science, wine and fermented beverages, microbiology, and food formulation. That overlap pattern — one brewing-specific class carrying the bulk of records, several adjacent classes carrying a third or less — is itself informative: it shows dry hopping and hop product innovation is still filed primarily as a brewing-process problem, not yet routinely reframed as a fermentation-biology or food-science one.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1KALAMAZOO HLDG INC37
  2. 2BERKELEY BREWING SCI INC20
  3. 3PHANTASM LTD14
  4. 4ANHEUSER BUSCH INBEV SA7
  5. 5JOHN I HAAS7
  6. 6CROSBY HOP FARM LLC4
  7. 7WAIMEA WEST LAND HLDG LTD3
  8. 8BUCHER DENWEL GMBH2
  9. 9DEFINE INSTR LTD2
  10. 10THE BREWING RES FOUND2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 101 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the technical weight of the field.

Filing activity peaked in 2019, then resumed modest growth

Annual filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 22 in 2019. The 2021-to-2024 window shows a further +14% increase, but every year from 2025 onward is still filling in under the roughly 18-month publication lag, so the apparent tail-off at the end of the chart should not be read as the field slowing down.

Filing activity peaked in 2019, then resumed modest growth061319251201720182220192220202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Brewing of beer dominates; fermentation science is the largest adjacent class

C12C (Brewing of beer) appears in 80.2% of the 101 records, far ahead of C12P (Fermentation & enzymatic synthesis) at 31.7% and C12G (Wine & fermented beverages) at 17.8%. Because records can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100%; the pattern to read is which classes ride alongside C12C, not a share of a fixed pie. C07K (Peptides & proteins) and A61K (Medicinal preparations) sit at the thin end, at 5.9% and 3.0% respectively — each a small but real signal of hop-derived compounds being claimed outside beverage use.

Brewing of beer dominates; fermentation science is the largest adjacent classC12C · Brewing of beer8180.2%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…3231.7%C12G · Wine & fermented beverages1817.8%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…1716.8%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages1413.9%C07K · Peptides & proteins65.9%A23P · Food shaping/forming33.0%A61K · Medicinal preparations33.0%Other2524.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 101 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hop Products and Dry Hopping with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hop products and dry hopping and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents anchoring this landscape

Representative Recent Filing
US20260055350A12026-02-26

Method for producing a hop extract emulsion, hop extract emulsion produced herewith, food and corresponding uses

SIMON H. STEINER, HOPFEN, GMBH

A process for preparing a hop extract emulsion, at least comprising the steps of: providing a hop extract, mixing the hop extract with water in a mass ratio of 40:60 to 95:5 (water:hop extract), and homogenizing the resulting mixture using ultrasound to produce the hop extract emulsion; together with beverages and foodstuffs prepared using the emulsion and corresponding uses.Filed by SIMON H. STEINER, HOPFEN, GMBH, published 2026-02-26 — one of the most recent records in scope.

US20260055350A1 — patent drawing 1US20260055350A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2020069100A1Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products8
2GB1576729AMethod of making an iso-acid preparation from hops8
3US20210010038A1Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products5
4WO2020069139A2New enzymatic process for production of modified hop products5
5US10961550B2Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products5
6US20200095619A1New enzymatic process for production of modified hop products5
7US11591625B2Enzymatic process for production of modified hop products4
8US20240254417A1Fermentation monitoring system and method2
9WO2021076917A1Genetically engineered yeast cells and methods of use thereof2
10US20190359918A1Natural bittering compounds from hops2

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings; treat this table as a map of influence on later filers, not a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for R&D and IP strategy

Three read-outs from the filing pattern that matter more than the raw counts.

Concentration
84.2% of 101 records
top 5 assignees combined

The field has a clear leader, not a crowded field

A single assignee holds 37 of the 101 records in scope, and the top 5 combined reach 84.2% of all records. That leaves little room for a new entrant to build a broad position through volume filing; differentiation has to come from a narrower, unclaimed technical angle rather than a wider one.

Based on the 13-company ranking returned for this dataset.
Prior art density
80.2% of 101 records
carry a C12C classification

Claim space in core brewing process is occupied

Eight in ten records touch C12C, the beer-brewing classification, meaning any new dry hopping or hop product claim drafted around the brewing step itself is likely to sit close to existing filings. The thinner classes — C07K peptides at 5.9% and A61K medicinal preparations at 3.0% — mark where hop-derived chemistry has been claimed outside the beverage context.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Citation lineage
8 citations
on the two lead documents

The most-cited records share one enzymatic lineage

WO2020069100A1 and GB1576729A each carry 8 citations, and three further records in the top-cited set are variants of the same 'enzymatic process for production of modified hop products' family. Anyone drafting around enzymatic hop modification is drafting around this cluster specifically, not the field in general.

Citation counts favour older filings within the searched corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hop products and dry hopping, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has gone quiet

The ranking is short and top-heavy: 13 companies account for the entire assignee ranking, with the top 10 combined reaching 97.0% of all 101 records in scope.

Leader
37 records
of 101 in scope

One assignee anchors the field

The leading assignee's 37 records set the scale for everyone else in the ranking; fifth place holds 7 and tenth place holds just 2, a steep drop-off typical of a field defined early by one filer's enzymatic-process programme.

Counted in patent families, not raw document counts.
Momentum
0 in the latest year
across several ranked assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet for multiple filers

Several ranked assignees, including two with a recorded -100% year-on-year change, show zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true current activity rather than confirming a slowdown, but it does mean the visible pipeline from these filers has thinned.

Momentum figures are year-on-year, latest complete year only.
Collaboration
2 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Co-filing is rare in this field

The strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset appears on just 2 shared records, between a brewing-patents entity and an affiliated research foundation. Outside that pair, the ranking is dominated by single-assignee filings rather than joint programmes.

Based on the co-assignee pairs identified across the 101 records.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit outside the dense C12C brewing-process core and carry comparatively few records.
Hop peptide isolation for non-beverage useHop creep enzyme deactivation methodsUltrasound-assisted hop extract emulsificationDosing-timing sensors for in-line dry hoppingHop-derived compounds in medicinal formulation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Kalamazoo Holdings, Inc.0
Berkeley Brewing Science, Inc.0-100%
PHANTASM LTD0
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA0
JOHN I HAAS0
CROSBY HOP FARM LLC0-100%
WAIMEA WEST LAND HLDG LTD0
BREWING PATENTS0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to two practical next steps: checking a specific claim idea against the enzymatic-modification cluster, and watching whether the leader's filing pace resumes once 2025–2026 data fills in.

Stress-test a claim against the cited cluster

Before drafting around enzymatic hop modification, check any candidate claim against the WO2020069100A1 / GB1576729A / US10961550B2 lineage specifically, since these carry the field's highest citation counts.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka

Track the leader's next filing wave

With the leading assignee holding over a third of all records and 2025 onward still understated by publication lag, monitoring its next disclosures will show whether the field's concentration is deepening or opening up.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about hop product and dry hopping patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hop Products and Dry Hopping covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hop Products and Dry Hopping in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hop products and dry hopping corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.