https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/horticultural-and-plant-growth-lighting-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Horticultural Lighting
Horticultural and plant growth lighting patents: who filed, what they claimed, and where filings have stalled
  • Filing peaked in 2019 at 24 families and has not returned to that level since — the growth curve is flat to declining rather than accelerating.
  • A01G and H05B dominate the IPC mix 121 and 67 records respectively, meaning most claims sit on horticultural control logic and lighting circuitry rather than on the semiconductor die itself (H01L: 11).
  • The US is the primary filing venue by a wide margin 69 of the tracked records were filed there, more than three times the EPO total of 22.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
128
Published Records
58%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-73%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A control-and-fixture field, not a chip field

Horticultural and plant growth lighting patenting concentrates on how light is measured, controlled and delivered to a canopy — dimming logic, photoperiod scheduling, spectral tuning against a prescribed "light recipe", and sensor-integrated fixtures — rather than on the underlying LED die technology. The IPC composition makes this explicit: A01G (horticulture and forestry) and H05B (electric lighting circuits) far outweigh H01L (semiconductor devices), which sits at just 11 of 128 records. Read together with F21V and F21K counts, the field looks like a systems-and-controls layer built on top of commodity LED components.That shape has consequences for anyone filing next. Claims worth defending are less likely to be about emitter architecture and more likely to be about the control loop: how ambient light is sensed, compared to a target spectrum, and corrected in real time. The most-cited records in this dataset bear that out — controller and dimming patents outrank pure fixture patents by citation count.

Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend below reads lower than it will eventually settle once pending applications publish.

Filing activity, 2017–2026 (partial)
  1. 1SCYNCE LED LLC22
  2. 2FLUENCE BIOENGINEERING INC19
  3. 3SUNTRACKER TECH12
  4. 4SOLLUM TECH INC11
  5. 5VALOYA OY10
  6. 6MEBIOL INC7
  7. 7GROWFLUX INC7
  8. 8ILLUM TECH INC6
  9. 9GREENLUX LIGHTING SOLUTIONS OY5
  10. 10SCHMIDT JONATHAN BECKER4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

128 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search combining horticultural lighting terminology with photosynthetic and control-related claim language across A01G7, H05B47 and H01L33.

Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then eased

Annual filings ran at 23 in 2017, peaked at 24 in 2019, and had fallen to 15 by the 2022 midpoint. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one to two years in any such trend will always understate true activity — but the multi-year plateau through the midpoint points to a maturing rather than accelerating field.

Filings rose to a 2019 peak, then eased06131925232017201824201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control and fixture classes outnumber emitter classes

A01G (121) and H05B (67) lead the IPC breakdown, with F21V (55) and F21Y (26) close behind on fixture form factor. H01L (11) and G02B (13) — the classes closest to the light-emitting element itself and its optics — are comparatively thin, reinforcing that most filed claim value sits in control and delivery, not emission.

Control and fixture classes outnumber emitter classesA01G · Horticulture & forestry12194.5%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…6752.3%F21V · Lighting device components5543.0%F21Y · Light-source form (index)2620.3%F21K · Light sources (non-electric & …1410.9%G02B · Optical elements & systems1310.2%H01L · Semiconductor devices118.6%G01J · Radiation & light measurement86.3%Other3628.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 128 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about horticultural and plant growth lighting and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records set the boundaries

Representative filing
US20190357447A12019-11-28

Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting to better simulate the sun (US20190357447A1)

SCYNCE LED LLC

A method and apparatus for a horticultural light system for use in a greenhouse where aspects of ambient light in the greenhouse are measured and compared against a prescribed light recipe. A light controller commands a light fixture contained within the greenhouse to augment the ambient light in response to the comparison. Photosynthetic photon flux, light intensity, color temperature and color spectrum among other aspects of light generated by the light fixture are altered by the controller to fill in deficiencies of the ambient light as compared to the prescribed light recipe.Filed by Scynce LED LLC, published 2019-11-28.

US20190357447A1 — patent drawing 1US20190357447A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record →
Most-cited patent families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20170034895A1A controller for a horticultural lighting system50
2US20160219794A1Radio-controlled lighting fixture with integrated sensors41
3US20180110102A1Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting with enhanced dimming and optimized efficiency26
4US20190191517A1Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting with current sharing24
5US10021837B2Radio-controlled luminaire with integrated sensors24
6US20190110406A1Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting to better simulate the sun23
7US20180084733A1Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting and associated optic systems23
8US9872357B1Horticultural luminaire, horticultural lighting arrangement and method for controlling horticultural lighting…21
9US20190082613A1System and method for advanced horticultural lighting19
10US9955632B1Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting to better simulate the sun16

Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older, earlier-filed records; treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where value sits

Three patterns stand out once families are grouped by IPC subclass, citation count and filing venue.

Filing trend
24 → 15
peak (2019) to midpoint (2022)

Momentum has flattened

Filings ran at 23 in 2017, peaked at 24 in 2019, and had eased to 15 by 2022. That is a plateau, not a growth curve — new entrants are filing into a field where the earliest movers already hold the most-cited control patents.

Trend, 2017–2026 (partial)
Claim concentration
121 of 128
records touch A01G

Horticultural control dominates the class mix

Almost every record in the dataset falls under A01G (horticulture and forestry), with H05B lighting-circuit claims layered on top. H01L semiconductor claims are comparatively rare, at 11 records.

IPC subclass distribution
Filing venue
69 vs 22
US filings vs EPO filings

The US is the primary battleground

United States filings outnumber the next-largest venue, the EPO, by more than three to one. Canada (11), China (4) and Australia (3) trail well behind, suggesting enforcement risk concentrates heavily in one jurisdiction.

Receiving office counts
Citation leaders
50 citations
top-cited record

Controller patents lead on influence

The most-cited record in the dataset is a controller patent for horticultural lighting systems, and three of the five most-cited records concern controllers or dimming rather than the fixture housing itself.

Most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to horticultural and plant growth lighting, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

A dense core of assignees, thin recent activity

Ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest links joining individual inventors to a small set of corporate filers — a pattern typical of founder-led lighting firms rather than large multinationals.

Co-filing pattern
4 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Inventor-and-company pairs lead co-filing

The strongest co-assignee links pair a named inventor with a single corporate assignee, repeated across four filings each. That points to small, tightly held filing programmes rather than joint ventures between large firms.

Co-assignee pairs, n=10
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
across all leading assignees

No leading assignee filed in the latest tracked year

Every one of the top assignees by volume shows zero filings in the most recent year. Given the 18-month publication lag, some of this is an artefact of timing — but the flat 2019–2022 trend suggests the slowdown predates the reporting gap.

Recent-year momentum
Venue concentration
69 US filings
of 128 total records

Filing strategy is US-centric

More than half of all tracked records were filed in the United States, with the EPO, WIPO/PCT and Canada picking up most of the remainder. Few assignees appear to be building broad multi-region portfolios.

Receiving offices
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit at low record counts relative to the core control-and-fixture claims, based on the IPC composition.
LED die-level spectral tuning (H01L33)Canopy-penetration optics (G02B)In-situ PPFD sensing feedback loops (G01J)Non-electric/LED hybrid sources (F21K)Wireless mesh photoperiod scheduling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
ILLUM TECH INC0
Faloya Inc.0
SUNTRACKER TECH0
SCHMIDT JONATHAN BECKER0
Molika Bioengineering Inc.0
Solum Technology Co.0
Mebio Inc.0
ILLUM HORTICULTURE LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate checking.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on controller claims

The most-cited records concern lighting controllers and dimming logic, not fixture housings. Any new filing that touches sensor-driven spectral adjustment should be checked against these first.

Explore controller claims in Eureka →

Test the under-claimed branches

H01L and G02B counts are thin relative to A01G and H05B. If your work sits at the LED die or canopy-optics level, that thinner prior art may leave room for a defensible first claim.

Map white space in Eureka →

Watch for a filing rebound

The flat trend through the 2022 midpoint could reverse once the 2024–2026 publication lag clears. Track new applications from the established co-assignee pairs for early signal.

Set up monitoring in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about horticultural lighting patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Horticultural and Plant Growth Lighting in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole horticultural and plant growth lighting corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.