Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Horticultural and plant growth lighting patenting concentrates on how light is measured, controlled and delivered to a canopy — dimming logic, photoperiod scheduling, spectral tuning against a prescribed "light recipe", and sensor-integrated fixtures — rather than on the underlying LED die technology. The IPC composition makes this explicit: A01G (horticulture and forestry) and H05B (electric lighting circuits) far outweigh H01L (semiconductor devices), which sits at just 11 of 128 records. Read together with F21V and F21K counts, the field looks like a systems-and-controls layer built on top of commodity LED components.
Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year in the trend below reads lower than it will eventually settle once pending applications publish.
128 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search combining horticultural lighting terminology with photosynthetic and control-related claim language across A01G7, H05B47 and H01L33.
Annual filings ran at 23 in 2017, peaked at 24 in 2019, and had fallen to 15 by the 2022 midpoint. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one to two years in any such trend will always understate true activity — but the multi-year plateau through the midpoint points to a maturing rather than accelerating field.
A01G (121) and H05B (67) lead the IPC breakdown, with F21V (55) and F21Y (26) close behind on fixture form factor. H01L (11) and G02B (13) — the classes closest to the light-emitting element itself and its optics — are comparatively thin, reinforcing that most filed claim value sits in control and delivery, not emission.
Shares are the percentage of the 128 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about horticultural and plant growth lighting and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method and apparatus for a horticultural light system for use in a greenhouse where aspects of ambient light in the greenhouse are measured and compared against a prescribed light recipe. A light controller commands a light fixture contained within the greenhouse to augment the ambient light in response to the comparison. Photosynthetic photon flux, light intensity, color temperature and color spectrum among other aspects of light generated by the light fixture are altered by the controller to fill in deficiencies of the ambient light as compared to the prescribed light recipe.Filed by Scynce LED LLC, published 2019-11-28.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20170034895A1 | A controller for a horticultural lighting system | 50 |
| 2 | US20160219794A1 | Radio-controlled lighting fixture with integrated sensors | 41 |
| 3 | US20180110102A1 | Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting with enhanced dimming and optimized efficiency | 26 |
| 4 | US20190191517A1 | Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting with current sharing | 24 |
| 5 | US10021837B2 | Radio-controlled luminaire with integrated sensors | 24 |
| 6 | US20190110406A1 | Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting to better simulate the sun | 23 |
| 7 | US20180084733A1 | Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting and associated optic systems | 23 |
| 8 | US9872357B1 | Horticultural luminaire, horticultural lighting arrangement and method for controlling horticultural lighting… | 21 |
| 9 | US20190082613A1 | System and method for advanced horticultural lighting | 19 |
| 10 | US9955632B1 | Method and apparatus for horticultural lighting to better simulate the sun | 16 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older, earlier-filed records; treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once families are grouped by IPC subclass, citation count and filing venue.
Filings ran at 23 in 2017, peaked at 24 in 2019, and had eased to 15 by 2022. That is a plateau, not a growth curve — new entrants are filing into a field where the earliest movers already hold the most-cited control patents.
Almost every record in the dataset falls under A01G (horticulture and forestry), with H05B lighting-circuit claims layered on top. H01L semiconductor claims are comparatively rare, at 11 records.
United States filings outnumber the next-largest venue, the EPO, by more than three to one. Canada (11), China (4) and Australia (3) trail well behind, suggesting enforcement risk concentrates heavily in one jurisdiction.
The most-cited record in the dataset is a controller patent for horticultural lighting systems, and three of the five most-cited records concern controllers or dimming rather than the fixture housing itself.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to horticultural and plant growth lighting, with the prior art for and against each one.
Ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with the strongest links joining individual inventors to a small set of corporate filers — a pattern typical of founder-led lighting firms rather than large multinationals.
The strongest co-assignee links pair a named inventor with a single corporate assignee, repeated across four filings each. That points to small, tightly held filing programmes rather than joint ventures between large firms.
Every one of the top assignees by volume shows zero filings in the most recent year. Given the 18-month publication lag, some of this is an artefact of timing — but the flat 2019–2022 trend suggests the slowdown predates the reporting gap.
More than half of all tracked records were filed in the United States, with the EPO, WIPO/PCT and Canada picking up most of the remainder. Few assignees appear to be building broad multi-region portfolios.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ILLUM TECH INC | 0 | — |
| Faloya Inc. | 0 | — |
| SUNTRACKER TECH | 0 | — |
| SCHMIDT JONATHAN BECKER | 0 | — |
| Molika Bioengineering Inc. | 0 | — |
| Solum Technology Co. | 0 | — |
| Mebio Inc. | 0 | — |
| ILLUM HORTICULTURE LLC | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate checking.
The most-cited records concern lighting controllers and dimming logic, not fixture housings. Any new filing that touches sensor-driven spectral adjustment should be checked against these first.
Explore controller claims in Eureka →H01L and G02B counts are thin relative to A01G and H05B. If your work sits at the LED die or canopy-optics level, that thinner prior art may leave room for a defensible first claim.
Map white space in Eureka →The flat trend through the 2022 midpoint could reverse once the 2024–2026 publication lag clears. Track new applications from the established co-assignee pairs for early signal.
Set up monitoring in Eureka →The dataset shows claims concentrated in horticultural control logic (IPC class A01G, 121 of 128 records) and lighting circuitry (H05B, 67 records), rather than in the LED semiconductor die itself. This means most patented value sits in how light is measured, scheduled and adjusted — photoperiod control, spectral tuning against a target recipe, and dimming — rather than in emitter architecture. Anyone assessing this space should expect denser prior art around control loops than around the light source hardware.
The dataset's assignee ranking is topped by a handful of specialised lighting firms and named inventors, several of whom co-file together repeatedly. Notably, every leading assignee by volume shows zero filings in the most recent tracked year, though the 18-month publication lag means very recent filings may not yet be visible. This makes the ranking a better guide to who built the existing claim base than to who is actively filing right now.
Filing activity peaked at 24 families in 2019, up from 23 in 2017, and had eased to 15 by the 2022 midpoint — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than sustained growth. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any patent trend will look artificially low. Even accounting for that lag, the multi-year plateau through 2022 suggests the field was maturing rather than accelerating going into the most recent filing years.
Relative to the dense A01G and H05B control-and-fixture claims, IPC classes closer to the light-emitting element and its optics are thin: H01L (semiconductor devices) has just 11 records and G02B (optical elements) has 8. Non-electric or hybrid LED source claims under F21K are similarly light at 14 records. These thinner branches — LED die-level spectral tuning, canopy-penetration optics, and in-situ sensing feedback loops — are worth checking closely before assuming the space is occupied.
The most-cited record in this dataset, US20170034895A1, is a controller for a horticultural lighting system, cited 50 times within the searched corpus. High citation counts inside a bounded corpus tend to favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited, so this should be read as a signal of influence on later controller designs rather than a claim to current market dominance. Three of the five most-cited records in the dataset concern controllers or dimming systems rather than physical fixtures, underlining where design-around risk concentrates.
Go past this page: query the whole horticultural and plant growth lighting corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.