Hot Strip Mill Rolling Schedule Patents: Who Leads 2026
Hot Strip Mill Rolling Schedule Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
40.3% concentration at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 225 of the 559 records in scope — core rolling-force and gauge-control claims sit with a small group of established filers. Filings peaked in 2017 at 7 in this dataset; the most recent years are undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2026's figure of 0 is not a real drop-off.
- 1NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION77
- 2HITACHI LTD43
- 3KAWASAKI STEEL CORP40
- 4WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP39
- 5GENERAL ELECTRIC CO26
See the full hot strip mill rolling schedule analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Frequently asked questions
Who holds the most patents on hot strip mill rolling schedules?
Filing in this field is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee alone accounts for 77 of the 559 records in scope, and the top 5 assignees combined hold 225 records, 40.3% of the total. The top 10 combined reach 329 records, 58.9% of the field. This pattern is typical of a mature industrial-equipment niche where a small group of steelmakers and mill builders have filed continuously for decades rather than a fragmented field with many small entrants.
What is the difference between rolling force models and gauge control in these patents?
Rolling force models predict the force needed at each stand based on material properties, temperature and reduction targets, while gauge control uses feedback from sensors to adjust roll gap or tension in real time to hit a target strip thickness. In this dataset both concepts sit mostly inside the B21B metal-rolling class (89.4% of 559 records), often in the same patent, because commercial mills need the predictive model to set an initial schedule and the feedback loop to correct it during the pass.
Why does the most recent filing year show almost no patents?
Publication of a filed patent application typically lags the filing date by roughly 18 months, so any year close to the data cut-off will always look artificially low. In this dataset the trend runs 2017 at 7 filings down to 2026 at 0, but the 2026 figure reflects the partial year and lag rather than a genuine stop in R&D activity. Readers should treat the last one to two years of any patent trend as understated rather than as evidence of a slowdown.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hot Strip Mill Rolling Schedule covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.