Book a demo

HTGR Passive Safety Patent Snapshot 2026

HTGR Passive Safety Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
HTGR Passive Safety Patent Snapshot in 2026

The HTGR passive safety patent space is extremely nascent, with just one family in scope and activity concentrated in a small cluster of Korean and US institutional filers. The competitive field is effectively open, with no dominant incumbent holding a broad portfolio and two new entrants appearing in the most recent filing window.

1
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
South Korea
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A highly concentrated, embryonic field led by Korean institutions

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co Ltd and Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute each hold the highest position in the applicant ranking, followed by Purdue Research Foundation and UT Battelle LLC, each with a single patent record.

The top five filers account for the entirety of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, indicating maximum concentration with no second tier to speak of — the field has not yet attracted a broad community of applicants.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1KOREA HYDRO & NUCLEAR POWER CO LTD2
2Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute2
3Purdue Research Foundation1
4UT Battelle LLC1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The visible position of Korean institutions suggests that South Korea’s national nuclear program is driving the early framing of IP in this space, while the appearance of two US entities signals that American research organizations are beginning to establish footholds.

The most recent filing period should be treated with caution due to standard patent publication lag; apparent gaps in 2025 and 2026 data do not necessarily reflect a true absence of activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A single filing event in a decade-long quiet field, anchored in nuclear reactor classification

The annual filing trend and technology composition together reveal a space that has seen minimal patent activity over the observed window, with all classification activity consolidated in a single IPC class.

Annual filing trend

No filings were recorded from 2017 through 2023; a single family appeared in 2024, with no further records in 2025 or 2026. Given publication lag, the true state of recent activity may be underrepresented in the 2024–2026 window and should not be read as a concluded peak.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1 in 2024.02017020180201902020020210202202023120240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

All patent records fall under G21C (Nuclear reactors), confirming that passive safety work in high-temperature gas-cooled reactors is classified entirely within the core nuclear reactor branch. No adjacent technology classes appear, reflecting the narrow and specialized nature of the corpus.

Technology compositionG21C · Nuclear reactors leads with 3.G21C · Nuclear reactors3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240420856A1Published 2024-12-19

Reactor core system

Purdue Research Foundation

A high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) core is disclosed which includes a plurality of nuclear fuel kernels encapsulated by i) solid structures; and ii) porous structures, wherein the solid structures and the porous structures form a heterogeneous tileable repeating assembly including a channel for moving heat out of the HTGR core, wherein a ratio of… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Reactor core system — patent drawingReactor core system — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Air/Water hybrid passive reactor cavity cooling ap…39
2Air/Water hybrid passive reactor cavity cooling ap…9
3Reactor core system1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co Ltd

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co Ltd

Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co Ltd holds the leading position with 2 patent records, all concentrated in G21C 15 (Nuclear reactors). The company co-files with Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, suggesting that its HTGR passive safety work is conducted as part of a national research program rather than as a standalone commercial IP strategy. No momentum trend data is available for this applicant in the evidence.

patent records: 2
Challenger · Purdue Research Foundation

Purdue Research Foundation

Purdue Research Foundation enters with 1 patent record and is flagged as a new entrant in the applicant momentum data. Its technology focus spans both G21C 15 and G21C 5, a slightly broader classification footprint than the Korean leaders. It co-files with UT Battelle LLC, forming a US academic-national-lab pair that mirrors the Korean institutional collaboration structure.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Korea Atomic Energy Research InstituteUT Battelle LLC+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.