Book a demo

Humanoid Robot Patent Landscape 2026

Humanoid Robot Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Humanoid Robot Patent Landscape in 2026

The humanoid robot patent field is in active growth, with Sony Group Corp holding the largest single portfolio among all filers and the top five applicants collectively accounting for a substantial share of output among the hundred largest filers. Filing activity has accelerated sharply in the most recent years, with new entrants and established players alike intensifying their positions.

5,446
Patent families in scope
40%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+26%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Sony leads a concentrated field with Boston Dynamics and Sanctuary surging

Sony Group Corp holds the top position in humanoid robot patenting, followed by SoftBank Robotics. Europe, Honda Motor, Boston Dynamics, and UBTECH Robotics — the top five filers together account for 40% of the combined output of the hundred largest applicants.

The gap between the first and second tiers is meaningful: Sony’s 697 patent families places it well ahead of SoftBank Robotics. Europe at 556 and Honda Motor at 463, while Boston Dynamics at 458 has closed that gap rapidly on strong recent momentum. Below rank five, volume drops sharply, with UBTECH at 248 and Sanctuary Cognitive Systems at 231 representing a distinct second tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Sony Group Corporation697
2SoftBank Robotics Europe556
3Honda Motor Co., Ltd.463
4Boston Dynamics, Inc.458
5UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd248
6Sanctuary Cognitive Systems Corp231
7Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.181
8Aldebaran Robotics SA117
9Beijing Institute of Technology111
10Toyota Motor Corporation109
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Shanghai Fourier Intelligence Co., Ltd.105
12Sarcos Corp94
13Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.86
14Figure AI Inc.81
15Yamaguchi Jinichi74
16THE JAPAN SCI & TECH AGENCY72
17GM Global Technology Operations LLC71
18Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC70
19Shenzhen Zhuji Power Technology Co., Ltd.69
20GDM Holding LLC65
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect long-term programs in manipulation, locomotion, and human-robot interaction, but the emergence of Sanctuary Cognitive Systems — classified as a new entrant by recent momentum — signals that the competitive frontier is not closed to well-funded challengers.

Data for 2025 and 2026 is subject to publication lag and is likely undercounted; recent-year figures should be treated as a floor rather than a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filings are rising sharply and manipulation remains the dominant technology branch

The annual trend and technology composition charts together show a field still in a growth phase, with a clear technological core in robotic manipulation and an expanding set of adjacent software and AI branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings trended between 415 and 589 patent families from 2017 through 2023 before accelerating to 827 in 2024 and appearing to reach 1,148 in 2025. The 2025 and 2026 figures are subject to publication lag and undercount true activity; nonetheless the directional signal of acceleration from 2024 onward is robust.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,148 in 2025.463201743020185892019415202044420214282022571202382720241,14820251312026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators and robots) dominates the technology mix, reflecting the centrality of arm and body mechanics to humanoid design. B62D (legged-robot locomotion) and G05D (control of non-electric variables) form the next layer, while G06F (digital data processing) and G06N (AI models) indicate growing software and learning-based patenting adjacent to the mechanical core.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 7,861; B62D · Vehicles & legged-robot locomotion 1,669.B25J · Manipulators & ro…7,861B62D · Vehicles & legged…1,669G05D · Control of non-el…1,132G06F · Electric digital …662G05B · Control & regulat…525G06N · Computing based o…502A63H · Toys398G06T · Image data proces…270↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20130184861A1Published 2013-07-18

Humanoid Robot that can Dynamically Walk with Limi…

Florida Institute Of Human & Machine Cognition

A control system for a bipedal humanoid robot that utilizes certain fundamental characteristics of bipedal motion to provide a robust and relatively simple balancing and walking mechanism. The system primarily utilizes the concept of “capturability,” which is defined as the ability of the robot to come to a stop without falling by taking N or fewer steps… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Humanoid Robot that can Dynamically Walk with Limi… — patent drawingHumanoid Robot that can Dynamically Walk with Limi… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Obstacle recognition method for autonomous robots728
2Charging system for mobile robot, method for searc…647
3Robot remote-control system and software distribut…447
4Robotic manipulation methods and systems for execu…446
5Methods and systems for food preparation in a robo…446
6Obstacle recognition method for autonomous robots444
7Interactive systems employing robotic companions417
8Systems and methods for operating a robotic system…366

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the landscape structure means for R&D strategy

Four structural observations — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — each carry distinct implications for teams deciding where to invest or how to differentiate.

Growth

Growth stage: annual filings still rising

The field is classified as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. The 26% recent-window growth rate confirms that this is not a mature, saturating market but an expanding one where early portfolio positions still carry strategic value. Teams entering now can still establish meaningful prior art.

Growth phase
Concentration

Concentrated top tier, but challengers are closing fast

The top five filers hold 40% of the combined output of the hundred largest applicants, indicating meaningful concentration. However, momentum data shows Boston Dynamics up 48% and Sanctuary Cognitive Systems classified as a new entrant with 199 recent patent families, demonstrating that the ranking is not static. Mid-tier players with focused, differentiated strategies can realistically challenge established positions.

High concentration
Collaboration

Industry-academia co-filing anchored by Sony and SoftBank Robotics

The most active co-filing pair is Sony Group Corp and Yamaguchi Jinichi, with 68 joint patent families. SoftBank Robotics Europe co-files extensively with INRIA (44 families), CNRS (14 families), and Amenisis (13 families). Honda Motor collaborates with Tokyo Institute of Technology and the University of Tokyo. These patterns show that leading firms are actively drawing on academic research, particularly in France and Japan, as a portfolio-building strategy.

Industry-academia
Geography

US and China are near-parity primary filing venues

The United States leads jurisdiction coverage, closely followed by China, with Europe (EPO) and Japan as significant secondary venues. This near-parity between US and Chinese coverage reflects competing innovation ecosystems: established players filing primarily in the US and Japan alongside a rapidly growing Chinese applicant base securing domestic protection. Teams should ensure their freedom-to-operate analysis covers both jurisdictions.

US–China parity
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sony Group CorporationYamaguchi Jinichi68
SoftBank Robotics EuropeINRIA (Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique)44
SoftBank Robotics EuropeCNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)14
SoftBank Robotics EuropeAmenisis13
Aldebaran Robotics SAINRIA (Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique)12
Sony Group CorporationATR Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International10
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Tokyo Institute of Technology6
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.University of Tokyo4
Sony Group CorporationSony Electronics Inc.3
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts and jurisdiction figures are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

Sony anchors the field; Boston Dynamics and Sanctuary are the fastest movers

The leader and challenger profiles below highlight divergent trajectories: a dominant incumbent with a broad manipulation and consumer robotics portfolio versus a dynamic group of challengers with concentrated, high-velocity recent filing programs.

Leader · Sony Group Corp

Sony Group Corp

Sony holds 697 patent families, the largest portfolio in the corpus, concentrated in manipulator mechanics (B25J 5, B25J 13) and walking or moving toy figures (A63H 11), reflecting both industrial and consumer humanoid programs. Despite this scale, recent momentum shows a sharp contraction of –85% versus the prior three-year window, suggesting Sony’s program may have shifted toward internal development or licensing rather than continued heavy filing.

families: 697
Challenger · Boston Dynamics Inc

Boston Dynamics Inc

Boston Dynamics holds 458 patent families and is growing at +48% versus the prior period — the strongest momentum among established players. Its technology emphasis spans manipulator programs (B25J 9), legged and walking robots (B62D 57), and autonomous control (G05D 1), a profile that directly addresses full-body humanoid locomotion and task execution. Sanctuary Cognitive Systems, classified as a new entrant, has already accumulated 199 recent patent families with a similar focus on manipulator integration and sensing, making it the most notable emerging challenger.

families: 458
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum data for all top-100 filers in the humanoid robot landscape.
UBTECH Robotics Corp LtdSanctuary Cognitive Systems Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Sony Group Corporation11▼ -85%
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.35▲ +17%
Boston Dynamics, Inc.207▲ +48%
UBTECH Robotics Corp Ltd81▼ -32%
Sanctuary Cognitive Systems Corp199▲ new entrant
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Google LLC30▲ +15%
Beijing Institute of Technology17▼ -61%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant ranking is measured in patent families; momentum compares recent three-year filings to the prior three-year period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the manipulation core

Several IPC branches sit at lower share within this corpus relative to their technical relevance to humanoid robots. These observations highlight areas where the patent density is lower, which may reflect under-exploited technical territory or simply the early stage of those sub-disciplines.

G06N · AI models for robot cognition

G06N (Computing based on AI models) accounts for roughly 3% of branch records in the corpus — notably sparse given that large-language-model and reinforcement-learning-driven control is a central research theme for next-generation humanoids. The gap between research interest and patent filings suggests that firms integrating AI-native control stacks have an opportunity to establish prior art before the branch becomes crowded. A plausible entry path is filing around specific training pipelines, sim-to-real transfer methods, and on-robot inference architectures.

Search this in Eureka →

G05B · Control and regulating systems

G05B (Control and regulating systems) represents approximately 3% of branch records, indicating that systems-level control architecture — covering feedback loops, safety interlocks, and real-time scheduling for humanoid platforms — is underrepresented relative to the hardware-centric B25J core. For teams developing middleware or operating systems for humanoid robots, this branch offers a lower-density filing environment with clear technical value as the industry moves toward standardized control frameworks.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches with low filing density, mapped against technical relevance and competitor coverage.
G05D · Control of non-electric variablesA63H · Toy and entertainment humanoids+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are computed at the patent-record level and reflect relative density within the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 19 · Manipulators & robotsB25J 13 · Manipulators & robotsB62D 57 · Legged & walking robotsB25J 5 · Manipulators & robots
Sony Group CorporationModerate · 188Moderate · 144Strong · 382Moderate · 162Strong · 487
Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Strong · 141Strong · 133Strong · 149Strong · 124Strong · 176
Boston Dynamics, Inc.Strong · 289Emerging · 29Emerging · 52Strong · 179Absent
SoftBank Robotics EuropeStrong · 232Strong · 138AbsentEmerging · 36Moderate · 54
UBTECH Robotics Corp LtdStrong · 173Emerging · 33Moderate · 48Moderate · 64Absent
Sanctuary Cognitive Systems CorpStrong · 187Moderate · 51Moderate · 42AbsentAbsent
Japan Science and Technology AgencyAbsentAbsentStrong · 62Strong · 52Strong · 65
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own humanoid robot patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.