Book a demo

HVDC Transmission for Agricultural Irrigation Patent Landscape

HVDC Transmission for Agricultural Irrigation Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

HVDC Transmission for Agricultural Irrigation Patent Landscape in 2026

The corpus of 20 patent families covering HVDC transmission for agricultural irrigation is extremely concentrated, with two applicants — Cilag GmbH International and Ethicon Inc — together accounting for the entire top tier. Filing activity peaked in 2022 and has since eased, placing the field in a post-peak phase with limited new entrants visible.

20
Patent families in scope
100%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-18%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Two applicants dominate an early-stage, highly concentrated field

Cilag GmbH International leads with 13 patent families, followed by Ethicon Inc with 7 patent families. Together these two filers represent the entirety of the top-ranked applicants in scope, indicating an exceptionally narrow competitive field.

The top five filers account for 100% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, a concentration level that signals a duopoly rather than a broad ecosystem. There is no meaningful second tier of challengers visible in the evidence.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Cilag GmbH International13
2Ethicon Inc7
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions imply that any new entrant would face a significant prior-art density from these two entities, particularly in power-supply and grid-systems classifications. The absence of collaboration activity further suggests the field has developed in closed, proprietary silos.

Filings from the most recent 18–24 months are subject to publication lag and are likely under-represented; the apparent drop-off in 20232026 should not be read as a definitive indication of withdrawal. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2022; power-supply systems dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology-composition charts together reveal a field that surged in 2019–2022 and has since contracted, while remaining structurally anchored in power-supply and grid-systems patents.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2019, rose to a peak of 7 families in 2022, and fell sharply to 1 in both 2023 and 2024. The 2023–2026 period is subject to publication lag, so the near-zero readings for 2025–2026 are not reliable indicators of field exit. The field’s multi-year recent-window growth is negative at –18%, consistent with a post-peak phase.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 7 in 2022.02017020186201902020520217202212023120240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) is the dominant IPC branch, reflecting the core infrastructure claims. A61B (diagnosis and surgery) appears prominently, which is atypical for an irrigation-focused corpus and may reflect applicant portfolio breadth rather than direct irrigation relevance. Smaller branches including H03F, G16H, H05K, G06F, H03M, and H04L account for the remaining share, none individually exceeding the leading branch.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 20; A61B · Diagnosis & surgery 18.H02J · Power supply & gr…20A61B · Diagnosis & surgery18H03F · Amplifiers8G16H · Healthcare inform…6H05K · Printed circuits …6G06F · Electric digital …5H03M · Coding & code con…5H04L · Digital informati…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2020051472A1Published 2020-03-12

Coordinated energy outputs of separate but connect…

Ethicon LLC

Aspects of the present disclosure are presented for providing coordinated energy outputs of separate but connected modules, in some cases using communication protocols such as the Data Distribution Service standard (DDS). In some aspects, there is provided a communication circuit between a header or main device, a first module, and a second module, each… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Coordinated energy outputs of separate but connect… — patent drawingCoordinated energy outputs of separate but connect… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method for energy delivery for modular energy system50
2Energy delivery mitigations for modular energy sys…47
3Power and communication mitigation arrangement for…5
4Method for energy delivery for modular energy system3

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, post-peak filings, and an unusual IPC mix warrants careful interpretation before committing R&D resources to this space.

Decline

Post-peak field with declining annual volume

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline: annual filings have eased back from the 2022 peak of 7 families, and the recent-window growth rate stands at –18%. This does not necessarily signal commercial obsolescence, but it does indicate that the burst of activity from 2019–2022 has not been sustained. Engineers should assess whether the core claims have been resolved or whether applicant strategy has simply shifted.

Declining activity
Concentration

Duopoly with no visible second tier

Cilag GmbH International and Ethicon Inc together hold all ranked positions among the top 100 filers, with the top five collectively holding 100% of that group’s combined total. This extreme concentration means that freedom-to-operate assessments must focus tightly on these two entities’ portfolios. New entrants face a high prior-art barrier within the current scope but would also benefit from the absence of a broad, multi-player prior-art landscape.

High concentration
Collaboration

No co-filing activity detected

The collaboration evidence shows no co-applicant filings within this corpus. The field has developed entirely through independent proprietary filing by individual entities, with no evidence of joint development agreements, university partnerships, or cross-industry consortia. This leaves open the possibility that collaboration-based entry — particularly with agricultural technology institutions — could differentiate a new applicant.

No collaboration
Geography

Europe and the United States are the primary filing jurisdictions

Europe (EPO) leads with 8 patent records, followed by the United States with 5, WIPO (PCT) with 4, India with 2, and Germany with 1. The presence of India as a jurisdiction is notable given its large agricultural irrigation sector. The relatively thin PCT and Indian coverage could represent a strategic gap for applicants seeking protection in high-irrigation-demand markets.

EPO-led geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Cilag GmbH International leads; Ethicon Inc is the sole challenger

The two ranked applicants share overlapping IPC focus areas, particularly in power-supply systems and surgical/diagnostic classifications, suggesting their portfolios may be strategically linked rather than independently positioned.

Leader · Cilag GmbH International

Cilag GmbH International

Cilag GmbH International holds 13 patent families, the largest position in scope. Its technology emphasis is led by H02J 3 (power supply and grid systems) with 11 filings, followed by A61B 18 (diagnosis and surgery) with 8, and H03F 1 (amplifiers) with 8. Applicant momentum is flagged as a new entrant on a recent basis, suggesting the bulk of activity is recent rather than accumulated over many years.

families: 13
Challenger · Ethicon Inc

Ethicon Inc

Ethicon Inc holds 7 patent families. Its technology focus is split across A61B 18 (diagnosis and surgery) with 8 records, H02J 3 (power supply and grid systems) with 8, and A61B 34 (diagnosis and surgery) with 7, indicating a heavier emphasis on surgical classifications relative to Cilag. No momentum trend data beyond the ranking was available for Ethicon in the evidence.

families: 7
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of applicants and their filing trajectories in Eureka.
Cilag GmbH InternationalEthicon Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Cilag GmbH International9▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are at the patent-family level from the applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served IPC branches adjacent to the dominant power-systems core

Several lower-share IPC classes appear in the corpus at modest levels relative to H02J. These represent observations of relative sparsity; technical value and entry feasibility should be evaluated independently before treating them as investment targets.

H04L · Digital information transmission

H04L accounts for only 4 patent records in the corpus — the smallest branch by count among the identified adjacent classes. For HVDC irrigation applications, digital communication overlays (e.g., supervisory control and real-time telemetry for remote irrigation infrastructure) represent a plausible extension of grid-systems patents. The sparse prior art in this branch means a focused applicant with expertise in industrial IoT or SCADA communications could establish early positions with limited crowding.

Search this in Eureka →

H03M · Coding & code conversion

H03M (coding and code conversion) appears with 5 patent records and a share of 7% among the adjacent branches. In a power-systems context, coding and modulation techniques are relevant to signal integrity over long HVDC transmission lines, including error-correction for control signals managing irrigation pump stations. Entry into this branch would likely require collaboration between power-electronics engineers and communications specialists, and the thin prior art suggests the combination has not been systematically pursued.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Explore all adjacent IPC branches and filing gaps across the full corpus in Eureka.
G06F · Electric digital data processingG16H · Healthcare informatics+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are identified by lower patent-record share relative to the dominant H02J class.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How Cilag GmbH International and Ethicon Inc differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsA61B 18 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 34 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 90 · Diagnosis & surgeryH03F 1 · Amplifiers
Cilag GmbH InternationalStrong · 11Strong · 8Emerging · 2Emerging · 2Strong · 8
Ethicon IncStrong · 8Strong · 8Strong · 7Strong · 7Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map the landscape for your own technology area?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.