Book a demo

HVDC Transmission for Renewable Integration Patent Landscape

HVDC Transmission for Renewable Integration Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape

HVDC Transmission for Renewable Integration Patent Landscape in 2026

General Electric and its affiliated entities dominate this field, collectively anchoring the top four ranked positions among the hundred largest filers in a moderately concentrated but still-growing space. Annual filing activity has expanded 42% over the recent window, with power-conversion and grid-systems technologies accounting for the overwhelming share of disclosed innovation.

432
Patent families in scope
38%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+42%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

General Electric leads a concentrated but multi-player field

General Electric Co holds the top position with 91 patent records, followed by Hitachi Energy Ltd at 62 and GE Energy Power Conversion Technology Ltd (GB) at 50 — the three alone account for a substantial portion of the hundred largest filers’ combined output.

The top five filers — General Electric Co, Hitachi Energy Ltd, GE Energy Power Conversion Technology Ltd (GB), General Electric Tech GmbH, and Rajiv Kumar Varma — together represent 38% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, signaling meaningful concentration at the top tier with a visible gap before the mid-tier players such as LSIS Co Ltd and Hamilton Sundstrand Corp (20 records each).

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1General Electric Co91
2Hitachi Energy Ltd62
3GE Energy Power Conversion Technology Ltd (GB)50
4General Electric Tech GmbH37
5VARMA RAJIV KUMAR25
6LSIS Co Ltd20
7Hamilton Sundstrand Corp20
8Siemens AG16
9ABB (Schweiz) AG16
10Hitachi Ltd14
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Indian Institute of Technology10
12Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV10
13CET Power Luxembourg SA10
14Supergrid Institute SAS10
15Zhejiang University10
16University of Cape Town10
17Resilient Power Systems LLC10
18NR Electric Co Ltd10
19NR Engineering Co Ltd10
20Universite Grenoble Alpes10
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The dominance of GE-affiliated entities across three of the top four positions suggests a deliberate portfolio strategy spanning AC/DC power conversion, grid interconnection, and rotating-machine controls; challengers entering must navigate a dense claim landscape in those core branches.

The most recent 18–24 months of data are subject to publication lag and should be treated as under-counts; the 20252026 figures in particular will rise as pending applications are published. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity is rising on a multi-year basis; power conversion and grid systems dominate the technology mix

The annual trend chart reveals a field in sustained growth punctuated by a notable 2023 peak, while the technology-composition chart shows that two IPC classes — grid systems and power conversion — account for the large majority of all disclosures.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 44 in 2017 to a peak of 73 in both 2023 and 2024 before the 2025 figure drops to 35 — a drop that reflects publication lag rather than a real decline. The 42% multi-year growth figure confirms the underlying upward trajectory; engineers should treat 2025–2026 counts as provisional.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 73 in 2023.44201739201829201959202040202136202273202373202435202542026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H02J (Power supply and grid systems) leads with 656 patent records, followed by H02M (Power conversion, AC/DC) at 367. All other branches — including H02H (Protective circuits), G05B (Control systems), and F03D (Wind turbines) — each contribute fewer than 50 records, confirming that core converter and grid-interface IP is where competition is densest.

Technology compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems leads with 656; H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.) 367.H02J · Power supply & gr…656H02M · Power conversion …367H02H · Protective circui…49G05B · Control & regulat…45F03D · Wind motors (wind…32G06F · Electric digital …32G06Q · Business, commerc…31G01R · Electric & magnet…24↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20180097450A1Published 2018-04-05

Hybrid high voltage direct current converter stati…

Abb Power Grids Switzerland AG

An objective of the invention to provide a hybrid converter station for HVDC system and the method operating the same. The hybrid rectifier station for high voltage direct current system includes: at least one AC bus; at least one line commutated converter configured to convert a portion of AC power supplied from the at least one AC bus to DC power… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Hybrid high voltage direct current converter stati… — patent drawingHybrid high voltage direct current converter stati… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1System, method, rotating machine and computer prog…333
2Collection of electric power from renewable energy…211
3Pulse width modulated control for hybrid inverters130
4System, method, rotating machine and computer prog…128
5Novel multi-level converter topology with the poss…124
6Modular converter with multilevel submodules114
7Bi-directional multilevel AC-DC converter arrangem…97
8Electric power system based on renewable energy so…88

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

Four dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — define the strategic context for any team evaluating entry or expansion in HVDC for renewable integration.

Growth

Growth stage: 42% multi-year expansion with activity rising

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, with annual filings rising and the multi-year window up 42%. The 2023–2024 peak at 73 filings per year represents the highest recorded annual volume in the dataset. Teams entering now face an active but still-open landscape rather than a mature, fully saturated one.

Growth stage
Concentration

Top five hold 38% of the hundred largest filers’ output

The top five filers collectively account for 38% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, with GE-affiliated entities occupying three of those five slots. The mid-tier — LSIS Co Ltd, Hamilton Sundstrand Corp, Siemens AG, ABB (Schweiz) AG — each hold materially fewer records, creating a visible tier gap. New entrants face dense prior art in converter and grid-interface branches but have more room in adjacent control and protection classes.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

ABB–Hitachi Energy pairing is the most active co-filing relationship

The most frequent co-filing pair is ABB (Schweiz) AG with Hitachi Energy Switzerland AG, with 7 joint records — reflecting the post-merger organizational overlap between those entities. General Electric Co and Equinor Energy AS have co-filed on 4 records, indicating an operator–OEM collaboration channel. Hitachi Energy Ltd also co-files with both ABB (Schweiz) AG and Hitachi Energy Switzerland AG, pointing to active intra-group portfolio coordination.

Consolidation-driven co-filing
Geography

United States and EPO lead; India is the fourth-largest jurisdiction

The United States leads with 267 patent records, followed by EPO at 178 and WIPO (PCT) at 97. India ranks fourth at 77 records — notably ahead of Germany (39), Australia (32), and Canada (32) — likely reflecting the academic and independent-inventor activity visible in the applicant list. China holds only 12 records in this corpus, suggesting either a portfolio gap or a distinct domestic filing strategy outside the scope captured here.

US-centric with broad PCT reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
ABB (Schweiz) AGHitachi Energy Switzerland AG7
General Electric CoEquinor Energy AS4
Hitachi Energy LtdHitachi Energy Switzerland AG2
Hitachi Energy LtdABB (Schweiz) AG2
VARMA RAJIV KUMARUniversity of Western Ontario1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a family validated in multiple offices appears in each relevant jurisdiction count.Explore insights →
Leaders

General Electric and Hitachi Energy lead by volume; technology emphasis differs

The top two filers share grid-systems and power-conversion as primary branches but differ in emphasis: General Electric Co concentrates on AC/DC conversion hardware, while Hitachi Energy Ltd anchors its portfolio in grid-system interconnection.

Leader · General Electric Co

General Electric Co

General Electric Co holds 91 patent records — the largest single-applicant position in this corpus. Its technology focus is led by H02M 7 (AC/DC power conversion, 68 records), followed by H02J 3 (grid systems, 45 records) and H02M 1 (power conversion fundamentals, 24 records), indicating deep investment in converter hardware for grid tie-in. Recent-period momentum is flagged as a new entrant pattern in the most recent window (2 recent records), which likely reflects reclassification of activity across the GE-affiliated entities rather than a genuine pullback.

patent records: 91
Challenger · Hitachi Energy Ltd

Hitachi Energy Ltd

Hitachi Energy Ltd ranks second with 62 patent records and shows a new-entrant trajectory in the most recent window (35 recent records), indicating rapidly accelerating disclosure activity under the Hitachi Energy brand following the ABB Power Grids acquisition. Its primary focus is H02J 3 (grid systems, 41 records), with secondary positions in H02J 7 (charging/storage grid integration, 12 records) and H02M 7 (AC/DC conversion, 11 records) — a profile weighted toward grid architecture rather than converter hardware.

patent records: 62
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top 20 applicants including LSIS Co Ltd, Hamilton Sundstrand Corp, Siemens AG, and ABB (Schweiz) AG.
LSIS Co LtdSiemens AG+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
General Electric Co2▲ new entrant
Hitachi Energy Ltd35▲ new entrant
General Electric Tech GmbH3▼ -87%
ABB (Schweiz) AG2▲ new entrant
Hamilton Sundstrand Corp2▲ new entrant
VARMA RAJIV KUMAR3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are patent records from the applicant ranking; technology emphasis drawn from subclass-level IPC focus data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches in HVDC protection and control

Compared with the dominant H02J and H02M branches, several adjacent IPC classes hold relatively sparse patent records despite clear technical relevance to HVDC for renewable integration; these are observations of relative sparsity, not validated commercial opportunities.

H02H · Protective circuit arrangements

H02H carries only 49 patent records — roughly 3% of all branch-level records in the corpus — despite fault protection being a well-recognized engineering challenge in multi-terminal HVDC grids fed by variable renewable sources. DC fault detection and isolation hardware remains technically demanding and commercially relevant for meshed offshore grids. Teams with competencies in fast-acting DC breakers or converter-level protection logic may find room to differentiate, given the limited existing claim density relative to H02J and H02M.

Search this in Eureka →

G05B · Control & regulating systems

G05B holds 45 patent records — also approximately 3% of branch-level records — despite the growing importance of advanced control strategies (e.g., model-predictive control, adaptive droop) for coordinating multiple renewable sources over long-distance HVDC links. The combination of sparse patent density and evident technical need makes this an adjacent branch worth monitoring. Entry paths likely exist at the intersection of real-time control software and HVDC converter modulation, though overlap with H02J and H02M claims should be carefully assessed.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all five under-served adjacent branches including F03D (Wind turbines) and G06F (Digital data processing) with filing-density overlays.
F03D · Wind motors (wind turbines)G06F · Electric digital data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch record counts are at the patent-record level across the full corpus; share figures reflect each branch’s proportion of total branch-level records.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH02J 3 · Power supply & grid systemsH02M 7 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02M 1 · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)H02J 1 · Power supply & grid systemsH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systems
General Electric CoStrong · 45Strong · 68Moderate · 24Emerging · 13Absent
Hitachi Energy LtdStrong · 41Moderate · 11Emerging · 7AbsentModerate · 12
General Electric Tech GmbHStrong · 36Moderate · 11Moderate · 10Emerging · 6Absent
GE Energy Power Conversion Technology Ltd (GB)Strong · 13Strong · 18Strong · 13AbsentAbsent
VARMA RAJIV KUMARStrong · 16Strong · 10AbsentAbsentEmerging · 3
Hamilton Sundstrand CorpAbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 13Strong · 16
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own HVDC patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.