Book a demo

HVDC Transmission Safety Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

HVDC Transmission Safety Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hvdc-transmission-safety-and-compliance-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Smart Grid & Energy Systems
HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance Patents
  • A thin, concentrated record. just 19 patent families match this claim set, with filings peaking at 5 in 2020 and falling back to nothing by the 2022 midpoint.
  • Power grid IPC dominates. every matching record sits in H02J, while protection (H02H), conversion (H02M) and solar-coupled (H02S) claims each account for only a handful.
  • No single filer has recent momentum. every tracked assignee, including Hitachi Energy at -100% YoY, shows zero filings in the latest year — this is a quiet claim space right now.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
19
Published Records
84%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 19 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A narrow, specific claim space around HVDC safety compliance

This landscape isolates patent families that combine HVDC transmission terminology with explicit DC protection compliance, insulation coordination or grid code compliance language, restricted to IPC classes covering protective circuits, AC/DC grid interconnection and power conversion. That combination is deliberately narrow: it is not a general HVDC landscape but the subset where safety and regulatory compliance are claimed as such.

The result is a small corpus of 19 families spanning 2015 through the 2026 cutoff, concentrated almost entirely in power supply and grid systems classifications. Filing activity is uneven rather than trending, which matters for how a reader should read the trend chart that follows.

Filing activity, 2015–2026
  1. 1SAE Power Lux (Luxembourg) S.A.8
  2. 2AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH3
  3. 3LS Electric Co., Ltd.2
  4. 4ABB Technology Ltd.2
  5. 5Hitachi Energy Ltd.1
  6. 6VEERABHADRA ELITE ELECTRODYNAMIC SOLUTIONS LLP1
  7. 7LS Electric Co., Ltd.1
  8. 8ATLANTIC GRID OPERATIONS A LLC1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final year or two of any trend chart will always look thinner than filing activity actually was. Read the shape of the curve, not the endpoint.

A single peak, then decline

Filings were at zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 5 in 2020, and had returned to 0 by the 2022 midpoint before the most recent partial year. That is not a growth curve — it reads as a short burst of filing activity around 2019-2021 rather than a sustained build-out.

A single peak, then decline013450201720182019520202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H02J carries the entire dataset

All 19 matching records classify under H02J (power supply and grid systems), with secondary classifications scattered thinly across telephonic communication (5), protective circuit arrangements (3), power conversion (3) and photovoltaic generation (3). Control systems, digital data processing and nanotechnology each appear once or twice, suggesting compliance claims are being drafted as grid-system patents first and only incidentally touching protection or conversion hardware.

H02J carries the entire datasetH02J · Power supply & grid systems19100.0%H04M · Telephonic communication526.3%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements315.8%H02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)315.8%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…315.8%G05B · Control & regulating systems210.5%G06F · Electric digital data processi…210.5%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications15.3%Other421.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 19 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hvdc transmission safety and compliance and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this corpus

Representative Filing
WO2025132716A12025-06-26

System for the generation and transmission of high-voltage direct current

AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GMBH

The application describes an HVDC transmission line carried by pylons, with a high-voltage PV generator connected directly to a transmission pole and power conversion equipment feeding an AC or DC grid. At least one row of PV modules is coupled straight onto the HVDC line rather than through a separate collection and inversion stage.Filed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, published 2025-06-26.

WO2025132716A1 — patent drawing 1WO2025132716A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2013115915A1Control and protection of a DC power grid17
2US20210288492A1Safe and resilient energy distribution for a highly efficient microgrid6
3WO2021180638A1Safe and resilient energy distribution system for a highly efficient microgrid2
4EP3879661A1Safe and resilient energy distribution system for a highly efficient microgrid2
5KR1020150130156AApparatus and method for insulation design of high voltage direct current transmission system2

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of having had longer to accumulate references within the searched corpus; treat this as a signal of influence on later drafting, not of current commercial relevance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

With only 19 families total, this is a corpus where a handful of filings define the entire competitive picture — read the following in that light.

Filing activity
Peak 5 in 2020
families filed

A short burst, not a build-out

Activity rose to a peak of 5 families in 2020 and had fallen back to zero by the 2022 midpoint. That pattern is more consistent with a cluster of related filings around a single development cycle than an emerging technology gaining sustained interest.

2017: 0 → 2020 peak: 5 → 2022: 0
Classification concentration
19 of 19 in H02J
records

Compliance claims are drafted as grid-system patents

Every record in this dataset classifies under H02J, power supply and grid systems. Protective circuit arrangements (H02H) and power conversion (H02M) each appear in only 3 records, meaning the protection and conversion hardware angles on HVDC safety are comparatively thin.

H02H: 3 · H02M: 3 · H02S: 3
Geographic filing
EPO leads at 6
receiving-office filings

Europe and PCT dominate the filing route

Europe (EPO) accounts for 6 of the tracked receiving-office filings and WIPO/PCT for 4, with South Korea and the United States at 2 each. That skew points to European and multi-jurisdictional filers treating this as a compliance-driven, cross-border claim area rather than a single-market one.

EPO 6 · PCT 4 · KR 2 · US 2
Citation leadership
17 citations
on the top record

One older filing anchors the prior art

WO2013115915A1, on control and protection of a DC power grid, carries 17 citations, well ahead of the next tier of records clustered around 2 to 6. Anyone drafting protection-logic claims in this space should expect examiners to cite it.

Next-highest cited record: 6 citations
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hvdc transmission safety and compliance, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

A fragmented field with no current momentum leader

Every assignee tracked in the recent-momentum data shows zero filings in the latest year, including Hitachi Energy, which recorded a -100% year-on-year change. That flatness across the board, not any single company's retreat, is the notable finding here.

Momentum
0 latest-year filings
across every tracked assignee

No active filer right now

AIT, LS Electric, ABB, Hitachi Energy and other tracked assignees all show zero filings in the most recent year, with Hitachi Energy specifically down -100% year-on-year. This is consistent with the broader trend data showing the 2020 peak has not been sustained.

Hitachi Energy: -100% YoY
Filing base
19 total families
across all assignees

A shallow field, easy to map fully

With only 19 families across the entire tracked corpus, no single assignee is likely to hold a dominant blocking position. This favours new entrants who can identify the specific claims already staked out rather than working around a deep thicket.

19 families, 19 IPC-matched records
Filing routes
6 at EPO
leading receiving office

European filing is the most contested route

The European Patent Office receives the largest share of filings in this dataset at 6, ahead of PCT at 4. A filer targeting Europe should expect the most examiner familiarity with this specific compliance claim combination there.

EPO 6 · WIPO/PCT 4
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with thin representation in this dataset relative to the core H02J grid-system claims.
DC fault-current limiting circuitsPV-to-HVDC direct pole couplinginsulation coordination for converter stationsgrid-code-driven protection relay logicmulti-terminal HVDC compliance testing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SAE Power Lux (Luxembourg) S.A.0
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH0
LS Electric Co., Ltd.0
ABB Technology Ltd.0
Hitachi Energy Ltd.0-100%
VEERABHADRA ELITE ELECTRODYNAMIC SOLUTIONS LLP0
LS Electric Co., Ltd.0
ATLANTIC GRID OPERATIONS A LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset here is narrow by design; the next steps depend on whether you need freedom-to-operate certainty or a broader view of adjacent HVDC claim territory.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited record

WO2013115915A1's 17 citations make it the single most important prior-art reference to clear before drafting new DC grid protection claims.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Watch for renewed filing activity

With every tracked assignee at zero in the latest year, a new filing from any of them would be the first sign the 2020 peak is being repeated.

Set up monitoring in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches before committing claims

PV-to-HVDC direct coupling and multi-terminal compliance testing show thin coverage relative to core grid-system claims — worth a targeted search before drafting.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on HVDC transmission safety patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hvdc transmission safety and compliance corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.