HVDC Transmission Safety Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
- A thin, concentrated record. just 19 patent families match this claim set, with filings peaking at 5 in 2020 and falling back to nothing by the 2022 midpoint.
- Power grid IPC dominates. every matching record sits in H02J, while protection (H02H), conversion (H02M) and solar-coupled (H02S) claims each account for only a handful.
- No single filer has recent momentum. every tracked assignee, including Hitachi Energy at -100% YoY, shows zero filings in the latest year — this is a quiet claim space right now.
Filing growth compares 2021 (3 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 19 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A narrow, specific claim space around HVDC safety compliance
This landscape isolates patent families that combine HVDC transmission terminology with explicit DC protection compliance, insulation coordination or grid code compliance language, restricted to IPC classes covering protective circuits, AC/DC grid interconnection and power conversion. That combination is deliberately narrow: it is not a general HVDC landscape but the subset where safety and regulatory compliance are claimed as such.
The result is a small corpus of 19 families spanning 2015 through the 2026 cutoff, concentrated almost entirely in power supply and grid systems classifications. Filing activity is uneven rather than trending, which matters for how a reader should read the trend chart that follows.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the final year or two of any trend chart will always look thinner than filing activity actually was. Read the shape of the curve, not the endpoint.
A single peak, then decline
Filings were at zero in 2017, rose to a peak of 5 in 2020, and had returned to 0 by the 2022 midpoint before the most recent partial year. That is not a growth curve — it reads as a short burst of filing activity around 2019-2021 rather than a sustained build-out.
H02J carries the entire dataset
All 19 matching records classify under H02J (power supply and grid systems), with secondary classifications scattered thinly across telephonic communication (5), protective circuit arrangements (3), power conversion (3) and photovoltaic generation (3). Control systems, digital data processing and nanotechnology each appear once or twice, suggesting compliance claims are being drafted as grid-system patents first and only incidentally touching protection or conversion hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 19 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hvdc transmission safety and compliance and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this corpus
System for the generation and transmission of high-voltage direct current
The application describes an HVDC transmission line carried by pylons, with a high-voltage PV generator connected directly to a transmission pole and power conversion equipment feeding an AC or DC grid. At least one row of PV modules is coupled straight onto the HVDC line rather than through a separate collection and inversion stage.Filed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology, published 2025-06-26.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2013115915A1 | Control and protection of a DC power grid | 17 |
| 2 | US20210288492A1 | Safe and resilient energy distribution for a highly efficient microgrid | 6 |
| 3 | WO2021180638A1 | Safe and resilient energy distribution system for a highly efficient microgrid | 2 |
| 4 | EP3879661A1 | Safe and resilient energy distribution system for a highly efficient microgrid | 2 |
| 5 | KR1020150130156A | Apparatus and method for insulation design of high voltage direct current transmission system | 2 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of having had longer to accumulate references within the searched corpus; treat this as a signal of influence on later drafting, not of current commercial relevance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
With only 19 families total, this is a corpus where a handful of filings define the entire competitive picture — read the following in that light.
A short burst, not a build-out
Activity rose to a peak of 5 families in 2020 and had fallen back to zero by the 2022 midpoint. That pattern is more consistent with a cluster of related filings around a single development cycle than an emerging technology gaining sustained interest.
Compliance claims are drafted as grid-system patents
Every record in this dataset classifies under H02J, power supply and grid systems. Protective circuit arrangements (H02H) and power conversion (H02M) each appear in only 3 records, meaning the protection and conversion hardware angles on HVDC safety are comparatively thin.
Europe and PCT dominate the filing route
Europe (EPO) accounts for 6 of the tracked receiving-office filings and WIPO/PCT for 4, with South Korea and the United States at 2 each. That skew points to European and multi-jurisdictional filers treating this as a compliance-driven, cross-border claim area rather than a single-market one.
One older filing anchors the prior art
WO2013115915A1, on control and protection of a DC power grid, carries 17 citations, well ahead of the next tier of records clustered around 2 to 6. Anyone drafting protection-logic claims in this space should expect examiners to cite it.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hvdc transmission safety and compliance, with the prior art for and against each one.
A fragmented field with no current momentum leader
Every assignee tracked in the recent-momentum data shows zero filings in the latest year, including Hitachi Energy, which recorded a -100% year-on-year change. That flatness across the board, not any single company's retreat, is the notable finding here.
No active filer right now
AIT, LS Electric, ABB, Hitachi Energy and other tracked assignees all show zero filings in the most recent year, with Hitachi Energy specifically down -100% year-on-year. This is consistent with the broader trend data showing the 2020 peak has not been sustained.
A shallow field, easy to map fully
With only 19 families across the entire tracked corpus, no single assignee is likely to hold a dominant blocking position. This favours new entrants who can identify the specific claims already staked out rather than working around a deep thicket.
European filing is the most contested route
The European Patent Office receives the largest share of filings in this dataset at 6, ahead of PCT at 4. A filer targeting Europe should expect the most examiner familiarity with this specific compliance claim combination there.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SAE Power Lux (Luxembourg) S.A. | 0 | — |
| AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH | 0 | — |
| LS Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ABB Technology Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Hitachi Energy Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| VEERABHADRA ELITE ELECTRODYNAMIC SOLUTIONS LLP | 0 | — |
| LS Electric Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ATLANTIC GRID OPERATIONS A LLC | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset here is narrow by design; the next steps depend on whether you need freedom-to-operate certainty or a broader view of adjacent HVDC claim territory.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited record
WO2013115915A1's 17 citations make it the single most important prior-art reference to clear before drafting new DC grid protection claims.
Explore prior art in EurekaWatch for renewed filing activity
With every tracked assignee at zero in the latest year, a new filing from any of them would be the first sign the 2020 peak is being repeated.
Set up monitoring in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches before committing claims
PV-to-HVDC direct coupling and multi-terminal compliance testing show thin coverage relative to core grid-system claims — worth a targeted search before drafting.
Run a white space search in EurekaCommon questions on HVDC transmission safety patents
This landscape identifies 19 patent families that combine HVDC transmission terminology with explicit safety-compliance language such as DC protection compliance, insulation coordination or grid code compliance, filtered to relevant power-systems IPC classes. That is a small, specific corpus rather than a general HVDC patent count, since it excludes filings that mention HVDC without making a compliance-related claim. Anyone using this figure for competitive analysis should treat it as the compliance-specific subset, not the full HVDC transmission patent universe.
The dataset shows a fragmented ownership picture with no assignee showing filing activity in the most recent year, including larger names such as Hitachi Energy, ABB and LS Electric. Hitachi Energy specifically recorded a -100% year-on-year change, meaning it had filings previously but none most recently. With only 19 families across the whole field, ownership is spread thin enough that no single company holds a dominant blocking position right now.
Filing activity rose to a peak of 5 families in 2020, then dropped to zero by the 2022 midpoint. This pattern is more consistent with a short cluster of related development work, possibly tied to a specific regulatory update or project deployment, than with sustained R&D investment. Readers should also account for publication lag: filings from the last one to two years are undercounted in any dataset with a mid-2026 cutoff, so the apparent decline may soften once later filings publish.
Relative to the 19-of-19 concentration in H02J power-grid classifications, areas like DC fault-current limiting circuits, PV-to-HVDC direct pole coupling, insulation coordination specific to converter stations, and multi-terminal HVDC compliance testing show comparatively thin representation. These sit adjacent to the core grid-system claims but are not the primary focus of most filings in this corpus. A first claim in one of these branches would need to tie a specific protection or coordination mechanism to a named HVDC configuration rather than claiming the grid system generally.
WO2013115915A1, covering control and protection of a DC power grid, is the most-cited record in this corpus at 17 citations, well ahead of the next tier which clusters around 2 to 6 citations. Records describing safe and resilient energy distribution for microgrids also recur across multiple jurisdictions (US, WO and EP filings of essentially the same invention), indicating that family is actively being pursued for broad geographic coverage. Any new DC protection or grid-safety claim should be checked against both of these before drafting.
Research HVDC Transmission Safety and Compliance in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole hvdc transmission safety and compliance corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.