HVDC Transmission Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
- Filing has plateaued, not grown. Activity peaked at 11 families in 2021 and sat at 8 by the 2022 midpoint, with no assignee in this dataset showing filings in the latest year.
- Grid control claims dominate power conversion claims. H02J records (143) outnumber H02M power-conversion records (43) by more than 3 to 1, showing the claim pressure sits on system-level DC grid control rather than converter hardware.
- Filing is split across five receiving offices with no single gateway. EPO (39), US (27), WIPO/PCT (22), China (13) and Germany (12) each carry a meaningful share, so a freedom-to-operate check has to clear multiple jurisdictions rather than one home market.
Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 151 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent families combining HVDC transmission terminology with claims specific to multi-terminal HVDC, DC grid control and grid support control, filtered to the IPC classes covering grid power supply (H02J) and power conversion (H02M) hardware. That combination isolates system-level DC grid integration work from the much larger body of general HVDC converter and rectifier patents that do not address multi-terminal or grid-support control specifically.
151 patent families span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with publication naturally lagging filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years of activity in the trend line will read lower than the eventual filed total.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 151 families: how filing activity has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A peak in 2021, then plateau
Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2021, then eased to 8 at the 2022 midpoint. Read the tail years as undercounted rather than as a genuine drop-off, given publication lag.
Grid control outweighs conversion hardware
H02J (power supply and grid systems) covers 143 of the 151 records, versus 43 for H02M (power conversion) and 28 for H02H (protective circuits). The overlap indicates most families claim grid-level control logic layered on top of, rather than instead of, conversion and protection hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 151 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on HVDC Transmission Smart Grid with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hvdc transmission smart grid and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
WO2025083383A1 — Stability of multi-terminal HVDC systems and control methods
The filing describes a method of stabilising a multi-terminal HVDC system by characterising and optimising dynamic performance across a transfer network so that each transfer branch and each HVDC converter is bounded input bounded output stable, avoiding instability caused by interactions between converters.Filed by Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission, published 2025-04-24.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20130197704A1 | DC connection scheme for windfarm with internal MVDC collection grid | 197 |
| 2 | US20120092904A1 | Coordinated control of multi-terminal HVDC systems | 44 |
| 3 | WO2010115452A1 | Power flow control in a meshed HVDC power transmission network | 36 |
| 4 | WO2012044369A1 | Coordinated control of multi-terminal HVDC systems | 32 |
| 5 | US20150131342A1 | Multi terminal HVDC control | 31 |
| 6 | US20130322131A1 | Cascaded converter station and cascaded multi-terminal HVDC power transmission system | 26 |
| 7 | US20160254669A1 | Coordinated control of multi-terminal HVDC systems | 25 |
| 8 | EP2688191A1 | Multi terminal HVDC control | 24 |
| 9 | US20130229739A1 | Voltage balancing of symmetric HVDC monopole transmission lines after earth faults | 23 |
| 10 | WO2010115453A1 | DC voltage compensation in a multi-terminal HVDC power transmission network | 19 |
Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, class composition and citation pattern above.
Growth has flattened, not accelerated
The peak year of 11 families in 2021 was not sustained; by the 2022 midpoint activity had already eased to 8. Combined with an 18-month publication lag, this looks more like a maturing claim space than an expanding one.
Grid-control logic is the crowded layer
Nearly all records touch H02J, the grid power-supply class, while only 43 also carry H02M conversion codes. New entrants filing pure grid-control logic without a hardware tie will meet the densest prior art.
Influence sits with a handful of early filings
The most-cited record draws 197 citations, well ahead of the next tier around 30-44. That gap suggests foundational multi-terminal control concepts were staked out early and later filings build on, rather than replace, them.
No single gateway office
EPO leads with 39 records but does not approach a majority; US, WIPO/PCT, China and Germany each carry a meaningful share. Clearance work has to be run across jurisdictions rather than treated as a single-market question.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hvdc transmission smart grid, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the ground, and where it's open
Recent-year momentum across the leading assignees in this dataset reads flat: every major filer tracked shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the plateau visible in the overall trend and the publication lag on very recent filings.
Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission
Filer of the representative WO2025083383A1 stability-control application, addressing converter interaction instability in multi-terminal systems. Momentum in the most recent year reads at zero, in line with every other tracked assignee, likely reflecting publication lag rather than a stop in filing.
ABB and Siemens
Both appear among the strongest co-assignee and filing entities in this dataset, consistent with their long-standing position in HVDC converter and grid-control equipment. Neither shows filings in the latest tracked year.
State Grid Corporation of China
China-origin filings account for 13 of the 151 records overall. State Grid appears in the leading-assignee set, reflecting China's parallel domestic build-out of multi-terminal HVDC infrastructure.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| ABB Technology Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Ipsotek Research Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission plc | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| State Grid Corporation of China | 0 | — |
| General Electric Technology GmbH | 0 | — |
| JUHLIN LARS ERIK | 0 | — |
| Jaume I University, Castellon | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a plateaued, jurisdictionally spread field with concentration in grid-control claims. Two follow-on checks are worth running before committing a filing strategy.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on the gate chips
The under-claimed branches above — fault ride-through coordination, converter interaction stability, hybrid AC/DC protection — carry lighter IPC density than core grid-control claims and deserve a targeted search rather than an assumption of white space.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaTrack the top-cited families forward
The 197-citation record and its immediate tier anchor most later filings; a forward-citation pull on those specific families will show which competitors have built directly on them.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions on HVDC transmission patents
The dataset's leading-assignee ranking includes established grid-equipment manufacturers such as ABB and Siemens, transmission utilities such as Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission, and state grid operators including State Grid Corporation of China and General Electric's grid technology arm. None of these assignees shows filings in the latest tracked year, which is consistent with an overall filing plateau rather than any single company stepping back. A practical read is that the field is held by a small group of long-standing industrial and utility filers rather than a wave of new entrants.
Not clearly. Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2021, then eased to 8 by the 2022 midpoint, and the trend does not show renewed acceleration afterward. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one to two years in any such trend will always look lower than the eventual total, so a flat or declining recent tail should not be read as certain decline. Taken together, the pattern looks like a maturing rather than expanding claim space.
Most records sit in H02J, the class covering power supply and grid systems, which accounts for 143 of the 151 families in this dataset. H02M, power conversion, covers 43 records, and H02H, protective circuit arrangements, covers 28; smaller counts appear in digital data processing (G06F), switches and relays (H01H), and electric measurement (G01R). The heavy overlap between H02J and the smaller classes indicates most inventions claim grid-level control logic layered on existing conversion and protection hardware rather than new hardware architectures on their own.
WO2025083383A1, filed by Scottish Hydro Electric Transmission and published in April 2025, describes methods for stabilising multi-terminal HVDC systems by characterising and optimising the dynamic performance of the transfer network. The core mechanism configures each transfer branch and each HVDC converter to be bounded-input-bounded-output stable, specifically to avoid instability arising from interactions between multiple converters operating on the same DC grid. Anyone designing multi-terminal control schemes with more than two converters should check this filing directly, since converter-interaction stability is a narrower and more specific claim area than general HVDC control.
The technology composition data shows lighter representation outside the core H02J/H02M/H02H cluster, in areas such as digital-twin or data-processing overlays on grid-support control (G06F, only 6 records), and DC fault ride-through coordination logic that sits between protection and control claims. These branches are not unclaimed, but they carry meaningfully less IPC density than core multi-terminal control, so a targeted freedom-to-operate search there is more likely to surface open claim space than a search in the crowded H02J core. Marine and offshore DC collection (B63H overlap, 1 record) is another visibly thin branch worth checking if the application involves offshore wind HVDC collection grids.
Research HVDC Transmission Smart Grid in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole hvdc transmission smart grid corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.