Book a demo

Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hybrid-air-and-liquid-cooling-in-racks-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Datacenter Infrastructure · Patent Landscape 2026
Hybrid air and liquid cooling in racks: who holds the claims, and where the field is still open
  • Filings nearly doubled between 2021 and 2024 (+122%), yet no single assignee holds more than a slice of the field — the leader accounts for a small share of the 1,170 records in scope.
  • 42.8% of records sit in H05K (printed circuits & assemblies), while refrigeration-cycle and heat-exchanger-detail classes each stay under 9% — claim density is uneven across the stack.
  • The ranked leaders' combined top 10 covers only 24.4% of all records, leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants still active in recent years.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,170
Published Records
17%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+122%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (45 records) with 2024 (100) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,170 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Hybrid air and liquid cooling in racks describes systems that combine conventional air cooling with liquid cooling loops — rear door heat exchangers, partial liquid cooling retrofits, and staged deployments that leave a residual fraction of heat load on air. The search scope in this dataset pulls records that discuss fraction, residual air cooling, containment, airflow balance, staged deployment or power usage effectiveness alongside the core cooling terms, which concentrates the corpus on mixed-mode deployments rather than pure liquid immersion or pure air systems.

The 1,170 records span filings from 2015 through mid-2026, with receiving offices led by the United States, followed by China, the European Patent Office and the WIPO PCT route. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so filing counts for 2025 and 2026 understate actual activity and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION63
  2. 2HALDOR TOPSOE AS47
  3. 3DELL PROD LP31
  4. 4OVH28
  5. 5INSPUR SUZHOU INTELLIGENT TECH CO LTD27
  6. 6PERSTORP AB21
  7. 7VERTIV CORP20
  8. 8BULL SA16
  9. 9ARAGON AS16
  10. 103M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO16
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,170 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how it distributes across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 34 in 2017 to a peak of 127 in 2023, and grew 122% between 2021 (45) and 2024 (100) — the last year in this range treated as complete. The 2026 figure (13) is a partial year and should be read as an in-progress count, not a decline.

Filing trend, 2017–20260387511315034201720182019202020212022127202320242025132026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) carries 42.8% of the 1,170 records, well ahead of G06F (13.7%) and H10W (9.6%). Heat-exchange apparatus (F28D, 8.6%) and heat-exchanger details (F28F, 4.7%) trail behind chip- and board-level classes, suggesting most claim activity sits closer to the electronics package than the mechanical cooling loop itself. Records can carry multiple classes, so these shares sum to more than 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH05K · Printed circuits & assemblies50142.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…16013.7%H10W1129.6%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus1018.6%H01L · Semiconductor devices786.7%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …726.2%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps645.5%F28F · Heat-exchanger details554.7%Other97283.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,170 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hybrid air and liquid cooling in racks and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a recent representative filing

Recent representative filing
US20260231379A12026-08-06

Liquid cooling architecture for high-performance datacenters and optimization methods for any cooling architecture

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS

A method, system, and computer program product for optimizing a liquid cooling architecture for a datacenter are provided. Operational parameters corresponding to a datacenter and a plurality of server units to be mounted in a rack within the datacenter are received. Groups of one or more server units from among the plurality of server units are determined based on the operational parameters. The server units are caused to be mounted in the rack based on the determined groups, and a group of server units is connected to a coolant distribution unit.Filed by The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois; published 2026-08-06.

US20260231379A1 — patent drawing 1US20260231379A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing →
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6775137B2Method and apparatus for combined air and liquid cooling of stacked electronics components375
2US20040100770A1Method and apparatus for combined air and liquid cooling of stacked electronics components254
3US20030168439A1Wafer stage for wafer processing apparatus and wafer processing method214
4US5704416ATwo phase component cooler211
5US6924981B2Method for combined air and liquid cooling of stacked electronics components205
6US20110059355A1High-energy metal air batteries165
7US20090126909A1System and method for facilitating cooling of a liquid-cooled electronics rack159
8US20090133866A1Hybrid air and liquid coolant conditioning unit for facilitaating cooling of one or more electronics racks of…155
9US20090194329A1Methods for forming wellbores in heated formations153
10US4955205AMethod of conditioning building air147

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside a searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence on later work, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs of the same dataset, each pointing at a different practical question: how fast the field is moving, where claim density sits, and how concentrated ownership is.

Momentum
+122%
filing growth, 2021→2024

Activity accelerated sharply through 2023–2024

Filings grew from 45 in 2021 to 100 in 2024, with a peak of 127 in 2023. That is a genuine acceleration in a mature-looking field, not noise — and it happened while ownership stayed fragmented, meaning the growth is coming from new entrants as much as incumbents.

2021–2024, complete years only
Claim density
42.8%
of records classed in H05K

Board- and package-level claims dominate the corpus

H05K (printed circuits & assemblies) covers 42.8% of the 1,170 records, nearly three times the next class. Mechanical heat-exchanger classes (F28D, F28F) sit far lower, which points to where new claim space is comparatively less crowded.

IPC subclass, share of all records
Concentration
16.8%
top 5 assignees' share of all records

No single filer dominates the field

The top 5 assignees combined account for 16.8% of the 1,170 records, and the top 10 for 24.4%. That leaves the large majority of filings spread across a long tail of entities filing in smaller volumes — a field still open to new claim positions rather than one locked up by a handful of incumbents.

Share of all 1,170 records in scope
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hybrid air and liquid cooling in racks, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The assignee ranking covers 100 companies returned by the data endpoint, counted by patent family. It is not a top-50 or top-100 cut of a larger list — it is the full ranking the dataset returns.

Leader position
63
records, leading assignee

A clear leader, but not a dominant one

The leading assignee holds 63 of the 1,170 records — meaningfully ahead of fifth place at 27 — but still well short of the kind of dominance that would close off the field to new filers.

Records, leading assignee
Mid-field drop-off
27 → 16
records, 5th to 10th place

A steep drop after the top five

Fifth place holds 27 records and tenth place holds 16, a fast fall-off that signals a shallow group of established filers rather than a deep bench of repeat players.

Fifth vs tenth-ranked assignee
Recent momentum
6
filings, latest year, top mover

Momentum has shifted away from the earlier leaders

Several of the historically active assignees show zero filings in the latest year, including two with a -100% year-on-year change, while at least one assignee continues filing at a modest but positive pace. Recency here should be read cautiously given the 18-month publication lag.

Latest-year filings by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Sub-areas with comparatively thin claim density relative to the core board- and chip-level classes.
Residual air-fraction control logicRear door heat exchanger retrofit kitsCoolant distribution unit failoverAirflow balance sensing at rack levelStaged liquid-cooling deployment sequencing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Perstorp AB6
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0
Haldor Topsoe A/S0
Dell Products L.P.0-100%
OVH0
Inspur Suzhou Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.0-100%
Intel Corporation0
Vertiv Corp.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with rising filing activity, uneven claim density across the stack, and no dominant owner — three separate reasons to look closer before deciding where to file.

Map claim density before drafting

Check where a proposed claim sits relative to the H05K-heavy core versus the thinner mechanical heat-exchanger classes, so drafting effort goes where the white space actually is.

Explore the IPC breakdown in Eureka →

Track the recent-momentum shifts

Several early leaders have gone quiet in the latest year while other filers keep moving — worth watching before assuming the current ranking will hold.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka →

Read the most-cited prior art directly

The most-cited records in this set date back over a decade; understanding what they actually claim clarifies what later filings had to design around.

Open the cited-patent table in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hybrid Air and Liquid Cooling in Racks in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hybrid air and liquid cooling in racks corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.