Book a demo

Hybrid Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Snapshot

Hybrid Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Hybrid Supercapacitor Current Collector Patent Snapshot in 2026

The hybrid supercapacitor current collector patent space is highly concentrated, with SAFT Group and the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) together accounting for the majority of activity among a small corpus of 9 patent families. Filing volume peaked in 2017–2018 and has been sparse since, suggesting a niche field that remains technically open despite limited but sustained interest from a handful of institutional actors.

9
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

SAFT Group leads a tightly held, low-volume niche

SAFT Group is the clear leader, holding 6 patent records — the largest single-applicant share among the top hundred filers. CEA follows closely with 5 patent records, making the top two applicants together the visible force in this field.

The top five filers account for 79% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, a concentration level that is unusually high even for an emerging niche. The tier gap between SAFT Group and all other applicants is narrow only because the absolute corpus is small; meaningful second-tier competition has not yet materialized.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1SAFT Group6
2French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)5
3Mancevski Alexander Graziani2
4Research Institute of Tsinghua University in Shenzhen1
5Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology1
6Zneng Ruixin (Xiamen) Energy Storage Technology Co., Ltd.1
7Tsinghua University1
8National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra1
9University of Chinese Academy of Sciences1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The positions of SAFT Group and CEA — both French institutions with strong electrochemical engineering traditions — imply that foundational current-collector architectures for hybrid supercapacitors are largely controlled by European incumbents, leaving room for entrants from Asia and North America who are only beginning to appear.

The most recent filing years are subject to publication lag and likely undercount activity; conclusions about very recent momentum should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2017–2018 and the technology mix is capacitor-dominant

The annual filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that generated its primary output in 2017–2018, went quiet for several years, and shows only isolated signals of renewed interest. The IPC class distribution confirms that capacitor engineering (H01G) is the overwhelmingly visible technical route.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked at 4 patent families in 2017 and 2 in 2018, then fell to zero for four consecutive years (2019–2022). A single record appeared in 2023, and 2 records appear in 2025, though those recent years are subject to publication lag and should not be read as a confirmed recovery. The overall pattern is consistent with an early burst of foundational IP followed by a long quiet period.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 4 in 2017.42017220180201902020020210202212023020242202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01G (Capacitors) accounts for 20 patent records — the visible branch — followed by H01M (Batteries, cells and fuel cells) at 8 records, reflecting the hybrid nature of the devices. C01G (Compounds of other metals) represents only 1 patent record, marking it as a distinctly sparse adjacent branch. All applicants in the corpus share H01G 11 as their primary IPC focus.

Technology compositionH01G · Capacitors leads with 20; H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells 8.H01G · Capacitors20H01M · Batteries, cells …8C01G · Compounds of othe…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20190333709A1Published 2019-10-31

Method for the production of a cylindrical hybrid …

Blue Solutions

The invention relates to a process for the preparation of a cylindrical alkali metal-ion hybrid supercapacitor and to a cylindrical alkali metal-ion hybrid supercapacitor obtained according to said process. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for the production of a cylindrical hybrid … — patent drawingMethod for the production of a cylindrical hybrid … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Electrochemical supercapacitor device made from an…16
2supercapacitor14
3Electrochemical cell, energy storage system and ve…8
4Ultrathin Asymmetric Nanoporous-Nickel Graphene-Co…4
5Asymmetric supercapacitor with alkaline electrolyt…4
6Electrochemical supercapacitor device made from an…2
7金属导电材料用作镧离子混合超级电容器负极、镧离子混合超级电容器及其制备方法1
8Supercapacitor1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · SAFT Group

SAFT Group

SAFT Group holds 6 patent records — the largest portfolio in the corpus — split evenly across H01G 11 (Capacitors, 6 records) and H01M 12 (Batteries and fuel cells, 6 records), confirming deep coverage of the hybrid interface. No momentum trend data is available from the evidence base for SAFT Group, so trajectory beyond its established position cannot be characterized. Its dual H01G–H01M emphasis suggests a focus on full-cell current-collector integration rather than isolated electrode components.

patent records: 6
Challenger · CEA (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission)

CEA

CEA holds 5 patent records concentrated in H01G 11 (5 records), with minor entries in H01M 10 and H01M 12 (1 record each), indicating a capacitor-first technical orientation relative to SAFT Group’s more balanced hybrid approach. No momentum trend is available from the evidence base for CEA. Tsinghua University is the only applicant with a recorded momentum signal — flagged as a new entrant — but its 1-record base means its challenge to the top two is nascent at best.

patent records: 5
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
MANCEVSKI ALEXANDER GRAZIANITsinghua University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.