Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 42 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent families that combine core hydraulic actuator hardware — hydraulic actuators, hydraulic cylinders and servo-hydraulic systems — with explicit environmental-durability claims: temperature durability, corrosion resistance, contamination tolerance and seal durability. The scope is deliberately narrow: a hydraulic cylinder patent with no durability language in its title or claims does not qualify, and a seal patent with no hydraulic actuator context does not qualify either.
The result is a compact corpus of 42 records across 42 families, concentrated in a handful of IPC subclasses and a short list of receiving offices. That size is itself informative: this is a specialised claim space, not a crowded commodity one, and a handful of well-placed filings can still shift the balance.
Publication always lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025–2026 counts in this trend understate real filing activity for those years; treat the last one to two data points as provisional rather than a true decline signal on their own.
Filings opened at 1 in 2017, rose unevenly to a peak of 5 in 2023, and the midpoint year of 2022 sits at only 2 — a shape that reads as flat or declining rather than compounding growth. Read the final one or two years as incomplete rather than as evidence the field has gone quiet.
F15B (fluid-pressure actuators, 37 records) and F16J (pistons, seals and gaskets, 17) carry almost all of the claim density. C22C alloys and F16N lubrication systems each sit at 4, with B23K welding, C23C coatings, B08B cleaning and B23P metal working all in single digits — these lighter subclasses are candidates for less-contested filing, not evidence that the underlying problems are solved.
Shares are the percentage of the 42 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydraulic actuator environmental durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method of packing elongated porous bodies moved between zones of different pressure, where a porous cable reciprocates through a pressurized, thixotropic packing agent supplied continuously under pressure exceeding the higher-pressure zone, filling the cable's cross-section throughout its length with sealant.Filed as a PCT application and granted in 1989, this record is the second most-cited in the corpus and anchors one of the earliest sealant-under-pressure approaches to hydraulic actuator sealing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5269537A | Composite radial seal | 38 |
| 2 | US4856414A | Viscoelastoplastic-sealant packed flexible power transmission cable for hydraulic actuator | 32 |
| 3 | JP1983118309A | Hydraulic cylinder using no piston rod | 16 |
| 4 | CN200982331Y | 夹层缸壁二级双作用耳轴进油耐海水液压缸 | 9 |
| 5 | JP1983028001A | Hydraulic cylinder for cab tilting | 7 |
| 6 | CN209539694U | 一种具有防护功能的液压缸 | 5 |
| 7 | CN202451500U | 一种超高压机械自锁液压缸 | 5 |
| 8 | CN205937292U | 带有防腐蚀结构的海事油缸 | 4 |
| 9 | JP1982152493A | Manufacture of hydraulic cylinder having smooth anodic oxide film on sliding surface | 3 |
| 10 | CN213711467U | 一种耐腐蚀性高的重压型液压缸 | 2 |
Citation counts inside a bounded corpus like this one skew toward older filings that have simply had more time to accumulate citations — treat them as a signal of historical influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC spread and receiving offices are put side by side.
With the midpoint year at just 2 filings and the peak only reaching 5, this field has not shown a compounding growth curve at any point in the tracked window. Recent-year momentum tables show multiple established assignees at zero in the latest year, including one at a reported -100% YoY.
Two-thirds of receiving-office filings route through China, with Japan a distant second and the United States, Canada and WIPO together accounting for a handful of records. Freedom-to-operate work aimed only at the US misses most of the documented claim activity.
Seal and gasket claims (F16J) run at nearly half the volume of core actuator claims (F15B), confirming that durability in this field is fought over seal material and geometry almost as much as cylinder design itself.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydraulic actuator environmental durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Zhongchuang Zhiling (Zhengzhou) Industrial Technology Group Co., Ltd. | Zhengzhou Coal Mining Machinery Group Co., Ltd. (ZMJ) | 1 |
Only one co-assignee pair appears in the dataset, a single link between Zhongchuang Zhiling (Zhengzhou) Industrial Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Zhengzhou Coal Mining Machinery Group Co., Ltd. (ZMJ) — this is a field of largely independent filers, not joint-venture clusters.
Assignee activity is thin and, per the recent-year momentum data, largely cooling: several long-standing filers — including Toki Corporation, Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd., Bosch Automotive Systems Corporation and Caterpillar Inc. — show zero filings in the latest tracked year, and Xuzhou XCMG Hydraulic Components Co., Ltd. posts a reported -100% YoY drop.
Automotive and industrial names that built out this space earlier in the window — Toki Corporation, Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd., Bosch Automotive Systems Corporation, Caterpillar Inc. — show no filings in the most recent tracked year. That does not mean they have exited; publication lag means recent activity may not have surfaced yet.
Xuzhou XCMG Hydraulic Components Co., Ltd. is the one assignee in this dataset with an explicit YoY figure attached, a full drop to zero. Whether that reflects a strategy shift or simply a filing gap waiting on publication is not answerable from this data alone.
The single documented co-assignee pair — Zhongchuang Zhiling (Zhengzhou) Industrial Technology Group Co., Ltd. with Zhengzhou Coal Mining Machinery Group Co., Ltd. (ZMJ) — is the exception, not the rule. Most records in this corpus carry a single assignee, suggesting durability improvements here are being developed in-house rather than through joint filings.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Toki Corporation | 0 | — |
| Luo Ruiming | 0 | — |
| Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Bosch Automotive Systems Corporation | 0 | — |
| Xuzhou XCMG Hydraulic Components Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 0 | — |
| Beijing Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| Zhongchuang Zhiling (Zhengzhou) Industrial Technology Group Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to a narrow, thinly-populated field where the next move depends on what you are trying to protect.
These two records carry the most citations in the corpus and anchor sealing approaches that later filings build around. Any new seal-durability claim should be checked against both before drafting.
Explore prior art in EurekaWith 28 China and 10 Japan filings against 2 in the US, freedom-to-operate and competitive monitoring built around US filings alone will miss most of the documented activity in this field.
Set up monitoring in EurekaThe filing trend in this dataset peaks at 5 records in 2023 and falls afterward, but publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 counts are structurally incomplete rather than a confirmed decline. The more reliable read is that filing has been flat overall since the midpoint year of 2022, which recorded only 2 filings. A genuine slowdown would need another year or two of published data to confirm.
Start with F16J, which covers pistons, seals and gaskets and accounts for 17 of the 42 records in this corpus — nearly half the volume of the core actuator subclass F15B. Because seal claims sit close in volume to actuator-architecture claims, a durability search that only covers F15B will miss a large share of relevant prior art. C23C coating and F16N lubrication subclasses are worth a secondary pass since they intersect with seal-adjacent wear mechanisms.
China, based on receiving-office counts: 28 of the tracked filings route through China against 10 for Japan and only 2 for the United States. That imbalance means most of the active claim activity in this specific durability niche is happening in Chinese filings, and a monitoring program limited to USPTO or EPO records will see only a small fraction of it. Japan is the useful secondary jurisdiction to add given its 10 filings.
US4856414A covers a method of packing a porous cable moved between pressure zones using a continuously supplied, pressurized thixotropic sealant that fills the cable's full cross-section — a specific mechanism for hydraulic actuator sealing, not sealing in general. It is the second most-cited record in this corpus, which signals it has shaped later sealant-under-pressure approaches, but its claims are narrow to that particular packing method and pressure relationship. New designs using different sealant delivery mechanisms, materials, or pressure regimes are not automatically blocked by it, though any design using continuous pressurized thixotropic packing should be checked against it directly.
No — this dataset shows only one co-assignee pair across all 42 records, a link between Zhongchuang Zhiling (Zhengzhou) Industrial Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Zhengzhou Coal Mining Machinery Group Co., Ltd. (ZMJ). The near-total absence of joint filings suggests that durability improvements in this niche are being developed in-house by individual companies rather than through collaborative R&D or joint ventures. That has a practical implication for competitive intelligence: tracking single assignees closely will surface more signal than looking for consortium or alliance activity.
Go past this page: query the whole hydraulic actuator environmental durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.