https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hydraulic-actuator-fatigue-and-fracture-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mechanical Engineering & Machinery
Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture Patents
  • Filing activity peaked in 2020 at 61 records then dropped off sharply, with the midpoint year 2022 showing zero filings — a pattern of a short filing burst rather than sustained investment.
  • Australia dominates the filing office split 101 of 116 records came through the Australian receiving office, against single digits everywhere else, meaning the visible activity is concentrated in one jurisdiction rather than globally distributed.
  • Excavating equipment claims outnumber generic fluid-pressure claims E02F (earth moving) appears in 101 records versus 108 for F15B, showing most fatigue/fracture claims are being written against construction-equipment actuators specifically, not general hydraulics.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
116
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
AU
Leading Jurisdiction
13
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (40 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families combining hydraulic actuator, hydraulic cylinder or servo-hydraulic terminology in the title/abstract with fatigue-life, fracture-mechanics, crack-propagation or high-pressure-fatigue language, restricted to the actuator, testing and seal IPC classes (F15B15/14, G01N3/32, F16J10). It captures 116 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend line is always undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2015-2026
  1. 1CATERPILLAR INC101
  2. 2SHIMADZU SEISAKUSHO LTD4
  3. 3NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP4
  4. 4AIR FORCE GOVERNMENT OF THE US SEC THE THE2
  5. 5ADTECH SYST RES2
  6. 6Tianjin Fuyun Tianyi Technology Co., Ltd.2
  7. 7BLUE LEAF I P INC2
  8. 8CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC2
  9. 9HITACHI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO LTD1
  10. 10CNH ITALA1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 116 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A burst, not a build

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 61 in 2020, then fell away; 2022 registers zero filings at the midpoint of the window, and 2026 is a partial year. That shape points to a concentrated filing campaign around 2018-2021 rather than a steadily growing field.

A burst, not a build02040608012017201820196120202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Actuator claims dominate, but earth-moving context is everywhere

F15B (fluid-pressure actuators) leads at 108 of 116 records, closely tracked by E02F (excavating and earth-moving) at 101 — meaning most of this corpus is written specifically for construction-equipment hydraulics rather than hydraulics in general. F16J (pistons, seals, gaskets) appears in 53 records, and testing-specific classes G01N and G01M appear in single digits, suggesting test-method claims are a minority relative to structural and sealing claims.

Actuator claims dominate, but earth-moving context is everywhereF15B · Fluid-pressure actuators & sys…10893.1%E02F · Excavating & earth moving10187.1%F16J · Pistons, seals & gaskets5345.7%E01C · Roads & pavements2118.1%G01N · Material analysis & testing86.9%G01M · Testing machine & structure ba…54.3%B06B · Generating mechanical vibratio…10.9%G06F · Electric digital data processi…10.9%Other10.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 116 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydraulic actuator fatigue and fracture and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in this corpus

Representative record
US4283957A1981-08-18

US4283957A — Torsional exciter for a rotating structure

XCITE SYSTEMS CORPORATION

An exciter applies a dynamic torsional force to a rotating structure — a turbine shaft, a vehicle axle or similar — during mechanical testing to determine natural modes of vibration, fatigue life and other response characteristics. The exciter uses a rotary hydraulic actuator with a housing secured to the test structure, a driveshaft rotatable relative to that housing, an inertial mass on the driveshaft, a hydraulic power supply, and an electrohydraulic torque setpoint circuit that produces a torque command.Filed 1981-08-18 by XCITE SYSTEMS CORPORATION. Its 58 citations inside this corpus make it one of the most-referenced prior-art documents for rotary hydraulic fatigue testing.

US4283957A — patent drawing 1US4283957A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited patent documents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20020162400A1Multiaxial high cycle fatigue test system116
2US6718833B2Multiaxial high cycle fatigue test system78
3US4283957ATorsional exciter for a rotating structure58
4US6817278B2Piston assembly for hydraulic cylinder20
5AU2020102790A4Hydraulic cylinder with specific performance dimensions9
6JP1997303319ACylinder device7
7EP1413774A1Piston assembly for hydraulic cylinder.5
8US20040074385A1Piston assembly for hydraulic cylinder5
9US20190316608A1Hydraulic actuator3
10JP1986040536ARunning load testing apparatus3

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older records; treat them as a signal of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once the filing counts, IPC split and citation data are read together.

Filing shape
Peak 61 filings in 2020
vs. 0 at 2022 midpoint

A short, concentrated filing window

The jump from one filing in 2017 to 61 in 2020, followed by a collapse to zero by 2022, is not the profile of a maturing field with steady investment. It looks like a small number of applicants running a filing campaign, likely tied to a specific product cycle or regulatory testing requirement.

Read the recent-year tail as understated due to publication lag, not as evidence the field has ended.
Jurisdiction
101 of 116 via Australia
receiving office split

Activity is jurisdictionally narrow

United States, Japan, China and the EPO together account for 15 records; Australia alone accounts for 101. A landscape this concentrated in one office suggests the underlying demand — construction-equipment testing standards, mining-sector procurement, or a specific applicant's home market — is itself narrow.

Filers targeting only Australia may be exposed elsewhere; filers everywhere else face a thinner prior-art base.
Claim overlap
108 F15B vs. 101 E02F
co-occurring IPC subclasses

Generic hydraulics and earth-moving claims are nearly the same set

The near-equal counts in F15B and E02F indicate that most fatigue/fracture claims in this corpus are not written as abstract hydraulic-actuator improvements — they are written against excavator, loader or similar earth-moving equipment. A generic hydraulic-cylinder fatigue claim faces this entire E02F-tagged prior art as context.

F16J (seals/pistons) at 53 records is the largest sub-branch not already saturated by the E02F overlap.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydraulic actuator fatigue and fracture, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee set includes equipment manufacturers, testing-instrument makers and individual filers; recent-year momentum has flattened across all of them.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across all tracked assignees

No assignee is currently active

Caterpillar Inc. (Caterpillar), Shimadzu Corporation (Shimadzu), Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) (NTT) and other named assignees all show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the 2020 filing peak, this points to a field where the visible campaign has already run its course, at least in published records to date.

Recent-year zeros should be weighed against the 18-month publication lag before concluding activity has stopped.
Collaboration
9 co-assignee pairs
strongest pair count: 4

Collaboration is limited and clustered

Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole corpus, and the strongest pairings — involving Shimadzu Corporation, Shimadzu Corporation and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) — top out at 4 shared filings each. This is a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-development consortia.

A newcomer partnering with a testing-instrument specialist would be entering largely uncontested collaborative territory.
Citation anchor
116 citations
US20020162400A1

Testing-system patents anchor the citation graph

The two most-cited documents in this corpus are both multiaxial high-cycle fatigue test systems, not actuator products themselves. That suggests the patent literature's influence has run through test methodology as much as through the actuators being tested.

New test-method claims will need to distinguish themselves against a deep, well-cited prior-art base.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with thin filing density relative to the core F15B/E02F overlap
seal-wear crack initiation modelstorsional fatigue exciters for non-turbine shaftshigh-pressure fatigue test rigs outside G01N3/32piston-rod fracture prediction algorithmsvibration-based crack propagation sensors
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Caterpillar Inc.0
Shimadzu Corporation0
Shimadzu Corporation0
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)0
Tianjin Fuyun Tianyi Technology Co., Ltd.0
XIE MING0
TERBORG GARY E0
SONI SOM R0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a narrow, jurisdictionally concentrated field with a closed filing burst. The next steps depend on whether you are trying to file, license or design around it.

Map the Australia-heavy filings against your target markets

With 101 of 116 records filed through one office, check whether the underlying claims have equivalent family members in the US, Japan, China or Europe before assuming freedom to operate there.

Explore the family tree in Eureka

Separate test-method claims from actuator-structure claims

The most-cited documents in this corpus are fatigue test systems, not actuators. Treat these as distinct claim territories when assessing risk or drafting new applications.

Run a claim-chart comparison in Eureka

Revisit the recent-year data once lag clears

Zero filings in the latest tracked year across every assignee is consistent with publication lag as much as with a genuinely dormant field. Recheck this trend in 12-18 months.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hydraulic Actuator Fatigue and Fracture in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hydraulic actuator fatigue and fracture corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.