Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (40 records) with 2024 (0) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
This landscape tracks patent families combining hydraulic actuator, hydraulic cylinder or servo-hydraulic terminology in the title/abstract with fatigue-life, fracture-mechanics, crack-propagation or high-pressure-fatigue language, restricted to the actuator, testing and seal IPC classes (F15B15/14, G01N3/32, F16J10). It captures 116 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing year in any trend line is always undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 116 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 61 in 2020, then fell away; 2022 registers zero filings at the midpoint of the window, and 2026 is a partial year. That shape points to a concentrated filing campaign around 2018-2021 rather than a steadily growing field.
F15B (fluid-pressure actuators) leads at 108 of 116 records, closely tracked by E02F (excavating and earth-moving) at 101 — meaning most of this corpus is written specifically for construction-equipment hydraulics rather than hydraulics in general. F16J (pistons, seals, gaskets) appears in 53 records, and testing-specific classes G01N and G01M appear in single digits, suggesting test-method claims are a minority relative to structural and sealing claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 116 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydraulic actuator fatigue and fracture and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn exciter applies a dynamic torsional force to a rotating structure — a turbine shaft, a vehicle axle or similar — during mechanical testing to determine natural modes of vibration, fatigue life and other response characteristics. The exciter uses a rotary hydraulic actuator with a housing secured to the test structure, a driveshaft rotatable relative to that housing, an inertial mass on the driveshaft, a hydraulic power supply, and an electrohydraulic torque setpoint circuit that produces a torque command.Filed 1981-08-18 by XCITE SYSTEMS CORPORATION. Its 58 citations inside this corpus make it one of the most-referenced prior-art documents for rotary hydraulic fatigue testing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20020162400A1 | Multiaxial high cycle fatigue test system | 116 |
| 2 | US6718833B2 | Multiaxial high cycle fatigue test system | 78 |
| 3 | US4283957A | Torsional exciter for a rotating structure | 58 |
| 4 | US6817278B2 | Piston assembly for hydraulic cylinder | 20 |
| 5 | AU2020102790A4 | Hydraulic cylinder with specific performance dimensions | 9 |
| 6 | JP1997303319A | Cylinder device | 7 |
| 7 | EP1413774A1 | Piston assembly for hydraulic cylinder. | 5 |
| 8 | US20040074385A1 | Piston assembly for hydraulic cylinder | 5 |
| 9 | US20190316608A1 | Hydraulic actuator | 3 |
| 10 | JP1986040536A | Running load testing apparatus | 3 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older records; treat them as a signal of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the filing counts, IPC split and citation data are read together.
The jump from one filing in 2017 to 61 in 2020, followed by a collapse to zero by 2022, is not the profile of a maturing field with steady investment. It looks like a small number of applicants running a filing campaign, likely tied to a specific product cycle or regulatory testing requirement.
United States, Japan, China and the EPO together account for 15 records; Australia alone accounts for 101. A landscape this concentrated in one office suggests the underlying demand — construction-equipment testing standards, mining-sector procurement, or a specific applicant's home market — is itself narrow.
The near-equal counts in F15B and E02F indicate that most fatigue/fracture claims in this corpus are not written as abstract hydraulic-actuator improvements — they are written against excavator, loader or similar earth-moving equipment. A generic hydraulic-cylinder fatigue claim faces this entire E02F-tagged prior art as context.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydraulic actuator fatigue and fracture, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee set includes equipment manufacturers, testing-instrument makers and individual filers; recent-year momentum has flattened across all of them.
Caterpillar Inc. (Caterpillar), Shimadzu Corporation (Shimadzu), Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) (NTT) and other named assignees all show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the 2020 filing peak, this points to a field where the visible campaign has already run its course, at least in published records to date.
Only 9 co-assignee pairs appear across the whole corpus, and the strongest pairings — involving Shimadzu Corporation, Shimadzu Corporation and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) — top out at 4 shared filings each. This is a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-development consortia.
The two most-cited documents in this corpus are both multiaxial high-cycle fatigue test systems, not actuator products themselves. That suggests the patent literature's influence has run through test methodology as much as through the actuators being tested.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc. | 0 | — |
| Shimadzu Corporation | 0 | — |
| Shimadzu Corporation | 0 | — |
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | 0 | — |
| Tianjin Fuyun Tianyi Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| XIE MING | 0 | — |
| TERBORG GARY E | 0 | — |
| SONI SOM R | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a narrow, jurisdictionally concentrated field with a closed filing burst. The next steps depend on whether you are trying to file, license or design around it.
With 101 of 116 records filed through one office, check whether the underlying claims have equivalent family members in the US, Japan, China or Europe before assuming freedom to operate there.
Explore the family tree in EurekaThe most-cited documents in this corpus are fatigue test systems, not actuators. Treat these as distinct claim territories when assessing risk or drafting new applications.
Run a claim-chart comparison in EurekaZero filings in the latest tracked year across every assignee is consistent with publication lag as much as with a genuinely dormant field. Recheck this trend in 12-18 months.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaThis landscape identifies 116 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off that combine hydraulic actuator, hydraulic cylinder or servo-hydraulic terminology with fatigue-life or fracture-mechanics language, restricted to the relevant fluid-pressure, testing and sealing IPC classes. That figure counts distinct patent families, which is a fairer measure than raw document counts because it neutralises duplicate filings across jurisdictions and continuation applications. It should be treated as the visible portion of the field within this specific search scope, not an exhaustive count of every related filing worldwide.
The trend shows one filing in 2017, a rise to a peak of 61 in 2020, and zero at the 2022 midpoint, which is the shape of a concentrated filing campaign rather than gradual field growth. This kind of burst typically follows a specific trigger — a new testing standard, a product-line refresh, or a single large filer clearing a backlog — rather than broad-based industry adoption. The apparent drop-off in the most recent years should also be read against the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication, which understates activity closest to the present.
The tracked assignees include Caterpillar (Caterpillar Inc.), Shimadzu (Shimadzu Corporation and Shimadzu Corporation), NTT (Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)), and smaller filers including Tianjin Fuyun Tianyi Technology Co., Ltd. and individual inventor XIE MING. All of the named assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, indicating the visible filing activity from these parties has already concentrated in earlier years within this window. Collaboration between assignees is limited, with only 9 co-assignee pairs identified across the entire corpus.
US4283957A, assigned to XCITE SYSTEMS CORPORATION and filed in 1981, covers a rotary hydraulic actuator-based torsional exciter used to apply dynamic torque to a rotating structure — such as a turbine shaft or vehicle axle — for fatigue and vibration-mode testing. It is one of the most-cited documents in this corpus, which signals strong influence on later test-system claims rather than automatic blocking power over every hydraulic-actuator fatigue application today. Whether it constrains a new filing depends on whether the new claims overlap its specific combination of rotary actuator, inertial mass and electrohydraulic torque-setpoint circuit, which requires a claim-by-claim comparison rather than a citation count alone.
The IPC composition shows dense overlap between F15B (fluid-pressure actuators, 108 records) and E02F (excavating equipment, 101 records), meaning most existing claims are written specifically against construction and earth-moving hydraulics. Sub-branches such as seal-wear crack initiation modelling, torsional fatigue testing outside turbine and vehicle-shaft contexts, and vibration-based crack propagation sensing show much thinner filing density in this dataset. These under-claimed areas are candidates for new filings, though thin density in a bounded search should be confirmed against a broader classification sweep before relying on it as freedom to operate.
Go past this page: query the whole hydraulic actuator fatigue and fracture corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.