Hydraulic Actuator Noise Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
- Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has not returned to that level, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at a single filing — a technology where claim space opened early and has cooled since.
- China accounts for roughly half of all receiving-office activity (43 of 81 records), far ahead of Japan and the United States, which points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate checks matter most today.
- The five most-cited records are all vehicle active-suspension patents from the 1990s, meaning the foundational isolator and control-valve concepts long predate the current filing wave and still anchor prior-art searches.
Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 81 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families where hydraulic actuators, hydraulic cylinders and servo-hydraulic systems intersect with claims aimed at noise reduction, pressure pulsation damping, vibration isolation or quiet operation. The scope is drawn narrowly around F15B21/00, F16F and F15B15 so the set captures damping and isolation hardware rather than hydraulic systems generally.
81 families were published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing years are undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 81-family set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A 2017 peak followed by a flat-to-declining run
Filings rose to 5 in 2017, the high point of the window, then settled to lower and less consistent levels through the 2022 midpoint of 1. There is no second wave visible in the data through the cut-off, though the final one or two years are necessarily undercounted given publication lag.
F16F dominates; automotive and marine contexts pull in the rest
F16F (springs and vibration dampers) covers the large majority of records at 76, confirming this is fundamentally a damper/isolator landscape rather than a hydraulic-circuit one. B62D (motor vehicles and steering) and B60G (vehicle suspension) show the automotive application is the largest adjacent context, while E04H and E04M/F16M entries point to a smaller but distinct structural-isolation use case outside vehicles.
Shares are the percentage of the 81 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydraulic actuator noise and vibration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited prior art and a representative filing
US5725066A — Active tractor suspension system
An active vehicle suspension employs a multi-point support system between a vehicle's chassis and cab. Each support point has an isolator which includes a linear hydraulic actuator connected at its quiet end to the payload by a passive vibration isolator and at its vibrating end to the chassis. A support spring off-loads most of the cab weight, and an accelerometer feeds a signal used to operate a hydraulic valve that controls actuator movement.Filed by Applied Power Inc.; among the most-cited records in this corpus.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US3701499A | Active fluid isolation system | 153 |
| 2 | US6029764A | Coordinated control of an active suspension system for a work vehicle | 128 |
| 3 | US5899288A | Active suspension system for a work vehicle | 104 |
| 4 | US5603387A | Active vehicle suspension system | 103 |
| 5 | US5725066A | Active tractor suspension system | 74 |
| 6 | US20080053763A1 | System and method for self-powered magnetorheological-fluid damping | 55 |
| 7 | US6854269B2 | Noise attenuation in a hydraulic circuit | 27 |
| 8 | CN106594172A | 具有准零刚度的半主动控制型垂直隔振器 | 26 |
| 9 | CN103791018A | 一种多维隔振平台及其空气弹簧 | 23 |
| 10 | CN101363494A | 液固混合介质隔振器 | 17 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-outs from the trend, geography and citation data, translated into what they imply for someone deciding where to file or search.
Growth has flattened, not accelerated
The absence of a rising second wave after 2017 suggests the core damping and isolation concepts here were largely staked out in the first half of the window. New filings since then have been sparse rather than incremental improvements on a growing base.
China is the primary filing venue by a wide margin
With 43 of 81 records filed through the Chinese receiving office against 14 in Japan and 11 in the United States, freedom-to-operate work should start there rather than treat it as a secondary jurisdiction.
The most-cited art predates the current filing wave
All five most-cited records are active-suspension patents built around hydraulic actuators and accelerometer feedback, several from the 1990s. Any new filing in vibration isolation for vehicle cabs or chassis will be compared against this baseline first.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydraulic actuator noise and vibration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and how concentrated the field is
Co-assignee activity is minimal — only two pairs appear in the whole set — which points to a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-development consortia.
Almost no joint filing
The only recurring pairing links a Japanese construction contractor and a component supplier on a single shared filing. Outside that, assignees in this set file independently, which is typical of a mature mechanical sub-field where firms protect incremental designs rather than co-develop platforms.
No assignee shows current-year filings
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, from established players like CASE Corporation and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to university filers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the overall flat-to-declining trend rather than a single firm pulling back.
Academic and defence-research filers sit alongside industrial names
The assignee set mixes commercial vehicle and marine engineering firms with universities and a naval research institute, suggesting the underlying isolator and damping techniques are studied as much as they are commercialised.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| CASE CORPORATION | 0 | — |
| Applied Power Group | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Harbin Engineering University | 0 | — |
| Obayashi Corporation | 0 | — |
| Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics | 0 | — |
| Beijing Institute of Technology | 0 | — |
| China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation No. 719 Research Institute | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.
Map claim scope against the 1990s active-suspension art
Before drafting in vehicle cab or chassis isolation, work through the claim language of the most-cited pre-2000 patents to see what is actually still blocking versus merely influential.
Explore in EurekaCheck China filings first for FTO
With 43 of 81 records filed through China's receiving office, any freedom-to-operate review that starts elsewhere risks missing the bulk of the active claim set.
Run a search in EurekaTest the under-claimed branches
Marine and structural hydraulic damping show thinner claim density than the automotive core — worth a targeted novelty check before assuming the space is occupied.
Ask EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
This landscape identifies 81 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off that combine hydraulic actuator, cylinder or servo-hydraulic terms with noise reduction, pulsation damping, vibration isolation or quiet-operation claims. That count reflects a narrowly scoped search built around specific IPC codes (F15B21/00, F16F, F15B15), so a broader hydraulics search would return a larger but less targeted set. Patent families, not raw document counts, are used here because families remove duplicate counting from continuations and multi-country filings of the same invention.
The assignee set mixes vehicle and marine engineering firms, a defence-research institute, and several universities, with no single filer dominating the field. Recent-year momentum data shows zero filings in the latest tracked year across every named assignee, which is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining filing trend rather than one company's retreat. Co-assignee filing is almost nonexistent — only two pairs appear across the whole set — so most of these organisations are filing independently rather than through joint ventures.
The data shows 2017 as the high point at 5 filings, with the 2022 midpoint down to a single filing and no clear rebound visible through the cut-off. This pattern usually means the core damping and isolation mechanisms were staked out early, leaving less headroom for new independent claims later in the window. It is worth treating the final one to two years of the trend cautiously, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months and recent activity is likely undercounted.
US5725066A, assigned to Applied Power Inc., claims a multi-point cab suspension architecture where a linear hydraulic actuator sits between a passive vibration isolator at the 'quiet end' and the vehicle chassis at the 'vibrating end', with an accelerometer feeding a control valve. Designs that closely follow this specific accelerometer-to-valve feedback loop combined with a passive isolator in series with the hydraulic actuator sit closest to its claim scope. It is one of the most-cited records in this corpus, so any new filing in vehicle cab isolation should be checked against its specific claim language rather than assumed to be blocked by citation count alone.
The IPC composition shows F16F vibration-damper claims concentrated overwhelmingly around automotive suspension contexts (B62D, B60G), while marine, structural building (E04H, E04B) and general support-frame (F16M) applications appear in much smaller numbers. That imbalance suggests thinner claim density in non-vehicle hydraulic isolation, such as structural damping or marine hull-mounted actuator systems, relative to the well-covered vehicle cab and chassis space. Confirming this requires a targeted novelty search rather than relying on volume alone, since a small count can still sit on a strong existing claim.
Research Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole hydraulic actuator noise and vibration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.