Book a demo

Hydraulic Actuator Noise Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Hydraulic Actuator Noise Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hydraulic-actuator-noise-and-vibration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mechanical Engineering & Machinery
Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration Patents
  • Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has not returned to that level, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at a single filing — a technology where claim space opened early and has cooled since.
  • China accounts for roughly half of all receiving-office activity (43 of 81 records), far ahead of Japan and the United States, which points to where enforcement and freedom-to-operate checks matter most today.
  • The five most-cited records are all vehicle active-suspension patents from the 1990s, meaning the foundational isolator and control-valve concepts long predate the current filing wave and still anchor prior-art searches.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
81
Published Records
31%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-80%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 81 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families where hydraulic actuators, hydraulic cylinders and servo-hydraulic systems intersect with claims aimed at noise reduction, pressure pulsation damping, vibration isolation or quiet operation. The scope is drawn narrowly around F15B21/00, F16F and F15B15 so the set captures damping and isolation hardware rather than hydraulic systems generally.

81 families were published between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent filing years are undercounted and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2015-2026
  1. 1CASE CORPORATION8
  2. 2APPL POWER INC(US)6
  3. 3MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD5
  4. 4OHBAYASHI GUMI LTD3
  5. 5NO 719 RES INST CHINA SHIPBUILDING IND3
  6. 6BEIJING INST OF TECH3
  7. 7ZHONGBEI UNIV3
  8. 8MAZIN BEN3
  9. 9HARBIN ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY SANYA NANHAI INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT BASE2
  10. 10WUXI HONGYUAN DEVFLEX2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 81-family set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2017 peak followed by a flat-to-declining run

Filings rose to 5 in 2017, the high point of the window, then settled to lower and less consistent levels through the 2022 midpoint of 1. There is no second wave visible in the data through the cut-off, though the final one or two years are necessarily undercounted given publication lag.

A 2017 peak followed by a flat-to-declining run013455201720185201952020520212022520232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

F16F dominates; automotive and marine contexts pull in the rest

F16F (springs and vibration dampers) covers the large majority of records at 76, confirming this is fundamentally a damper/isolator landscape rather than a hydraulic-circuit one. B62D (motor vehicles and steering) and B60G (vehicle suspension) show the automotive application is the largest adjacent context, while E04H and E04M/F16M entries point to a smaller but distinct structural-isolation use case outside vehicles.

F16F dominates; automotive and marine contexts pull in the restF16F · Springs & vibration dampers7693.8%B62D · Motor vehicles & steering1619.8%F15B · Fluid-pressure actuators & sys…78.6%B60G · Vehicle suspension67.4%E04H · Specialised buildings & struct…56.2%F16M · Supports, stands & frames56.2%B60K · Vehicle propulsion & drive33.7%E04B · Building structures & elements33.7%Other2834.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 81 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydraulic actuator noise and vibration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited prior art and a representative filing

Representative record
US5725066A1998-03-10

US5725066A — Active tractor suspension system

APPLIED POWER INC.

An active vehicle suspension employs a multi-point support system between a vehicle's chassis and cab. Each support point has an isolator which includes a linear hydraulic actuator connected at its quiet end to the payload by a passive vibration isolator and at its vibrating end to the chassis. A support spring off-loads most of the cab weight, and an accelerometer feeds a signal used to operate a hydraulic valve that controls actuator movement.Filed by Applied Power Inc.; among the most-cited records in this corpus.

US5725066A — patent drawing 1US5725066A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US3701499AActive fluid isolation system153
2US6029764ACoordinated control of an active suspension system for a work vehicle128
3US5899288AActive suspension system for a work vehicle104
4US5603387AActive vehicle suspension system103
5US5725066AActive tractor suspension system74
6US20080053763A1System and method for self-powered magnetorheological-fluid damping55
7US6854269B2Noise attenuation in a hydraulic circuit27
8CN106594172A具有准零刚度的半主动控制型垂直隔振器26
9CN103791018A一种多维隔振平台及其空气弹簧23
10CN101363494A液固混合介质隔振器17

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the trend, geography and citation data, translated into what they imply for someone deciding where to file or search.

Filing momentum
2017 peak → 2022 midpoint of 1
families/year

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

The absence of a rising second wave after 2017 suggests the core damping and isolation concepts here were largely staked out in the first half of the window. New filings since then have been sparse rather than incremental improvements on a growing base.

Read this against the 18-month publication lag before assuming activity has actually stopped.
Geographic concentration
China 43 of 81 records
receiving office

China is the primary filing venue by a wide margin

With 43 of 81 records filed through the Chinese receiving office against 14 in Japan and 11 in the United States, freedom-to-operate work should start there rather than treat it as a secondary jurisdiction.

WIPO/PCT filings (4) are too few to suggest a strong internationalisation strategy across this set.
Prior-art anchors
Top cite: 153 (US3701499A)
citations

The most-cited art predates the current filing wave

All five most-cited records are active-suspension patents built around hydraulic actuators and accelerometer feedback, several from the 1990s. Any new filing in vibration isolation for vehicle cabs or chassis will be compared against this baseline first.

High citation counts here signal influence on later drafting, not that these patents remain enforceable or novel today.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydraulic actuator noise and vibration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and how concentrated the field is

Co-assignee activity is minimal — only two pairs appear in the whole set — which points to a field of largely independent filers rather than joint-development consortia.

Filing pattern
2 co-assignee pairs
across 81 families

Almost no joint filing

The only recurring pairing links a Japanese construction contractor and a component supplier on a single shared filing. Outside that, assignees in this set file independently, which is typical of a mature mechanical sub-field where firms protect incremental designs rather than co-develop platforms.

Low co-filing also means licensing and cross-assignment risk is comparatively low here.
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
for named assignees

No assignee shows current-year filings

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, from established players like CASE Corporation and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to university filers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the overall flat-to-declining trend rather than a single firm pulling back.

Confirm against fresh publications before concluding any one filer has exited the space.
Filer mix
Universities among top filers
assignee type

Academic and defence-research filers sit alongside industrial names

The assignee set mixes commercial vehicle and marine engineering firms with universities and a naval research institute, suggesting the underlying isolator and damping techniques are studied as much as they are commercialised.

This mix is one reason the field lacks a single dominant assignee cluster.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin claim density relative to the core F16F damper space:
marine hull-mounted actuator isolationstructural (non-vehicle) hydraulic vibration dampingelectro-hydraulic valve noise suppressionaccelerometer-feedback control loops outside cab suspensionpressure-pulsation damping for drive-train actuators
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
CASE CORPORATION0
Applied Power Group0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
Harbin Engineering University0
Obayashi Corporation0
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics0
Beijing Institute of Technology0
China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation No. 719 Research Institute0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.

Map claim scope against the 1990s active-suspension art

Before drafting in vehicle cab or chassis isolation, work through the claim language of the most-cited pre-2000 patents to see what is actually still blocking versus merely influential.

Explore in Eureka

Check China filings first for FTO

With 43 of 81 records filed through China's receiving office, any freedom-to-operate review that starts elsewhere risks missing the bulk of the active claim set.

Run a search in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Marine and structural hydraulic damping show thinner claim density than the automotive core — worth a targeted novelty check before assuming the space is occupied.

Ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hydraulic Actuator Noise and Vibration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hydraulic actuator noise and vibration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.