Book a demo

Hydrogen Recycling Magnet Patents: Leader Plus a Long Tail 2026

Hydrogen Recycling Magnet Patents: Leader Plus a Long Tail 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hydrogen-assisted-recycling-of-rare-earth-magnets-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Updated 2026
Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets: Patents and Who Holds Them
  • One assignee leads at 17 records, but the top 5 combine for only 41.1% of all 124 records in scope — no single player controls the field.
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 17 records and has since flattened or declined, with 2022 at just 4 — momentum has shifted rather than continued to build.
  • H01F and B22F dominate the IPC mix, while C25C electrolytic routes and B01D separation processes sit at 4.8% and 4.0% of records — narrow, largely open branches.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
124
Published Records
41%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-53%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (17 records) with 2024 (8) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 124 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Hydrogen assisted recycling covers a family of processes that use hydrogen absorption to break down sintered NdFeB magnets — either as a purely mechanical decrepitation step ahead of reprocessing, or as part of a short loop chemical route that recovers rare earth content without full re-refining. The search scope in this dataset combines hydrogen decrepitation, direct recycling and related extraction and reprocessing terms across 124 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026.

The technology sits at the intersection of magnet manufacturing, powder metallurgy and metal extraction, which is why records cluster across several IPC subclasses rather than one. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate actual filing activity for those years.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1THE UNIV OF BIRMINGHAM17
  2. 2YANTAI DONGXING MAGNETIC MATERIALS INC17
  3. 3NINGBO STAR MATERIALS HI TECH6
  4. 4YEDA RES & DEV CO LTD6
  5. 5RITCHIE TECH PTY LTD5
  6. 6PRINCETON NUENERGY INC4
  7. 7NINGBO YUNSHENG SPECIAL METAL MATERIAL CO LTD4
  8. 8BAOTOU YUNSHENG STRONG MAGNETIC MATERIAL4
  9. 9KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV4
  10. 10NINGBO YUNSHENG CO LTD4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 124 records: how filing activity has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings rose to a peak of 17 records in 2021, dropped to 4 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not recovered since — a flat-to-declining pattern rather than a technology still building momentum. The 2026 figure of 1 record is a partial year and should not be read as a collapse in interest.

Filing trend, 2017–20260510152072017201820192020172021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H01F (magnets, inductors and transformers) appears on 55.6% of records and B22F (powder metallurgy) on 43.5%, confirming that most filings address the magnet-forming and powder-processing steps rather than upstream chemistry. C22B extraction and refining (23.4%) and C22C alloys (21.0%) form a second tier; C25C electrolytic production, B01D separation and B29B plastics preparation each sit under 5%, the narrowest claimed corners of the field.

IPC subclass distributionH01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…6955.6%B22F · Powder metallurgy5443.5%C22B · Metal extraction & refining2923.4%C22C · Alloys2621.0%H01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells129.7%B29B · Plastics preparation64.8%C25C · Electrolytic metal production64.8%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…54.0%Other5544.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 124 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydrogen assisted recycling of rare earth magnets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Prior Art

Foundational and most-cited patents

Representative Record
US5143560A1992-09-01

US5143560A — Method for forming Fe-B-R-T alloy powder by hydrogen decrepitation of die-upset billets

HITACHI METALS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

A method for high volume manufacture of Fe-B-R-T alloy powders without sacrificing magnetic properties such as intrinsic coercivity, using hydrogen decrepitation of vacuum cast or die-upset billets. Hydriding runs at a partial pressure of hydrogen between 250 and 760 mm Hg at 100 to 500 degrees C for 30 minutes to 6 hours or longer depending on load size; dehydriding occurs under vacuum below 10-2 mm Hg or in an inert atmosphere at equivalent hydrogen partial pressure. The resulting powder is typically incorporated into matrix or composite magnets with a binder prior to pressing and orienting.Filed by Hitachi Metals International, dated 1992-09-01 — the earliest foundational reference in this dataset's citation network.

View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2002038276A1Method for direct recycling of plastic wastes86
2US5143560AMethod for forming Fe-B-R-T alloy powder by hydrogen decrepitation of die-upset billets41
3US20130263699A1Magnet Recycling40
4US20120137829A1Magnet Recycling40
5CN103065787A一种制备烧结钕铁硼磁体的方法39
6US4853045AMethod for the manufacture of rare earth transition metal alloy magnets34
7US8734714B2Magnet recycling25
8US20150071810A1Method for preparing neodymium-iron-boron (nd-fe-b)-based sintered magnet21
9WO2012101398A1Magnet recovery19
10US20170221615A1Method for preparing an r-t-b permanent magnet18

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the data means for filing strategy

Three findings that shape where new filings can still find open claim space, and where they cannot.

Concentration
41.1% of 124
top 5 combined share

Leadership is real but not dominant

The leading assignee holds 17 records, well ahead of fifth place at 5, yet the top 5 assignees together account for only 41.1% of all 124 records in scope. That leaves the majority of the field distributed across a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants — a structure that rewards a well-drafted narrow claim more than it punishes a late entrant.

Based on the assignee ranking of 124 records
Momentum
17 → 4
peak (2021) to midpoint (2022)

Filing has cooled since 2021

Activity peaked at 17 records in 2021 and had fallen to 4 by 2022, with no clear recovery since. Combined with several leading assignees showing zero filings in the latest year, this looks like a field that had a filing wave rather than one still accelerating — worth confirming against 2025-2026 filings once publication catches up.

18-month publication lag applies to the most recent years
Technology mix
55.6% H01F
share of 124 records

Claims cluster on the magnet and powder steps

H01F and B22F together dominate the IPC mix, meaning most claim drafting has focused on the decrepitation and powder-forming stages rather than the extraction or electrolytic chemistry upstream. C25C and B01D each sit near 5% of records, suggesting the wet-chemistry and separation ends of the process are comparatively unclaimed.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydrogen assisted recycling of rare earth magnets, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where they are filing it

Filing activity spans manufacturers, magnet material specialists and a handful of university and institute assignees, filed predominantly through the United States, EPO and China receiving offices.

Leader
17 records
leading assignee

A single leader without a dominant share

The top-ranked assignee holds 17 of the 124 records in scope, more than three times the fifth-place count of 5, but still well short of controlling the field outright given the 41.1% combined top-5 share.

Assignee ranking, 124 records
Filing venues
43 US filings
of receiving offices tracked

US and EPO lead, China close behind

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 43, ahead of Europe at 20 and China at 19; WIPO/PCT filings (13), India (10) and the UK (8) round out the picture, indicating a filing strategy centred on the US and European markets with meaningful China and PCT coverage.

Receiving office counts, this dataset
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Collaboration is concentrated within corporate groups

All ten identified co-assignee pairs link entities that share a parent or group structure rather than independent companies filing jointly, suggesting cross-company technology sharing in this niche remains limited.

Co-assignee pair analysis
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches with the fewest records relative to the core magnet-forming claims — worth checking before assuming freedom to operate.
Electrolytic rare earth recovery (C25C)Membrane/filtration separation of leached liquorOxygen pickup control during rehydridingShort-loop chemical extraction routesBattery-magnet material crossover (H01M)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Yantai Dongxing Magnetic Materials Inc.0
The University of Birmingham0
Yeda Research and Development Co., Ltd.0
Ningbo Star Materials Hi-Tech Co., Ltd.0
RITCHIE TECH PTY LTD0-100%
Koninklijke Philips N.V.0
Princeton NuEnergy Inc.0-100%
Ningbo Yunsheng Hi-Tech Magnetics Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The trend and ranking answer where activity has been. The next questions are about where claim space is still open and what blocks a specific process route.

Map freedom to operate against the leading claims

Cross-reference a specific process step — hydriding temperature, dehydriding vacuum level, binder chemistry — against the claims held by the leading assignees before committing to a design.

Run a claim comparison in Eureka →

Track the under-claimed branches

Electrolytic recovery and separation processes carry the fewest records in this dataset; a monitoring watch on new filings in these subclasses can surface entrants early.

Set up a monitoring watch in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hydrogen Assisted Recycling of Rare Earth Magnets in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hydrogen assisted recycling of rare earth magnets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.