Hydrogen Liquefaction Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Hydrogen Liquefaction and Ortho-Para Conversion Patents
One assignee dominates the ranked leaders. the leader holds 37 records against a fifth-place count of 3 and a tenth-place count of 2, a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one. Filings rose to a peak of 10 records in 2022 before falling back; the tracked 2021-to-2024 window went from 8 to 4 records, a 50% decline. Note that 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent years should not be read as a continued drop.
- 1LINDE AG37
- 2JTURBO ENG & TECH LLC11
- 3HANGZHOU ZHONGTAI CRYOGENIC TECH CORP5
- 4TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAT MUNCHEN4
- 5BRISE CHEM PTE LTD3
See the full hydrogen liquefaction and ortho para conversion analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
Who holds the most patents in hydrogen liquefaction?
One assignee leads the ranked field with 37 records, well ahead of the rest of the 15 companies in the ranking, where fifth place holds only 3 records and tenth place holds 2. This gap indicates a portfolio built up over sustained large-scale plant engineering work rather than a recent surge of filings. The remaining ranked assignees are a mix of universities, national research bodies and smaller process-technology firms, each with single-digit record counts, so competitive pressure outside the leader is comparatively light.
Is hydrogen liquefaction patent filing increasing or declining?
Filing volume peaked at 10 records in 2022 and the tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a decline from 8 to 4 records, a 50% drop over three years. However, publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in this dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as confirming a continued decline. The safest reading is that filing has pulled back from a 2022 peak, with the most recent trend still unresolved.
What does ortho-para conversion have to do with hydrogen liquefaction patents?
Liquid hydrogen naturally contains a mix of ortho and para spin isomers, and if the para fraction is not raised before storage the gas continues converting after liquefaction, releasing heat that causes boil-off losses. Patents in this space cover the catalysts and process stages used to drive that conversion during liquefaction rather than after it. In this dataset, catalyst and materials-related claims (IPC class C09K) appear in 31.0% of the 71 records, a much smaller share than the 91.5% covering the core liquefaction cycle itself, suggesting catalyst-specific claims are less crowded than cycle-configuration claims.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Liquefaction and Ortho Para Conversion covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.