https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/hydrogen-metallurgy-and-dri-dri-pellet-reduction-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Metals & Metallurgy
Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: Where DRI Pellet Reduction Patents Concentrate

A data-backed look at DRI pellet reduction patents: filing trends from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, IPC class concentration, the leading assignees, and where claim space remains open in hydrogen metallurgy and direct r

107
Published Records
60%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (5 records) → 2024 (5); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 107 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape maps 107 patent records filed between 2015 and the 2026-08-31 cut-off that describe direct reduced iron (DRI) pellet reduction — the processes and equipment used to convert iron ore pellets into DRI using reducing gases, including hydrogen-based and coal-gas-based routes. The scope spans shaft-furnace reduction chemistry, furnace and kiln hardware, downstream steelmaking follow-on claims, and supporting processes such as gas purification and material conveying.

Coverage draws on receiving offices including India, the EPO, the United States, WIPO/PCT, Canada and Australia, giving a cross-jurisdictional view of where this technology is being protected. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, filing activity in the most recent one to two years is understated in every chart on this page.

Records in scope by filing year and IPC class
  1. 1MIDREX TECHNOLOGIES INC19
  2. 2PAUL WURTH SA13
  3. 3HYL TECH12
  4. 4DANIELI & C OFFICINE MECCANICHE SPA11
  5. 5SAUDI BASIC INDUSTRIES CORP9
  6. 6HYBRIT DEV AB8
  7. 7CHEMTREAT INC5
  8. 8JINDAL STEEL & POWER5
  9. 9GLOBAL IRON & STEEL SERVICES LLC5
  10. 10MAGALDI POWER SPA4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The 107 records in scope span 2015 to the 2026-08-31 cut-off. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate actual filing activity and should be read as provisional.

Filing activity: a peak year, then a flat plateau

Filings peaked in 2017 at 15 records. Between 2021 and 2024 — the most recent span that can be read as complete — filings held flat at 5 records in both years, a 0% change. Later years in the chart are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as a decline.

Filing activity: a peak year, then a flat plateau04811151520172018201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Where the claims sit: shaft-furnace reduction dominates

C21B (iron production / blast furnace) covers 85.0% of the 107 records, by far the densest single class. C22B (metal extraction and refining) follows at 29.0%, with furnace/kiln hardware classes F27B and F27D each at 22.4% and steelmaking follow-on claims (C21C) at 19.6%. Gas purification (C10K), conveying (B65G) and alloying (C22C) each sit under 10%, marking them as comparatively thin branches. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the 107 records and should not be summed.

Where the claims sit: shaft-furnace reduction dominatesC21B · Iron production (blast furnace)9185.0%C22B · Metal extraction & refining3129.0%F27B · Furnaces & kilns2422.4%F27D · Furnace details & accessories2422.4%C21C · Steelmaking2119.6%C10K · Purifying fuel gases65.6%B65G · Conveying & material handling43.7%C22C · Alloys43.7%Other2624.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 107 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydrogen metallurgy & dri: dri pellet reduction patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents anchoring this landscape

Representative Filing
US9546409B22017-01-17

US9546409B2 — Process for producing direct reduced iron (DRI) utilizing gases derived from coal

HYL TECHNOLOGIES

A process for producing DRI from iron ores using a fossil-fuel-derived gas that carries sulfur compounds and BTX. The gas is heated and passed through a bed of DRI particles or iron oxide outside the reduction reactor, where the bed adsorbs sulfur and destroys BTX. The cleaned gas is then combined with the reactor's reducing-gas stream after partial removal of H2O and CO2, restoring its reducing potential.Filed by HYL Technologies; publication dated 2017-01-17.

US9546409B2 — patent drawing 1US9546409B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO1999036581A1Sustainable steelmaking by efficient direct reduction of iron oxide and solid waste minimisation24
2WO2013027084A1Process for producing direct reduced iron (DRI) utilizing gases derived from coal15
3US20180119237A1Direct reduction process and shaft furnace utilizing an extended flow diverter cone10
4US20140260803A1Process for producing direct reduced iron (DRI) utilizing gases derived from coal10
5US4692353AMethod of inhibiting degeneration of direct reduced iron6
6IN201821040473AA process for beneficiation and iron making from lean iron ore fines using high ash coals.5
7US20230121974A1Method and apparatus for manufacturing steel using rotary generated thermal energy4
8US20160326606A1Methods for producing improved steels by injecting iron containing by-products of an iron ore production proc…3
9WO2022223606A1Method of operating an electric arc furnace and steel mill2
10WO2015114546A1Composite iron pellets2

Citation counts are drawn from within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing pattern signals for strategy

Four figures from the 107-record dataset that matter more for decision-making than the raw counts alone.

Concentration
59.8%
of 107 records held by top 5

A short leader group, not a fragmented field

The top 5 assignees combined hold 59.8% of all 107 records in scope, and the top 10 push that to 85.0%. With a leader at 19 records and a steep drop to 9 at fifth place, this is a field where a handful of incumbents set the claim boundaries most new filers have to work around.

Basis: assignee ranking, 107 records in scope.
Filing Momentum
0%
change, 2021 → 2024

Flat, not falling, at the most recent complete years

Filings held at 5 records in both 2021 and 2024, a 0% change across that span, after peaking at 15 in 2017. Years beyond 2024 are still incomplete in the data because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so recent-year dips should not be read as a slowdown.

Basis: filing trend, 2017 peak year, 2021-2024 complete span.
Claim Density
85.0%
of records carry a C21B class

Shaft-furnace reduction is where the claims sit

C21B, the iron-production and blast/shaft-furnace class, appears on 85.0% of the 107 records, far ahead of any other class. Furnace hardware (F27B, F27D) and downstream steelmaking (C21C) each add meaningful secondary density, meaning new filers need to clear both the reduction chemistry and the reactor hardware around it.

Basis: IPC subclass shares against 107 records; a record may carry multiple classes.
White Space
3.7%
of records in the thinnest classes

Conveying and alloying claims are barely filed

Material conveying (B65G) and alloying (C22C) each sit at 3.7% of the 107 records, and gas purification (C10K) at 5.6% — all far below the 22-29% occupied by furnace and extraction claims. These are the branches where claim space is least occupied, though thin coverage is not itself proof of patentability.

Basis: IPC subclass shares, lowest three classes against 107 records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydrogen metallurgy & dri: dri pellet reduction patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Collaboration is rare, not routine
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
HYL TechnologiesDanieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A.9
Midrex Technologies, Inc.MEDREX TECH INC1
HYL TechnologiesZENDEJAS MARTINEZ EUGENIO1

Only 3 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with one pairing recorded 9 times and the other two appearing once each — joint filings are the exception in this field, not the norm.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going claim by claim against the specific documents named here.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader cluster

With 85.0% of the 107 records held by the top 10 assignees, a new filing in shaft-furnace reduction or gas recombination needs a direct claim comparison against that group before drafting.

Run an FTO check in Eureka

Draft into the thinner branches

Gas purification, conveying and alloying classes each sit under 10% of records, marking the most open claim space documented in this dataset.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the flat filing plateau

With 2021-2024 filings flat at 5 records, watch whether 2025-2026 publications — still incomplete — shift that pattern once they catch up.

Set up a filing monitor in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on DRI pellet reduction patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Hydrogen Metallurgy & DRI: DRI Pellet Reduction Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole hydrogen metallurgy & dri: dri pellet reduction patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.