Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-backed look at DRI pellet reduction patents: filing trends from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, IPC class concentration, the leading assignees, and where claim space remains open in hydrogen metallurgy and direct r
Filing growth = 2021 (5 records) → 2024 (5); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 107 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
This landscape maps 107 patent records filed between 2015 and the 2026-08-31 cut-off that describe direct reduced iron (DRI) pellet reduction — the processes and equipment used to convert iron ore pellets into DRI using reducing gases, including hydrogen-based and coal-gas-based routes. The scope spans shaft-furnace reduction chemistry, furnace and kiln hardware, downstream steelmaking follow-on claims, and supporting processes such as gas purification and material conveying.
Coverage draws on receiving offices including India, the EPO, the United States, WIPO/PCT, Canada and Australia, giving a cross-jurisdictional view of where this technology is being protected. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, filing activity in the most recent one to two years is understated in every chart on this page.
The 107 records in scope span 2015 to the 2026-08-31 cut-off. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate actual filing activity and should be read as provisional.
Filings peaked in 2017 at 15 records. Between 2021 and 2024 — the most recent span that can be read as complete — filings held flat at 5 records in both years, a 0% change. Later years in the chart are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, so they should not be read as a decline.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
C21B (iron production / blast furnace) covers 85.0% of the 107 records, by far the densest single class. C22B (metal extraction and refining) follows at 29.0%, with furnace/kiln hardware classes F27B and F27D each at 22.4% and steelmaking follow-on claims (C21C) at 19.6%. Gas purification (C10K), conveying (B65G) and alloying (C22C) each sit under 10%, marking them as comparatively thin branches. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100% of the 107 records and should not be summed.
Shares are the percentage of the 107 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about hydrogen metallurgy & dri: dri pellet reduction patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA process for producing DRI from iron ores using a fossil-fuel-derived gas that carries sulfur compounds and BTX. The gas is heated and passed through a bed of DRI particles or iron oxide outside the reduction reactor, where the bed adsorbs sulfur and destroys BTX. The cleaned gas is then combined with the reactor's reducing-gas stream after partial removal of H2O and CO2, restoring its reducing potential.Filed by HYL Technologies; publication dated 2017-01-17.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO1999036581A1 | Sustainable steelmaking by efficient direct reduction of iron oxide and solid waste minimisation | 24 |
| 2 | WO2013027084A1 | Process for producing direct reduced iron (DRI) utilizing gases derived from coal | 15 |
| 3 | US20180119237A1 | Direct reduction process and shaft furnace utilizing an extended flow diverter cone | 10 |
| 4 | US20140260803A1 | Process for producing direct reduced iron (DRI) utilizing gases derived from coal | 10 |
| 5 | US4692353A | Method of inhibiting degeneration of direct reduced iron | 6 |
| 6 | IN201821040473A | A process for beneficiation and iron making from lean iron ore fines using high ash coals. | 5 |
| 7 | US20230121974A1 | Method and apparatus for manufacturing steel using rotary generated thermal energy | 4 |
| 8 | US20160326606A1 | Methods for producing improved steels by injecting iron containing by-products of an iron ore production proc… | 3 |
| 9 | WO2022223606A1 | Method of operating an electric arc furnace and steel mill | 2 |
| 10 | WO2015114546A1 | Composite iron pellets | 2 |
Citation counts are drawn from within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Four figures from the 107-record dataset that matter more for decision-making than the raw counts alone.
The top 5 assignees combined hold 59.8% of all 107 records in scope, and the top 10 push that to 85.0%. With a leader at 19 records and a steep drop to 9 at fifth place, this is a field where a handful of incumbents set the claim boundaries most new filers have to work around.
Filings held at 5 records in both 2021 and 2024, a 0% change across that span, after peaking at 15 in 2017. Years beyond 2024 are still incomplete in the data because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so recent-year dips should not be read as a slowdown.
C21B, the iron-production and blast/shaft-furnace class, appears on 85.0% of the 107 records, far ahead of any other class. Furnace hardware (F27B, F27D) and downstream steelmaking (C21C) each add meaningful secondary density, meaning new filers need to clear both the reduction chemistry and the reactor hardware around it.
Material conveying (B65G) and alloying (C22C) each sit at 3.7% of the 107 records, and gas purification (C10K) at 5.6% — all far below the 22-29% occupied by furnace and extraction claims. These are the branches where claim space is least occupied, though thin coverage is not itself proof of patentability.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to hydrogen metallurgy & dri: dri pellet reduction patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| HYL Technologies | Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A. | 9 |
| Midrex Technologies, Inc. | MEDREX TECH INC | 1 |
| HYL Technologies | ZENDEJAS MARTINEZ EUGENIO | 1 |
Only 3 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, with one pairing recorded 9 times and the other two appearing once each — joint filings are the exception in this field, not the norm.
The figures above establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going claim by claim against the specific documents named here.
With 85.0% of the 107 records held by the top 10 assignees, a new filing in shaft-furnace reduction or gas recombination needs a direct claim comparison against that group before drafting.
Run an FTO check in EurekaGas purification, conveying and alloying classes each sit under 10% of records, marking the most open claim space documented in this dataset.
Explore white space in EurekaWith 2021-2024 filings flat at 5 records, watch whether 2025-2026 publications — still incomplete — shift that pattern once they catch up.
Set up a filing monitor in EurekaThe assignee ranking covers 32 companies drawn from the 107 records in scope, and it is a full ranking rather than a top-50 or top-100 cut. The leader holds 19 records, with the fifth-placed company at 9 and the tenth at 4, showing a steep drop-off after the first handful of names. The top 5 companies combined account for 59.8% of all 107 records, and the top 10 combined account for 85.0%, so filing activity is heavily concentrated among a small group rather than spread evenly across the 32 ranked entities.
Filings peaked in 2017 at 15 records and the trend since has been uneven rather than steadily rising. Looking at the most recent span that can be treated as complete, 2021 to 2024, filings held flat at 5 records in both years — a 0% change over that three-year window. Years after 2024 in the underlying data are still incomplete because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so any apparent drop in the most recent one or two years reflects that lag rather than an actual slowdown.
C21B, the class for iron production including blast furnace and shaft furnace reduction, covers 85.0% of the 107 records in scope and is clearly the core class for this technology. C22B (metal extraction and refining) is next at 29.0%, followed by furnace and kiln hardware classes F27B and F27D at 22.4% each, and steelmaking follow-on claims under C21C at 19.6%. Smaller classes covering gas purification, material conveying and alloying each account for under 10% of records, marking them as thinner, less-claimed branches of the same technology area.
US9546409B2, assigned to HYL Technologies with a 2017-01-17 date, claims a process for producing direct reduced iron using a fossil-fuel-derived reducing gas that carries sulfur compounds and BTX contaminants. The gas is heated, then passed through a bed of DRI particles or iron oxide outside the main reduction reactor, where that bed adsorbs the sulfur and destroys the BTX before the cleaned gas is recombined with the reactor's main reducing-gas stream. It sits within the same HYL/Midrex family lineage that produced two of the most-cited coal-gas DRI documents in this dataset, so it is a useful reference point for anyone designing a gas-conditioning step around a shaft-furnace reduction process.
Based on IPC class shares across the 107 records, the thinnest branches are fuel-gas purification at 5.6%, material conveying and handling at 3.7%, and alloying at 3.7% — all well below the 22-29% density of the furnace-hardware and metal-extraction classes. Co-assignee collaboration is also sparse, with only 3 recorded co-filing pairs across the dataset, suggesting joint-development filings in this space are uncommon. Together these signals point toward gas-purification integration and conveying/logistics claims as areas with comparatively open claim space, though 'less-crowded' does not guarantee a claim will grant — a proper novelty search against the specific documents is still required.
Go past this page: query the whole hydrogen metallurgy & dri: dri pellet reduction patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.